The effectiveness of a needle-free system in reducing injection pain during palatal infiltrative anesthesia in children: a randomized clinical study

Background: Dental palatal infiltrative injection challenges tolerance in pediatric patients. The study aimed to evaluate the pain and effectiveness of the Comfort-In™ injection compared to dental needle injection using palatal infiltrative anesthesia to extract upper permanent first molars in children. Methods: This randomized, parallel-arm, prospective clinical trial was conducted in children aged 7 to 14 years who required the extraction of upper permanent first molars. Fifty participants were randomized into two groups: the Comfort-In™ and the dental needle injection group. Pain acceptance was evaluated during the palatal infiltrative anesthesia using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS) and the Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale. Extra-dose requirements were assessed in both groups. Data were analyzed using version 4.4.1 of the R programming language, and the significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: The WBFPRS was evaluated for pain acceptance, and a statistically significant difference was found, with the Comfort-In™ injection group demonstrating better pain acceptance compared to the dental needle injection group (p = 0.003). There was no statistical difference between the Comfort-In™ injection system and the dental needle injection in FLACC scores (p = 0.05) and the extra-dose requirements (p = 0.05). In the multiple regression for FLACC, the dental needle method increased scores (β ± SE (Standard Error) = 0.53 ± 0.20; p = 0.012). In the ordinal logistic regression for WBFPRS, it also yielded higher scores (β ± SE = 3.27 ± 0.73; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Dental needle injection anesthesia was associated with more pain during palatal anesthesia than Comfort-In™ injection method. Although Comfort-In™ injection system generally provided adequate anesthesia, it required an extra dose in some cases. Nevertheless, due to its lower pain perception and needle-free application, the Comfort-In™ injection system is recommended as a suitable alternative for palatal anesthesia in pediatric patients. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06606587.

Comfort-In™; Dental anxiety; Needle-free injection; Palatal infiltrative anesthesia

[1] Altan H, Çevik H, Doğru S, Coşgun A, Süren M, Okan İ. The pain colour of children with toothache in Turkish population. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19: 59.

[2] Altan H, Demiray MD, Almas B, Altan A, Tuncdemir AR. The validation of the dental undergraduates’ preparedness assessment scale (Du-Pas) and the evaluation of the effect of integrated clinical practices on the knowledge and experience of final year dental students using Du-Pas. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2025; 28: 261–271.

[3] Altan H, Coşgun A. Analysis of tweets on toothache during the COVID-19 pandemic using the CrystalFeel algorithm: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 418.

[4] Vitale MC, Gallo S, Pascadopoli M, Alcozer R, Ciuffreda C, Scribante A. Local anesthesia with SleeperOne S4 computerized device vs traditional syringe and perceived pain in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 47: 82–90.

[5] Akşit-Bıçak D, Hussein TO, Kumar G. Pediatric dentists’ approaches to dental treatment of children with dental fear and anxiety. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences. 2024; 9: 403–410.

[6] Shen T, Wang X, Xue Q, Chen D. Active versus passive distraction for reducing procedural pain and anxiety in children: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Italian Journal of Pediatrics. 2023; 49: 109.

[7] Murat E, ŞahinC, Bayram F. Comparison of inferior alveolar nerve block and infiltration anesthesia techniques for pain control in pediatric primary mandibular molar extractions. European Journal of Research in Dentistry. 2024; 8: 59–65.

[8] Srivastava A, Kundu A, Paul AR. A detailed review of the recent development of needle-free drug delivery devices. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology. 2025; 49: 187–206.

[9] Altan H, Almas B. Clinical evaluation of different types of injection systems and comparison of pain acceptance in palatal anesthesia in pediatric patients: a randomized controlled split-mouth study. Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2025; 25: 191–199.

[10] MIKA MEDICAL CO. Comfort-in™ Needle-Free injection system. 2013. Available at: https://www.comfort-in.com (Accessed: 01 September 2025).

[11] Altan H, Belevcikli M, Coşgun A, Demir O. Comparative evaluation of pain perception with a new needle-free system and dental needle method in children: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiology. 2021; 21: 301.

[12] Kaya E, Yıldırım S. Effect of a needle‐free system versus traditional anesthesia on pain perception during palatal injections in children. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2023; 33: 132–140.

[13] Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for randomized trials. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2010; 152: 726–732.

[14] Kaya E, Yildirim S. Effect of a needle-free system vs traditional anesthesia on pain perception. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2023; 33: 132–140.

[15] Elicherla NR, Saikiran KV, Anchala K, Elicherla SR, Nuvvula S. Evaluation of the effectiveness of tell-show-do and ask-tell-ask in the management of dental fear and anxiety: a double-blinded randomized control trial. Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2024; 24: 57–65.

[16] Amorim KS, Franz-Montan M, Groppo FC, Muniz BV, Araújo JSM, Santana JVF, et al. Palatal needle-free anesthesia for upper molars extraction. A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. 2020; 48: 815–819.

[17] Sovatdy S, Vorakulpipat C, Kiattavorncharoen S, Saengsirinavin C, Wongsirichat N. Inferior alveolar nerve block by intraosseous injection with Quicksleeper® at the retromolar area in mandibular third molar surgery. Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2018; 18: 339–347.

[18] Jibb L, Stinson J. Pain assessment. In Twycross A, Stinson J, Zempsky WT, Jordan A (eds.) Managing pain in children and young people: a clinical guide (pp. 73–93). 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken. 2024.

[19] Sierra-Núñez D, Bosch-Alcaraz A, Ordóñez MAF, Mercedes Nebra Muñoz M, Merino AG, Lucena EG, et al. Pain assessment in patients with cognitive dysfunction: adaptation and validation of the r-FLACC scale. Annals of Pediatrics. 2025; 103: 503898.

[20] Rathi NV, Khatri AA, Agrawal AG, Baliga S, Thosar NR, Deolia SG. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine vs lidocaine in primary molars. Anesthesia Progress. 2019; 66: 3–7.

[21] Belevcikli M, Altan H, Demir O. Effect of the new needle-free injection system on pain perception and dental anxiety during anesthesia: randomized controlled split-mouth study. Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2023; 23: 1–8.

[22] Ocak H, Akkoyun EF, Çolpak HA, Demetoğlu U, Yücesoy T, Kılıç E, et al. Is the jet injection effective for teeth extraction? Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020; 121: 19–24.

[23] Nogueira APA, Ferreira MC, Maia CDCR, Gonçalves BLL, Filho EM, Costa CP, et al. Efficacy of articaine anesthesia with needle-free/Comfort-in method and conventional needle injection in dental patients with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2024; 28: 205.

[24] Arapostathis KN, Dabarakis NN, Coolidge T, Tsirlis A, Kotsanos N. Comparison of acceptance, preference, and efficacy between jet injection INJEX and local infiltration anesthesia in 6 to 11-year-old dental patients. Anesthesia Progress. 2010; 57: 3–12.

[25] Monteiro J, Tanday A, Ashley PF, Parekh S, Alamri H. Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental treatment. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020; 2: CD011024.