Article Data

  • Views 169
  • Dowloads 125

Original Research

Open Access

Postoperative adverse reactions in dental treatment under general anesthesia: a comparative analysis between preschool and school-age children in China

  • Li Zhang1
  • Sha Luo1
  • Yan Wang1
  • Xueqin Yang2
  • Qiang Luo3
  • Dan Ye1
  • Ran Yang1,*,

1State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China

2Department of Stomatology, Shenzhen Longhua District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, 518100 Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

3State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.007 Vol.50,Issue 1,January 2026 pp.78-85

Submitted: 17 March 2025 Accepted: 30 April 2025

Published: 03 January 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Ran Yang E-mail: yangran@scu.edu.cn

Abstract

Background: To investigate the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions in children dental treatment under dental general anesthesia (DGA) and to compare the difference in distribution between preschool and school-age children in China. Methods: Participants of this study were 130 preschool children and 128 school-age children who underwent DGA from January to September 2024. Data collected included questionnaire-based basic information, postoperative complications and a parental satisfaction survey within three days. Date was analyzed and compared between two group. Results: 84.9% of the included children experienced ≥1 adverse reactions. The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was higher in preschool children than that in school-age children (91.4% vs. 78.5%, p < 0.05). The most common adverse reactions in both groups were pain and negative emotions. The incidence of postoperative pain (75.4%), negative emotions (76.2%), significant occlusal discomfort (23.1%), fever (13.1%) and the average number of treated teeth (15 ± 3.7), root canal treatments (3.3 ± 2.2) and pulpotomies (2.0 ± 1.9) was higher in preschool children than that in school-age children (57.8%, 29.7%, 7.8% , 4.7% and 14 ± 3.1, 1.9 ± 1.6 and 1.2 ± 1.6, respectively) (p < 0.05). The probability of drowsiness was higher in school-age children than that in preschool children (22.7% vs. 10%, p < 0.05). The average number of extractions in preschool children was lower than in school-age children (1.8 ± 1.9 vs. 3.1 ± 2.7, p < 0.05). In addition, the average number of full crown treatments in preschool children was higher than in school-age children, yet without statistically significant difference (5.1 ± 2.3 vs. 3.3 ± 2.2, p > 0.05). Conclusions: Children may experience very high probability of postoperative adverse reactions after DGA. Preschool children may develop more adverse reactions than school-age children, necessitating more attention and effective soothing measures for this group of children.


Keywords

Pediatric dentistry; General anesthesia; Adverse reactions; Dental treatment


Cite and Share

Li Zhang,Sha Luo,Yan Wang,Xueqin Yang,Qiang Luo,Dan Ye,Ran Yang. Postoperative adverse reactions in dental treatment under general anesthesia: a comparative analysis between preschool and school-age children in China. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(1);78-85.

References

[1] Watt RG, Daly B, Allison P, Macpherson LMD, Venturelli R, Listl S, et al. Ending the neglect of global oral health: time for radical action. The Lancet. 2019; 394: 261–272.

[2] Zou J. Oral health management for children. West China Journal of Stomatology. 2018; 36: 465–468. (In Chinese)

[3] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Clinical guideline on the elective use of minimal, moderate, and deep sedation and general anesthesia for pediatric dental patients. Pediatric Dentistry Journal. 2004; 26: 95–103.

[4] Rajasekaran JJ, Krishnamurthy HK, Bosco J, Jayaraman V, Krishna K, Wang T, et al. Oral microbiome: a review of its impact on oral and systemic health. Microorganisms. 2024; 12: 1797.

[5] Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007; 39: 175–191.

[6] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Clinical guideline on pediatric restorative dentistry. Pediatric Dentistry Journal. 2004; 26: 106–114.

[7] Rajab LD, Obaid AE, Hamdan MAM, Hassona Y. Postoperative morbidity of dental paediatric patients treated under general anaesthesia at a university hospital: an observational study. International Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 2022: 9606010.

[8] Velasco AL, Hueso FJC, Silvestre FJ, Torres MP, Vázquez-Ferreiro P. Pediatric morbidity after oral surgery procedures under general anaesthesia: a systematic review. Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2023; 124: 101262.

[9] Patnana AK, Chaudhry K, Dhawan A, Duraisamy AK, Rathore K, Kumar P. effectiveness of oral health rehabilitation under general anaesthesia on oral health-related quality of life in children with intellectual and developmental disabilities—a prospective study. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2024; 35: 386–389.

[10] Euasobhon P, Atisook R, Bumrungchatudom K, Zinboonyahgoon N, Saisavoey N, Jensen MP. Reliability and responsivity of pain intensity scales in individuals with chronic pain. Pain. 2022; 163: e1184–e1191.

[11] Kakti A, Abumelha RK, Alajmi AM, Dagriri LK, Alkodari LA, Fares MJ, et al. Postoperative pain of pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment under general anesthesia visiting a general hospital: a cross-sectional study. Children. 2023; 10: 671.

[12] Gisour EF, Heidari F, Nekouei AH, Jahanimoghadam F. Postoperative acute psychological complications following dental procedures under general anesthesia in uncooperative children. BMC Anesthesiology. 2024; 24: 393.

[13] Da Silva K, Lionel A, O'Brien JM, Wright KD, Raazi M. The use of general anesthesia for pediatric dentistry in Saskatchewan: a retrospective study. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. 2022; 88: m9.

[14] Costi D, Cyna AM, Ahmed S, Stephens K, Strickland P, Ellwood J, et al. Effects of sevoflurane versus other general anaesthesia on emergence agitation in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014; 2014: CD007084.

[15] Erkmen Almaz M, Akbay Oba A, Saroglu Sonmez I. Postoperative morbidity in pediatric patients following dental treatment under general anesthesia. European Oral Research. 2019; 53: 113–118.

[16] Teshome D, Fenta E, Mekete G, Getachew N, Zurbachew N, Geta K, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with postoperative sore throat in Ethiopia: a systemic review and meta-analysis, 2023. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2024; 45: 102818.

[17] Joseph RM, Rao AP, Srikant N, Karuna YM, Nayak AP. Evaluation of changes in the occlusion and occlusal vertical dimension in children following the placement of preformed metal crowns using the hall technique. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2020; 44: 130–134.

[18] Mathew MG, Jeevanandan G. The evaluation of postoperative complications and oral health-related quality of life following dental general anesthesia for early childhood caries. Cureus. 2023; 15: e47325.

[19] Šimunović-Erpušina M, Bakarčić D, Cicvarić O, Šimunović L, Sotošek V, Petrović D, et al. Postoperative morbidity after dental treatment under general anesthesia in children with and without disabilities. Medicina. 2024; 60: 668.

[20] Chen XX, Jiang X, Zhong J, Zhang HM, Huang Q, Xia B. Postoperative complications following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia in children. Chinese Journal of Stomatology. 2017; 52: 661–666. (In Chinese)


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top