Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Evaluation of periodontal health in healthy primary molars in comparison with molars restored with stainless steel crowns
1Department of Odontostomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Dentistry), University of Barcelona, 08970 Barcelona, Spain
2Unit of Microbiology Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, 08907 L’Hospitalet, Spain
3Unit of Biostatistics, Department of Basic Clinical Practice, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2025.057 Vol.49,Issue 3,May 2025 pp.115-118
Submitted: 24 July 2024 Accepted: 22 October 2024
Published: 03 May 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Andrea Rubio E-mail: andrearubio@ub.edu
Background: Children with large carious lesions are best treated with stainless-steel crowns (SSC). However, few studies have evaluated periodontal health after SSC restorations. Methods: A total of 33 children between the ages of 4 and 10 with primary molars restored with SSC were included in the study. SSC-restored molars and healthy primary teeth were evaluated for gingival status. Gingival and periodontal parameters evaluated included plaque index, plaque accumulation, gingival index, probing depth, and bleeding on probing. Results: Gingival inflammation scores were significantly higher in SSCs than in healthy teeth. Plaque accumulation, gingival index, probing values, and bleeding were significantly higher in SSC-treated molars than in healthy teeth. Conclusions: Molars restored with SSCs had higher gingival inflammation scores and deteriorated gingival health than healthy molars.
Stainless steel crowns; Primary molars; Gingival health
Andrea Rubio,Juan R. Boj,Tanya Pereira,Gonzalo Peón,Teresa Vinuesa. Evaluation of periodontal health in healthy primary molars in comparison with molars restored with stainless steel crowns. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025. 49(3);115-118.
[1] Innes NP, Ricketts D, Chong LY, Keightley AJ, Lamont T, Santamaria RM. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015; 2015: CD005512.
[2] Seale NS, Randall R. The use of stainless steel crowns: a systematic literature review. Pediatric Dentistry. 2015; 37: 145–160.
[3] World Health Organization. The World Oral Health Report 2022. 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240061484 (Accessed: 23 February 2022).
[4] Heidari A, Shahrabi M, Hosseini Z, Sari NM. Periodontal assessment of permanent molar teeth restored with stainless steel crown in terms of pocket depth, bleeding on probing, gingival color and inflammation. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2019; 12: 116–119.
[5] Checchio LM, Gaskill WF, Carrel R. The relationship between periodontal disease and stainless steel crowns. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1983; 50: 205–209.
[6] Mathew MG, Samuel SR, Soni AJ, Roopa KB. Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2020; 24: 3275–3280.
[7] Taran PK, Kaya MS. A comparison of periodontal health in primary molars restored with prefabricated stainless steel and zirconia crowns. Pediatric Dentistry. 2018; 40: 334–339.
[8] Pei S, Chen M. Comparison of periodontal health of primary teeth restored with zirconia and stainless steel crowns: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2023; 122: 148–156.
[9] Beldüz Kara N, Yilmaz Y. Assessment of oral hygiene and periodontal health around posterior primary molars after their restoration with various crown types. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2014; 24: 303–313.
[10] Prabhu S, Krishnamoorthy S, Sathyaprasad S, Chandra H, Divyia J, Mohan A. Gingival, oral hygiene and periodontal status of the teeth restored with stainless steel crown: a prospective study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2018; 36: 273–278.
[11] Shieh G, Jan S, Randles RH. Power and sample size determinations for the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 2007; 77: 717–724.
[12] Subirana I, Sanz H, Vila J. Building bivariate tables: the compareGroups package for R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2014; 57: 1–16.
[13] Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, de Oliveira LJC, Conde MCM, Demarco FF, et al. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2018; 28: 123–139.
[14] Sharaf AA, Farsi NM. A clinical and radiographic evaluation of stainless steel crowns for primary molars. Journal of Dentistry. 2014; 32: 27–33.
[15] Durr DP, Ashrafi MH, Duncan WK. A study of plaque accumulation and gingival health surrounding stainless steel crowns. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1982; 49: 343–346.
[16] Bin AlShaibah W, El-Shehaby F, El-Dokky N, Reda A. Comparative study on the microbial adhesion to preveneered and stainless steel crowns. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2012; 30: 206–211.
[17] Aggarwal P, Goyel V, Mathur S, Sachdev V. Effect of stainless-steel crown and preformed zirconia crown on the periodontal health of endodontically treated primary molars correlating with IL-1β: an in vivo study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2022; 46: 199–203.
[18] Fathima A, Jeevanandan G. Comparative evaluation of gingival health among children with stainless steel crowns and stainless steel bands: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Cureus. 2024; 16: e60473.
[19] Hamza B, Eliades T, Attin T, Schwendener S, Karygianni L. Initial bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on novel restorative materials used in paediatric dentistry. Dental Materials. 2024; 40: 573–579.
[20] Schmidt JC, Sahrmann P, Weiger R, Schmidlin PR, Walter C. Biologic width dimensions—a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2013; 40: 493–504.
[21] Schätzle M, Lang NP, Ånerud Å, Boysen H, Bürgin W, Löe H. The influence of margins of restorations on the periodontal tissues over 26 years. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2001; 28: 57–64.
[22] Paniz G, Nart J, Gobbato L, Chierico A, Lops D, Michalakis K. Periodontal response to two different subgingival restorative margin designs: a 12-month randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2016; 20: 1243–1252.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top