Article Data

  • Views 2098
  • Dowloads 384

Original Research

Open Access

An in vitro comparative evaluation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride, tricalcium phosphate and grape seed extract on remineralization of artificial caries lesion in primary enamel

  • Sneha Desai1
  • Dinesh Rao1,*,
  • Sunil Panwar1
  • Nihal Kothari1
  • Surabhi Gupta1

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Udaipur, 313024, Rajasthan, India

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2022.010 Vol.46,Issue 5,September 2022 pp.72-80

Published: 01 September 2022

*Corresponding Author(s): Dinesh Rao E-mail: pedodinesh2003@gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the remineralization potential of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride, tricalcium phosphate and grape seed extract on artificial caries lesions in primary enamel. Study design: A sample of 40 non-carious, primary molar teeth was collected and cut in longitudinal sections into three equal halves. Those 120 samples were divided into four equal groups. Group A: Sections treated with casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF), Group B: Sections treated with tricalcium phosphate, Group C: Sections treated with grape seed extract Group D: Sections treated with deionized water (control group). Samples were evaluated for change in surface characteristics, mineral content using Scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM-EDX) and microhardness using Vicker’s microhardness tester. Cavitated lesions were evaluated for Cone beam computer tomography to obtain baseline data post remineralization. Results: The reminer-alization potential of grape seed extract was found to be greater compared to tricalcium phosphate followed by CPP-ACPF. Conclusion: All the three groups viz. CPP-ACPF, tricalcium phosphate and grape seed extract showed remineralization under the in vitro pH cycling model, while grape seed extract group showed significantly greater remineralization compared to the CPP-ACPF and tricalcium phosphate groups.


Keywords

Carious lesions; CPP-ACPF; Tricalcium phosphate; Grape seed extract; Remineralization


Cite and Share

Sneha Desai,Dinesh Rao,Sunil Panwar,Nihal Kothari,Surabhi Gupta. An in vitro comparative evaluation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride, tricalcium phosphate and grape seed extract on remineralization of artificial caries lesion in primary enamel. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2022. 46(5);72-80.

References

1. Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Logan S, Sheiham A. Topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouth rinses, gels or varnishes) for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003; 2003: CD002782.

2. Itthagarun A, King NM, Rana R. Effects of child formula dentifrices on artificial caries like lesions using in vitro pH-cycling: preliminary results. International Dental Journal. 2007; 57: 307–313.

3. Vyavhare S, Sharma D, Kulkarni V. Effect of three different pastes on remineralization of initial enamel lesion: an in vitro study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2015; 39: 149–160.

4. Balakrishnan A, Jonathan R, Benin P, Kuumar A. Evaluation to determine the caries remineralization potential of three dentifrices: an in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2013; 16: 375.

5. Reynolds EC. Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by casein phosphopeptide-stabilized calcium phosphate solutions. Journal of Dental Research. 1997; 76: 1587–1595.

6. Jo SY, Chong HJ, Lee EH, Chang NY, Chae JM, Cho JH, et al. Effects of various toothpastes on remineralization of white spot lesions. Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2014; 44: 113–118.

7. Hamba H, Nakamura K, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Muramatsu T. Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions using toothpaste containing tricalcium phosphate and fluoride: an in vitro µCT analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 292.

8. Silva APPD, Gonçalves RS, Borges AFS, Bedran-Russo AK, Shinohara MS. Effectiveness of plant-derived proanthocyanidins on demineralization on enamel and dentin under artificial cariogenic challenge. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2015; 23: 302–309.

9. Naveena Preethi P, Nagarathana C, Sakunthala BK. Remineralizing agent—Then and now—An update. Dentistry. 2014; 4: 1–4.

10. Garg P, Singh U, Sinha D, Tyagi S. An update on remineralizing agents. Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry. 2013; 3: 151.

11. Parashar K, Zaidka S, Somani R, Jayanti S. Anti cariogenic effects of polyphenol plant products—A review. International Journal of Research in Ayurveda & Pharmacy. 2011; 2: 736–742.

12. Wenzel A, Hirsch E, Christensen J, Matzen LH, Scaf G, Frydenberg M. Detection of cavitated approximal surfaces using cone beam CT and intraoral receptors. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2013; 42: 39458105–39458105.

13. Tsuchida R, Araki K, Okano T. Evaluation of a limited cone-beam volumetric imaging system: comparison with film radiography in detecting incipient proximal caries. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2007; 104: 412–416.

14. Young S, Lee J, Hodges R, Chang T, Elashoff D, White S. A comparative study of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography and charge-coupled device sensors for detecting caries. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2009; 38: 445–451.

15. Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2008; 37: 18–22.

16. Senel B, Kamburoglu K, Uçok O, Yüksel SP, Ozen T, Avsever H. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39: 501–511.

17. Qu X, Li G, Zhang Z, Ma X. Detection accuracy of in vitro approximal caries by cone beam computed tomography images. European Journal of Radiology. 2011; 79: e24–e27.

18. Kayipmaz S, Sezgin ÖS, Saricaoğlu ST, Çan G. An in vitro comparison of diagnostic abilities of conventional radiography, storage phosphor, and cone beam computed tomography to determine occlusal and approximal caries. European Journal of Radiology. 2011; 80: 478–482.

19. Jayarajan J, Janardhanam P, Jayakumar P, Deepika. Efficacy of CPP-ACP and CPP-ACPF on enamel remineralization—an in vitro study using scanning electron microscope and DIAGNOdent. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2011; 22: 77–82.

20. Reynolds EC. Anticariogenic complexes of amorphous calcium phosphate stabilized by casein phosphopeptides: a review. Special Care in Dentistry. 1998; 18: 8–16.

21. Joshi S, Patil N, Choudhari S, Kulkarni S. Comparative evaluation of remineralizing potential of three agents on artificially demineralized human enamel: an in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2013; 16: 116.

22. Karlinsey RL, Mackey AC, Walker ER, Amaechi BT, Karthikeyan R, Najibfard K, et al. Remineralization potential of 5,000 ppm fluoride dentifrices evaluated in a pH cycling model. Journal of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene. 2010; 2: 1–6.

23. Cochrane NJ, Cai F, Huq NL, Burrow MF, Reynolds EC. New approaches to enhanced remineralization of tooth enamel. Journal of Dental Research. 2010; 89: 1187-1197.

24. Rainey JT. Air abrasion: an emerging standard of care in conservative operative dentistry. Dental Clinics of North America. 2002; 46: 185–209.

25. Bajaj M, Poornima P, Praveen S, Nagaveni N, Roopa K, Neena I, et al. Comparison of CPP-ACP, tri-calcium phosphate and hydroxya-patite on remineralization of artificial caries like lesions on primary enamel—an in vitro study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2016; 40: 404–409.

26. Nakamura Y, Tsuji S, Tonogai Y. Analysis of proanthocyanidins in grape seed extracts, health foods and grape seed oils. Journal of Health Science. 2003; 49: 45–54.

27. Neilson AP, O’Keefe SF, Bolling BW. High-molecular-weight proanthocyanidins in foods: overcoming analytical challenges in pursuit of novel dietary bioactive components. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology. 2016; 7: 43–64.

28. Zhu F. Proanthocyanidins in cereals and pseudocereals. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2019; 59: 1521–1533.

29. Shi J, Yu J, Pohorly JE, Kakuda Y. Polyphenolics in grape seeds-biochemistry and functionality. Journal of Medicinal Food. 2003; 6: 291–299.

30. Songsermsakul P, Pornphairin E, Porasuphatana S. Comparison of antioxidant activity of grape seed extract and fruits containing high β-carotene, vitamin C, and E. International Journal of Food Properties. 2013; 16: 643–648.

31. Rauf A, Imran M, Abu-Izneid T, Iahtisham-Ul-Haq, Patel S, Pan X, et al. Proanthocyanidins: a comprehensive review. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2019; 116: 108999.

32. Gu L, Kelm MA, Hammerstone JF, Beecher G, Holden J, Haytowitz D, et al. Concentrations of proanthocyanidins in common foods and estimations of normal consumption. The Journal of Nutrition. 2004; 134: 613–617.

33. Travaglia F, Bordiga M, Locatelli M, Coïsson JD, Arlorio M. Polymeric proanthocyanidins in skins and seeds of 37 vitis vinifera l. Cultivars: a methodological comparative study. Journal of Food Science. 2011; 76: C742–C749.

34. Escribano-Bailon T, Gutierrez-Fernandez Y, Rivas-Gonzalo JC, Santos-Buelga C. Characterization of procyanidins of Vitis vinifera variety Tinta del Pais grape seeds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1992; 40: 1794–1799.

35. Kuhnert S, Lehmann L, Winterhalter P. Rapid characterisation of grape seed extracts by a novel HPLC method on a diol stationary phase. Journal of Functional Foods. 2015; 15: 225–232.

36. Xie Q, Bedran-Russo AK, Wu CD. In vitro remineralization effects of grape seed extract on artificial root caries. Journal of Dentistry. 2008; 36: 900–906.

37. Alrafee S, Niazy M, El-yassaky M. Remineralization potential of grape seed versus amorphous calciumphosphate-nanoparticles on sound and caries affected dentin. Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls. 2017; 4: 231–237.

38. Silva APPD, Gonçalves RS, Borges AFS, Bedran-Russo AK, Shinohara MS. Effectiveness of plant-derived proanthocyanidins on demineralization on enamel and dentin under artificial cariogenic challenge. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2015; 23: 302–309.

39. Cheng L, Li J, Hao Y, Zhou X. Effect of compounds of Galla chinensis on remineralization of enamel surface in vitro. Archives of Oral Biology. 2010; 55: 435–440.

40. Azarpazhooh A, Limeback H. Clinical efficacy of casein derivatives. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2008; 139: 915–924.

41. Al-Ammar A, Drummond JL, Bedran-Russo AK. The use of collagen cross-linking agents to enhance dentin bond strength. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2009; 91B: 419–424.

42. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Quintessence: Tokyo. 1998.

43. Sung H, Huang D, Chang W, Huang R, Hsu J. Evaluation of gelatin hydrogel crosslinked with various crosslinking agents as bioad-hesives:in vitro study. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1999; 46: 520–530.

44. Van Luyn MJA, van Wachem PB, Dijkstra PJ, olde Damink LHH, Feiijen J. Calcification of subcutaneously implanted collagen in relation to cytotoxicity, cellular interactions and crosslinking. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 1995; 6: 288–296.

45. Bedran-Russo AKB, Pereira PNR, Duarte WR, Drummond JL, Yamauchi M. Application of crosslinkers to dentin collagen enhances the ultimate tensile strength. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2007; 80B: 268–272.

46. Palombo EA. Traditional medicinal plant extracts and natural products with activity against oral bacteria: potential application in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2011; 2011: 680354.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top