Article Data

  • Views 183
  • Dowloads 104

Reviews

Open Access

Craniofacial phenotyping of pediatric sleep-disordered breathing: orthodontic management, timing, and treatment approaches

  • Kyung-A Kim1
  • Hwarang Jeong2
  • Su-Jung Kim1,*,
  • Audrey Yoon3,4,*,

1Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, 02453 Seoul, Republic of Korea

2Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, 02453 Seoul, Republic of Korea

3Division of Sleep Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA

4Department of Orthodontics, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry at the University of the Pacific, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.001 Vol.50,Issue 1,January 2026 pp.1-10

Submitted: 24 March 2025 Accepted: 09 May 2025

Published: 03 January 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Su-Jung Kim E-mail: ksj113@khu.ac.kr
*Corresponding Author(s): Audrey Yoon E-mail: Audrey12@stanford.edu

Abstract

Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) presents a multifactorial etiology distinct from adult OSA, necessitating orthodontists to recognize specific craniofacial features that influence upper airway collapsibility. Accurate diagnosis and effective management of pediatric OSA require understanding these phenotypes, categorized into subtypes such as Class II with retrognathic mandible, vertical maxillary excess, constricted nasomaxillary complex, Class III with retrognathic maxilla, and bimaxillary deficiency. Growth modification treatments targeting the nasomaxillary complex and mandible’s dimensions can enhance skeletal growth and airway patency, creating an optimal environment for normal respiratory function and craniofacial development. Tailored treatment strategies based on craniofacial phenotyping can significantly improve outcomes. Orthodontists play a crucial role in guiding craniofacial development at various stages, emphasizing the importance of a collaborative, team-based approach to managing sleep-disordered breathing. According to the differential growth theory, intervention timing and appliance type should be chosen based on the specific bony target and area of respiratory obstruction. The craniofacial complex and dentition undergo significant changes from infancy to adulthood, presenting critical windows for targeted intervention. This article proposes a clinical framework for multidisciplinary care, emphasizing refined phenotyping to determine the most appropriate management strategies. In the future, personalized care will identify children who would benefit most from targeted craniofacial management within an interdisciplinary team setting.


Keywords

Pediatric sleep disordered breathing; Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea; Upper airway; Craniofacial abnormalities; Clinical phenotype


Cite and Share

Kyung-A Kim,Hwarang Jeong,Su-Jung Kim,Audrey Yoon. Craniofacial phenotyping of pediatric sleep-disordered breathing: orthodontic management, timing, and treatment approaches. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(1);1-10.

References

[1] Jost P, Conte AL, Lira AO, Pugliese F, Palomo JM, Quevedo B, et al. Risk of sleep-disordered breathing in orthodontic patients: comparison between children and adolescents. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2024; 46: cjae049.

[2] Picherit M, Trentesaux T, Ternisien A, Foumou N, Delfosse C, Marquillier T. Management of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome in children: what is the role of orthodontics? A scoping review. Sleep and Breathing. 2025; 29: 127.

[3] Tyler G, Machaalani R, Waters KA. Three-dimensional orthodontic imaging in children across the age spectrum and correlations with obstructive sleep apnea. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2023; 19: 275–282.

[4] Ikävalko T, Närhi M, Eloranta AM, Lintu N, Myllykangas R, Vierola A, et al. Predictors of sleep disordered breathing in children: the PANIC study. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2018; 40: 268–272.

[5] Kim SJ, Ahn HW, Hwang KJ, Kim SW. Respiratory and sleep characteristics based on frequency distribution of craniofacial skeletal patterns in Korean adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea. PLOS ONE. 2020; 15: e0236284.

[6] Avital D, Noyman I, Bistritzer J, Goldbart A, Hazan G, Langman Y, et al. High prevalence of epilepsy in pediatric patients with obstructive sleep apnea—a large-scale cross-sectional study. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2025; 184: 278.

[7] Zinchuk AV, Gentry MJ, Concato J, Yaggi HK. Phenotypes in obstructive sleep apnea: a definition, examples and evolution of approaches. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2017; 35: 113–123.

[8] Guilleminault C, Akhtar F. Pediatric sleep-disordered breathing: new evidence on its development. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2015; 24: 46–56.

[9] Cohen A, Gunthner A, Cervone A, Uzwy M, Urban-Galvez SN. Recurrence of obstructive sleep apnea in post-adenotonsillectomy obese pediatric patients: a systematic review. Cureus. 2025; 17: e84741.

[10] Kim KA, Kim SJ, Yoon A. Craniofacial anatomical determinants of pediatric sleep-disordered breathing: a comprehensive review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2025; 34: 26–34.

[11] Kim SJ, Kim KB. Orthodontics in obstructive sleep apnea patients: a guide to diagnosis, treatment planning, and interventions. 1st edn. Springer: Switzerland. 2020.

[12] Yoon A, Gozal D, Kushida C, Pelayo R, Liu S, Faldu J, et al. A roadmap of craniofacial growth modification for children with sleep-disordered breathing: a multidisciplinary proposal. Sleep. 2023; 46: zsad095.

[13] Huang L, Xu Y, Gong X, Gao X. Anatomical phenotype of obstructive sleep apnea patients based on cluster analysis. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2023; 26: 608–617.

[14] Coban G, Buyuk SK. Sleep disordered breathing and oral health-related quality of life in children with different skeletal malocclusions. The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice. 2025; 43: 70–77.

[15] Fernandes Fagundes NC, Loliencar P, MacLean JE, Flores-Mir C, Heo G. Characterization of craniofacial-based clinical phenotypes in children with suspected obstructive sleep apnea. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2023; 19: 1857–1865.

[16] Kim KA, Lee KH, Kim JE, Cho HN, Yoon HJ, Kim SJ. Craniofacial treatment protocol for a pediatric patient with obstructive sleep apnea and skeletal Class III malocclusion: a 13-year follow-up. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2022; 162: 410–428.

[17] Sfondrini MF, Gallo S, Pascadopoli M, Gandini P, Roncoroni C, Scribante A. Upper airway dimensions among different skeletal malocclusions: a retrospective observational study by cephalometric analysis. Dentistry Journal. 2024; 12: 12.

[18] Ozbek MM, Memikoglu TU, Gögen H, Lowe AA, Baspinar E. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopedic treatment in skeletal Class II cases. The Angle Orthodontist. 1998; 68: 327–336.

[19] Scribante A, Pascadopoli M, Zampetti P, Rocchi C, Falsarone F, Sfondrini MF. Changes in the upper airway dimension following the use of functional appliances in children with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review. Children. 2025; 12: 227.

[20] Li J, Ge X, Guan H, Zhang S, Qiao X, Chang W, et al. Three-dimensional changes of the upper airway in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with functional appliances: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2021; 43: 415–423.

[21] Bidjan D, Sallmann R, Eliades T, Papageorgiou SN. Orthopedic treatment for class ii malocclusion with functional appliances and its effect on upper airways: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9: 3806.

[22] Baka ZM, Fidanboy M. Pharyngeal airway, hyoid bone, and soft palate changes after Class II treatment with twin-block and forsus appliances during the postpeak growth period. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2021; 159: 148–157.

[23] Zreaqat M, Hassan R, Samsudin AR, Alforaidi S. Effects of twin-block appliance on upper airway parameters in OSA children with class II malocclusion and mandibular retrognathia: a CBCT study. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2023; 182: 5501–5510.

[24] Ahmed MJ, Diar-Bakirly S, Deirs N, Hassan A, Ghoneima A. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of airway volume in growing class II patients treated with Frankel II appliance. Head & Face Medicine. 2024; 20: 11.

[25] Jeha BA, Haddad R. Skeletal and dental effects of forsus fatigue resistance device versus twin block appliance for Class II malocclusion treatment in growing patients: a systematic review. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research. 2024; 10: e70054.

[26] Bernardes R, Di Bisceglie Ferreira LM, Machado Júnior AJ, Jones MH. Effectiveness of functional orthopedic appliances as an alternative treatment among children and adolescents with obstructive sleep apnea: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine. 2023; 105: 88–102.

[27] Carvalho FR, Lentini-Oliveira DA, Prado LB, Prado GF, Carvalho LB. Oral appliances and functional orthopaedic appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016; 10: CD005520.

[28] Ganesh G, Tripathi T. Effect of fixed functional appliances on pharyngeal airway dimensions in Skeletal Class II individuals—a scoping review. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2021; 11: 511–523.

[29] Bariani RCB, Bigliazzi R, Cappellette Junior M, Moreira G, Fujita RR. Effectiveness of functional orthodontic appliances in obstructive sleep apnea treatment in children: literature review. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2022; 88: 263–278.

[30] Al-Dboush R, Soltan R, Rao J, El-Bialy T. Skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant device for correction of Class II malocclusions-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2021; 24: 52–61.

[31] Malmgren O, Ömblus J, Hägg U, Pancherz H. Treatment with an appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1987; 91: 143–151.

[32] Pacha MM, Fleming PS, Pandis N, Shagmani M, Johal A. The use of the hanks Herbst vs twin-block in class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2023; 164: 314–324.e1.

[33] Cretella Lombardo E, Franchi L, Gastaldi G, Giuntini V, Lione R, Cozza P, et al. Development of a prediction model for short-term success of functional treatment of Class II malocclusion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 4473.

[34] Hänggi MP, Teuscher UM, Roos M, Peltomäki TA. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008; 30: 598–605.

[35] Lux CJ, Conradt C, Burden D, Komposch G. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary and mandibular growth increments. The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 2004; 41: 304–314.

[36] Buschang PH, Carrillo R, Rossouw PE. Orthopedic correction of growing hyperdivergent, retrognathic patients with miniscrew implants. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2011; 69: 754–762.

[37] Hong RK, Lim SM, Heo JM, Baek SH. Orthodontic treatment of gummy smile by maxillary total intrusion with a midpalatal absolute anchorage system. Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2013; 43: 147–158.

[38] Gokce G, Gode S, Ozturk A, Kirazlı T, Veli I. Evaluation of the effects of different rapid maxillary expansion appliances on airway by acoustic rhinometry: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2022; 155: 111074.

[39] Calvo-Henriquez C, Megias-Barrera J, Chiesa-Estomba C, Lechien JR, Maldonado Alvarado B, Ibrahim B, et al. The impact of maxillary expansion on adults’ nasal breathing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy. 2021; 35: 923–934.

[40] Buck LM, Dalci O, Darendeliler MA, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulou AK. Volumetric upper airway changes after rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthodontic. 2017; 39: 463–473.

[41] Brunetto DP, Moschik CE, Dominguez-Mompell R, Jaria E, Sant’Anna EF, Moon W. Mini-implant assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) effects on adult obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and quality of life: a multi-center prospective controlled trial. Progress in Orthodontics. 2022; 23: 3.

[42] Yoon A, Abdelwahab M, Liu S, Oh J, Suh H, Trieu M, et al. Impact of rapid palatal expansion on the internal nasal valve and obstructive nasal symptoms in children. Sleep and Breathing. 2021; 25: 1019–1027.

[43] Yu M, Ma Y, Xu Y, Bai J, Lu Y, Han F, et al. Orthodontic appliances for the treatment of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2023; 72: 101855.

[44] Yoon A, Abdelwahab M, Bockow R, Vakili A, Lovell K, Chang I, et al. Impact of rapid palatal expansion on the size of adenoids and tonsils in children. Sleep Medicine. 2022; 92: 96–102.

[45] Kim JE, Hwang KJ, Kim SW, Liu SY, Kim SJ. Correlation between craniofacial changes and respiratory improvement after nasomaxillary skeletal expansion in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea patients. Sleep and Breathing. 2022; 26: 585–594.

[46] Lima Illescas MV, Aucapiña Aguilar DC, Vallejo Ledesma LP. A review on the influence of rapid maxillary expansion and mandibular advancement for treating obstructive sleep apnea in children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 47: 9–16.

[47] Kapetanović A, Theodorou CI, Bergé SJ, Schols JGJH, Xi T. Efficacy of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) in late adolescents and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2021; 43: 313–323.

[48] Gorikapudi PK, Chhabria V, Kaur K, Ramasamy P, Jeeboy S, Venkatesh R, et al. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment modalities for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review. Cureus. 2024; 16: e65161.

[49] Huang YS, Guilleminault C. Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: where do we stand? Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2017; 80: 136–144.

[50] Meyns J, Thanatchaporn J, Shujaat S, Politis C, Jacobs R. Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trial. Progress in Orthodontics. 2025; 26: 14.

[51] Cordasco G, Matarese G, Rustico L, Fastuca S, Caprioglio A, Lindauer SJ, et al. Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2014; 17: 133–143.

[52] Celikoglu M, Buyukcavus MH. Changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position after maxillary protraction with different alternate rapid maxillary expansion and construction protocols: a prospective clinical study. The Angle Orthodontist. 2017; 87: 519–525.

[53] Seo WG, Han SJ. Comparison of the effects on the pharyngeal airway space of maxillary protraction appliances according to the methods of anchorage. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2017; 39: 3.

[54] Alhamwi AM, Burhan AS, Nawaya FR, Sultan K. Soft tissue changes associated with Class III orthopaedic treatment in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Progress in Orthodontics. 2025; 26: 10.

[55] Caruso S, Lisciotto E, Caruso S, Marino A, Fiasca F, Buttarazzi M, et al. Effects of rapid maxillary expander and Delaire mask treatment on airway sagittal dimensions in pediatric patients affected by Class III malocclusion and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Life. 2023; 13: 673.

[56] Cornelis MA, Tepedino M, Riis NV, Niu X, Cattaneo PM. Treatment effect of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing patients compared to controls: a systematic review with meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2021; 43: 51–56.

[57] Balos-Tuncer B, Ulusoy C, Tuncer C, Turkoz C, Kale Varlik S. Effects of reverse headgear on pharyngeal airway in patients with different vertical craniofacial features. Brazilian Oral Research. 2015; 29: 1–8.

[58] Clemente R, Contardo L, Greco C, Di Lenarda R, Perinetti G. Class III treatment with skeletal and dental anchorage: a review of comparative effects. BioMed Research International. 2018; 2018: 7946019.

[59] Havakeshian G, Koretsi V, Eliades T, Papageorgiou SN. Effect of orthopedic treatment for Class III malocclusion on upper airways: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9: 3015.

[60] Quo S, Lo LF, Guilleminault C. Maxillary protraction to treat pediatric obstructive sleep apnea and maxillary retrusion: a preliminary report. Sleep Medicine. 2019; 60: 60–68.

[61] Yang X, Chen Y, Miao C, Zheng W. Comparative analysis of rapid expansion combined with maxillary protraction therapy in patients at different growth phases: a retrospective study. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2025; 29: 105.

[62] Lucchi P, Rosa M, Bruno G, De Stefani A, Zalunardo F, Gracco A. Difference in using protrusion face mask before or after rapid palatal expansion in skeletal Class III children: a preliminary study. Children. 2022; 9: 1535.

[63] Saadia M, Torres E. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in Class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions: a longitudinal retrospective study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000; 117: 669–680.

[64] Schneider-Moser UEM, Moser L. Very early orthodontic treatment: when, why and how? Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2022; 27: e22spe2.

[65] Rodríguez de Guzmán-Barrera J, Sáez Martínez C, Boronat-Catalá M, Montiel-Company JM, Paredes-Gallardo V, Gandía-Franco JL, et al. Effectiveness of interceptive treatment of Class III malocclusions with skeletal anchorage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12: e0173875.

[66] Gurgel M, Cevidanes L, Costa F, Pereira R, Cunali P, Bittencourt L, et al. Three-dimensional comparison between the effects of mandibular advancement device and maxillomandibular advancement surgery on upper airway. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23: 436.

[67] Wolford LM, Karras SC, Mehra P. Considerations for orthognathic surgery during growth, part 2: maxillary deformities. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2001; 119: 102–105.

[68] Wolford LM, Karras SC, Mehra P. Considerations for orthognathic surgery during growth, part 1: mandibular deformities. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2001; 119: 95–101.

[69] Ahn HW, Lee BS, Kim SW, Kim SJ. Stability of modified maxillomandibular advancement surgery in a patient with preadolescent refractory obstructive sleep apnea. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015; 73: 1827–1841.

[70] Budihardja AS, Nathania S. Association of obstructive sleep apnea in children with and without cleft lip palate. BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25: 883.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top