Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Comparison of orthodontic adverse effects: braces versus clear aligners
1Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Health Sciences, Bezmialem Vakif University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey
2Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey
3Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey
DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2025.007 Vol.49,Issue 1,January 2025 pp.74-86
Submitted: 19 October 2023 Accepted: 11 January 2024
Published: 03 January 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Elif Dilara Seker E-mail: elseker@bezmialem.edu.tr
Background: The aim of the study is to compare the potential side effects of fixed orthodontic treatment (FOT) and clear aligner therapy (CAT). Methods: 27 individuals who were treated with clear aligners (20 Female, 7 Male; mean age: 22.57 ± 7.37) and 22 patients treated with braces (14 Female, 8 Male; mean age: 17.05 ± 4.51) formed the study group. The periodontal statuses of the patients were evaluated before treatment (T0), 3 months (T1) after, and at 6th month (T2) following the beginning of the treatment. The amount of root resorption in maxillary & mandibular incisors was evaluated using the ImageJ software on periapical radiographies taken with the paralleling technique. Pain experience and chewing function were also recorded during treatment. Results: The root lengths showed a significant decrease from T0 to T2 in both groups. Compared to CAT, greater amount of root resorption was noted with FOT (p < 0.05). The highest degrees of pain and the highest chewing difficulty scores were recorded at the 24th hour for both groups. The pain scores after the 2nd week in CAT were similar to those before the orthodontic treatment, while this amelioration occurred after the 1st month in FOT. Chewing function improved after the 2nd week in CAT and after the 1stweek in FOT. Periodontal status evaluation showed that there was no significant difference in probing depth between the groups for the maxillary teeth. However, higher probing depth values were observed for all mandibular teeth in FOT. The change in the plaque index and the levels of bleeding were higher for FOT at all time points. Conclusions: CAT has some advantages in terms of protecting periodontal health and controlling root resorption during orthodontic treatment. In terms of the patients’ treatment experience, while the pain levels felt by the patients in the CAT group decreased faster, chewing performance improved more rapidly in the FOT group. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT06709287.
Clear aligners; Fixed orthodontic treatment; Adverse effects; Root resorption; Periodontal status
Ibrahim Emir Mertoglu,Demet Sahin,Elif Dilara Seker. Comparison of orthodontic adverse effects: braces versus clear aligners. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025. 49(1);74-86.
[1] Papageorgiou SN, Tilen R, Vandevska-Radunovic V, Eliades T. Occlusal outcome after orthodontic treatment with preadjusted straight-wire and standard edgewise appliances. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics. 2021; 82: 321–328.
[2] Pereira D, Machado V, Botelho J, Proença L. Comparison of pain perception between clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10: 4276.
[3] Yassir YA, Nabbat SA, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR. Clinical effectiveness of clear aligner treatment compared to fixed appliance treatment: an overview of systematic reviews. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2022; 26: 2353–2370.
[4] Fowler B. A comparison of root resorption between invisalign treatment and contemporary orthodontic treatment [master’s thesis]. University of Southern California. 2010.
[5] Yi J, Xiao J, Li Y, Li X, Zhao Z. External apical root resorption in non-extraction cases after clear aligner therapy or fixed orthodontic treatment. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2018; 13: 48–53.
[6] Al-Zainal MH, Anvery S, Al-Jewair T. Clear aligner therapy may not prevent but may decrease the incidence of external root resorption compared to full fixed appliances. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice. 2020; 20: 101438.
[7] Hu L, Mulla Issa FK, Mulla Issa ZK, Rabah A. Periodontal parameters in adult patients with clear aligners orthodontics treatment versus three other types of brackets: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Orthodontic Science. 2020; 9: 4.
[8] Jiang Q, Li J, Mei L, Du J, Levrini L, Abbate GM, et al. Periodontal health during orthodontic treatment with clear aligners and fixed appliances. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2018; 149: 712–720.e12.
[9] Pango Madariaga AC, Bucci R, Rongo R, Simeon V, D’anto V, Valletta R, et al. Impact of fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners on the periodontal health: a prospective clinical study. Dentistry Journal. 2020; 8: 4.
[10] Lago GV, Fernandes TMF, Oltramari NPVP, Almeida MR, Miranda LV, Conti ACDCF, et al. Reliability of CBCT and periapical radiography methods to evaluate external apical root resorption during early phase of orthodontic treatment. Journal of Health Sciences. 2018; 20: 2–7.
[11] Mumghamba EGS, Pitiphat W, Matee MIN, Simon E, Merchant AT. The usefulness of using Ramfjord teeth in predicting periodontal status of a Tanzanian adult population. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2004; 31: 16–18.
[12] Barnett ML, Ciancio SG, Mather ML. The modified papillary bleeding index-comparison with gingival index during the resolution of gingivitis. Journal of Preventive Dentistry. 1980; 6: 135–138.
[13] Fischman SL. Current status of indices of plaque. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1986; 13: 371–374.
[14] Velez JC, Friedman LE, Barbosa C, Castillo J, Juvinao QDL, Williams MA, Gelaye B, et al. Evaluating the performance of the pain interference index and the short form McGill pain questionnaire among Chilean injured working adults. PLOS ONE. 2022; 17: e0268672.
[15] Stamm T, Hohoff A, Ehmer U. A subjective comparison of two lingual bracket systems. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2005; 27: 420–426.
[16] Xie L, Ma Y, Sun X, Yu Z. The effect of orthodontic pain on dental anxiety: a review. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 47: 32–36.
[17] Gupta A, Devi P, Srivastava R, Jyoti B. Intra oral periapical radiography-basics yet intrigue: a review. Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research & Education. 2014; 4: 83–87.
[18] Bornstein MM, Lauber R, Sendi P, von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam computed tomography in mandibular molars for analysis of anatomical landmarks before apical surgery. Journal of Endodontics. 2011; 37: 151–157.
[19] Taravati S, Balak Z, Rakhshan V. Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography in detection and measurement of the external root resorption in primary molars: a single-blind prospective clinical study. International Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 2022: 1–10.
[20] Parrales-Bravo C, Friedrichsdorf SP, Costa C, Paiva JB, Iglesias-Linares A. Does endodontics influence radiological detection of external root resorption? An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23: 221.
[21] Zamani H, Falahati F, Omidi R, Abedi-Firouzjah R, Zare M, Momeni F, et al. Estimating and comparing the radiation cancer risk from cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in pediatric and adult patients. International Journal of Radiation Research. 2020; 18: 885–893.
[22] Albin A, Goren A, Faber R, Anderson N, Dauer L, Quinn B, et al. Dosimetry comparison of CBCT versus digital 2D orthodontic imaging in a pediatric orthodontic patient [master’s thesis]. State University of New York at Stony Brook. 2021.
[23] Genji L, Varghese RM, Subramaniyan AK. Comparison of duration of leveling and aligning in different types of crowding in lower anteriors. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. 2022; 13: 1255–1262.
[24] Remley ML. Force analysis of aligner materials in lingual bodily movement of a central incisor over time [master’s thesis]. Saint Louis University. 2022.
[25] Sawicka M, Bedini R, Wierzbicki PM, Pameijer CH. Interrupted orthodontic force results in less root resorption than continuous force in human premolars as measured by microcomputed tomography. Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica. 2014; 52: 289–296.
[26] Kalia S, Reginald M, Birte M. Clear aligners and their role in orthodontics. Adult Orthodontics. 2022; 31: 379–391.
[27] Li Y, Deng S, Mei L, Li Z, Zhang X, Yang C, et al. Prevalence and severity of apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment with clear aligners and fixed appliances: a cone beam computed tomography study. Progress in Orthodontics. 2020; 21: 1.
[28] Diddige R, Negi G, Kiran KVS, Chitra P. Comparison of pain levels in patients treated with 3 different orthodontic appliances—a randomized trial. Medicine and Pharmacy Reports. 2020; 93: 81.
[29] Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2008; 134: 470.e1–470.e8.
[30] Batham P, Batham A, Kalia U, Nagar A, Jain S. Pathways of pain to pleasure in orthodontics: a review. Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research. 2017; 3: 124–128.
[31] Cardoso PC, Espinosa DG, Mecenas P, Flores-Mir C, Normando D. Pain level between clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review. Progress in Orthodontics. 2020; 21: 3.
[32] Almasoud NN. Pain perception among patients treated with passive self-ligating fixed appliances and Invisalign® aligners during the first week of orthodontic treatment. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2018; 48: 326–332.
[33] Gao M, Yan X, Zhao R, Shan Y, Chen Y, Jian F, et al. Comparison of pain perception, anxiety, and impacts on oral health-related quality of life between patients receiving clear aligners and fixed appliances during the initial stage of orthodontic treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2021; 43: 353–359.
[34] Gameiro GH, Schultz C, Trein MP, Mundstock KS, Weidlich P, Goularte JF. Association among pain, masticatory performance, and proinflammatory cytokines in crevicular fluid during orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2015; 148: 967–973.
[35] Khamnuengsitthi N, Pipatphatsakorn M, Tansalarak R. Occlusal factors influencing non-carious cervical lesions in post-orthodontic patients: evaluation using T-Scan® III. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2023; 16: 193–198.
[36] Sadry S, Giray B. Evaluation of occlusion parameters using T-scan III in patients receiving fixed orthodontic treatment. APOS Trends in Orthodontics. 2023; 13: 91–99.
[37] Kim BI, Jeong SH, Chung KH, Cho YK, Kwon HK, Choi CH. Subjective food intake ability in relation to maximal bite force among Korean adults. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2009; 36: 168–175.
[38] Lou T, Tran J, Castroflorio T, Tassi A, Cioffi I. Evaluation of masticatory muscle response to clear aligner therapy using ambulatory electromyographic recording. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2021; 159: e25–e33.
[39] Duarte L, Bezerra AP, Flores-Mir C, De Luca Canto G, Pereira LJ, Vega Gonçalves TMS. Activation and installation of orthodontic appliances temporarily impairs mastication. The Angle Orthodontist. 2022; 92: 275–286.
[40] Ngan P, Kess B, Wilson S. Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1989; 96: 47–53.
[41] Alajmi S, Shaban A, Al-Azemi R. Comparison of short-term oral impacts experienced by patients treated with invisalign or conventional fixed orthodontic appliances. Medical Principles and Practice. 2020; 29: 382–388.
[42] Boyd RL, Oh H, Fallah M, Vlaskalic V. An update on present and future considerations of aligners. Journal of the California Dental Association. 2006; 34: 793–805.
[43] Shi J, Zhou N, He B, Hong X, Guo W, Jiang L, Li H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of severe periodontitis for Ramfjord teeth based on different classifications. To be published in Oral Diseases. 2023. [Preprint].
[44] Marsh PD, Moter A, Devine DA. Dental plaque biofilms: communities, conflict and control. Periodontology 2000. 2011; 55: 16–35.
[45] Lu H, Tang H, Zhou T, Kang N. Assessment of the periodontal health status in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and Invisalign system. Medicine. 2018; 97: e0248.
[46] Zhao R, Huang R, Long H, Li Y, Gao M, Lai W. The dynamics of the oral microbiome and oral health among patients receiving clear aligner orthodontic treatment. Oral Diseases. 2020; 26: 473–483.
[47] Sharma R, Drummond R, Wiltshire W, Schroth R, Lekic M, Bertone M, et al. Quality of life in an adolescent orthodontic population. The Angle Orthodontist. 2021; 91: 718–724.
[48] Ren Y, Jongsma MA, Mei L, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and biofilm formation—a potential public health threat? Clinical Oral Investigations. 2014; 18: 1711–1718.
[49] Cantekin K, Celikoglu M, Karadas M, Yildirim H, Erdem A. Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances on oral health status: a comprehensive study. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2011; 6: 235–238.
[50] Lanteri V, Poggi S, Blasi S, De Angelis D, Gangale S, Farronato M, et al. Periodontal aspects of orthodontic treatment with Invisalign® versus fixed appliances in the same patients: a pilot study. International Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2020; 13: 419–447.
[51] Karkhanechi M, Chow D, Sipkin J, Sherman D, Boylan RJ, Norman RG, et al. Periodontal status of adult patients treated with fixed buccal appliances and removable aligners over one year of active orthodontic therapy. The Angle Orthodontist. 2013; 83: 146–151.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top