Morphological types of sella turcica bridging and sella turcica dimensions in relation to palatal canine impaction: a retrospective study

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the presence of sella turcica bridging and palatal canine impaction (PCI) using several classification methods. In this retrospective study, lateral cephalometric radiographs of 120 subjects with PCI (43 males, 77 females; mean age 18.8 ± 7.8 years) and 120 controls (44 males, 76 females; mean age 18.1 ± 5.6 years) with complete permanent dentition were examined. The extent of sella turcica bridging was assessed using two different methods, and the types of complete sella turcica bridging were evaluated. The sella turcica dimensions were measured and analyzed using the t-test, and comparison of the presence of sella turcica bridging was performed using the two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. The frequency of complete sella turcica bridging was significantly higher in subjects with PCI (18.3%) than in controls (8.3%, p = 0.023) but without significant differences in the occurrence of sella turcica bridging of Type A (ribbon-like fusion) and Type B (extension of clinoid processes). No significant differences in partial bridging were found between patients with PCI and controls according to both methods. The length and the anteroposterior diameter were significantly larger in subjects with PCI and no difference was observed between the groups in the sella turcica depth. Complete sella turcica bridging occurred significantly more frequently in subjects with PCI than in controls. However, the association between partial bridging and PCI was not confirmed, therefore, we do not recommend any classification of partial bridging for clinical practice.

Palatal canine impaction; Sella turcica bridging; Morphology; Sella dimensions

[1] Allareddy V, Caplin J, Markiewicz MR, Meara DJ. Orthodontic and surgical considerations for treating impacted teeth. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2020; 32: 15–26.

[2] Alassiry A. Radiographic assessment of the prevalence, pattern and position of maxillary canine impaction in Najran (Saudi Arabia) population using orthopantomograms—a cross-sectional, retrospective study. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2020; 32: 155–159.

[3] Chapokas AR, Almas K, Schincaglia G. The impacted maxillary canine: a proposed classification for surgical exposure. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology 2012; 113: 222–228.

[4] Alyami B, Braimah R, Alharieth S. Prevalence and pattern of impacted canines in Najran, South Western Saudi Arabian population. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2020; 32: 300–305.

[5] Kolokitha OE, Balli D, Zarkadi AE, Gizani S. Association between maxillary canine impaction and other dental anomalies: radiological study of a mixed dentition children’s cohort from an orthodontic clinic. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2023; 24: 401–407.

[6] Hamada Y, Timothius CJC, Shin D, John V. Reprint of canine impaction—a review of the prevalence, etiology, diagnosis and treatment. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2021; 27: 27–33.

[7] Graf CC, Dritsas K, Ghamri M, Gkantidis N. Reliability of cephalometric superimposition for the assessment of craniofa-cial changes: a systematic review. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2022; 44: 477–490.

[8] Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between 6 and 21 years of age. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2004; 26: 597–604.

[9] Cuschieri A, Cuschieri S, Zammit C. Sella turcica bridging: a systematic review. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2022; 44: 381–389.

[10] Roomaney IA, Chetty M. Sella turcica morphology in patients with genetic syndromes: a systematic review. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2021; 24: 194–205.

[11] Amelinda VP, Ismaniati NA, Purbiati M. Association of sella turcica bridge and ponticulus posticus with palatally impact-ed canine and hypodontia. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2019; 12: 1090–1094.

[12] Dadgar S, Alimohamadi M, Rajabi N, Rakhshan V, Sobouti F. Associations among palatal impaction of canine, sella turci-ca bridging, and ponticulus posticus (atlas arcuate foramen). Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2021; 43: 93–99.

[13] Scribante A, Sfondrini MF, Cassani M, Fraticelli D, Beccari S, Gandini P. Sella turcica bridging and dental anomalies: is there an association?International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2017; 27: 568–573.

[14] Majeed O, Quadeer TA, Habib M. Relationship between palatally impacted canines and sella turcica bridging. Journal of the Pakistan Dental Association. 2018; 27: 160–164.

[15] Tepedino M, Laurenziello M, Guida L, Montaruli G, Grassia V, Chimenti C, et al. Sella turcica and craniofacial morphology in patients with palatally displaced canines: a retrospective study. Folia Morphologica. 2020; 79: 51–57.

[16] Divya S, Urala A, Prasad GL, Pentapati KC. Sella turcica bridging a diagnostic marker for impacted canines and supernu-merary teeth. Journal of International Oral Health. 2018; 10: 94–98.

[17] Kaya Y, Öztaş E, Goymen M, Keskin S. Sella turcica bridging and ponticulus posticus calcification in subjects with differ-ent dental anomalies. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2021; 159: 627–634.

[18] Gupta SP, Rauniyar S. Association between sella turcica bridging and hypodontia—a radiographic study. Europasian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020; 2: 11–16.

[19] Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, Caltabiano M. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with dental anomalies. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2006; 28: 580–585.

[20] Jing J, Feng J, Yuan Y, Guo T, Lei J, Pei F, et al. Spatiotemporal single-cell regulatory atlas reveals neural crest lineage diversification and cellular function during tooth morphogenesis. Nature Communications. 2022; 13: 4803.

[21] Kjær I. Sella turcica morphology and the pituitary gland—a new contribution to craniofacial diagnostics based on histolo-gy and neuroradiology. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2015; 37: 28–36.

[22] Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, Caltabiano M. Skeletal anomalies and normal variants in patients with palatally displaced canines. The Angle Orthodontist. 2009; 79: 727–732.

[23] Ali B, Shaikh A, Fida M. Association between sella turcica bridging and palatal canine impaction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2014; 146: 437–441.

[24] Haji Ghadimi M, Amini F, Hamedi S, Rakhshan V. Associations among sella turcica bridging, atlas arcuate foramen (pon-ticulus posticus) development, atlas posterior arch deficiency, and the occurrence of palatally displaced canine impaction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2017; 151: 513–520.

[25] Al-Nakib L, Najim AA. A cephalometric study of sella turcica size and morphology among young Iraqi normal population in comparison to patients with maxillary malposed canine. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry. 2011; 23: 53–58.

[26] Becktor JP, Einersen S, Kjaer I. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with severe craniofacial deviations. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2000; 22: 69–74.

[27] Silverman FN. Roentgen standards fo-size of the pituitary fossa from infancy through adolescence. American Journal of Roentgenology and Radium Therapy and Nuclear Medicine. 1957; 78: 451–460.

[28] Kisling E. Cranial Morphology in Down’s syndrome: a comparative roentgen cephalometric study in adult males. Thesis. Munksgaard, Copenhagen. Institution/University. 1966.

[29] Sundareswaran S, Nipun CA. Bridging the gap: sella turcica in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 2015; 52: 597–604.

[30] Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. G. Allen & Unwin Limited: London. 1940.

[31] Sato D, Endo T. Size and bridging of the sella turcica in Japanese orthodontic patients with tooth agenesis. Odontology. 2020; 108: 730–737.

[32] Antonarakis GS, Huanca Ghislanzoni L, La Scala GC, Fisher DM. Sella turcica morphometrics in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2020; 23: 398–403.

[33] Jankowski T, Jedliński M, Grocholewicz K, Janiszewska-Olszowska J. Sella turcica morphology on cephalometric radio-graphs and dental abnormalities—is there any association? Systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 4456.

[34] El Wak T, Akl R, Mati M, Khoury E, Ghoubril J. Association between sella turcica bridging and palatal canine impaction: evaluation using lateral cephalograms and CBCT. International Orthodontics. 2018; 16: 338–348.

[35] Ugurlu M, Bayrakdar IS, Kahraman F, Oksayan R, Dagsuyu IM. Evaluation of the relationship between impacted canines and three-dimensional sella morphology. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2020; 42: 23–29.

[36] Yan S, Huang S, Wu Z, Liu Y, Men Y, Nie X, et al. A CBCT investigation of the sella turcica dimension and sella turcica bridging in different vertical growth patterns. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 1890.

[37] Acevedo AM, Lagravere-Vich M, Al-Jewair T. Diagnostic accuracy of lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography for the assessment of sella turcica bridging. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2021; 160: 231–239.

[38] Ortiz PM, Tabbaa S, Flores-Mir C, Al-Jewair T. A CBCT investigation of the association between sella-turcica bridging and maxillary palatal canine impaction. BioMed Research International. 2018; 2018: 329050.

[39] Macrì M, Perrella G, Varvara G, Murmura G, Traini T, Rendina F, et al. Assessments of prevalence of ponticulus posticus, atlas posterior arch deficiency, sella turcica bridging, maxillary canine impaction, and associations among them in 500 CBCTs of Italian orthodontic patients. Frontiers in Dental Medicine. 2021; 2: 708169.