Arm design of band and loop space maintainer affects its longevity: a patient-specific finite element study

Fixed space maintainers (FSMs) are commonly utilized in pediatric dentistry to prevent space loss following premature tooth extraction. Although previous studies have examined the survival rates and causes of FSM failure, the impact of arm design on failure has not been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the tensile and compressive stresses related to FSMs with different arm designs and evaluate the effect of arm designs on FSM failure. Cone beam computed tomography images of a child who experienced premature loss of a primary mandibular left second molar tooth were retrieved from our database, then processed and simulated using the Rhinoceros software. Finite element analysis was performed to evaluate the stresses on four distinct FSM arm designs under simulated chewing forces. The results showed that the straight-arm FSM design exhibited the highest von Mises principal stress, while FSMs with curved arms and surrounding primary mandibular left first molar in the mesial area demonstrated the lowest von Mises stress accumulation. Intense stress accumulation on the distal surface of tooth 74 was observed in the test models due to the transmitted forces by the FSM. The maximum principal stresses accumulated at the base of the alveolar socket of the mesial root of tooth 36, while the minimum principal stresses were identified at the mesio-marginal area of the alveolar crest. The arm design played a crucial role in enabling the appliance to effectively withstand the stresses accumulating on the Space maintainer (SM) and orthodontic band. Bending the SM arms to match the surrounding profile with curvature increased the stress absorption capacity by increasing the arm length.

Fixed space maintainer; Finite element analysis; Primary molar; Band and loop; Tooth loss

[1] Law CS. Management of premature primary tooth loss in the child patient. Journal of the California Dental Association. 2013; 41: 612–618.

[2] Nascimento EB, Rodrigues R, Manso MC. Prevalence of dental floss use in deciduous dentition: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2023; 21: 116–127.

[3] Watt E, Ahmad A, Adamji R, Katsimbali A, Ashley P, Noar J. Space maintainers in the primary and mixed dentition—a clinical guide. British Dental Journal. 2018; 225: 293–298.

[4] Barros SE, Siqueira SP, Janson G, Chiqueto K. Short‐term efficacy of vacuum‐formed maintainer for deciduous second molar space maintenance in the mixed dentition: a single‐centre, randomized controlled clinical trial. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2021; 24: 502–510.

[5] Heidari A, Mokhtari S, Hamrah MH, Tavana Z, Heydarigoojani M, Tavana N. Investigating the factors affecting the need for unilateral space maintainer for first primary molars in late mixed dentition. BioMed Research International. 2022; 2022: 7604144.

[6] Lee J. Fully digital workflow for the fabrication of a tooth‐colored space maintainer for a young patient. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2023; 35: 561–566.

[7] Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMDO, Bottino MA, Kleverlaan CJ, Koolstra JH. Mouthguard use and TMJ injury prevention with different occlusions: a three‐dimensional finite element analysis. Dental Traumatology. 2020; 36: 662–669.

[8] Bragança GFD, Vilela ABF, Soares PBF, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares CJ. Influence of ceramic veneer thickness and antagonist on impact stresses during dental trauma with and without a mouthguard assessed with finite element analysis. Dental Traumatology. 2021; 37: 215–222.

[9] Qudeimat MA, Sasa IS. Clinical success and longevity of band and loop compared to crown and loop space maintainers. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2015; 16: 391–396.

[10] Khanna S, Rao D, Panwar S, Pawar BA, Ameen S. 3D printed band and loop space maintainer: a digital game changer in preventive orthodontics. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021; 45: 147–151.

[11] Demirel A, Bezgin T, Sarı Ş. Effects of root maturation and thickness variation in coronal mineral trioxide aggregate plugs under traumatic load on stress distribution in regenerative endodontic procedures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study. Journal of Endodontics. 2021; 47: 492–499.e4.

[12] Demirel A, Sarı Ş. Are increased masticatory forces risk for primary 2nd molars without successors? A 3D FEA study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2019; 43: 64–68.

[13] Firmiano TC, de Oliveira AA, Costa PVDM, Cardoso LS, Pereira RD, Veríssimo C. Influence of different ethylene‐vinyl acetate brands used for custom‐fitted mouthguard fabrication on the stress and strain during an impact. Dental Traumatology. 2022; 38: 431–438.

[14] Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitascioglu G. Effect of root filling on stress distribution in premolars with endodontic-lesion: a finite elemantal analysis study. Journal of Endodontics 2016;42:150-155.

[15] Jang Y, Hong HT, Roh BD, Chun HJ. Influence of apical root resection on the biomechanical response of a single-rooted tooth: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Journal of Endodontics. 2014;40:1489-1493.

[16] Matsuyama Y, Motoyoshi M, Tsurumachi N, Shimize N. Effect of palate depth, modified arm shape, and anchor screw on rapid maxillary expansion: a finite element analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2015;37:188-193.

[17] Romeed S, Dunne S. Stress analysis of different post-luting system: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Australian Dental Journal 2013;58:82-88.

[18] Lee H, Jo M, Sailer I, Noh G. Effects of implant diameter, implant-abutment connection type, and bone density on the biomechanical stability of implant components and bone: a finite element analysis study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022; 128: 716–728.

[19] Karimizadeh Z, Kamali Sabeti A, Rafatjou R. Maximum equivalent stress induced and the displacement of the developing permanent first molars after the premature loss of primary second molars: a finite element analysis. Dental and Medical Problems. 2020; 57: 401–409.

[20] Hollanders ACC, Kuper NK, Huysmans MCDNJM, Versluis A. The effect of occlusal loading on cervical gap deformation: a 3D finite element analysis. Dental Materials. 2020; 36: 681–686.

[21] Owais AI, Shaweesh M, Abu Alhaija ESJ. Maximum occusal bite force for children in different dentition stages. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2013; 35: 427–433.

[22] Köseoğlu S, Fidancıoğlu A, Sağlam M, Savran L. Management of a periodontal pocket using a removable orthodontic appliance and nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2015; 2015: 374850.

[23] Gurcan AT, Koruyucu M, Kuru S, Sepet E, Seymen F. Effects of fixed and removable space maintainers on dental plaque and DMFT/dft values. Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2021; 23: 137–147.

[24] Martín-Vacas A, Caleya AM, Gallardo NE. Comparative analysis of space maintenance using transpalatal arch and nance button. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021; 45: 129–134.

[25] Ortiz MIG, Ribeiro MES, Lima DANL, Silva CM, Loretto SC, da Silva e Souza Júnior MH. Compliance of randomized clinical trials on dental caries prevention methods with the consort statement: a systematic review. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice. 2021; 21: 101542.

[26] Carvalho V, Soares P, Verissimo C, Pessoa R, Versluis A, Soares C. Mouthguard biomechanics for protecting dental implants from impact: experimental and finite element impact analysis. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2018; 33: 335–343.

[27] Firmiano TC, Oliveira MTF, de Souza JB, Soares CJ, Versluis A, Veríssimo C. Influence of impacted canines on the stress distribution during dental trauma with and without a mouthguard. Dental Traumatology. 2019; 35: 276–284.

[28] Alper B, Gultekin P, Yalci S. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry. Edition 10th InTech: London 2012.

[29] Guo H, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Liu H. Computer-aided design of polyetheretherketone for application to removable pediatric space maintainers. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 201.

[30] Ierardo G, Luzzi V, Lesti M, Vozza I, Brugnoletti O, Polimeni A, et al. Peek polymer in orthodontics: a pilot study on children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2017; 9: e1271–e1275.