Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Antimicrobial activity of different irrigation solutions on Enterococcus faecalis in the root canal of the primary teeth—an in vitro comparative study
1Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2025.085 Vol.49,Issue 4,July 2025 pp.148-153
Submitted: 09 August 2024 Accepted: 28 October 2024
Published: 03 July 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Fatih Sengul E-mail: fsengul@atauni.edu.tr
Background: Enterococcus faecalis is a key pathogen in persistent endodontic infections, particularly in primary teeth with complex root canal anatomy. This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of five irrigation solutions against E. faecalis. Methods: Seventy-five extracted primary teeth were prepared and inoculated with E. faecalis (3 × 109 CFU/mL) then divided into five groups (n = 15): 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 9% etidronic acid, 17% glycolic acid, and 0.9% physiological saline (NaCl). Root canals were irrigated, and bacterial samples were collected at 30 minutes, 24 hours, and 72 hours. Bacterial counts were analyzed using ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results: NaOCl, etidronic acid, and glycolic acid significantly reduced E. faecalis counts within 30 minutes. EDTA showed no immediate effect but inhibited bacterial growth by 24 hours. NaCl caused a gradual reduction in bacterial load over time (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Etidronic and glycolic acids were effective alternatives to NaOCl in disinfecting primary tooth root canals. These agents may offer biocompatible options in pediatric endodontics, but further in vivo studies are warranted.
Enterococcus faecalis; Etidronic acid; Glycolic acid; Root canal irrigation; Sodium hypochlorite
Peris Celikel,Banu Ceyhan,Murat Buyuksefil,Anna Levchenko,Fatih Sengul,Sera Simsek Derelioglu,Mehmet Cemal Adiguzel. Antimicrobial activity of different irrigation solutions on Enterococcus faecalis in the root canal of the primary teeth—an in vitro comparative study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025. 49(4);148-153.
[1] Ozkan HB, Cobankara FK, Sayin Z, Ozer F. Evaluation of the antibacterial effects of single and combined use of different irrigation solutions against intracanal enterococcus faecalis. Acta stomatologica Croatica. 2020; 54: 250–262..
[2] Delgado RJ, Gasparoto TH, Sipert CR, Pinheiro CR, Moraes IG, Garcia RB, et al. Antimicrobial effects of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis. Journal of Endodontics. 2010; 36: 1389–1393.
[3] Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. Journal of Endodontics. 2006; 32: 93–98.
[4] Ahmed HMA. Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. International Endodontic Journal. 2013; 46: 1011–1022.
[5] Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endodontic Topics. 2005; 10: 77–102.
[6] Pozos-Guillen A, Garcia-Flores A, Esparza-Villalpando V, Garrocho-Rangel A. Intracanal irrigants for pulpectomy in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2016; 26: 412–425.
[7] Ozlek E, Acikgoz E, Gökkaya NZ, Taşan A, Altındağ F. Histological evaluation of the debris removal efficiency of activation of sodium hypochlorite solution at different concentrations. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23: 528.
[8] Tulsani SG, Chikkanarasaiah N, Bethur S. An in vivo comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and Biopure MTAD™ against Enterococcus faecalis in primary teeth: a qPCR study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2014; 39: 30–34.
[9] Hülsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. International Endodontic Journal. 2003; 36: 810–830.
[10] Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N. Root canal irrigants. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2010; 13: 256–264
[11] Kataoka M, Sasaki M, Hidalgo AR, Nakano M, Shimizu S. Glycolic acid production using ethylene glycol-oxidizing microorganisms. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 2001; 65: 2265–2270.
[12] Thibault PK, Wlodarczyk J, Wenck A. A double-blind randomized clinical trial on the effectiveness of a daily glycolic acid 5% formulation in the treatment of photoaging. Dermatologic Surgery. 1998; 24: 573–578.
[13] Cecchin D, Farina AP, Vidal C, Bedran-Russo AK. A novel enamel and dentin etching protocol using α-hydroxy glycolic acid: surface property, etching pattern, and bond strength studies. Operative Dentistry. 2018; 43: 101–110.
[14] Hua X, Cao R, Zhou X, Xu Y. One-step continuous/semi-continuous whole-cell catalysis production of glycolic acid by a combining bioprocess with in-situ cell recycling and electrodialysis. Bioresource Technology. 2019; 273: 515–520.
[15] Bello YD, Porsch HF, Farina AP, Souza MA, Silva EJNL, Bedran-Russo AK, et al. Glycolic acid as the final irrigant in endodontics: mechanical and cytotoxic effects. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2019; 100: 323–329.
[16] Rapala H, Kallakuri M, Kumar GL. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of etidronic acid and propolis against E. faecalis in primary teeth: an in vivo study. Journal of South Asian Association of Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 6: 51–55.
[17] Qamar S, Jayanna R, Ahuja VR. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine, and triple antibiotic paste in different combination forms as intracanal medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis in primary teeth: an in vivo randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 16: 448–452.
[18] Gupta A, Chaudhary G, Sharma VK, Mishra A, Shalini, Seal B. Assessment of antimicrobial efficacy of aqueous ozone, green tea, and normal saline as irrigants in pulpectomy procedures of primary teeth. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2023; 11: 61–63.
[19] Agarwal S, Tyagi P, Deshpande A, Yadav S, Jain V, Rana KS. Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of aqueous ozone, green tea, and normal saline as irrigants in pulpectomy procedures of primary teeth. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2020; 38: 164–170.
[20] Shingare P, Chaugule V. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of miswak, propolis, sodium hypochlorite and saline as root canal irrigants by microbial culturing and quantification in chronically exposed primary teeth. Germs. 2011; 1: 12–21.
[21] Leelapornpisid W, Wanwatanakul P, Mahatnirunkul T. Efficacy of calcium hydroxide-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) biodegradable nanoparticles as an intracanal medicament against endodontopathogenic microorganisms in a multi-species biofilm model. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2024; 50: 89–96.
[22] Attiguppe PR, Tewani KK, Naik SV, Yavagal CM, Nadig B. Comparative evaluation of different modes of laser assisted endodontics in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017; 11: ZC124–ZC127.
[23] Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. Journal of Endodontics. 2006; 32: 389–398.
[24] Oter B, Topçuog Lu N, Tank MK, Çehreli SB. Evaluation of antibacterial efficiency of different root canal disinfection techniques in primary teeth. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 2018; 36: 179–184.
[25] Celikezen FC, Sahin İ.H. Investigation of antimicrobial and antifungal effects of some boron compounds. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science. 2023; 12: 591–595.
[26] Goulart DB, Beyi AF, Wu Z, Adiguzel MC, Schroeder A, Singh K, et al. Effect of danofloxacin treatment on the development of fluoroquinolone resistance in campylobacter jejuni in calves. Antibiotics. 2022; 11: 531.
[27] Karale R, Odedra KM, Srirekha A, Champa C, Shetty A, Pushpalatha S, et al. Effect of dentin on the antimicrobial efficacy of 3% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 18% etidronic acid on Candida albicans: an in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2016; 19: 455–460.
[28] Moradi F, Haghgoo R. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of nanosilver solution, sodium hypochlorite and normal saline in root canal irrigation of primary teeth. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2018; 9: S227–S232.
[29] Cogulu D, Uzel A, Oncag O, Eronat C. PCR-based identification of selected pathogens associated with endodontic infections in deciduous and permanent teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2008; 106: 443–449.
[30] Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Santos KR. Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. Journal of Endodontics. 2004; 30: 315–320.
[31] Forghani M, Afshari E, Parisay I, Garajian R. Effect of a passive sonic irrigation system on elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from root canal systems of primary teeth, using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite: an in vitro evaluation. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2017; 11: 177–182.
[32] Boutsioukis C, Arias-Moliz MT. Present status and future directions—irrigants and irrigation methods. International Endodontic Journal. 2022; 55: 588–612.
[33] Basir L, Abdi R, Hashemi E. Cleaning efficacy of various root canal irrigants in primary teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Journal of General Dentistry. 2022; 70: 29–33.
[34] Walia V, Goswami M, Mishra S, Walia N, Sahay D. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chlorhexidine, sodium hypochlorite, the diode laser and saline in reducing the microbial count in primary teeth root canals—an in vivo study. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences.2019; 10: 268–274.
[35] Venghat S, Hegde M, Shetty C. Irrigants used in endodontics. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2014; 3: 126–132.
[36] Liu H, Nio S, Shen Y. Sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in dentinal tubules: effect of concentration, temperature, and exposure time. Odontology. 2024; 112: 390–398.
[37] Darrag A. Effectiveness of different final irrigation solutions on smear layer removal in intraradicular dentin. Tanta Dental Journal. 2014; 11: 93–99.
[38] Hariharan VS, Nandlal B, Srilatha KT. Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopy study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2010; 28: 271–277.
[39] Violich DR, Chandler NP. The smear layer in endodontics—a review. International Endodontic Journal. 2010; 43: 2–15.
[40] Zehnder M, Schmidlin P, Sener B, Waltimo T. Chelation in root canal therapy reconsidered. Journal of Endodontics. 2005; 31: 817–820.
[41] Boessler C, Peters OA, Zehnder M. Impact of lubricant parameters on rotary instrument torque and force. Journal of Endodontics. 2007; 33: 280–283.
[42] Supraja AN, Arali V, Rapala H, Vemagiri CT, Kallakuri M, Kumar GLP. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of etidronic acid against Enterococcus faecalis in primary teeth: an in vivo study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024; 17: 433–436.
[43] Bernstein EF, Lee J, Brown DB, Yu R, Van Scott E. Glycolic acid treatment increases type I collagen mRNA and hyaluronic acid content of human skin. Dermatologic Surgery. 2001; 27: 429–433.
[44] Eldeniz AU, Erdemir A, Belli S. Effect of EDTA and citric acid solutions on the microhardness and the roughness of human root canal dentin. Journal of Endodontics. 2005; 31: 107–110.
[45] Gambin DJ, Leal LO, Farina AP, Souza MA, Cecchin D. Antimicrobial activity of glycolic acid as a final irrigant solution for root canal preparation. Journal of General Dentistry. 2020; 68: 41–44.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 2.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top