Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Prescription reliability of maxillary tooth movements by an orthodontic clear aligner system in children: a preliminary retrospective study
1Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, 02447 Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University, 02447 Seoul, Republic of Korea
3Dio Implant Ortho Research & Design Center, 48058 Busan, Republic of Korea
4Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, 50612 Yangsan, Republic of Korea
5Dental and Life Science Institute & Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, 50612 Yangsan, Republic of Korea
6Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, 02447 Seoul, Republic of Korea
DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.008 Vol.50,Issue 1,January 2026 pp.86-93
Submitted: 13 May 2025 Accepted: 03 July 2025
Published: 03 January 2026
*Corresponding Author(s): Jonghyun Shin E-mail: jonghyuns@pusan.ac.kr
*Corresponding Author(s): Ok Hyung Nam E-mail: pedokhyung@gmail.com
Background: The Dio Ortho navi clear aligner system was recently introduced to the market. This study aimed to confirm the reliability of the Dio Ortho navi clear aligner system by assessing the consistency between actual and predicted orthodontic tooth movements. Methods: Mixed-dentition and permanent-dentition patients were included. Sequential individualized orthodontic tooth movements were prescribed and recorded as digital images. Intraoral scans were performed at the corresponding observation periods: before treatment (T0), after 20 weeks (T1), and at the end of treatment (T2). Linear measurements were made, including changes in the arch width, tooth position of the maxillary permanent first incisors and permanent first molars, and torque of the maxillary permanent first incisors. Discrepancies between predicted and observed results were calculated. Superimposition between the predicted and achieved dental arches was performed, and the root mean square (RMS) values for the entire tooth surfaces were calculated at T2. Results: No significant differences in the linear discrepancies were observed between two groups (p > 0.05), except for intermolar width changes at T1 and torque changes. Most tooth position discrepancies ranged within 0.5 mm. The mean RMS values were 0.77 ± 0.20 mm in the mixed-dentition group and 0.92 ± 0.29 mm in the permanent-dentition group with no significant differences (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, no significant differences in the reliability of orthodontic tooth movement were observed between patients with mixed and permanent dentition. This finding suggests that the Dio Ortho navi clear aligner can be a reliable treatment option for clear orthodontic aligners.
Children; Clear orthodontic aligner; Digital dentistry; Orthodontic appliance; Reliability
Ju Ri Ye,Sungwon Ryu,Jang Sun Lee,Eungyung Lee,Jonghyun Shin,Ok Hyung Nam. Prescription reliability of maxillary tooth movements by an orthodontic clear aligner system in children: a preliminary retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(1);86-93.
[1] Wang Y, Liu C, Jian F, McIntyre GT, Millett DT, Hickman J, et al. Initial arch wires used in orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018; 7: CD007859.
[2] Marincak Vrankova Z, Rousi M, Cvanova M, Gachova D, Ruzicka F, Hola V, et al. Effect of fixed orthodontic appliances on gingival status and oral microbiota: a pilot study. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22: 455.
[3] Shankarappa S, Burk JT, Subbaiah P, Rao RN, Doddawad VG. White spot lesions in fixed orthodontic treatment: etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and future research perspectives. Journal of Orthodontic Science. 2024; 13: 21.
[4] Chapman JA, Roberts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, González-Cabezas C. Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2010; 138: 188–194.
[5] Chandra A, Thosar NR, Parakh H. Clear aligners in pediatric dentistry: a scoping review. Cureus. 2024; 16: e58992.
[6] Lu H, Tang H, Zhou T, Kang N. Assessment of the periodontal health status in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and Invisalign system: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018; 97: e0248.
[7] Bichu YM, Alwafi A, Liu X, Andrews J, Ludwig B, Bichu AY, et al. Advances in orthodontic clear aligner materials. Bioactive Materials. 2023; 22: 384–403.
[8] Gao M, Yan X, Zhao R, Shan Y, Chen Y, Jian F, et al. Comparison of pain perception, anxiety, and impacts on oral health-related quality of life between patients receiving clear aligners and fixed appliances during the initial stage of orthodontic treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2021; 43: 353–359.
[9] Zhao R, Huang R, Long H, Li Y, Gao M, Lai W. The dynamics of the oral microbiome and oral health among patients receiving clear aligner orthodontic treatment. Oral Diseases. 2020; 26: 473–483.
[10] AlMogbel A. Clear aligner therapy: up to date review article. Journal of Orthodontic Science. 2023; 12: 37.
[11] Muro MP, Caracciolo ACA, Patel MP, Feres MFN, Roscoe MG. Effectiveness and predictability of treatment with clear orthodontic aligners: a scoping review. International Orthodontics. 2023; 21: 100755.
[12] Houle JP, Piedade L, Todescan R, Pinheiro FHSL. The predictability of transverse changes with Invisalign. The Angle Orthodontist. 2017; 87: 19–24.
[13] Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, Agran B, Viana G. Influence of attachments and interproximal reduction on the accuracy of canine rotation with Invisalign. A prospective clinical study. The Angle Orthodontist. 2008; 78: 682–687.
[14] Bilello G, Fazio M, Amato E, Crivello L, Galvano A, Currò G. Accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: a prospective observational study. Progress in Orthodontics. 2022; 23: 12.
[15] Lombardo L, Arreghini A, Ramina F, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, Siciliani G. Predictability of orthodontic movement with orthodontic aligners: a retrospective study. Progress in Orthodontics. 2017; 18: 35.
[16] Campbell S, Goldstein G. Angle’s classification-a prosthodontic consideration: best evidence consensus statement. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2021; 30: 67–71.
[17] Park YS, Lee SP, Paik KS. The three-dimensional relationship on a virtual model between the maxillary anterior teeth and incisive papilla. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007; 98: 312–318.
[18] Chae YK, Lee H, Hyun HK, Lee H, Choi SC, Nam OH. Three-dimensional evaluation of tooth preparation forms in paediatric zirconia crowns: an in vitro study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2022; 32: 392–400.
[19] Kim CH, Moon SJ, Kang CM, Song JS. The predictability of arch expansion with the Invisalign First system in children with mixed dentition: a retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024; 48: 91–100.
[20] Zhou N, Guo J. Efficiency of upper arch expansion with the Invisalign system. The Angle Orthodontist. 2020; 90: 23–30.
[21] Hansa I, Katyal V, Ferguson DJ, Vaid N. Outcomes of clear aligner treatment with and without Dental Monitoring: a retrospective cohort study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2021; 159: 453–459.
[22] D’Antò V, Valletta R, Di Mauro L, Riccitiello F, Kirlis R, Rongo R. The predictability of transverse changes in patients treated with clear aligners. Materials. 2023; 16: 1910.
[23] Simon M, Keilig L, Schwarze J, Jung BA, Bourauel C. Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique–regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization. BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14: 1–7.
[24] Castroflorio T, Sedran A, Parrini S, Garino F, Reverdito M, Capuozzo R, et al. Predictability of orthodontic tooth movement with aligners: effect of treatment design. Progress in Orthodontics. 2023; 24: 2.
[25] Alwafi AA, Hannam AG, Yen EH, Zou B. A new method assessing predicted and achieved mandibular tooth movement in adults treated with clear aligners using CBCT and individual crown superimposition. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13: 4084.
[26] Li B, Xu YM, Shi RY, Hu YR, Liu SY, Gu ZX. A retrospective study of the accuracy of invisalign progress assessment with clear aligners. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13: 9000.
[27] Grünheid T, Loh C, Larson BE. How accurate is Invisalign in nonextraction cases? Are predicted tooth positions achieved? The Angle Orthodontist. 2017; 87: 809–815.
[28] Gaddam R, Freer E, Kerr B, Weir T. Reliability of torque expression by the Invisalign® appliance: a retrospective study. Australasian Orthodontic Journal. 2021; 37: 3–13.
[29] Loberto S, Pavoni C, Fanelli S, Lugli L, Cozza P, Lione R. Predictability of expansion movements performed by clear aligners in mixed dentition in both arches: a retrospective study on digital casts. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 694.
[30] Ye JR, Park SH, Lee H, Hong S, Chae YK, Lee KE, et al. Influence of limited mouth opening in children on intraoral scanning accuracy: an in vitro study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2024; 34: 755–763.
[31] Mapelli A, Serafin M, Dolci C, Gibelli D, Caprioglio A, Sforza C, et al. Consistency and reliability analyses of a comprehensive index for the evaluation of teeth alignment performance. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11: 1016.
[32] Sharp IG, Minick G, Carey C, Shellhart CW, Tilliss T. Assessment of simulated vs actual orthodontic tooth movement with a customized fixed lingual appliance using untreated posterior teeth for registration and digital superimposition: a retrospective study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2022; 161: 272–280.
[33] Sachdev S, Tantidhnazet S, Saengfai NN. Accuracy of tooth movement with in-house clear aligners. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 2021; 10: 177–182.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 2.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top