Correlation between head circumference and mesio-distal width of the maxillary central incisor: a cross sectional study among three different population groups

The size and shape of a tooth vary between individuals of different ethnic groups and genders because of the influence of different genetic factors. The information regarding the different anatomical factors using maxillary anterior teeth is very scanty. Thus to give more clarity, a study was planned to assess the correlation between head circumference and tooth-mesiodistal width among children of different ethnic origins.The study was carried out on 210 children aged 7 to 12 years in schools at Abha, Saudi Arabia.The mesiodistal (MD) width of the central incisor was measured using a digital vernier caliper. A Meter tape ruler was used to measure the Head/Cephalic dimensions. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using IBM SPSS 20.0, and the results were analyzed. It was found that mean MD tooth width and head circumference were maximum in Saudi children, followed by South Asian and Arab/African, with an insignificant statistical difference (p-value > 0.05). Correlation between MD dimensions of maxillary central incisor with head circumference was statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) among Saudi and South Asian populations, whereas statistically insignificant (p-value > 0.05) difference between Saudi and Arab/African populations. It was concluded that there exist the ethnic differences between tooth-mesiodistal width and head circumference dimensions of children. A positive correlation between head circumference and mesiodistal width of the central incisor was determined.

Head circumference; Maxillary central incisor; Mesio-distal width

[1] Ain T, Alasmari F, Togoo R, Maalawi G, Almoghamer A, Alalshikh A. Physical height and crown dimensions of primary teeth: a dental morphometric study in Saudi Arabian children. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2022; 26: 108.

[2] Hasegawa Y, Amarsaikhan B, Chinvipas N, Tsukada S, Terada K, Uzuka S, et al. Comparison of mesiodistal tooth crown diameters and arch dimensions between modern Mongolians and Japanese. Odontology. 2014; 102: 167–175.

[3] Abozeid H, El Shiekh M, AElsayed M. Determination of the combined mesiodistal widths of the permanent mandibular incisors and that of the maxillary and mandibular canines and premolars in a group of Egyptian children in Suez governorate: a cross-sectional study. Advanced Dental Journal. 2019; 1: 77–85.

[4] Hattab F. Mesiodistal rown diameters and tooth size discrepancy of permanent dentition in thalassemic patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2013; 5: e239–44.

[5] Laeeque M, Nirmale VK, Diwan CV. Derivation of demarcating points for sex determination from the skull. International Journal of Recent Trends in Science and Technology. 2013; 6: 56–59.

[6] Vodanović M, Demo Ž, Njemirovskij V, Keros J, Brkić H. Odontometrics: a useful method for sex determination in an archaeological skeletal population? Journal of Archaeological Science. 2007; 34: 905–913.

[7] Sandeep N, Satwalekar P, Srinivas S, Reddy CS, Reddy GR, Reddy BA. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth dimensions for the existence of golden proportion: clinical study. Journal of International Oral Health. 2015; 7: 18–21.

[8] Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ preferences of anterior tooth proportion—a web-based study. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2000; 9: 123–136.

[9] Miranda G, D’Souza M. Evaluating the reliability of the interalar width and intercommissural width as guides in selection of artificial maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical study. Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry. 2016; 6: 64.

[10] Attokaran G, Shenoy K. Correlation between interalar distance and mesiodistal width of maxillary anterior teeth in Thrissur, Kerala, Indian population. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2018; 8: 118.

[11] Gupta R, Luthra RP, Sharma A. A comparative evaluation of the inter-relationship between inner-canthal distance, inter-alar width and inter—pupillary distance with respect to inter canine width amongst the population of Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2016; 4: 186–192.

[12] Rodríguez-Alayza S, Obando-Pereda G. Comparison between Obando’s anthropometric formula and Mondelli’s formula to estimate central incisor width. Journal of Oral Research. 2016; 5: 114–118.

[13] Arun Kumar KV, Gupta SH, Sandhu HS. Determination of mesiodistal width of maxillary anterior teeth using inner canthal distance. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2015; 71: S376–S381.

[14] Baleegh S, Choudhry Z, Malik S, Baleegh H. The relationship between widths of upper anterior teeth and facial widths. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2015; 35: 742–745.

[15] Johnson PF. Racial norms: esthetic and prosthodontic implications. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992; 67: 502–508.

[16] Kumar M, Gopichand PV. Estimation of stature from cephalo-facial anthropometry in 800 Haryanvi adults. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences. 2013; 3: 42–46.

[17] Ilayperuma I. On the prediction of personal stature from cranial dimensions. International Journal of Morphology. 2010; 28: 1135–1140.

[18] Deogade SC, Mantri SS, Saxena S, Daryani H. Correlation between combined width of maxillary anterior teeth, interpupillary distance and intercommissural width in a group of Indian people. International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2014; 4: 105–111.