Article Data

  • Views 395
  • Dowloads 145

Original Research

Open Access

Investigation of incidental findings in CBCT images of pediatric patients: a retrospective study

  • Mesude Çitir1,*,
  • Yeliz Mısra Solmaz1

1Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, 60000 Tokat, Türkiye

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2025.120

Submitted: 26 July 2025 Accepted: 30 September 2025

Online publish date: 22 October 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Mesude Çitir E-mail: mesude.citir@gop.edu.tr

Abstract

Background: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows detailed imaging of teeth and jaw structures in children. These scans may reveal findings that are unrelated to the initial reason for imaging. This raises questions about how common such findings are in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to determine the type and frequency of incidentally detected findings in the maxillofacial region in CBCT images of patients in the pediatric and adolescent age group. Methods: Incidental findings detected in six regions, including air spaces, dental, bone, jaw lesions, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and soft tissue calcifications, were recorded in 194 CBCT images obtained in 3 different field of view (FOV) sizes. The relationship between incidental findings and gender was examined using the chi-square test, and the relationship between age and incidental findings was examined using Spearman correlation analysis. Results: A total of 1187 incidental findings were identified in 189 (97.4%) of 194 paediatric patients on CBCT images. The most common findings were inferior concha hypertrophy (59.8%), maxillary sinus septa (58.2%), and root dilaceration (55.7%). Dental findings were observed in 89.2% of patients, and airway findings in 76.8%. Incidental findings in the bony structures and temporomandibular joint regions were significantly more prevalent among girls (p = 0.04). A positive correlation was found between age and the number of incidental findings. The number of findings was influenced by FOV size and imaging region. Conclusions: Incidental findings, especially dental and airway anomalies, are common in pediatric CBCT scans. Early detection of TMJ and airway issues is important, but routine CBCT use in children for these alone is not advised due to radiation exposure.


Keywords

Incidental finding; Cone-beam computed tomography; CBCT; Pediatric patient


Cite and Share

Mesude Çitir,Yeliz Mısra Solmaz. Investigation of incidental findings in CBCT images of pediatric patients: a retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025.doi:10.22514/jocpd.2025.120.

References

[1] Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. European Radiology. 1998; 8: 1558–1564.

[2] Hora BS, Varghese AS, Patil P, Anbalagan S, Chandarani S, Shaik N. The role of three-dimensional imaging (CBCT) in enhancing diagnostic accuracy in endodontics: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2024; 16: S871–S873.

[3] Lopes IA, Tucunduva RM, Handem RH, Capelozza AL. Study of the frequency and location of incidental findings of the maxillofacial region in different fields of view in CBCT scans. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2017; 46: 20160215.

[4] Yiğit T, Yüksel HT, Evirgen Ş, Kaçmaz I, Türkmenoğlu A. Evaluation of use of cone beam computed tomography in paediatric patients: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2023; 33: 468–476.

[5] Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C, Nair MK, et al. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2008; 106: 561–562.

[6] Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2009; 38: 187–195.

[7] Souza DLd, Ramos MEE, Corrêa M. Main incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography in the head and neck region and the impact in patients’ lives: an integrative literature review. Gaúcha Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 70: e20220047.

[8] Braun MJ, Rauneker T, Dreyhaupt J, Hoffmann TK, Luthardt RG, Schmitz B, et al. Dental and maxillofacial cone beam CT-high number of incidental findings and their impact on follow-up and therapy management. Diagnostics. 2022; 12: 1036.

[9] Hlongwa P, Moshaoa MAL, Musemwa C, Khammissa RAG. Incidental pathologic findings from orthodontic pretreatment panoramic radiographs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20: 3479.

[10] Alanzi A, Bufersen N, Haider S, Abdulrahim M. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in schoolchildren in Kuwait. International Dental Journal. 2024; 74: 566–572.

[11] Kamble LS, Byakodi RS, Kshar AB, Paranjpe AG, Awale SS, Shete MD. Prevalence of incidental findings based on anatomical location and their clinical significance on cone beam computed tomography scans—an observational study. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology. 2023; 35: 250–254.

[12] Asaumi JI, Hisatomi M, Yanagi Y, Unetsubo T, Maki Y, Matsuzaki H, et al. Evaluation of panoramic radiographs taken at the initial visit at a department of paediatric dentistry. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2008; 37: 340–343.

[13] Akbay E, Cokkeser Y, Yilmaz O, Cevik C. The relationship between posterior septum deviation and depth of maxillopalatal arch. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013; 40: 286–290.

[14] Távora DM, Roque-Torres GD, Costa ED, Brasil DM, Oliveira ML. Incidental finding of bullous concha by cone beam computed tomography. Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2022; 24: 26–31.

[15] Zhang L, Zhang Y, Xu Q, Shu J, Xu B, Liu L, et al. Increased risks of maxillary sinus mucosal thickening in Chinese patients with periapical lesions. Heliyon. 2023; 9: e18050.

[16] Rastegar H, Osmani F. Evaluation of mucous retention cyst prevalence on digital panoramic radiographs in the local population of Iran. Radiology Research and Practice. 2022; 2022: 8650027.

[17] Guo M, Zang X, Fu W, Yan H, Bao X, Li T, et al. Classification of nasal polyps and inverted papillomas using CT-based radiomics. Insights into Imaging. 2023; 14: 188.

[18] Hamasha AA, Al-Khateeb T, Darwazeh A. Prevalence of dilaceration in Jordanian adults. International Endodontic Journal. 2002; 35: 910–912.

[19] Hua L, Thomas M, Bhatia S, Bowkett A, Merrett S. To extract or not to extract? Management of infraoccluded second primary molars without successors. British Dental Journal. 2019; 227: 93–98.

[20] Almpani K, Tran H, Ferri A, Hung M. Assessment of condylar anatomy and degenerative changes in temporomandibular joint disorders—a scoping review. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2023; 13: 764–780.

[21] Mortellaro C, Biancucci P, Picciolo G, Vercellino V. Eagle’s syndrome: importance of a corrected diagnosis and adequate surgical treatment. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2002; 13: 755–758.

[22] Ozdede M, Akay G, Karadag O, Peker I. Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of tonsilloliths. Medical Principles and Practice. 2020; 29: 279–284.

[23] Vogiatzi T, Papageorgiou SN, Silikas N, Walsh T. Incidental findings from cone-beam computed tomography in children and adolescents: a systematic review. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2025. PMID: 39820816.

[24] Khalifa HM, Felemban OM. Nature and clinical significance of incidental findings in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review. Oral Radiology. 2021; 37: 547–559.

[25] Langella J, Finkelman MD, Alon E, Fida Z, Martin A, Amato R. Incidental findings in small field of view cone-beam computed tomography scans, part 2: interpretation with aid of a checklist. Journal of Endodontics. 2023; 49: 390–394.

[26] Ahmed F, Brooks SL, Kapila SD. Efficacy of identifying maxillofacial lesions in cone-beam computed tomographs by orthodontists and orthodontic residents with third-party software. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2012; 141: 451–459.

[27] Dief S, Veitz-Keenan A, Amintavakoli N, McGowan R. A systematic review on incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2019; 48: 20180396.

[28] Kühnisch J, Anttonen V, Duggal MS, Spyridonos ML, Rajasekharan S, Sobczak M, et al. Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and adolescents: an EAPD policy document. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2020; 21: 375–386.

[29] Shelly E, Waldron MG, Field E, Moore N, Young R, Scally A, et al. Cumulative radiation dose from medical imaging in children with congenital heart disease: a systematic review. Children. 2023;10: 645.

[30] Kadkhodayan S, Almeida FT, Lai H, Pacheco-Pereira C. Uncovering the hidden: a study on incidental findings on CBCT scans leading to external referrals. International Dental Journal. 2024; 74: 808–815.

[31] Doğramacı EJ, Rossi-Fedele G, McDonald F. Clinical importance of incidental findings reported on small-volume dental cone beam computed tomography scans focused on impacted maxillary canine teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2014; 118: e205–e209.

[32] Kocsis C, Sommerlath Sohns JM, Graf I, Dreiseidler T, Kreppel M, Rothamel D, et al. Incidental findings on craniomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in orthodontic patients. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry. 2019; 22: 149–162.

[33] Drage N, Rogers S, Greenall C, Playle R. Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography in orthodontic patients. Journal of Orthodontics. 2013; 40: 29–37.

[34] Etemad L, Mehta S, Lurie AG, Tadinada A. Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings in the maxillofacial complex of adolescent orthodontic patients: a retrospective cone beam computed tomography analysis. Cureus. 2023; 15: e47480.

[35] Cesur-Aydin K, Balli-Akgol B, Delilbaşi B, Gürler G. Evaluation of maxillary sinus findings in children using CBCT. Gazzetta Medica Italiana—Archives of Medical Science. 2019; 178: 386–391.

[36] Shetty SR, Al Bayatti SW, Al-Rawi NH, Kamath V, Reddy S, Narasimhan S, et al. The effect of concha bullosa and nasal septal deviation on palatal dimensions: a cone beam computed tomography study. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 607.

[37] Walters ZA, Phillips KM, Previtera MJ, Gray ST, Sedaghat AR. Minimal radiographic mucosal thickness or opacification criterion for sinus-specific endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2023; 169: 221–226.

[38] Choi YS, Lee Y, Park MJ. Sudden‐onset projectile rhinorrhea from the right nostril. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2024; 31: 267–271.

[39] Theodoridis C, Damaskos S, Angelopoulos C. Frequency and Clinical Significance of Incidental Findings on CBCT imaging: a retrospective analysis of full-volume scans. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research. 2024; 15: e5.

[40] Edwards R, Alsufyani N, Heo G, Flores-Mir C. The frequency and nature of incidental findings in large-field cone beam computed tomography scans of an orthodontic sample. Progress in Orthodontics. 2014; 15: 37.

[41] Marciniak A, Mielnik-Niedzielska G. Asymptomatic radiological changes in computer tomography in children with head trauma. Polish Journal of Otolaryngology. 2019; 73: 5–11.

[42] Shahrour R, Shah P, Withana T, Jung J, Syed AZ. Oroantral communication, its causes, complications, treatments and radiographic features: a pictorial review. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2021; 51: 307–311.

[43] Singh AK, Soni S, Jaiswal D, Pani P, Sidhartha R, Nishant. Prevalence of supernumerary teeth and its associated complications among school-going children between the ages of 6 and 15 Years of Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2022; 15: 504–508.

[44] Heboyan A, Avetisyan A, Karobari MI, Marya A, Khurshid Z, Rokaya D, et al. Tooth root resorption: a review. Science Progress. 2022; 105: 368504221109217.

[45] Abdelhafeez MM, Alrasheed FM. Prevalence and pattern of mandibular condensing osteitis lesions in Saudi population at Qassim region. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2024; 16: S2661–S2663.

[46] Soluk-Tekkesin M, Wright JM. The world health organization classification of odontogenic lesions: a summary of the changes of the 2022 (5th) edition. Turkish Journal of Pathology. 2022; 38: 168–184.

[47] Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D. Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. 1st edn. IARC: Lyon. 2005.

[48] El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ. WHO classification of head and neck tumours. 4th edn. IARC: Lyon. 2017.

[49] Wang S, Hong Y, Qu J, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Zhai J, et al. PTCH/SMO gene mutations in odontogenic keratocysts and drug interventions. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. 2023; 52: 867–876.

[50] Mehdizadeh M, Rezaei Z, Moghadam FG. Incidental findings in temporomandibular joint region detected by cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2020; 14: 337–342.

[51] Ma KS, Thota E, Huang JY, Wei JC, Resnick CM. Increased risk of temporomandibular joint disorders and craniofacial deformities in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a population-based cohort study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2022; 51: 1482–1487.

[52] Günaçar DN, Köse TE, Ceren F. Radiodiagnostic properties of maxillary antroliths: a retrospective cone beam computed tomography study. BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25: 259.

[53] Rege IC, Sousa TO, Leles CR, Mendonça EF. Occurrence of maxillary sinus abnormalities detected by cone beam CT in asymptomatic patients. BMC Oral Health. 2012; 12: 30.

[54] Imdad A, Wang AG, Adlakha V, Crespo NM, Merrow J, Smith A, et al. Laryngeal penetration and risk of aspiration pneumonia in children with dysphagia—a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 4087.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top