Barriers and challenges faced by orthodontists in providing orthodontic care and implementing new innovative technologies in the field of orthodontics among children and adults: a qualitative study

Orthodontic treatment requires the cooperation of patients as well as orthodontists. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate and address the challenges and barriers orthodontists have in achieving the desired orthodontic results, as well as make recommendations for ways to address the stated problems and introduce new innovative technologies to the area of orthodontics. This qualitative study wasbased on the grounded theory. Twelve orthodontists participated in face-to-face interviews, which were primarily comprised of open-ended questions. Data analysis was carried out manually using the “by hand” method. Orthodontists between the age group of 29–42 were interviewed. The answers varied depending on the years of experience of the interviewees. Teenagers and boys were found to be most non-compliant with the treatment. The average treatment span ranged between 6 months for mild cases up to 3 years for severe orthodontic cases occurring most commonly in government hospitals. Patient compliance plays a major role in orthodontics. Poor oral hygiene maintenance, brackets breakage by patients, and missed appointments were the major concerns mentioned by participants and hindered getting the desired results. Patients’ main worries were related to the cost of therapy, premolar extractions, the length of treatment, and the possibility of relapse. Patient counseling and reinforcement at the start of the treatment can help to overcome the challenges and barriers in orthodontics since patient motivation is a very important factor in obtaining the desired results. It is recommended to conduct more training sessions for the orthodontists in order to introduce them to new technological paradigms.

Barriers; Challenges; Innovative technologies; Orthodontists; Orthodontic results

[1] S. Kapila, J. Nervina. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications forts use. DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology. 2015; 44: 20140282.

[2] Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2014; 146: 673–682.

[3] Chow J, Cioffi I. Pain and orthodontic patient compliance: a clinical perspective. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2018; 24: 242–247.

[4] Inkster ME, Donnan PT, MacDonald TM, Sullivan FM, Fahey T. Adherence to antihypertensive medication and association with patient and practice factors. Journal of Human Hypertension. 2006; 20: 295–297.

[5] Kazancı F, Aydoğan C, Alkan. Patients’ and parents’ concerns and decisions about orthodontic treatment. Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2016; 46: 20–26.

[6] Bennett ME, Michaels C, O’Brien K, Weyant R, Phillips C, Vig KD. Measuring beliefs about orthodontic treatment: a questionnaire approach. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 1997; 57: 215–223.

[7] E. Taneva, B. Kusnoto, C. A. Evans. 3D scanning, imaging, and printing in orthodontics. Issues in Contemporary Orthodontics. 2015; 148: 862–867.

[8] Skjott Linneberg M, Korsgaard S. Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal. 2019; 19: 259–270.

[9] P. Mihas. Qualitative data analysis. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 2019.

[10] Tsichlaki A, Chin SY, Pandis N, Fleming PS. How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2016; 149: 308–318.

[11] Bradley E, Shelton A, Hodge T, Morris D, Bekker H, Fletcher S, et al. Patient-reported experience and outcomes from orthodontic treatment. Journal of Orthodontics. 2020; 47: 107–115.

[12] Almurtadha RH, Alhammadi MS, Fayed MMS, Abou-El-Ezz A, Halboub E. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice. 2018; 18: 193–202.

[13] Pan F, Yang Z, Wang J, Cai R, Liu J, Zhang C, et al. Influence of orthodontic treatment with premolar extraction on the spatial position of maxillary third molars in adult patients: a retrospective cohort cone-bean computed tomography study. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 321.

[14] Vilhjálmsson G, Zermeno JP, Proffit WR. Orthodontic treatment with removal of one mandibular incisor: outcome data and the importance of extraction site preparation. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2019; 156: 453–463.

[15] Omar Z, Short L, Banting DW, Saltaji H. Profile changes following extraction orthodontic treatment: a comparison of first versus second premolar extraction. International Orthodontics. 2018; 16: 91–104.

[16] Oliver RG, Knapman YM. Attitudes to orthodontic treatment. British Journal of Orthodontics. 1985; 12: 179–188.

[17] Chaudhary FA, Ahmad B, Sinor MZ. The severity of facial burns, dental caries, periodontal disease, and oral hygiene impact oral health-related quality of life of burns victims in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 570.

[18] Chaudhary F, Ahmad B, Butt D, Hameed S, Bashir U. Normal range of maximum mouth opening in pakistani population: a cross-sectional study. Journal of International Oral Health. 2019; 11: 353–356.

[19] D. Feu. Orthodontic treatment of periodontal patients: challenges and solutions, from planning to retention. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2020; 25: 79–116.

[20] Perry J, Johnson I, Popat H, Morgan MZ, Gill P. Adolescent perceptions of orthodontic treatment risks and risk information: a qualitative study. Journal of Dentistry. 2018; 74: 61–70.

[21] M. Sandhya Jain, M. Kuriakose. Latest technologies in orthodontics—a review. International Journal. 2020: 3: 1–11.