Article Data

  • Views 353
  • Dowloads 168

Systematic Reviews

Open Access

Effectiveness of oral health interventions for schoolchildren from disadvantaged backgrounds: a systematic review protocol

  • Aiman Nadiah Ahmad Tajudin1
  • Ainol Haniza Kherul Anuwar1
  • Jamaludin Marhazlinda1
  • Zamros Yuzadi Mohd Yusof1,*,

1Department of Community Oral Health and Clinical Prevention, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.076 Vol.48,Issue 4,July 2024 pp.38-44

Submitted: 24 October 2023 Accepted: 26 December 2023

Published: 03 July 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Zamros Yuzadi Mohd Yusof E-mail: zamros@um.edu.my

Abstract

Disadvantaged schoolchildren from rural and low socioeconomic backgrounds face persistent oral health inequalities, specifically dental caries, and periodontal diseases. This protocol aims to review the effectiveness of promotive and preventive oral health interventions for improving the oral health of primary schoolchildren in these areas. We will search the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) via EBSCOhost, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Dentistry and Oral Sciences databases for studies published from 2000–2023. The review includes randomised/nonrandomised controlled trials and community trials evaluating the effectiveness of promotive and preventive oral health interventions on at least one of these outcomes: changes in dental caries status, periodontal disease status, oral hygiene status/practices, sugar consumption, or smoking behaviours. Two reviewers will independently assess the searched articles, extract the data, and assess the risk of bias in the studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB 2) for randomised controlled trials and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomised controlled trials. Both narrative and quantitative analyses will be conducted. However, only narrative synthesis will be performed if the data are substantially heterogeneous. The synthesised evidence from this review can inform policymakers on evidence-based interventions to improve the oral health outcomes of schoolchildren from rural and low socioeconomic backgrounds. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42022344898).


Keywords

Child; Dental health education; Low socioeconomic status; Rural population; School dentistry


Cite and Share

Aiman Nadiah Ahmad Tajudin,Ainol Haniza Kherul Anuwar,Jamaludin Marhazlinda,Zamros Yuzadi Mohd Yusof. Effectiveness of oral health interventions for schoolchildren from disadvantaged backgrounds: a systematic review protocol. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024. 48(4);38-44.

References

[1] World Health Organization (WHO). Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240061484 (Accessed: 14 January 2023).

[2] O’Neill J, Tabish H, Welch V, Petticrew M, Pottie K, Clarke M, et al. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014; 67: 56–64.

[3] American Psyschological Association. APA dictionary of psychology: Socioeconomic Status. 2023. Available at: https://dictionary.apa.org/socioeconomic-status (Accessed: 08 August 2023).

[4] Lutfiyya MN, McCullough JE, Haller IV, Waring SC, Bianco JA, Lipsky MS. Rurality as a root or fundamental social determinant of health. Disease-a-Month. 2012; 58: 620–628.

[5] Verlinden DA, Reijneveld SA, Lanting CI, van Wouwe JP, Schuller AA. Socio-economic inequality in oral health in childhood to young adulthood, despite full dental coverage. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2019; 127: 248–253.

[6] Haag D, Schuch H, Ha D, Do L, Jamieson L. Oral health inequalities among indigenous and non-indigenous children. JDR Clinical & Translational Research. 2021; 6: 317–323.

[7] Tadakamadla SK, Tadakamadla J, Kroon J, Lalloo R, Johnson NW. Effect of family characteristics on periodontal diseases in children and adolescents—a systematic review. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2020; 18: 3–16.

[8] Funieru C, Klinger A, Băicuș C, Funieru E, Dumitriu HT, Dumitriu A. Epidemiology of gingivitis in schoolchildren in Bucharest, Romania: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2017; 52: 225–232.

[9] Oral Health Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia. National oral health survey for schoolchildren. 2017. Available at: https://hq.moh.gov.my/ohd/images/pdf/research/NHMS%202017%20NOHSS%202017%20Vol%20II%20Oral%20Health%20Status%20of%2012%20yr%20olds.pdf (Accessed: 07 February 2023).

[10] Laurence B, Farmer-Dixon CM, Southwell A, Marshall T, Shara N, Taylor G, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and caries prevalence in underserved black adolescents. Pediatric Dentistry. 2021; 43: 363–370.

[11] Institute for Public Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia. National health and morbidity survey. 2017. Available at: https://iku.moh.gov.my/images/IKU/Document/REPORT/NHMS2017/AHSReportNHMS2017.pdf (Accessed: 25 February 2023).

[12] Institute for Public Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia. Tobacco and e-cigarette survey among Malaysian adolescents. 2016. Available at: https://iku.moh.gov.my/images/IKU/Document/REPORT/TECMA2016/TabaccoandECigarette.pdf (Accessed: 21 February 2023).

[13] Duggal M. Providing all children with the quality dental care they deserve. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2014; 5: 3–5.

[14] Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Worthington HV, Walsh T, O’Malley L, Clarkson JE, Macey R, et al. Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015; 2015; CD010856.

[15] Jafarzadeh D, Rezapour R, Abbasi T, Sadegh Tabrizi J, Zeinolabedini M, et al. The effectiveness of fluoride varnish and fissure sealant in elementary school children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2022; 51: 266–277.

[16] Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M. Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016; 2016: CD003067.

[17] Faustino-Silva DD, Colvara BC, Meyer E, Hugo FN, Celeste RK, Hilgert JB. Motivational interviewing effects on caries prevention in children differ by income: a randomized cluster trial. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2019; 47: 477–484

[18] Wei C, Lo K, Lin Y, Hu C, Chen F, Huang H. Effects of health-promoting school strategy on dental plaque control and preventive behaviors in schoolchildren in high-caries, rural areas of Taiwan: a quasi-experimental design. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 573–583.

[19] World Health Organization (WHO). Social determinants of health. 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1 (Accessed: 15 March 2023).

[20] Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015; 372: 793–795.

[21] de Silva AM, Hegde S, Akudo Nwagbara B, Calache H, Gussy MG, Nasser M, et al. Community-based population-level interventions for promoting child oral health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016; 12: CD009837

[22] Bramantoro T, Santoso CMA, Hariyani N, Setyowati D, Zulfiana AA, Nor NAM, et al. Effectiveness of the school-based oral health promotion programmes from preschool to high school: a systematic review. PLOS ONE. 2021; 16: e0256007.

[23] Cooper AM, O'Malley LA, Elison SN, Armstrong R, Burnside G, Adair P, Dugdill L, Pine C. Primary school-based behavioural interventions for preventing caries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013, 5:CD009378.

[24] Skeie MS, Klock KS. Dental caries prevention strategies among children and adolescents with immigrant- or low socioeconomic backgrounds- do they work? A systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18: 20.

[25] Shen A, Bernabé E, Sabbah W. Systematic review of intervention studies aiming at reducing inequality in dental caries among children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18:1300.

[26] Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews. 2015; 4: 1.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top