Article Data

  • Views 362
  • Dowloads 174

Original Research

Open Access

Comparison of the physical properties of glass ionomer modified with silver phosphate/hydroxyapatite or titanium dioxide nanoparticles: in vitro study

  • Berenice Pérez-Castro1,†
  • Abigailt Flores-Ledesma1,†
  • Efraín Rubio-Rosas2
  • Bernardo Teutle-Coyotecatl1
  • Blanca Irma Flores-Ferreyra1,3
  • Liliana Argueta-Figueroa4
  • María de los Angeles Moyaho-Bernal1,*,

1Faculty of Stomatology, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla, 72410 Puebla, PUE, Mexico

2Innovation and Knowledge Transfer Directorate (DITCo), Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla, 72570 Puebla, PUE, Mexico

3School of Dentistry, Autonomous University of Mexico State, 50130 Toluca, MEX, Mexico

4CONAHCYT—National Technological Institute of Mexico/Toluca Technological Institute, 52149 Metepec, MEX, Mexico

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.089 Vol.48,Issue 4,July 2024 pp.160-167

Submitted: 01 November 2023 Accepted: 11 January 2024

Published: 03 July 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): María de los Angeles Moyaho-Bernal E-mail: angeles.moyaho@correo.buap.mx

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are the common materials employed in pediatric dentistry because of their specific applications in class I restorations and atraumatic restoration treatments (ART) of deciduous teeth in populations at high risk of caries. Studies show a limited clinical durability of these materials. Attempts have thus been made to incorporate nanoparticles (NPs) into the glass ionomer for improving resistance and make it like the tooth structure. An in vitro experimental study was conducted using the required samples dimensions and prepared based on the test being carried out on the three groups with or without the modification of light-cured glass ionomer. Samples were grouped as follows: control group (G1_C), 2% silver phosphate/hydroxyapatite NPs group (G2_SPH), and 2% titanium dioxide NPs group (G3_TiO2). The physical tests regarding flexural strength (n = 10 per group), solubility (n = 10 per group), and radiopacity (n = 3 per group) were performed. The data were analyzed by Shapiro Wilks test, and one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA), and multiple comparisons by post hoc Tukey’s test. The p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. No statistically significant difference was observed between the control group (G1_C) and (G2_SPH) (p = 0.704) in the flexural strength test, however differences were found between G2_SPH and G3_TiO2 groups, ANOVA (p = 0.006); post hoc Tukey’s test (p = 0.014). Pertaining to the solubility, G2_SPH obtained the lowest among the three groups, ANOVA (p = 0.010); post hoc Tukey’s test (p = 0.009). The three study groups obtained an adequate radiopacity of >1 mm Al, respectively. The resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) was further modified with 2% silver phosphate/hydroxyapatite NPs to improve the physical properties such as enhancing the solubility and sorption without compromising the flexural strength and radiopacity behavior of modified RMGIC. The incorporation of 2% titanium dioxide NPs did not improve the properties studied.


Keywords

Glass ionomer; Nanoparticles; Silver phosphate; Hydroxyapatite; Titanium dioxide; Physical properties


Cite and Share

Berenice Pérez-Castro,Abigailt Flores-Ledesma,Efraín Rubio-Rosas,Bernardo Teutle-Coyotecatl,Blanca Irma Flores-Ferreyra,Liliana Argueta-Figueroa,María de los Angeles Moyaho-Bernal. Comparison of the physical properties of glass ionomer modified with silver phosphate/hydroxyapatite or titanium dioxide nanoparticles: in vitro study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024. 48(4);160-167.

References

[1] Gobierno de México. Informes SIVEPAB 2019. 2020. Available at: https://www.gob.mx/salud/documentos/informes-sivepab-2019 (Accessed: 09 May 2023).

[2] Diario Oficial de la Federación. Official Mexican STANDARD NOM-013-SSA2-2015, for the prevention and control of oral diseases. Official Journal of the Federation. Available at: https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5462039&fecha=23/11/2016#gsc.tab=0 (Accessed: 05 June 2023).

[3] Asociación Latinoamericana de Odontopediatría. The reference manual for Clinical Procedures in Pediatric Dentistry. 2014. Available at: http://backup.revistaodontopediatria.org/publicaciones/manuales/referencia-para-procedimientos-en-odontopediatria/Manual-de-Referencia-para-Procedimientos-en-Odontopediatria.pdf (Accessed: 12 July 2023).

[4] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatric restorative dentistry. The reference manual of Pediatric Dentistry. 2022. Available at: https://www.aapd.org/globalassets/media/policies_guidelines/bp_restorativedent.pdf (Accessed: 03 June 2023).

[5] Sidhu SK. Glass-ionomers in dentistry. 1st edn. Springer: London, United Kingdom. 2016.

[6] Fierascu RC. Incorporation of nanomaterials in glass ionomer cements-recent developments and future perspectives: a narrative review. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12: 3827.

[7] Garcia-Contreras R, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Contreras-Bulnes R, Sakagami H, Morales-LuckiE RA, Nakajima H. Mechanical, antibacterial and bond strength properties of nano-titanium-enriched glass ionomer cement. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2015; 23: 321–328.

[8] Assery MKA, Alshubat A, Abushanan A, Labban N, Hashem M. Nanoparticles as void fillers in glass ionomer cement for enhanced physicomechanical properties. Materials Express. 2020; 10: 1960–1964.

[9] Kielbassa AM, Oehme EP, Shakavets N, Wolgin M. In vitro wear of (resin-coated) high-viscosity glass ionomer cements and glass hybrid restorative systems. Journal of Dentistry. 2021; 105: 103554.

[10] Kheur M, Kantharia N, Lakha T, Kheur S, Al-Haj Husain N, Özcan M. Evaluation of mechanical and adhesion properties of glass ionomer cement incorporating nano-sized hydroxyapatite particles. Odontology. 2020; 108: 66–73.

[11] Gjorgievska E, Nicholson JW, Gabrić D, Guclu ZA, Miletić I, Coleman NJ. Assessment of the impact of the addition of nanoparticles on the properties of glass-ionomer cements. Materials. 2020; 13: 276.

[12] Singer L, Bierbaum G, Kehl K and Bourauel C. Evaluation of the flexural strength, water sorption, and solubility of a glass ionomer dental cement modified using phytomedicine. Material. 2020; 13: 5352.

[13] Rodríguez-Lugo V, Karthik TVK, Mendoza-Anaya D, Rubio-Rosas E, Villaseñor Cerón LS, Reyes-Valderrama MI, et al. Wet chemical synthesis of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite flakes: effect of pH and sintering temperature on structural and morphological properties. Royal Society Open Science. 2018; 5: 180962.

[14] Morales-Valenzuela AA, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Lara-Carrillo E, Garcia-Contreras R, Hegazy-Hassan W, Toral-Rizo VH, et al. Enhancement of fluoride release in glass ionomer cements modified with titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Medicine. 2022; 101: e31434.

[15] Rameshbabu N, Sampath Kumar TS, Prabhakar TG, Sastry VS, Murty KVGK, Prasad Rao K. Antibacterial nanosized silver substituted hydroxyapatite: synthesis and characterization. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2007; 80: 581–591.

[16] Prime Dental Manufacturing. Light-cured universal restorative. 2020. Available at: https://www.primedentalmfg.com/cements/glass-ionomer-universal-restorative (Accessed: 14 June 2023).

[17] International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry—Water-Based Cements—Part 2: resin-modified cements. 2017. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/69901.html (Accessed: 22 June 2023).

[18] Dinakaran DS. Sorption and solubility characteristics of compomer, conventional and resin modified glass-ionomer immersed in various media. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2014; 13: 41–45.

[19] Vivan RR, Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Hungaro Duarte MA, et al. Evaluation of the radiopacity of some commercial and experimental root-end filling materials. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2009; 108: e35–e38.

[20] Jowkar Z, Jowkar M, Shafiei F. Mechanical and dentin bond strength properties of the nanosilver enriched glass ionomer cement. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2019; 11: e275–e281.

[22] Amirulsyafiee A, Khan MM, Harunsani MH. Ag3PO4 and Ag3PO4–based visible light active photocatalysts: Recent progress, synthesis, and photocatalytic applications. Catalysis Communications. 2022; 172: 106556.

[21] Mansoor A, Khan MT, Mehmood M, Khurshid Z, Ali MI, Jamal A. Synthesis and characterization of titanium oxide nanoparticles with a novel biogenic process of dental application. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12: 1078.

[22] Amirulsyafiee A, Khan MM, Harunsani MH. Ag3PO4 and Ag3PO4–based visible light active photocatalysts: Recent progress, synthesis, and photocatalytic applications. Catalysis Communications. 2022; 172: 106556.

[23] Saghiri MA, Vakhnovetsky J, Vakhnovetsky A. Functional role of inorganic trace elements in dentin apatite—Part II: copper, manganese, silicon, and lithium. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. 2022; 72: 126995.

[24] Murugan R, Yazid F, Nasruddin NS, Anuar NNM. Effects of nanohydroxyapatite incorporation into glass ionomer cement (GIC). Minerals. 2021; 12: 9.

[25] Murugan L, Kim S, Rajesh A, Arunachalam K, Davoodbasha M, Kim J, et al. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite/silver nanoparticles composites and their antibacterial properties for dental filling application. BioNanoScience. 2023; 13: 2215–2224.

[26] Elbasuney S, El‑Sayyad GS, Radwan SM, Correa‑Duarte MA. Antimicrobial, and antibioflm activities of silver doped hydroxyapatite: a novel bioceramic material for dental filling. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials. 2022; 32: 4559–4575.

[27] Elsaka SE, Hamouda IM, Swain MV. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and antibacterial properties. Journal of Dentistry. 2011; 39: 589–598.

[28] Baskar H, Hari A, Anirudhan S. Comparative evaluation of flexural strength, modulus of elasticity, and microleakage of three different glass ionomer restorative materials in Class V preparations—an in vitro study. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2023; 15: 67.

[29] Ahmed H. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 14th edn. Mosby Inc: St. Louis, Missouri, United States. 2019.

[30] Chun K, Choi H, Lee J. Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. Journal of Dental Biomechanics. 2014; 5: 1758736014520809.

[31] Porter GC, Tompkins GR, Schwass DR, Li KC, Waddell JN, Meledandri CJ. Anti-biofilm activity of silver nanoparticle-containing glass ionomer cements. Dental Materials. 2020; 36: 1096–1107.

[32] Paluch E, Seniuk A, Plesh G, Widelski J, Szymanski D, Wiglusz RJ, et al. Mechanism of action and efficiency of Ag3PO4-based photocatalysts for the control of hazardous gram-positive pathogens. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 13553.

[33] Roberts H, Berzins D and Nicholson J. Long-term water balance evaluation in glass ionomer restorative materials. Materials. 2022; 15: 807.

[34] International Standards Organization. ISO 4049: 2009 Dentistry. Polymer-based restorative materials. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/42898.html (Accessed: 22 June 2023).

[35] Genaro LE, Anovazzi G, Hebling J, Zuanon ACC. Glass ionomer cement modified by resin with incorporation of nanohydroxyapatite: in vitro evaluation of physical-biological properties. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10: 1412.

[36] Yaylacı A, Karaarslan ES, Hatırlı H. Evaluation of the radiopacity of restorative materials with different structures and thicknesses using a digital radiography system. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2021; 51: 261.

[37] Hidayati L, Supriyadi S, Annisa DA, Sulistiyani S, Nugroho R, Sukotjo C. The radiopacity of glass ionomer cement after addition of nHA powder: experimental study. Journal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran. 2023; 32: 105–111.

[38] Ma Y, Guo YZ, Liu Y, Wang YR, Yang JC, Kong XZ, Jia HL, et al. Mechanical and antibacterial properties of h-BN-TiO2 nanocomposite-modified glass ionomer cement. Frontiers in Materials. 2022; 9: 883027.

[39] Abed FM, Kotha SB, AlShukairi H, Almotawah FN, Alabdulaly RA, Mallineni SK. Effect of different concentrations of silver nanoparticles on the quality of the chemical bond of glass ionomer cement dentine in primary teeth. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2022; 10: 816652.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top