2 × 4 appliance in the mixed dentition stage: a scoping review of the evidence

A great emphasis is currently given to the early correction of malocclusions to prevent further complications if left untreated. Interceptive orthodontics not only simplifies but also eliminates the need for later procedures. The 2 × 4 appliance is an orthodontic treatment modality applied during the mixed dentition period, particularly for malpositioned permanent upper incisors. This scoping review was aimed to examine the breadth and depth of the published literature on this clinical topic, as well as knowledge gaps, about this fixed appliance during mixed dentition, for the correction of incipient anterior malocclusions (incisor crowdings, midline diastemas, or crossbites). PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source, and two grey literature databases were explored; under a structured PICO question (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and eligibility criteria, for relevant clinical trials, observational studies, and case reports/series (in English or Spanish), using different searching terms. Titles and abstracts were screened. Full-text articles were critically reviewed for bias risk and a data charting table was constructed. 161 references were identified, after which 115 titles remained after removing duplicates. After the abstract screening, 18 potential full-text articles were reviewed. Finally, 16 studies were included, according to the performed critical appraisal. The 2 × 4 appliance is suitable for mixed dentition patients with mild or severe malocclusions, particularly when removable appliance usage is a critical problem.

2 × 4 appliance; Early orthodontic treatment; Mixed dentition

[1] Rohilla M, Bodh M, Kumar A, Namdev R. Early interception using 2×4 appliance: a case series. International Journal of Advances in Case Reports. 2017; 4: 226–229.

[2] Sunnak R, Johal A, Fleming PS. Is orthodontics prior to 11 years of age evidence-based? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry. 2015; 43: 477–486.

[3] Suresh M, Ratnaditya A, Kattimani VS, Karpe S. One phase versus two phase treatment in mixed dentition: a critical review. Journal of International Oral Health. 2016; 7: 144–147.

[4] Solanki PJ, Choudhari SR, Vaghela CM, Saxena SI. Use of the two by four appliance: a treatment modality for the correction of malaligned maxillary anterior teeth during mixed dentition period. International Journal of Development Research. 2017; 7: 17729–17732.

[5] Gianelly AA. Treatment of crowding in the mixed dentition. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2002; 121: 569–571.

[6] Loli D. The versatility of the 2×4 appliance. WebmedCentral Orthodontics. 2017; 8: WMC005397.

[7] Al Gunaid TH, Arifin R, Narmada IB, Tarman KE. Perspectives of indonesian orthodontists on the ideal orthodontic treatment time. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2010; 12: 351–357.

[8] daCosta OO, Aikins EA, Isiekwe GI, Adediran VE. Malocclusion and early orthodontic treatment requirements in the mixed dentitions of a population of Nigerian children. Journal of Orthodontic Science. 2016; 5: 81–86.

[9] Soni S, Bafna Y, Choski K, Patel J, Kotadiya J. Early orthodontics interception in mixed dentition using 2×4 appliance: a series of 3 case report. Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research. 2019; 7: 44–49.

[10] Da Silva-Filho OG, Silva-Lara T, Bibiano GF, Fernández-Sánchez J. 4 × 2 leveling: importance of its application in mixed and permanent dentition. Spanish Orthodontics. 2006; 46: 167–178.

[11] Naidu S, Suresh A. The applications of 2×4 appliance during mixed dentition. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences. 2018; 2: 49–51.

[12] McKeown HF, Sandler J. The two by four appliance: a versatile appliance. Dental Update. 2001; 28: 496–500.

[13] Dowsing P, Sandler J. How to effectively use a 2×4 appliance. Journal of Orthodontics. 2004; 31: 248–258.

[14] Singhal P, Namdev R, Jindal A, Bodh M, Dutta S. A multifaceted approach through two by four appliances for various malocclusions in mixed dentition. Clinical Dentistry. 2015; 9: 14–19.

[15] Sockalingam SNMP, Khan KAM, Kuppusamy E. Interceptive correction of anterior crossbite using short-span wire-fixed orthodontic appliance: a report of three cases. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2018; 2018: 1–5.

[16] Kumari N, Saini N, Garg S, Namdev R. Interceptive segmental orthodontic: role in early mixed dentition. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research. 2020; 10: 303–08.

[17] Das L, Sarkar A, Banerjee D, Adak A, Saha S, Sarkar S. Catch them young: early interception of malocclusion in mixed dentition period using 2×4 appliance. International Journal of Current Research. 2020; 12: 10247–10250.

[18] Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005; 8: 19–32.

[19] Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 2010; 5: 69.

[20] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71.

[21] Cerda J, Villarroel L. Evaluation of the interobserver concordance in pediatric research: the Kappa Coefficient. Chilean Journal of Pediatrics. 2008; 79: 54–58.

[22] Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343: d5928.

[23] Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2010; 25: 603–605.

[24] Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, Bazerbachi F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2018; 23: 60–63.

[25] Gu Y, Rabie AB, Hagg U. Treatment effects of a simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000; 117: 691–699.

[26] Agarwal A, Mathur R. Segmental orthodontics for the correction of crossbites. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2011; 4: 43–47.

[27] Wiedel AP, Bondemark L. Fixed versus removable orthodontic appliances to correct anterior crossbite in the mixed dentition—a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2015; 37: 123–127.

[28] Yordanova G, Mladenov M, Gurgurova G. Cross-bite treatment and problems during the early stages of developing of the dentition in the frontal area. International Journal of Science and Research. 2016; 5: 1506–1510.

[29] Harika R, Dwijendra KS, Arun P, Swetha SS. Correction of midline diastema and rotated incisors using a versatile fixed partial appliance in mixed dentition: a case report. Pediatric Dental Care. 2016; 1: 116–118.

[30] Sunil MM, Zareena MA, Ratheesh MS, Anjana G. Early orthodontic interception of anterior crossbitein mixed dentition. Journal of International Oral Health. 2017; 9: 88–90.

[31] Andley Y, Saraf BG, Sheoran N, Nisha N. Too much too soon, rather than in too little or too late: orthodontic in mixed dentition. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences. 2019; 5: 374–381.

[32] Fleming PS. Timing of orthodontic treatment: early or late? Australian Dental Journal. 2017; 62: 11–19.

[33] Quinzi V, Ferro R, Rizzo FA, Marranzini EM, Federici Canova F, Mummolo S, et al. The two by four appliance: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2018; 19: 145–150.

[34] Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics: The Art and Science. 3rd ed. Anja (Med) Publishing House: New Delhi, India. 2006.

[35] Hussain U, Ayub A, Farhan M. Etiology and treatment of midline diastema: a review of the literature. Pakistan Orthodontic Journal. 2013; 5: 27–33.