Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024; 48(1): 26-31. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.004
Original Research

Dental problems in children with autism: a 5-year study

Paola Martina Marra1,*,, Luca Fiorillo2,3,4,5,*,, Gabriele Cervino2, Cesare D’Amico2, Salvatore Crimi6, Aida Meto5, Giuseppe Minervini7,8,*,, Marco Cicciù6

1Complex Operative Unit of Stomatological surgery in Developmental age, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy

2Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, School of Dentistry, Messina University, 98100 Messina, Italy

3Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological Specialties, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80121 Naples, Italy

4Department of Prosthodontics, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, 411018 Pune, India

5Department of Dentistry, University of Aldent, 1000 Tirana, Albania

6Department of Biomedical and Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Catania University, 95123 Catania, Italy

7Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, 600077 Chennai, India

8Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialties, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80121 Naples, Italy

*Corresponding Author(s):lfiorillo@unime.it (Luca Fiorillo); Giuseppe.minervini@unicampania.it (Giuseppe Minervini);paolamartina.marra@unicampania.it (Paola Martina Marra)

History Submitted: 19 January 2023 | Accepted: 06 May 2023 | Published: 03 January 2024
Copyright:  ©2024 The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

Caries experience of children and complex clinical circumstances are an actual challenge for any healthcare professional. To investigate the early childhood caries (ECC) in autistic and non autistic children (≤4 years of age) evaluating the amount of dental damage and the treatments carried out in both groups. Data regarding the oral health status of 40 patients (≤4 years of age) were assembled. The sample group was constituted of 20 autistic children (12 males with a mean age of 2.5 years and 8 females with a mean age of 3.2 years) whereas 20 patients without the autistic spectrum represented the control group (11 males with a mean age of 3 and 9 females with a mean age of 3.3 years). There were no significant differences between the two groups as regards both the extent of dental damage and the treatments carried out. About the frequency, in the autistic group, the most frequent caries were the white spots and enamel proximal lesions (2.2%), followed by only white spots (1.2%) and brown-black cavities and root stumps (0.6%). In the control group, the brown-black cavities and root stumps represented the most frequent findings (2.2%), followed by white spots and enamel proximal lesions (1.4%) and white spots (0.4%). Regarding the treatments, the most repeated management of dental damage among autistic patients was composite restorations (2.2%) while in nonautistic patients were tooth extractions (2%).

Keywords:Autistim spectrum disorder;Dental care;Pediatric dentistry;Early childhood caries
PDF(533.43 kB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Paola Martina Marra, Luca Fiorillo, Gabriele Cervino, Cesare D’Amico, Salvatore Crimi, Aida Meto, Giuseppe Minervini, Marco Cicciù. Dental problems in children with autism: a 5-year study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024; 48(1): 26-31. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.004

1. Introduction

Early childhood caries (ECC) is an oral pathology which affect primary dentition of children younger than 6 years of age; primary upper incisors and primary upper and lower molars are severely decayed and disrupted [1, 2, 3]. Despite substantial improvements in preventive dentistry, ECC continues to affect very small children globally. In 4- to 6-year-old children, the prevalence generally ranges from 27% to 48% [1, 2, 3].

The aetiology is multifactorial and complex and can regard the interaction between cariogenic microbiota, vulnerable teeth and fermentable carbohydrates; in many cases, the children slept with honey on the feeding bottle at naptime and bedtime. The lactic acid, which reduces the intraoral pH and produces demineralization of tooth enamel, is generated by the bacteria that consume carbohydrates like sucrose, fructose and glucose [2, 3, 4, 5].

A protracted demineralization can cause dentin’s corrosion and cavitation [6]. Developmental enamel defects, such as enamel hypoplasia and children with juvenile diabetes mellitus or special needs, are described by the literature [7] as significant risk factors for developing early childhood caries.

A low socioeconomic background and prenatal and perinatal malnutrition influence the occurrence of caries in children; poor oral hygiene and the consumption of highly sugary foods are related to a lower level of education [7, 8, 9, 10]. As contributory risk factors the literature describes caregiver psychosocial stresses [10]. As regards the most involved primary teeth, the upper central incisors are among the first to erupt, so, they will be exposed to the bacteria for longer (Figs. 1A,B,2A) [10]; most of the time, the primary lower incisors are totally healthy or slightly affected since they are protected by the tongue’s position. At the beginning, the maxillary incisors show a white demineralization spot near the gingival margin, generally unnoticed by the parents. The white spot slowly progresses to brown-black extensive cavities (Fig. 2A). In more severe cases (Fig. 2B,C), the crowns of the upper incisors appear destroyed and only the root stumps are present.

Brown-black cavities. (A) 
Intraoral frontal view of 3-year autistic male who shows extensive decays of 
primary incisors. (B) Intraoral frontal and lateral views of 2.7-year female who 
shows brown-black cavities in the upper and lower arches except for the lower 
incisors that not present any caries.

Fig. 1.Brown-black cavities. (A) Intraoral frontal view of 3-year autistic male who shows extensive decays of primary incisors. (B) Intraoral frontal and lateral views of 2.7-year female who shows brown-black cavities in the upper and lower arches except for the lower incisors that not present any caries.

Root stumps. (A) Intraoral 
frontal view of 3-year no autistic female who shows extensive decays of primary 
dentition and root stumps in the upper and lower arches; the lower primary 
incisors, except for the left lateral incisor, appear healthy. (B) Intraoral 
frontal view of 3-year female who shows root stumps in the upper and lower 
arches; the lower primary teeth are also affected. (C) Intraoral frontal view of 
2.5-year autistic female showing root stumps and extensive decay in both 
arches.

Fig. 2.Root stumps. (A) Intraoral frontal view of 3-year no autistic female who shows extensive decays of primary dentition and root stumps in the upper and lower arches; the lower primary incisors, except for the left lateral incisor, appear healthy. (B) Intraoral frontal view of 3-year female who shows root stumps in the upper and lower arches; the lower primary teeth are also affected. (C) Intraoral frontal view of 2.5-year autistic female showing root stumps and extensive decay in both arches.

Some authors [9] showed that the enamel of the primary teeth can be demineralized much more rapidly since it is less structured and significantly thinner than in the permanent dentition.

The most common microorganisms associated with ECC were mutans streptococci (MS) bacteria, which included the species S mutans and S sobrinus [9]. Some investigations revealed that children with very high levels of MS presented additional cavities over time 6 times more than those without MS at first visit [10, 11, 12, 13]. The treatment is very complex and often can be executed only under sedation or general anaesthesia. It depends on many factors, including the age of the children, their compliance and health state and the amount of dental damage.

Frequently, young children with the autistic spectrum are involved [11, 12, 13, 14].

Autism or autistic disorder is a set of alterations in brain development, which vary from one subject to another, leading to impaired social and language skills, as well as various behavioural disorders [11, 12, 13]. The first symptoms of autism in children appear early in childhood [14]. The etiology of autism is still not clear, but it is generally classified as primary or idiopathic autism, which has a non-specific genetic base [13]. Mental retardation is described in 70% of the cases [13].

In small children, extensive dental decays represent a significant dentofacial health problem that can provoke medical, aesthetic and psychological consequences [15, 16].

To date, no studies described the different stages of early childhood caries both in children with and without the autistic spectrum during a period. The present study aimed to investigate the frequency of early childhood caries in autistic and non-autistic patients (≤4 years of age) pointing out the most frequent treatments carried out in both groups.

2. Materials and methods

The present retrospective study was conducted on all autistic and non-autistic patients (≤4 years of age) from November 2017 to November 2022.

The pathology of early childhood caries was retrieved from a database.

For all patients the data had been collected at the initial visit followed by the screening until the treatments were carried out. During the first visit, the parents were asked to sign an informed consent in order to record the data of their children.

From the first visit, the patients were recalled within a month to be able to carry out the treatment suitable for their needs. After treatment, they were recalled after 6 months for a follow-up.

When the collaboration of the children made it possible, along with dental examinations, intraoral periapical radiographs (Fig. 3) or a panoramic X-ray were performed.

Periapical radiograph 
showing tooth decay and a periapical lesion.

Fig. 3.Periapical radiograph showing tooth decay and a periapical lesion.

One examiner grouped all data (intraoral and extraoral photos, periapical or panoramic X-ray). The sample group was constituted of 20 autistic children (12 males with a mean age of 2.5 years and 8 females with a mean age of 3.2 years) whereas 20 patients without the autistic spectrum represented the control group (11 males with a mean age of 3 years and 9 females with a mean age of 3.3 years).

As regards the autistic group, only patients with the diagnosis of mild or moderate autism were included.

The following parameters were considered for each patient of both groups:

- Age and gender;

- The dental damage;

- The treatments carried out (Chlorhexidine varnish, varnish topical fluoride with resin base, composite restoration, composite restoration technique and pulp treatment, stainless steel crowns and tooth extraction);

Syndromes, craniofacial anomalies, diagnoses of severe autism and convulsions represented the exclusion criteria.

The obtained data were coded and entered into Microsoft Excel which was then subjected to statistical analysis. Chi-square test and Yates’ chi-square and Yates’ p-value test were performed. The results were expressed in percentage. With the Chi-square test performed, significant data have been obtained according to Table 3. First of all, the Chi-square value performed at 2.857 with a degree of freedom of 5. The p-value is 0.722, so the previous assumption could be confirmed that the difference between groups is not significant with p > 0.05. Yates’ chi-square is 5.681 and Yates’ p-value is 0.338; data were analysed using the statistical package Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Software, Version 14, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

Table 1 shows the age and sex distribution of the sample and control group. In the last 5-year findings, males presented more early childhood caries than females in the sample and control group; respectively, 2.4% and 2.2%.

There were no significant differences between the two groups as regards both the extent of dental damage (p < 0.920) as shown Table 2 and the treatments carried out (p < 0.338) as shown in Table 3.

This manuscript has been checked with the Fi-index tool and obtained a score of 0.86 on the date 16 November 2022. No according to Scopus® for the first author only [17, 18].

Table 1.Demographics of the sample group (autistic children) and control group (non-autistic children).
SexNAge (yr) Mean ± SD
Sample group
Males122.5 ± 2.0
Females83.2 ± 1.5
Control group
Males113.0 ± 3.5
Females93.3 ± 2.0
SD: standard deviation.
Table 2.Distribution of the extent of dental damage in the sample and the control group.
Autistic GroupControl Group
Extent of dental damage
White spot6 (1.2%)2 (0.4%)
White spots and enamel proximal lesions11 (2.2%)7 (1.4%)
Brown-black cavities and root stumps3 (0.6%)11 (2.2%)
Table 3.Treatments were carried out in the sample and the control group.
TreatmentsAutistic GroupControl Group
Chlorhexidine varnish1 (0.2%)
Varnish topical fluoride with resin base2 (0.4%)
Composite restoration11 (2.2%)2 (0.4%)
Composite restorative technique and pulp treatment2 (0.4%)
Stainless steel crowns3 (0.6%)

4. Discussion

Caries experience of children and complex clinical circumstances are an actual challenge for any healthcare professional. To date, very few dated articles [17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24] have dealt with this topic in very small children (≤4 years of age) and no articles analyzed the same oral health condition in children (≤4 years of age) with the autistic spectrum comparing them with an age-matched control group. It is very important to intercept these oral pathologies as early as possible, to allow children to eat, to decrease the pain and discomfort, and to avoid or limit repercussions on the permanent dentition as showed in Figs. 1,2,3.

Some authors [21] showed that a significant number of parents, whose children had early childhood caries, knew about the damaging effects of putting sugary constituents on the baby bottle for a long time. Instead, according to our findings, another studies [24, 25, 26] concluded that the awareness of ECC was generally lower among parents of ECC children than among parents of children without ECC. Moreover, they found also that the percentage of babies with ECC weaned from the bottle after 14 months old was higher (36.8%) than babies without the condition (26.5%) Other authors [23] showed that babies born after maternal complications during pregnancy or who experienced a painful birth must be considered at risk of developing caries when exposed to disproportionate bottle nursing.

Some authors [27] investigated the factors related to the susceptibility of early childhood caries in 392 children; they found significant differences in three factors: eating too many sweets each day, brushing before and after sleeping, and parents helped to brush. However, they also found a significant relation between the parents’ level of education and oral health understanding and the ECC. We agree with the findings of the authors [27], the patients with brown-black cavities and root stumps came from a poor background and their family were socially disadvantaged.

Otherwise from other authors [28, 29, 30, 31], who found in autistic children a higher caries prevalence and poor oral hygiene reporting more invasive dental treatments carried out respect to non-autistic children, in our outcomes, we didn’t find any significant differences among autistic and non-autistic children, probably because most of the patients’ families came from disadvantaged backgrounds with a poor knowledge of the importance of oral hygiene.

Many studies [10, 11, 12, 13] reported a higher prevalence in ECC in autistic patients with a higher age; in our case, since they were very young children, probably they were more monitored by the parents despite the disadvantaged social context.

According to the literature [32], the crowns are one of the most long-lasting, retentive and relatively inexpensive restorative materials that have shown good long-term retention and significant clinical success in the restoration of larger carious lesions [33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38].

Since preserving primary teeth is essential for maintaining maxillary growth [39, 40, 41], aesthetics, mastication function and speech [42, 43, 44, 45], when possible, pulp treatments, composite restoration, chlorhexidine varnish and varnish topical fluoride with resin base were also performed in non-autistic group under sedation. Fluoride helps to remineralize the demineralized tooth surfaces injured by caries increasing the resistance. This study presents some limitations: the limited number of patients and no randomization was performed. Paediatricians have an essential role in intercepting these oral pathologies; they can teach parents to realize early oral and dental hygiene, adopt an appropriate diet, and show them how to recognize early signs of rampant caries, such as white spots.

5. Conclusions

The dentist and the paediatrician have to intercept oral problems in pediatric patients to avoid dental and psychological complications. The extent of dental damage and the treatments carried out were not statistically different between autistic and non-autistic group. The control and the management of ECC is arduous, due to the multifarious behavioral problems that derive from social, economic and environmental factors of the families. Preventive approaches should focus on early dental inspection, tooth brushing, limiting an excessive use of sugar and using topical fluoride.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Author contributions

PMM—conceptualization; LF—methodology, formal analysis; LF and AM—software; GC—validation, investigation; CDA—resources; LF, SC and AM—data curation; PMM and GM—writing–original draft preparation; CDA and GM—writing–review and editing; MC—supervision, project administration. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the University of Aldent, Faculty of Oral Sciences (Reference number: 22/2; Date: 20 March 2023). Written informed consent has been obtained for all patients prior to the start of the study.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Giuseppe Minervini is serving as one of the Editorial Board members of this journal. We declare that Giuseppe Minervini had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to APG.

References

Feldens CA, Rodrigues PH, de Anastácio G, Vítolo MR, Chaffee BW. Feeding frequency in infancy and dental caries in childhood: a prospective cohort study. International Dental Journal. 2018; 68: 113–121.

[Google Scholar]

Cheng H, Chen R, Milosevic M, Rossiter C, Arora A, Denney-Wilson E. Interventions targeting bottle and formula feeding in the prevention and treatment of early childhood caries, overweight and obesity: an integrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 12304.

[Google Scholar]

van Meijeren-van Lunteren A, Voortman T, Elfrink MC, Wolvius E, Kragt L. Breastfeeding and childhood dental caries: results from a socially diverse birth cohort study. Caries Research. 2021; 55: 153–161.

[Google Scholar]

Garrocho-Rangel A, Navarro-Padilla P, Guzmán-Uribe D, Torre-Delgadillo G, Ruiz-Rodríguez S, Pozos-Guillén A. Clinical interventions for caries management through minimal intervention procedures in young children: an updated evidence-based review. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 47: 1–10.

[Google Scholar]

Ganesh A, Muthu MS, Padmanabhan R, Nuvvula S. Association of sleep-time feeding practices with early childhood caries: a case-control study. Caries Research. 2022; 56: 399–406.

[Google Scholar]

Zhu F, Chen Y, Yu Y, Xie Y, Zhu H, Wang H. Caries prevalence of the first permanent molars in 6–8 years old children. PLOS ONE. 2021; 16: e0245345.

[Google Scholar]

Anil S, Anand PS. Early childhood caries: prevalence, risk factors, and prevention. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2017; 5: 157.

[Google Scholar]

Kınıkoğlu İ, Türkoğlu Kayacı Ş, Arslan H. Short fiber reinforced composite on fracture strength of immature permanent anterior teeth with simulated regenerative endodontic procedures: an in vitro study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 47: 171–177.

[Google Scholar]

Twetman S, Dhar V. Evidence of effectiveness of current therapies to prevent and treat early childhood caries. Pediatric Dentistry. 2015; 37: 246–253.

[Google Scholar]

Topçuoğlu G, Kolçakoğlu K. Evaluation of accuracy of an electronic apex locator in presence of sodium hypochlorite in primary teeth with and without resorption. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 47: 150–154.

[Google Scholar]

Wilkenfeld DA, McCarthy AM. Ethical concerns with applied behavior analysis for autism spectrum “disorder”. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2020; 30: 31–69.

[Google Scholar]

Yu H, Zhang Z, Liu J, Hu P, Liu Z. Association study between genetic variants in vitamin D metabolism related genes and childhood autism spectrum disorder. Metabolic Brain Disease. 2020; 35: 971–978.

[Google Scholar]

Saito A, Stickley A, Haraguchi H, Takahashi H, Ishitobi M, Kamio Y. Association between autistic traits in preschool children and later emotional/behavioral outcomes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2017; 47: 3333–3346.

[Google Scholar]

C. Barthelemy. Autism, a neuro-developmental disorder. La Revue du Praticien. 2019; 69: 738–742. (In French)

[Google Scholar]

Marra PM, Parascandolo S, Fiorillo L, Cicciù M, Cervino G, D’Amico C, et al. Dental trauma in children with autistic disorder: a retrospective study. BioMed Research International. 2021; 2021: 1–6.

[Google Scholar]

Fiorillo L. Fi-index: a new method to evaluate authors Hirsch-index reliability. Publishing Research Quarterly. 2022; 38: 465–474.

[Google Scholar]

Fiorillo L, Cicciù M. The use of fi-index tool to assess per-manuscript self-citations. Publishing Research Quarterly. 2022; 38: 684–692.

[Google Scholar]

Khadra-Eid J, Baudet D, Fourny M, Sellier E, Brun C, François P. Development of a screening scale for children at risk of baby bottle tooth decay. Arch Pediatrics. 2012; 19: 235–241. (In French)

[Google Scholar]

Peretz B. Early childhood caries (ECC)/baby-bottle tooth decay—a reminder. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim. 2002; 19: 92.

[Google Scholar]

Mummolo S, Sapio S, Falco A, Vittorini OL, Quinzi V. Management of pedodontic patients in moderate sedation in clinical dentistry: evaluation of behaviour before and after treatment. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents. 2020; 34: 55–62.

[Google Scholar]

Alsadat FA, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi NM, Elderwi DA, Ainosa AM, Dardeer FM. Dental fear in primary school children and its relation to dental caries. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2018; 21: 1454–1460.

[Google Scholar]

Uribe SE, Innes N, Maldupa I. The global prevalence of early childhood caries: a systematic review with meta‐analysis using the who diagnostic criteria. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2021; 31: 817–830.

[Google Scholar]

Mubaraki S, AlOlyan R, AlBrekeit J, AlFouzan S, Abosharkh M, AlSaeri N, Baseer MA. Prevalence of caries in first permanent molar among children in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective study. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2022; 26: 7550–7555.

[Google Scholar]

Karikoski E, Sarkola T, Blomqvist M. Dental caries prevalence in children with congenital heart disease—a systematic review. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2021; 79: 232–240.

[Google Scholar]

Frencken J. Caries epidemiology and its challenges. Monographs in Oral Science. 2018; 27: 11–23.

[Google Scholar]

Herford AS, Lu M, Akin L, Cicciù M. Evaluation of a porcine matrix with and without platelet-derived growth factor for bone graft coverage in pigs. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2012; 27: 1351–1358.

[Google Scholar]

Sun HB, Zhang W, Zhou XB. Risk factors associated with early childhood caries. Chinese Journal of Dental Research. 2017; 20: 97–104.

[Google Scholar]

Jaber MA. Dental caries experience, oral health status and treatment needs of dental patients with autism. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2011; 19: 212–217.

[Google Scholar]

Nagaraja VH, da Ponte Lopes J, Bergmann JHM. Reimagining prosthetic control: a novel body-powered prosthetic system for simultaneous control and actuation. Prosthesis. 2022; 4: 394–413.

[Google Scholar]

Tallarico M, Galiffi D, Scrascia R, Gualandri M, Zadrożny Ł, Czajkowska M, et al. Digital workflow for prosthetically driven implants placement and digital cross mounting: a retrospective case series. Prosthesis. 2022; 4: 353–368.

[Google Scholar]

Ballini A, Cantore S, Farronato D, Cirulli N, Inchingolo F, Papa F, et al. Periodontal disease and bone pathogenesis: the crosstalk between cytokines and porphyromonas gingivalis. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents. 2015; 29: 273–281.

[Google Scholar]

Troiano G, Laino L, Cicciù M, Cervino G, Fiorillo L, D’amico C, et al. Comparison of two routes of administration of dexamethasone to reduce the postoperative sequelae after third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2018; 12: 181–188.

[Google Scholar]

Ramos NdC, Ramos GF, Penteado MM, de Melo RM, Borges ALS, Bottino MA, et al. Comparative stress evaluation between bilayer, monolithic and cutback all-ceramic crown designs: 3D finite element study. Prosthesis. 2021; 3: 173–180.

[Google Scholar]

Zhu H, Lian L, Zhu K, Yu Y, Zhang W. Guardian factors affecting high prevalence of dental caries in preschool children. Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry. 2022; 20: 157–164.

[Google Scholar]

Alazmah A. Early childhood caries: a review. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2017; 18: 732–737.

[Google Scholar]

Seminario AL, Ivančaková R. Early childhood caries. Acta Medica. 2003; 46: 91–94.

[Google Scholar]

Marra P, Nucci L, Abdolreza J, Perillo L, Itro A, Grassia V. Odontoma in a young and anxious patient associated with unerupted permanent mandibular cuspid: a case report. Journal of International Oral Health. 2020; 12: 182.

[Google Scholar]

Qazi N, Pawar M, Padhly PP, Pawar V, D’Amico C, Nicita F, et al. Teledentistry: Evaluation of Instagram posts related to bruxism. Technology and Health Care. 2023; 31: 1923–1934.

[Google Scholar]

Rathi S, Chaturvedi S, Abdullah S, Rajput G, Alqahtani NM, Chaturvedi M, et al. Clinical trial to assess physiology and activity of masticatory muscles of complete denture wearer following Vitamin D intervention. Medicina (B Aires). 2023; 59: 410.

[Google Scholar]

Di Francesco F, Lanza A, Di Blasio M, Vaienti B, Cafferata EA, Cervino G, et al. Application of botulinum toxin in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Applied Sciences. 2022; 12: 12409.

[Google Scholar]

Crescente G, Minervini G, Spagnuolo C, Moccia S. Cannabis bioactive compound-based formulations: new perspectives for the management of orofacial pain. Molecules. 2022; 28: 106.

[Google Scholar]

Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Laino L, Herford AS, Lauritano F, Giudice GL, et al. Oral health impact profile in celiac patients: analysis of recent findings in a literature review. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2018; 2018: 1–9.

[Google Scholar]

Ozaydin MS, Doganturk L, Ulucan-Karnak F, Akdogan O, Erkoc P. Contemporary tools for the cure against pernicious microorganisms: micro-/nanorobots. Prosthesis. 2022; 4: 424–443.

[Google Scholar]

Malcangi G, Inchingolo AD, Inchingolo AM, Piras F, Settanni V, Garofoli G, et al. COVID-19 infection in children and infants: current status on therapies and vaccines. Children. 2022; 9: 249.

[Google Scholar]

Morar L, Băciuț G, Băciuț M, Bran S, Colosi H, Manea A, et al. Analysis of CBCT bone density using the hounsfield scale. Prosthesis. 2022; 4: 414–423.

[Google Scholar]