Article Data

  • Views 2585
  • Dowloads 479

Original Research

Open Access

The effect of virtual reality distraction on anxiety level during dental treatment among anxious pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial

  • Sara M. Bagher1
  • Osama M. Felemban1,*,
  • Abdulaziz A. Alandijani2
  • Moayad M. Tashkandi2
  • Ghalia Y. Bhadila1
  • Amina M. Bagher3

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

2General Dentist, 21452 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

3Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, King Abdulaziz University, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.036 Vol.47,Issue 4,July 2023 pp.63-71

Submitted: 31 December 2022 Accepted: 07 March 2023

Published: 03 July 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Osama M. Felemban E-mail: omfelemban@kau.edu.sa

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of Virtual Reality Distraction (VRD) on dental anxiety among anxious children undergoing prophylactic dental treatment by utilizing both subjective (Venham Anxiety and Behavioral Rating Scale (VABRS)) and objective (heart rate (HR) and salivary cortisol level (SCL)) measures. This randomized controlled study included 36 (6- to 14-year-old) healthy and anxious children who needed prophylactic dental treatment and had a history of previous dental treatment. The eligible children’s anxiety level was evaluated using a modified version of the Abeer Dental Anxiety Scale-Arabic version (M-ACDAS) and those who scored at least 14 or more out of 21 were included. Participants were randomly distributed to either the VRD or control group. In the VRD group, participants wore the VRD eyeglasses during prophylactic dental treatment. In the control group, subjects received their treatment while watching a video cartoon on a regular screen. The participants were videotaped during the treatment, and their HR was recorded at four time points. Also, a sample from each participant’s saliva was collected twice, at the baseline and after the procedure. The mean M-ACDAS score at baseline in the VRD and the control groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.424). At the end of the treatment, the SCL was significantly lower in the VRD group (p < 0.001). Neither the VABRS (p = 0.171) nor the HR significantly differed between the VRD and control groups. Virtual reality distraction is a non-invasive method that has the potential to significantly reduce anxiety during prophylactic dental treatment among anxious children.


Keywords

Dental anxiety; Heart rate; Pediatric dentistry; Salivary cortisol; Virtual reality


Cite and Share

Sara M. Bagher,Osama M. Felemban,Abdulaziz A. Alandijani,Moayad M. Tashkandi,Ghalia Y. Bhadila,Amina M. Bagher. The effect of virtual reality distraction on anxiety level during dental treatment among anxious pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023. 47(4);63-71.

References

[1] Mendoza-Mendoza A, Perea MB, Yañez-Vico RM, Iglesias-Linares A. Dental fear in children: the role of previous negative dental experiences. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2015; 19: 745–751.

[2] Milsom K, Tickle M, Humphris G, Blinkhorn A. The relationship between anxiety and dental treatment experience in 5-year-old children. British Dental Journal. 2003; 194: 503–506.

[3] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. The reference manual of pediatric dentistry (pp. 306–324). American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Chicago, Ill. 2021.

[4] Prado IM, Carcavalli L, Abreu LG, Serra-Negra JM, Paiva SM, Martins CC. Use of distraction techniques for the management of anxiety and fear in paediatric dental practice: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2019; 29: 650–668.

[5] Bryson S. Virtual reality in scientific visualization. Computers & Graphics. 1993; 17: 679–685.

[6] Niharika P, Reddy NV, Srujana P, Srikanth K, Daneswari V, Geetha KS. Effects of distraction using virtual reality technology on pain perception and anxiety levels in children during pulp therapy of primary molars. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2018; 36: 364.

[7] Al-Namankany A, De Souza M, Ashley P. Evidence-based dentistry: analysis of dental anxiety scales for children. British Dental Journal. 2012; 212: 219–222.

[8] McGrath PA. Measurement issues in research on dental fears and anxiety. Anesthesia Progress. 1986; 33: 43.

[9] Jessop DS, Turner-Cobb JM. Measurement and meaning of salivary cortisol: a focus on health and disease in children. Stress. 2008; 11: 1–14.

[10] Flück CE, Miller WL. Disorders of the human adrenal cortex. 1st edn. Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers: Basel. 2008.

[11] AlMaummar M, AlThabit HO, Pani S. The impact of dental treatment and age on salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase levels of patients with varying degrees of dental anxiety. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19: 1–8.

[12] Furlan N, Gaviao MBD, Barbosa T, Nicolau J, Castelo PM. Salivary cortisol, alpha-amylase and heart rate variation in response to dental treatment in children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2012; 37: 83–87.

[13] Felemban OM, Alshamrani RM, Aljeddawi DH, Bagher SM. Effect of virtual reality distraction on pain and anxiety during infiltration anesthesia in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 321.

[14] Pande P, Rana V, Srivastava N, Kaushik N. Effectiveness of different behavior guidance techniques in managing children with negative behavior in a dental setting: a randomized control study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2020; 38: 259.

[15] Ran L, Zhao N, Fan L, Zhou P, Zhang C, Yu C. Application of virtual reality on non-drug behavioral management of short-term dental procedure in children. Trials. 2021; 22: 562.

[16] Rao DG, Havale R, Nagaraj M, Karobari NM, Latha AM, Tharay N, et al. Assessment of efficacy of virtual reality distraction in reducing pain perception and anxiety in children aged 6–10 years: a behavioral interventional study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2019; 12: 510.

[17] Shetty V, Suresh LR, Hegde AM. Effect of virtual reality distraction on pain and anxiety during dental treatment in 5 to 8 year old children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2019; 43: 97–102.

[18] Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2010; 1: 100–107.

[19] Al-Namankany A. Development of the first Arabic cognitive dental anxiety scale for children and young adults. World Journal of Meta-Analysis. 2014; 2: 64.

[20] Venham LL, Gaulin-Kremer E, Munster E, Bengston-Audia D, Cohan J. Interval rating scales for children’s dental anxiety and uncooperative behavior. Pediatric Dentistry. 1980; 2: 195–202.

[21] Chhabra N, Chhabra A, Walia G. Prevalence of dental anxiety and fear among five to ten year old children: a behaviour based cross sectional study. Minerva Stomatologica. 2012; 61: 83–89.

[22] El-Housseiny AA, Merdad LA, Alamoudi NM, Farsi NM. Effect of child and parent characteristics on child dental fear ratings: analysis of short and full versions of the children’s fear survey schedule-dental subscale. Oral Health and Dental Management. 2015; 14: 245–246.

[23] Ten Berge M, Veerkamp JS, Hoogstraten J, Prins PJ. Childhood dental fear in the Netherlands: prevalence and normative data. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2002; 30: 101–107.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top