Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
New regression equation for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a Turkish sample
1Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, 06010 Ankara, Turkey
DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2025.063 Vol.49,Issue 3,May 2025 pp.165-172
Submitted: 22 November 2024 Accepted: 03 January 2025
Published: 03 May 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Ozge Uslu-Akcam E-mail: ozgeusluakcam@aybu.edu.tr
Background: One of the methods used for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars is regression equaiton. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the reliability of regression equations developed for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars and to develop a new regression equation. Methods: Mesiodistal diameters of all permanent teeth except second molars were measured on orthodontic plaster models of 265 patients (133 females, mean age 15.09 years; 132 males, mean age 15.25 years). Actual values measured with digital caliper on orthodontic plaster models were compared with the predicted values of 3 regression equations developed for the Turkish population. For data analysis, Linear Regression Analysis was used to make measurement predictions. Intraclass correlation was used to evaluate intraobserver reliability. Based on the parameters of this study, a new regression equation was developed. Results: Three regression equations developed previously for the Turkish population underestimated the mesiodistal dimension of permanent canines and premolars. Mesiodistal diameters of teeth were significantly different between genders in both the maxillary and mandibular arches. A new regression equation was developed using the data of this study. Conclusions: Based on our population, the new regression equation would provide the closest prediction value for the sum of the mesiodistal widths of unerupted permanent canines and premolars. Therefore, it enables more realistic orthodontic treatment planning to be conducted.
Regression equation; Mixed dentition; Tooth size
Rumeysa Yıldız,Ozge Uslu-Akcam. New regression equation for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a Turkish sample. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025. 49(3);165-172.
[1] Bishara SE, Staley RN. Mixed-dentition mandibular arch length analysis: a step-by-step approach using the revised Hixon-Oldfather prediction method. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1984; 86: 130–135.
[2] Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 6th edn. Elsevier, Inc: Philadelphia. 2019.
[3] Abaid S, Zafar S, Kruger E, Tennant M. Size estimation of unerupted canines and premolars using various independent variables: a systematic review. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics. 2023; 84: 164–177.
[4] Scott GR. Dental anthropology. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. 2018; 45: 1–8.
[5] Dempsey PJ, Townsend GC, Martin NG, Neale MC. Genetic covariance structure of incisor crown size in twins. Journal of Dental Research. 1995; 74: 1389–1398.
[6] Al-Bitar ZB, Al-Omari IK, Sonbol HN, Al-Ahmad HT, Hamdan AM. Mixed dentition analysis in a Jordanian population. The Angle Orthodontist. 2008; 78: 670–675.
[7] Howe RP, McNamara JA, O’Connor KA. An examination of dental crowding and its relationship to tooth size and arch dimension. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1983; 83: 363–373.
[8] Jensen E, Kai-Jen Yen P, Moorrees CF, Thomsen SO. Mesiodistal crown diameters of the deciduous and permanent teeth in individuals. Journal of Dental Research. 1957; 36: 39–47.
[9] Steigman S, Harari D, Kuraita-Landman S. Relationship between mesiodistal crown diameter of posterior deciduous and succedaneous teeth in israeli children. European Journal of Orthodontics. 1982; 4: 219–227.
[10] Alkan Ö, Kaya Y, Bor S, Kayasan S, Kazanci F, Keskin S. Assessment the reliability of different mixed dentition analysis methods to estimate the width of unerupted canines and premolars. European Annals of Dental Sciences. 2016; 43: 69–76.
[11] Uysal T, Basciftci FA, Goyenc Y. New regression equations for mixed-dentition arch analysis in a Turkish sample with no Bolton tooth-size discrepancy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2009; 135: 343–348.
[12] Alessandri Bonetti G, Verganti S, Zanarini M, Bonetti S, Gatto MR. Mixed dentition space analysis for a northern Italian population: new regression equations for unerupted teeth. Progress in Orthodontics. 2011; 12: 94–99.
[13] Arici Y, Türk Y. Prediction of the unerupted canine and premolar teeth widths in a midlle black sea population. Current Research in Dental Sciences. 1999; 9: 38–41.
[14] Güner D, Ülgen M. Adaptations of the moyers tables for turkish children (determination of the mesio-distal widths of the canines and the premolars). Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2000; 13: 102–107.
[15] Arslan SG, Dildeş N, Kama JD, Genç C. Mixed-dentition analysis in a Turkish population. World Journal of Orthodontics. 2009; 10: 135–140.
[16] Sağlam-Aydinatay B, Akarsu-Güven B, Karakaya J, Yazdani H, Aksu M. Development of new regression equations for determining mesiodistal crown diameters of unerupted canines and premolars. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2014; 38: 12–21.
[17] Al-Khadra BH. Prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a Saudi Arab population. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1993; 104: 369–372.
[18] Bernabé E, Flores-Mir C. Are the lower incisors the best predictors for the unerupted canine and premolars sums? An analysis of a Peruvian sample. The Angle Orthodontist. 2005; 75: 202–207.
[19] Lee-Chan S, Jacobson BN, Chwa KH, Jacobson RS. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian-Americans. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1998; 113: 293–299.
[20] Yuen KK, Tang EL, So LL. Mixed dentition analysis for Hong Kong Chinese. The Angle Orthodontist. 1998; 68: 21–28.
[21] Nourallah AW, Gesch D, Khordaji MN, Splieth C. New regression equations for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary population. The Angle Orthodontist. 2002; 72: 216–221.
[22] Rehan SA, Imtiaz R, Mustafa S, Saleh A. Application of Moyer’s mixed dentition analysis and establishing probability tables in a sample of Pakistani population. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 9: 1312–1316.
[23] Diagne F, Diop-Ba K, Ngom PI, Mbow K. Mixed dentition analysis in a Senegalese population: elaboration of prediction tables. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2003; 124: 178–183.
[24] Giri J, Pokharel PR, Gyawali R, Timsina J, Pokhrel K. New regression equations for mixed dentition space analysis in Nepalese mongoloids. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18: 214.
[25] Al-Khannaq MRA, Nahidh M, Al-Dulaimy DA. The importance of the maxillary and mandibular incisors in predicting the canines and premolars crown widths. International Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 18: 1551413.
[26] Hunter WS, Priest WR. Errors and discrepancies in measurement of tooth size. Journal of Dental Research. 1960; 39: 405–414.
[27] Oakley C, Brunette DM. The use of diagnostic data in clinical dental practice. Dental clinics of North America. 2002; 46: 87–115.
[28] Frankel HH, Benz EM. Mixed dentition analysis for black Americans. Pediatric Dentistry. 1986; 8: 226–230.
[29] Ghose LJ, Baghdady VS. Analysis of the Iraqi dentition: mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth. Journal of Dental Research. 1979; 58: 1047–1054.
[30] Harris EF, Bailit HL. A principal components analysis of human odontometrics. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1988; 75: 87–99.
[31] Kommineni NK, Reddy CV, Chandra NS, Reddy DS, Kumar AK, Reddy MV. Mixed dentition analysis—applicability of two non-radiographic methods for Chennai school children. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 2014; 4: 133–138.
[32] Otuyemi OD, Noar JH. A comparison of crown size dimensions of the permanent teeth in a Nigerian and a British population. European Journal of Orthodontics. 1996; 18: 623–628.
[33] Ramesh N, Reddy MS, Palukunnu B, Shetty B, Puthalath U. Mixed dentition space analysis in Kodava population: a comparison of two methods. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014; 8: ZC01–ZC6.
[34] Ravinthar K, Gurunathan D. Applicability of different mixed dentition analyses among children aged 11–13 years in Chennai population. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2020; 13: 163–166.
[35] Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA. Orthodontic probability tables for black patients of African descent: mixed dentition analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1997; 112: 545–551.
[36] Thimmegowda U, Sarvesh SG, Shashikumar HC, Kanchiswamy LN, Shivananda DH, Prabhakar AC. Validity of Moyers mixed dentition analysis and a new proposed regression equation as a predictor of width of unerupted canine and premolars in children. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015; 9: ZC01–ZC6.
[37] Kieser JA, Groeneveld HT, McKee J, Cameron N. Measurement error in human dental mensuration. Annals of Human Biology. 1990; 17: 523–528.
[38] Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Abdallah EM, Fernandez Garcia A. Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the United States. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1989; 96: 416–422.
[39] Melgaço CA, Araújo MT, Ruellas AC. Applicability of three tooth size prediction methods for white Brazilians. The Angle Orthodontist. 2006; 76: 644–649.
[40] de Paula S, Almeida MA, Lee PC. Prediction of mesiodistal diameter of unerupted lower canines and premolars using 45 degrees cephalometric radiography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1995; 107: 309–314.
[41] Tanaka MM, Johnston LE. The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1974; 88: 798–801.
[42] Kanaparthi S, Done V, Madu GSP, Sahana S, Bandela V, Prasanth NJ. Pertinence of five different regression equations of mixed dentition analysis in West Godavari District children: a comparative study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024; 17: 871–876.
[43] Ghasemi T, Sabbaghzadeh M, Mollaei M, Mirzaei M. Comparison of the different methods of width estimation in unerupted canine and premolars. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 475.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top