Does tongue volume correlate with the upper airway and craniofacial structure of the skeletal Class III malocclusion pattern? A cross-sectional descriptive study in Vietnamese children

Background: This study aims to assess the impact of TV on craniofacial and maxillary airway morphology in Vietnamese children with skeletal Class III malocclusion using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive analysis was conducted on a total of 90 children (14–18 years old, 29 males and 61 females) from July 2023 to July 2024 with skeletal Class III malocclusion (angle formed by the A-nasion line and B-nasion line (ANB) ≤0, Wits appraisal ≤2), a body mass index of 18–25 kg/m2, no history of orthodontic treatment or orthognathic surgery, and no history of cleft lip or palate treatment. Lateral cephalometric radiography and CBCT were performed for each participant to identify differences and analyze the correlation of airway dimensions and craniofacial structure with TV. Results: The study revealed significant gender variations in molar dimension, age, and craniofacial measures. Males had higher TV, OCV, and pharyngeal airway volume than females, but the TV/OCV ratio was not significant. Age raised most metrics, with TV, OCAV, and OCV positively correlated. Tongue volume may affect airway dimension, since TV demonstrated a significant positive correlation with different parts of. Some craniofacial measurements were significantly associated with TV, particularly those related to the line between ANS and PNS present for Palatal plane (ANS-PNS) and L7-7.Other measurements, such dental width, did not correlate with TV. Conclusions: The study found significant differences in TV and dental arch width among individuals with skeletal Class III malocclusion, a negative correlation between TV and interincisal angle, and a significant negative correlation between the TV/OCV ratio and pharyngeal and oral airway volumes, indicating that TV, OCV, and their ratio are important for preserving airway patency and early recognition of upper airway abnormalities.

Airway volume; Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); Malocclusion; Tongue volume (TV); Skeletal Class III; Vietnamese population

[1] Shams N, Razavi M, Zabihzadeh M, Shokuhifar M, Rakhshan V. Associations between the severity of nasal septal deviation and nasopharynx volume in different ages and sexes: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2022; 44: 13.

[2] Rana SS, Kharbanda OP, Agarwal B. Influence of tongue volume, oral cavity volume and their ratio on upper airway: a cone beam computed tomography study. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2020; 10: 110–117.

[3] Varghese J, Kirsch C. Magnetic resonance imaging of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2021; 30: 79–83.

[4] Halim IA, Park JH, Liou EJW, Zeinalddin M, Al Samawi YS, Bay RC. Preliminary study: evaluating the reliability of CBCT images for tongue space measurements in the field of orthodontics. Oral Radiology. 2021; 37: 267.

[5] Grover S, Sidhu MS, Singaraju GS, Dabas A, Dogra N, Midha M. Three-dimensional evaluation of the tongue volume in different dentoskeletal patterns—a cone beam computed tomographic study. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2021; 13: S137–S142.

[6] Rajkumar B, Parameswaran R, Parameswaran A, Vijayalakshmi D. Evaluation of volume change in oral cavity proper before and after mandibular advancement. Angle Orthodontist. 2021; 91: 81–87.

[7] Ding X, Suzuki S, Shiga M, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T, Moriyama K. Evaluation of tongue volume and oral cavity capacity using cone-beam computed tomography. Odontology. 2018; 106: 266–273.

[8] Shaikh SM, Goswami M. Evaluation of the effect of different root canal preparation techniques in primary teeth using CBCT. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry . 2018; 42: 250–255.

[9] Le LN, Do TT, Truong LT, Dang The AT, Truong MH, Huynh Ngoc DK, et al. Cone beam CT assessment of mandibular foramen and mental foramen positions as essential anatomical landmarks: a retrospective study in Vietnam. Cureus. 2024; 16: e59337.

[10] Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18: 88.

[11] Manrikyan GE, Vardanyan IF, Markaryan MM, Manrikyan ME, Badeyan EH, Manukyan AH, et al. Association between the obstructive sleep apnea and cephalometric parameters in teenagers. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023;12:6851.

[12] Gaffuri F, Cossellu G, Maspero C, Lanteri V, Ugolini A, Rasperini G, et al. Correlation between facial growth patterns and cortical bone thickness assessed with cone-beam computed tomography in young adult untreated patients. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2021; 33: 161–167.

[13] Hotwani K, Sharma K, Jaiswal A. Evaluation of tongue/mandible volume ratio in children with obstructive sleep apnea. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2018; 23: 72–78.

[14] Van Dyck C, Dekeyser A, Vantricht E, Manders E, Goeleven A, Fieuws S. The effect of orofacial myofunctional treatment in children with anterior open bite and tongue dysfunction: a pilot study. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2015; 38: 227–234.

[15] Rodrigues J, Evangelopoulos E, Anagnostopoulos I, Sachdev N, Ismail A, Samsudin R. Impact of class II and class III skeletal malocclusion on pharyngeal airway dimensions: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2024; 10: e27284.

[16] Rajkumar B, Parameswaran R, Sanjana M, Boovaraghavan S, Vijayalakshmi D. Evaluation of pharyngeal airway volume three-dimensionally in various sagittal skeletal patterns-Systematic review. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2023; 34: 209–215.

[17] Inchingolo AD, Inchingolo AM, Campanelli M, Carpentiere V, de Ruvo E, Ferrante L. Orthodontic treatment in patients with atypical swallowing and malocclusion: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024; 48: 14–26.

[18] Neelapu BC, Kharbanda OP, Sardana HK, Balachandran R, Sardana V, Kapoor P. Craniofacial and upper airway morphology in adult obstructive sleep apnea patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cephalometric studies. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2017; 31: 79–90.

[19] Bandeira AM, Oltramari-Navarro PV, de Lima Navarro R, de Castro Ferreira Conti AC, de Almeida MR, Fernandes KB. Three-dimensional upper-airway assessment in patients with bronchial asthma. The Angle Orthodontist. 2014; 84: 254–259.

[20] Gershater E, Li C, Ha P, Chung CH, Tanna N, Zou M, et al. Genes and pathways associated with skeletal sagittal malocclusions: a systematic review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22: 13037.

[21] Ahn SH, Kim J, Min HJ, Chung HJ, Hong JM, Lee JG, et al. Tongue volume influences lowest oxygen saturation but not apnea-hypopnea index in obstructive sleep apnea. PLOS ONE. 2015; 10: e0135796.

[22] Cielo CM, Duffy KA, Vyas A, Taylor JA, Kalish JM. Obstructive sleep apnoea and the role of tongue reduction surgery in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews. 2018; 25: 58–63.

[23] Savoldi F, Dagassan-Berndt D, Patcas R, Mak WS, Kanavakis G, Verna C, et al. The use of CBCT in orthodontics with special focus on upper airway analysis in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2024; 53: 178–188.

[24] Aflah KA, Yohana W, Oscandar F. Volumetric measurement of the tongue and oral cavity with cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2022; 52: 333–342.

[25] Deshkar M, Thosar NR, Kabra SP, Yeluri R, Rathi NV. The influence of the tongue on the development of dental malocclusion. Cureus. 2024; 16: e61281.

[26] Chiang CC, Jeffres MN, Miller A, Hatcher DC. Three-dimensional airway evaluation in 387 subjects from one university orthodontic clinic using cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthodontist. 2012; 82: 985–992.

[27] Claudino LV, Mattos CT, Ruellas AC, Sant’ Anna EF. Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2013; 143: 799–809.

[28] Uysal T, Yagci A, Ucar FI, Veli I, Ozer T. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of relationship between tongue volume and lower incisor irregularity. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2013; 35: 555–562.

[29] Moreno Uribe LM, Miller SF. Genetics of the dentofacial variation in human malocclusion. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2015; 18: 91–99.

[30] Liégeois F, Albert A, Limme M. Comparison between tongue volume from magnetic resonance images and tongue area from profile cephalograms. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2010; 32: 381–386.

[31] Ihan Hren N, Barbič U. Tongue volume in adults with skeletal Class III dentofacial deformities. Head & Face Medicine. 2016; 12: 12.

[32] Do KL, Ferreyra H, Healy JF, Davidson TM. Does tongue size differ between patients with and without sleep-disordered breathing? Laryngoscope. 2000; 110: 1552–1555.

[33] Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, Nowak A. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1997; 111: 401–409.

[34] Shahidi S, Momeni Danaie S, Omidi M. Comparison of the pharyngeal airway volume between non-syndromic unilateral cleft palate and normal individuals using cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Dentistry. 2016; 17: 268–275.

[35] Gurani SF, Di Carlo G, Cattaneo PM, Thorn JJ, Pinholt EM. Effect of head and tongue posture on the pharyngeal airway dimensions and morphology in three-dimensional imaging: a systematic review. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research. 2016; 7: e1.