Article Data

  • Views 209
  • Dowloads 134

Original Research

Open Access

The effects of virtual reality and external cooling and vibration (Buzzy®) on dental anxiety and pain during inferior alveolar nerve block in children: a randomized clinical trial

  • Aybüke İpek Atik1
  • Arif Bolaca2,*,

1Private Dental Clinic, 20010 Denizli, Turkey

2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Pamukkale University, 20160 Denizli, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.015 Vol.50,Issue 1,January 2026 pp.156-165

Submitted: 19 April 2025 Accepted: 03 June 2025

Published: 03 January 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Arif Bolaca E-mail: abolaca@pau.edu.tr

Abstract

Background: To compare the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) and external cooling and vibration distraction techniques on dental anxiety and pain in children during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). Methods: In this randomized controlled parallel arm trial, 120 children aged 6 to 12 years requiring IANB were included and randomly assigned into one of three groups: Group I: VR eyeglasses, Group II: Buzzy® device and Group III: Control (conventional behavior management technique). Dental anxiety levels were measured by the heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation level (SpO2) before, during, and after the IANB procedure. Pain perception was assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale, Wong Baker Faces Scale (WBS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: A significant increase in HR was observed in all groups during the IANB procedure (p < 0.05). Group II (Buzzy® device) showed the lowest FLACC scores, followed by Group I (VR eyeglasses) and Group III (Control), with statistically significant differences among groups (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of WBS and VAS scores (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Although neither VR eyeglasses nor the Buzzy® device significantly reduced physiological indicators of dental anxiety during IANB, both techniques were effective in lowering pain levels compared to conventional behavior management techniques. Clinical Trial Registration: The study protocol was retrospectively registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT06788301).


Keywords

Dental anxiety; Distraction; Local anesthesia; Pain; Pediatric dentistry


Cite and Share

Aybüke İpek Atik,Arif Bolaca. The effects of virtual reality and external cooling and vibration (Buzzy®) on dental anxiety and pain during inferior alveolar nerve block in children: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(1);156-165.

References

[1] Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, et al. The revised international association for the study of pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020; 161: 1976–1982.

[2] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pain management in infants, children, adolescents, and individuals with special health care needs. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Chicago, Ill. 2024: 435–443.

[3] AlRaddadi ZA, AlHowaish LA, Sulimany AM. Pain-related behavior and pain perception associated with intraosseous local Anesthesia (QuickSleeper 5®) in pediatric patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Children. 2025; 12: 65.

[4] Czarnecki ML, Turner HN, Collins PM, Doellman D, Wrona S, Reynolds J. Procedural pain management: a position statement with clinical practice recommendations. Pain Management Nursing. 2011; 12: 95–111.

[5] Šimunović L, Špiljak B, Radulović M, Vlahovljak A, Ostojić M, Krlev J, et al. Relationship between children’s and parents’ dental anxiety: a cross-sectional study on the six European countries. Dentistry Journal. 2022; 10: 209.

[6] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Behaviour guidance for the pediatric dental patient. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Chicago, Ill. 2024: 358–378.

[7] Wismeijer AAJ, Vingerhoets AJJM. The use of virtual reality and audiovisual eyeglass systems as adjunct analgesic techniques: a review of the literature. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2005; 30: 268–278.

[8] Al-Namankany A, Petrie A, Ashley P. Video modelling and reducing anxiety related to dental injections—a randomised clinical trial. British Dental Journal. 2014; 216: 675–679.

[9] Prado IM, Carcavalli L, Abreu LG, Serra‐Negra JM, Paiva SM, Martins CC. Use of distraction techniques for the management of anxiety and fear in paediatric dental practice: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2019; 29: 650–668.

[10] Nuvvula S, Alahari S, Kamatham R, Challa RR. Effect of audiovisual distraction with 3D video glasses on dental anxiety of children experiencing administration of local analgesia: a randomised clinical trial. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2015; 16: 43–50.

[11] Aditya PVA, Prasad MG, Nagaradhakrishna A, Raju NS, Babu DN. Comparison of effectiveness of three distraction techniques to allay dental anxiety during inferior alveolar nerve block in children: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Heliyon. 2021; 7: e08092.

[12] Felemban OM, Alshamrani RM, Aljeddawi DH, Bagher SM. Effect of virtual reality distraction on pain and anxiety during infiltration anesthesia in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 321.

[13] Erdogan B, Aytekin Ozdemir A. The effect of three different methods on venipuncture pain and anxiety in children: distraction cards, virtual reality, and Buzzy® (Randomized Controlled Trial). Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2021; 58: e54–e62.

[14] Buldur B, Candan M. Does virtual reality affect children’s dental anxiety, pain, and behaviour? A randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2021; 21: e0082.

[15] Ghaderi F, Banakar S, Rostami S. Effect of pre-cooling injection site on pain perception in pediatric dentistry: “a randomized clinical trial”. Dental Research Journal. 2013; 10: 790–794.

[16] Tirupathi SP, Nanda N, Pallepagu S, Malothu S, Rathi N, Chauhan RS, et al. The combined effect of extraoral vibratory stimulus and external cooling on pain perception during intra-oral local anesthesia administration in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2022; 22: 87–96.

[17] Ballard A, Khadra C, Adler S, Trottier ED, Le May S. Efficacy of the Buzzy device for pain management during needle-related procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2019; 35: 532–543.

[18] Baxter AL, Lawson ML. Methodological concerns comparing buzzy to transilluminator device. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry. 2014; 29: 114–115.

[19] Wiederhold MD, Gao K, Wiederhold BK. Clinical use of virtual reality distraction system to reduce anxiety and pain in dental procedures. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2014; 17: 359–365.

[20] Alanazi KJ, Pani S, AlGhanim N. Efficacy of external cold and a vibrating device in reducing discomfort of dental injections in children: a split mouth randomised crossover study. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2019; 20: 79–84.

[21] Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine. 2010; 8: 18.

[22] Merkel S, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz J. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatric Nursing. 1997; 23: 293–297.

[23] Alshatrat SM, Sabarini JM, Hammouri HM, Al‐Bakri IA, Al‐Omari WM. Effect of immersive virtual reality on pain in different dental procedures in children: a pilot study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2022; 32: 264–272.

[24] Lee GY, Yamada J, Kyololo O, Shorkey A, Stevens B. Pediatric clinical practice guidelines for acute procedural pain: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2014; 133: 500–515.

[25] Armfield J, Heaton L. Management of fear and anxiety in the dental clinic: a review. Australian Dental Journal. 2013; 58: 390–407.

[26] Folayan MO, Idehen EE, Ufomata D. The effect of sociodemographic factors on dental anxiety in children seen in a suburban Nigerian hospital. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2003; 13: 20–26.

[27] Sarı F, Özbey İpek H. Comparison of different techniques used for inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia regarding the pain caused in cooperative children. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2025; 26: 139–147.

[28] Aartman IH, van Everdingen T, Hoogstraten J, Schuurs AH. Self-report measurements of dental anxiety and fear in children: a critical assessment. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1998; 65: 252–258, 229–230.

[29] Şermet Elbay Ü, Elbay M, Kaya C, Uğurluel C, Baydemir C. The Efficacy of DentalVibe injection comfort system producing vibration impuls to reduce injection pain of palatal local infiltration anesthesia in children. Klinikleri Journal of Dental Sciences. 2015; 21: 207–215.

[30] Padminee K, Hemalatha R, Shankar P, Senthil D, Jayakaran TG, Kabita S. Effectiveness of biofeedback relaxation and audio‐visual distraction on dental anxiety among 7‐ to 12‐year‐old children while administering local anaesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2022; 32: 31–40.

[31] Agarwal N, Dhawan J, Kumar D, Anand A, Tangri K. Effectiveness of two topical anaesthetic agents used along with audio visual aids in paediatric dental patients. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017; 11: ZC80–ZC83.

[32] Marwah N, Prabhakar A, Raju O. A comparison between audio and audiovisual distraction techniques in managing anxious pediatric dental patients. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2007; 25: 177–182.

[33] de Camargo Smolarek P, da Silva LS, Martins PRD, da Cruz Hartman K, Bortoluzzi MC, Chibinski ACR. The influence of distinct techniques of local dental anesthesia in 9- to 12-year-old children: randomized clinical trial on pain and anxiety. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021; 25: 3831–3843.

[34] Marwah N, Mishra P, Suohu T, Sharma S. A comparative evaluation of pain perception and comfort of a patient using Conventional Syringe and Buzzy System. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2020; 13: 27–30.

[35] Shekhar S, Suprabha BS, Shenoy R, Rao A, Rao A. Effect of active and passive distraction techniques while administering local anaesthesia on the dental anxiety, behaviour and pain levels of children: a randomised controlled trial. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2022; 23: 417–427.

[36] Narimany R, Faghihian R, Jafarzadeh Samani M. Effectiveness of external precooling and vibration induced by BUZZY on pain and anxiety during inferior alveolar nerve block injection in children. International Journal of Dentistry. 2024; 2024: 5515522.

[37] Mladenovic R, Mikic M, Arsic Z, Kalezic IS, Djordjevic F. Assessing the effect of virtual reality gamification on anxiety and pain management during extraction of MIH-affected lower first permanent molars in pediatric patients. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025; 49: 73–78.

[38] Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 8th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, USA. 2008.

[39] Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965; 150: 971–979.

[40] Kakigi R, Shibasaki H. Mechanisms of pain relief by vibration and movement. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1992; 55: 282–286.

[41] Nahra H, Plaghki L. Innocuous skin cooling modulates perception and neurophysiological correlates of brief CO2 laser stimuli in humans. European Journal of Pain. 2005; 9: 521–530.

[42] Themessl-Huber M, Freeman R, Humphris G, MacGillivray S, Terzi N. Empirical evidence of the relationship between parental and child dental fear: a structured review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2010; 20: 83–101.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top