Article Data

  • Views 205
  • Dowloads 105

Original Research

Open Access

Reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos about molar incisor hypomineralization

  • Sibel Acar1,*,
  • Aslı Aşık1

1Department of Pedodontics, Izmir Tınaztepe University, 35200 İzmir, Türkiye

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.017 Vol.50,Issue 1,January 2026 pp.182-189

Submitted: 09 May 2025 Accepted: 24 June 2025

Published: 03 January 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Sibel Acar E-mail: sibel.acar@tinaztepe.edu.tr

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and quality of videos about molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) on YouTube. Methods: The term “molar incisor hypomineralization” was searched on YouTube and 58 videos were screened. Seventeen YouTube videos that met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Videos were evaluated using the Modified Global Quality Score (mGQS), Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), Journal of the American Medical Association Scale (JAMAS), and Total Content Score. Based on the total content scores, videos with 0–4 points were considered to have low content, and those with 5–9 points were determined to have high content. Results: The findings showed an average total content score of 3.94 ± 2.65 out of 9. A total of 11 videos (64.7%) had low content, while 6 videos (35.3%) had high content. There were significant differences across the content categories for the amount of likes, total VIQI score, authorship, validity, and mGQS (p < 0.05). Following a comparison of the number of likes on videos with high and low content, it was discovered that the ones with higher content had significantly more likes (p < 0.05). Conclusions: YouTube videos about MIH are limited in quantity, and also the majority of the videos featured poor quality content and inadequate information. Since social media had a power on today’s information habits; a quality video can provide a roadmap by step-by-step explanations. Pediatric dentists can play a significant role in improving the quality of life for both patients and their families by creating and uploading high-quality videos on the symptoms, diagnostic process and management strategies of this disease.


Keywords

Molar incisor hypomineralization; Video analysis; YouTube; Health informatics


Cite and Share

Sibel Acar,Aslı Aşık. Reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos about molar incisor hypomineralization. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(1);182-189.

References

[1] Weerheijm KL. Molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH): clinical presentation, aetiology and management. Dental Update. 2004; 31: 9–12.

[2] Schwendicke F, Elhennawy K, Reda S, Bekes K, Manton DJ, Krois J. Global burden of molar incisor hypomineralization. Journal of Dentistry. 2018; 68: 10–18.

[3] Elhennawy K, Manton DJ, Crombie F, Zaslansky P, Radlanski RJ, Jost-Brinkmann PG, et al. Structural, mechanical and chemical evaluation of molar-incisor hypomineralization-affected enamel: a systematic review. Archives of Oral Biology. 2017; 83: 272–281.

[4] Lygidakis NA, Wong F, Jälevik B, Vierrou AM, Alaluusua S, Espelid I. Best clinical practice guidance for clinicians dealing with children presenting with molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH): an EAPD policy document. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2010; 11: 75–81.

[5] Knösel M, Jung K, Bleckmann A. YouTube, dentistry, and dental education. Journal of Dental Education. 2011; 75: 1558–1568.

[6] Bird CE, Kozin ED, Connors S, LoBue C, Abdullah K. A quantitative analysis of social media to determine trends in brain tumor care and treatment. Cureus. 2020; 12: e11530.

[7] Tozar KN, Yapıcı Yavuz G. Reliability of information on YouTube™ regarding pediatric dental trauma. Dental Traumatology. 2021; 37: 772–778.

[8] Sahin SC, Dere KA. Quality of information in—masseter botox—videos on YouTube: is it a sufficient guide for potential patients? Journal of Stomatology. 2020; 73: 313–325.

[9] Aydın MN, Yılmaz H. YoutubeTM video content analysis on removable orthodontic appliance. Yeditepe Dental Journal. 2020; 16: 220–225.

[10] Maganur PC, Hakami Z, Raghunath RG, Vundavalli S, Jeevanandan G, Almugla YM, et al. Reliability of educational content videos in YouTubeTM about stainless steel crowns. Children. 2022; 9: 571.

[11] Monteiro CMG, Silva KS, Tavares FOM, Dias MO, Maia LC, Pithon MM. Assessment of the reliability of YouTube™ videos about zirconia crowns in pediatric dentistry. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2023; 24: 585–590.

[12] Kaval ME, Kandemir Demirci G, Atesci AA, Sarsar F, Dindaroğlu F, Güneri P, et al. YouTube™ as an information source for regenerative endodontic treatment procedures: quality and content analysis. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2022; 161: 104732.

[13] Bandeira Lopes L, Machado V, Botelho J, Haubek D. Molar-incisor hypomineralization: an umbrella review. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2021; 79: 359–369.

[14] Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997; 277: 1244–1245.

[15] Cesur Aydin K, Gunec HG. Quality of information on YouTube about artificial intelligence in dental radiology. Journal of Dental Education. 2020; 84: 1166–1172.

[16] Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics Journal. 2015; 21: 173–194.

[17] Aguirre PEA, Anibal I, Lotto M, Strieder AP, Cruvinel T. Decoding early childhood caries: an in-depth analysis of YouTube videos for effective parental education. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2023; 24: 701–709.

[18] Simsek H, Buyuk SK, Cetinkaya E, Tural M, Koseoglu MS. “How I whiten my teeth”: YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 183.

[19] Ramadhani A, Zettira Z, Rachmawati YL, Hariyani N, Maharani DA. Quality and reliability of halitosis videos on YouTube as a source of information. Dentistry Journal. 2021; 9: 120.

[20] Korkmaz YN, Buyuk SK. YouTube as a patient-information source for cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 2020; 57: 327–332.

[21] Meade MJ, Sooriakumaran P, Dreyer CW. Orthodontic retention and retainers: quality of information provided by dental professionals on YouTube. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2020; 158: 229–236.

[22] Duman C. YouTube™ quality as a source for parent education about the oral hygiene of children. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2020; 18: 261–267.

[23] Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTube™ video analysis. The Angle Orthodontist. 2018; 88: 208–214.

[24] Jung MJ, Seo MS. Assessment of reliability and information quality of YouTube videos about root canal treatment after 2016. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22: 494.

[25] Gulve ND, Tripathi PR, Dahivelkar SD, Gulve MN, Gulve RN, Kolhe SJ. Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information about oral self-examination to detect oral cancer and precancerous lesions. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2022; 12: 226–234.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top