Article Data

  • Views 2064
  • Dowloads 365

Original Research

Open Access

The use of aesthetic paediatric full coverage restorations among paediatric dental practitioners: an international survey

  • Osama El Shahawy1,*,
  • Reham Ali Maher2
  • Suhad Al Jundi3
  • Iyad Hussein4
  • Huei Jinn Tong5
  • Narasimhan Srinivasan6
  • Monty Duggal7
  • Hani Nazzal7,8

1Department of paediatric dentistry, Cairo University and Future University, 12613 Cairo, Egypt

2Private practice, 11311 Cairo, Egypt

3Department of Preventive Dentistry, Jordan university of Science and Technology, 22110 Irbid, Jordan

4Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 31111 91768 Dubai, United Arab Emirates

5Discipline of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, 119085 Queenstown, Singapore

6Endodontic Department, Hamad Dental Services, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar

7School of Dental Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

8Paediatric Dentistry Department, Hamad Dental Services, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.031 Vol.47,Issue 4,July 2023 pp.16-24

Submitted: 02 August 2022 Accepted: 10 March 2023

Published: 03 July 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Osama El Shahawy E-mail: osama.shahawy@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

Abstract

Despite the recent growing evidence in support of prefabricated zirconia crown use as a successful option in managing grossly carious anterior and posterior primary teeth, the use of such crowns remains controversial within the paediatric dental profession. This study aims to assess the use of aesthetic full coverage paediatric restorations among paediatric dentists worldwide, with emphasis on aesthetic prefabricated zirconia crowns. This was an online cross-sectional survey questionnaire study comprising of 38 multiple-choice questions disseminated worldwide through the contact lists of national, regional and international paediatric dental organisations and social media platforms. The survey was completed by 556 respondents thus achieving power, with 391 (70.3%) females and 165 (29.7%) males. The respondents were from 55 different countries spread across six continents. The use of aesthetic full coverage restorations was reported by 80%(n = 444) of the respondents. For restoring anterior teeth, participants mainly used either composite strip crowns (94.4%, n = 419) or zirconia crowns (73.6%, n = 327), while those who used aesthetic crowns for restoring posterior teeth mainly used zirconia crowns (68.2%, n = 303). Within the limitations of this study, the results have shown a wide use of full coverage aesthetic restorations, including the use of zirconia crowns, of primary teeth within this international sample of practicing dentists.


Keywords

Full coverage restorations; Prefabricated zirconia crowns; Paediatric dental practitioners; Primary teeth


Cite and Share

Osama El Shahawy,Reham Ali Maher,Suhad Al Jundi,Iyad Hussein,Huei Jinn Tong,Narasimhan Srinivasan,Monty Duggal,Hani Nazzal. The use of aesthetic paediatric full coverage restorations among paediatric dental practitioners: an international survey. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023. 47(4);16-24.

References

[1] Uribe SE, Innes N, Maldupa I. The global prevalence of early childhood caries: a systematic review with meta‐analysis using the who diagnostic criteria. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2021; 31: 817–830.

[2] Soxman JA, Azadani EN, Casamassimo PS. Chapter 8: full-coverage restoration for primary molars. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken. 2021.

[3] Townsend JA, Wells MH. Behavior guidance of the pediatric dental patient. Pediatric Dentistry. 2019; 38: 352–370.e2.

[4] Alantali K, Al-Halabi M, Hussein I, El-Tatari A, Hassan A, Kowash M. Changes in preschool children’s oral health-related quality of life following restorative dental general anaesthesia. British dental journal. 2020; 229: 670–676.

[5] Khatri A. Esthetic zirconia crown in pedodontics. International Journal of Pedodontic Rehabilitation. 2017; 2: 31–33.

[6] Halawany HS, Salama F, Jacob V, Abraham NB, Moharib TNB, Alazmah AS, et al. A survey of pediatric dentists’ caries-related treatment decisions and restorative modalities—a web-based survey. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2017; 29: 66–73.

[7] Wilson NHF, Christensen GJ, Cheung SW, Burke FJT, Brunton PA. Contemporary dental practice in the UK: aspects of direct restorations, endodontics and bleaching. British Dental Journal. 2004; 197: 753–756.

[8] Ajayakumar LP, Chowdhary N, Reddy VR, Chowdhary R. Use of restorative full crowns made with zirconia in children: a systematic review. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2020; 13: 551–558.

[9] Alrashdi M, Ardoin J, Liu JA. Zirconia crowns for children: a systematic review. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2022; 32: 66–81.

[10] Dentistry Today. Pediatric dentists to grow by 60

[11] The World Bank. Population ages 0–14, total. 2022. Available at: https: //data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.0014.TO (Accessed: 22 January 2022).

[12] Hussein I, Al Halabi M, Kowash M, Salami A, Ouatik N, Yang Y, et al. Use of the hall technique by specialist paediatric dentists: a global perspective. British Dental Journal. 2020; 228: 33–38.

[13] Salami A, Walia T, Bashiri R. Comparison of parental satisfaction with three tooth-colored full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary incisors. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2015; 39: 423–428.

[14] Walia T, Salami AA, Bashiri R, Hamoodi OM, Rashid F. A randomised controlled trial of three aesthetic full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary teeth. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2014; 15: 113–118.

[15] Ram D, Fuks AB. Clinical performance of resin-bonded composite strip crowns in primary incisors: a retrospective study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2006; 16: 49–54.

[16] Kupietzky A, Waggoner WE, Galea J. Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years. Pediatric Dentistry. 2005; 27: 221–225.

[17] Alaki SM, Abdulhadi BS, AbdElBaki MA, Alamoudi NM. Comparing zirconia to anterior strip crowns in primary anterior teeth in children: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 313.

[18] Abdulhadi B, Abdullah M, Alaki S, Alamoudi N, Attar M. Clinical evaluation between zirconia crowns and stainless steel crowns in primary molars teeth. Journal of Pediatric Dentistry. 2017; 5: 21.

[19] Mathew MG, Roopa KB, Soni AJ, Khan MM, Kauser A. Evaluation of clinical success, parental and child satisfaction of stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns in primary molars. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2020; 9: 1418–1423.

[20] Ghosh A, Zahir S. Recent advances in pediatric esthetic anterior crowns. International Journal of Pedodontic Rehabilitation. 2020; 5: 35–38.

[21] Lee JK. Restoration of primary anterior teeth: review of the literature. Pediatric Dentistry. 2002; 24: 506–510.

[22] Al-Halabi MN, Bshara N, Nassar JA, Comisi JC, Rizk CK. Clinical performance of two types of primary molar indirect crowns fabricated by 3D printer and CAD/CAM for rehabilitation of large carious primary molars. European Journal of Dentistry. 2021; 15: 463–468.

[23] Talekar AL, Chaudhari GS, Waggoner WF, Chunawalla YK. An 18-month prospective randomized clinical trial comparing zirconia crowns with glass-reinforced fiber composite crowns in primary molar teeth. Pediatric Dentistry. 2021; 43: 355–362.

[24] Clark L, Wells MH, Harris EF, Lou J. Comparison of amount of primary tooth reduction required for anterior and posterior zirconia and stainless steel crowns. Pediatric Dentistry. 2016; 38: 42–46.

[25] Azab MM, Moheb DM, El Shahawy OI, Rashed MA. Influence of luting cement on the clinical outcomes of zirconia pediatric crowns: a 3- year split-mouth randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2020; 30: 314–322.

[26] Hanafi L, Altinawi M, Comisi JC. Evaluation and comparison two types of prefabricated zirconia crowns in mixed and primary dentition: a randomized clinical trial. Heliyon. 2021; 7: e06240.

[27] Möhn M, Frankenberger R, Krämer N. Wear and marginal quality of aesthetic crowns for primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2022; 32: 273–283.

[28] Baghalian A, Ranjpour M, Hooshmand T, Herman NG, Ebrahimi A. Comparison of fracture resistance in post restorations in primary maxillary incisors. European journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2014; 15: 313–316.

[29] El Shahawy OI, O’Connell AC. Successful restoration of severely mutilated primary incisors using a novel method to retain zirconia crowns—two year results. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2016; 40: 425–430.

[30] Casián-Adem J, Cobos L, Waggoner WF, Fuks AB. Prefabricated zirconia crowns–a solution to treat hypomineralized permanent molars: report of a case. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021; 45: 8–11.

[31] Rocha MCM, Inácio GC, Taira TM, Delgado RZR, Maciel SM, Frítola M. Zirconia crowns as an esthetic alternative for oral rehabilitation in pediatric dentistry: a review. Pediatric Dental Journal. 2021; 31: 224–234.

[32] Nusmile. NuSmile ZR technical support—nusmile ZR frequenty asked questions. 2022. Available at: https://nusmile.com/pages/nusmile-zr-support (Accessed: 22 January 2022).

[33] Yilmaz Y, Guler C. Evaluation of different sterilization and disinfection methods on commercially made preformed crowns. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2008; 26: 162–167.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top