Comparison of the effectiveness of the hall technique and orthodontic bands in managing extensive of carious lesions in deciduous molars of children with cognitive impairments—randomized clinical trial

Background: This study investigated the efficacy of the Hall Technique (HT) compared to orthodontic band cemented with glass ionomer (BGIC) in managing caries in primary molars of children with disabilities. A total of 58 children aged 4 to 10 years were included. Methods: Participants were randomly divided into two groups (n = 50 each): control group—HT and experimental group—BGIC. Block randomization was used. Follow-ups were conducted at 6 and 12 months. Caries progression was assessed using the Chi-Square test between groups and the McNemar test for intra-group comparisons over time. Procedure time was analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk and Mann-Whitney tests due to non-parametric data distribution. Results: After 6 months, no significant differences were observed in caries progression between groups. However, at 12 months, HT showed 92.1% success vs. BGIC 67.6% (p = 0.009). This group’s progression was significantly greater at 12 months compared to 6 months (p = 0.025). No significant differences in procedure time was observed between the groups. Conclusions: Although BGIC represents a viable alternative for treating extensive caries in primary molars, the HT technique significantly reduced caries lesion progression over 12 months. Clinical Trial Registration: The study protocol was registered in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC), available at https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-825qxqw and under the identification: U1111-1311-7698.

Dental caries; Dental restoration; Children with disabilities

[1] Andrade APP, Eleutério ASL. Patients with special needs: dental approach and general anesthesia. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia. 2015; 72: 66–69.

[2] Devinsky O, Boyce D, Robbins M, Pressler M. Dental health in persons with disability. Epilepsy Behavior. 2020; 110: 107174.

[3] Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, Ekstrand K, Weintraub JA, Ramos-Gomez F, et al. Dental caries. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2017; 3: 17030.

[4] Innes NP, Estribos DR, Evans DJ, Hall N, Leggate M. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice—a retrospective analysis. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2006; 200: 451–454; discussion 444.

[5] De Sena LR, Martins LFB, Leitão FLA, Picanço VV, Picanço AV, Diniz JP, et al. Hall technique: minimal intervention treatment of caries lesions in primary molars. Centro de Pesquisas Avançadas em Qualidade de Vida. 2024; 16: 7.

[6] Tedesco TK, Pássaro AL, Moro BLP, Silva GS, Pena JRA, Garbim JR, et al. Pediatric dentistry yearbook and current. 1st edn. Nova Odessa: São Paulo, Brazil. 2023.

[7] Valentim FB, Moreira KMS, Carneiro VC, do Nascimento LJ, Colares V, Imparato JCP. Cost-effectiveness and acceptance in children and parents of the Hall technique: systematic review of clinical trials. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2023; 24: 1016–1025.

[8] Pascareli-Carlos AM, Tedesco TK, Calvo AFB, Floriano I, Gimenez T, Gonçalves MDS, et al. Survival rate of the Hall technique compared with resin composite restoration in multi-surface cavities in primary teeth: a 1-year randomized clinical trial. Journal Applied Oral Science. 2023; 31: e20230048.

[9] Robertson MD, Schwendicke F, Araujo MP, Radford JR, Harris JC, McGregor S, et al. Dental caries experience, care index and restorative index in children with learning disabilities and children without learning disabilities; a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19: 146.

[10] BaniHani A, Santamaría RM, Hu S, Maden M, Albadri S. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. European Archives Paediatric Dentistry. 2022; 23: 667–693.

[11] Innes NPT, Evans DJP, Stirrups DR. The Hall technique; a randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months. BMC Oral Health. 2007; 7: 18.

[12] Thakur NS, Tyagi P, Tiwari S, Mali S, Chhattani B, Bhargava S. Comparative evaluation of Microleakage in Hall’s with SDF, Hall’s, and conventional technique using different luting cements. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 16: 16–21.

[13] Schwendicke F, Walsh T, Lamont T, Al-Yaseen W, Bjørndal L, Clarkson JE, et al. Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2021; 7: CD013039.

[14] Hu S, BaniHani A, Nevitt S, Maden M, Santamaria RM, Albadri S. Hall technique for primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Japanese Dental Science Review. 2022; 58: 286–297.