Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Reducing dental anxiety in children through tell-show-do technique vs. additional instructions with an artificial intelligence-based animated video: randomized clinical trial
1Unit of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Section of Dentistry, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2025.098 Vol.49,Issue 5,September 2025 pp.38-46
Submitted: 09 April 2025 Accepted: 11 June 2025
Published: 03 September 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Maurizio Pascadopoli E-mail: maurizio.pascadopoli01@universitadipavia.it
*Corresponding Author(s): Andrea Scribante E-mail: andrea.scribante@unipv.it
Background: Dental anxiety has always been a problem for practitioners, particularly among children. This research aimed to use artificial intelligence (AI) to create personalised cartoons that would positively engage and desensitise paediatric patients. Methods: The use of AI was evaluated as an adjunct to the traditional tell-show-do (TSD) method and compared versus TSD technique alone. A total of 42 paediatric patients, aged 5–10 years, classified as with high dental anxiety based on the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (FLACC), were randomly assigned to the Trial group (AI animated video plus TSD) or the Control group (TSD only). Dental anxiety levels were measured at baseline (T0) and after 14 days (T1) using the MDAS and FLACC. Oral hygiene was assessed using the Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S) and Bleeding on Probing (BoP). The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) was recorded at T0. Data normality was assessed using the D’Agostino-Pearson test, and the data were analysed with Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test followed by a Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Linear regressions were also performed (significance threshold: p < 0.05). Results: At T1, both groups exhibited significantly lower anxiety scores and non-verbal responses, as well as lower oral hygiene scores (p < 0.05). In the intergroup comparison, significantly lower MDAS scores were found in the Trial group (p > 0.05). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant effect of group on MDAS, with lower values observed in the Trial group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These results confirm the positive role of AI-based instructions in addition to the standard TSD technique. Further studies should evaluate the implementation of AI interventions in dental settings as a complementary approach. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06276478.
Dental anxiety; Artificial intelligence (AI); Patient compliance; Oral hygiene; Dental care for children
Marina Consuelo Vitale,Maurizio Pascadopoli,Paolo Zampetti,Arianna Balbi,Andrea Scribante. Reducing dental anxiety in children through tell-show-do technique vs. additional instructions with an artificial intelligence-based animated video: randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025. 49(5);38-46.
[1] Grisolia BM, Dos Santos APP, Dhyppolito IM, Buchanan H, Hill K, Oliveira BH. Prevalence of dental anxiety in children and adolescents globally: a systematic review with meta-analyses. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2021; 31: 168–183.
[2] Caprioglio A, Mariani L, Tettamanti L. A pilot study about emotional experiences by using CFSS-DS in young patients. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2009; 10: 121–124.
[3] Baier K, Milgrom P, Russell S, Mancl L, Yoshida T. Children’s fear and behavior in private pediatric dentistry practices. Pediatric Dentistry. 2004; 26: 316–321.
[4] Kvesić AJ, Hrelja M, Lovrić Ž, Šimunović L, Špiljak B, Supina N, et al. Possible risk factors for dental fear and anxiety in children who suffered traumatic dental injury. Dentistry Journal. 2023; 11: 190.
[5] Šimunović L, Špiljak B, Radulović M, Vlahovljak A, Ostojić M, Krlev J, et al. Relationship between children’s and parents’ dental anxiety: a cross-sectional study on the six European countries. Dentistry Journal. 2022; 10: 209.
[6] Ramos-Jorge ML, Marques LS, Pavia SM, Serra-Negra JM, Pordeus IA. Predictive factors for child behaviour in the dental environment. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2006; 7: 253–257.
[7] Luoto A, Tolvanen M, Rantavuori K, Pohjola V, Karlsson L, Lahti S. Individual changes in dental fear among children and parents: a longitudinal study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2014; 72: 942–947.
[8] Anchala K, Tirumala V, Saikiran KV, Elicherla NR, Rahul S, Nuvvula S. Efficacy of kaleidoscope, virtual reality, and video games to alleviate dental anxiety during local anesthesia in children: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2024; 24: 195–204.
[9] Balakrishnan P, Srinivasan D, Eagappan S. Comparative evaluation of three different behavior management techniques among children aged 6–12 years in dental practice: a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Dental and Medical Problems. 2024; 61: 641–650.
[10] Lal N, Tiim K, Nambiar V. Practice and perception of dental practitioners in the Suva-Nausori area, Fiji on management of paediatric patients with dental anxiety. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024; 48: 197–204.
[11] Vitale MC, Gallo S, Pascadopoli M, Alcozer R, Ciuffreda C, Scribante A. Local anesthesia with SleeperOne S4 computerized device vs traditional syringe and perceived pain in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 47: 82–90.
[12] Kim IH, Cho H, Song JS, Park W, Shin Y, Lee KE. Assessment of real-time active noise control devices in dental treatment conditions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19: 9417.
[13] Addleston HK. Child patient training. Fortnightly Review of the Chicago Dental Society. 1959; 38: 7–9, 27–29.
[14] Raseena KT, Jeeva PP, Kumar A, Balachandran D, Anil A, Ramesh R. A comparative study of tell-show-do technique with and without the aid of a virtual tool. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2020; 38: 393–399.
[15] Aitken JC, Wilson S, Coury D, Moursi AM. The effect of music distraction on pain, anxiety, and behaviour in pediatric dental patients. Pediatric Dentistry. 2002; 24: 114–118.
[16] Nalci G, Alaçam T, Altunkaynak B. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a mobile application in the management of dental anxiety: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2022; 49: 535–540.
[17] Pascadopoli M, Zampetti P, Nardi MG, Pellegrini M, Scribante A. Smartphone applications in dentistry: a scoping review. Dentistry Journal. 2023; 11: 243.
[18] Padmanabhan V, D’Souza S, Priya SP, Rehman M, El Bahra S, Tawfiq N, et al. Harnessing the potential of oral hygiene apps for pediatric dental care: a comprehensive narrative review. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2024; 17: 860–865.
[19] Habib K, Soliman T. Cartoons’ effect in changing children mental response and behavior. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2015; 3: 248–264.
[20] Vishwanathaiah S, Fageeh HN, Khanagar SB, Maganur PC. Artificial intelligence its uses and application in pediatric dentistry: a review. Biomedicines. 2023; 11: 788.
[21] Humphris GM, Morrison T, Lindsay SJ. The modified dental anxiety scale: validation and United Kingdom norms. Community Dental Health. 1995; 12: 143–150.
[22] Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in children. Pediatric Nursing. 1997; 23: 293–297.
[23] Greene JG, Vermillion JR. The simplified oral hygiene index. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1964; 68: 7–13.
[24] Löe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. Journal of Periodontology. 1967; 38: 610–616.
[25] Karaca S, Şirinoğlu Capan B. The effect of parental presence on the anxiety during first dental treatment in children. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2024; 83: 38–41.
[26] Padmanabhan V, Islam MS, Habib M, Abdulaziz Z, Goud M, Chaitanya NC, et al. Association between salivary cortisol levels, dental anxiety, and dental caries in children: a cross-sectional study. Dentistry Journal. 2023; 11: 205.
[27] Kumar V, Goud ESS, Turagam N, Mudrakola D, Ealla KR, Bhoopathi P. Prevalence of dental anxiety level in 6- to 12-year-old South Indian children. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2019; 11: S321–S324.
[28] Dikmen B. ICDAS II criteria (International Caries Detection and Assessment System). Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry. 2015; 49: 63–72.
[29] Shetty V, Suresh LR, Hegde AM. Effect of virtual reality distraction on pain and anxiety during dental treatment in 5–8 year old children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2019; 43: 97–102.
[30] Piepho H. An algorithm for a letter-based representation of all-pairwise comparisons. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 2004; 13: 456–466.
[31] Hegazi F, Alghamdi N, Alhajri D, Alabdulqader L, Alhammad D, Alshamrani L, et al. Association between dental fear and children’s oral health-related quality of life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21: 1195.
[32] Kharouba J, Peretz B, Blumer S. The effect of television distraction versus tell-show-do as behavioral management techniques in children undergoing dental treatments. Quintessence International. 2020; 51: 486–494.
[33] Sahebalam R, Rafieinezhad R, Boskabad M. Comparison of the efficacy of Jilo animation approach versus conventional tell-show-do (TSD) technique on cooperation and anxiety levels of children during dental practice: a randomized controlled clinical trials. Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. 2020; 21: 284–291.
[34] Gozin F, Tabe Bordbar F, Esmaeili M. Audio-visual storytelling for reducing dental anxiety in Iranian children: a randomized controlled trial. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2022; 23: 953–960.
[35] Padmanabhan V, Raidullah N, Kamel B. Effect of audiovisual distraction on pediatric dental anxiety: a cross-sectional study. Dental Journal. 2024; 57: 4–8.
[36] Radhakrishna S, Srinivasan I, Setty JV, D R MK, Melwani A, Hegde KM. Comparison of three behavior modification techniques for management of anxious children aged 4–8 years. Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2019; 19: 29–36.
[37] Aziz SZ, Jafar ZJ. The efficacy of Little Lovely Dentist app in reducing dental anxiety in children. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2023; 13: 388–393.
[38] Maru V, Patil RSB, Kumari S, Tiwari S, Bapat S. Influence of pretreatment exposure to pediatric dental care using the “Tiny Dentist” game on 4–7 years old children’s pain and anxiety: a parallel randomised clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 47: 96–102.
[39] Fortier MA, Kain ZN. Treating perioperative anxiety and pain in children: a tailored and innovative approach. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2015; 25: 27–35.
[40] Bagher SM, Felemban OM, Alandijani AA, Tashkandi MM, Bhadila GY, Bagher AM. The effect of virtual reality distraction on anxiety level during dental treatment among anxious pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 47: 63–71.
[41] Aminoshariae A, Kulild J, Nagendrababu V. Artificial intelligence in endodontics: current applications and future directions. Journal of Endodontics. 2021; 47: 1352–1357.
[42] Geetha V, Aprameya KS, Hinduja DM. Dental caries diagnosis in digital radiographs using neural network. Health Information Science and Systems. 2020; 8: 8.
[43] Acharya S, Godhi BS, Saxena V, Assiry AA, Alessa NA, Dawasaz AA, et al. Role of artificial intelligence in behavior management of pediatric dental patients—a mini review. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024; 48: 24–30.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 2.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top