Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry,2026,50(2):1-13 DOI:10.22514/jocpd.2026.030
Review

Teledentistry for dental caries screening and preventive care in children and adolescents: a global scoping review

Mannaa K. Aldowsari1,*,

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 12372 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author(s):maldowsari@ksu.edu.sa (Mannaa K. Aldowsari)

History Submitted: 25 July 2025 | Accepted: 27 October 2025 | Published: 03 March 2026
Copyright:  ©2026  The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

Dental caries is the most common chronic disease among children worldwide. Despite being largely preventable, disparities in access to care persist, particularly in low-resource and rural settings. Teledentistry offers a promising approach to bridge this gap by enabling remote screening, diagnosis, and preventive interventions. This scoping review aims to synthesize global evidence on the application of teledentistry for pediatric caries screening and preventive care, identifying implementation strategies, diagnostic accuracy, and challenges across diverse settings. This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the Preferred reporting system for systematic review and meta-analysis for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted across four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) and gray literature sources from January 2015 till 31 May 2025. Studies were included if they focused on teledentistry for caries screening/prevention in children (0–18 years). Data were extracted using a standardized form. A narrative synthesis was performed, supported by tabular and visual summaries of key findings. Twenty-three studies were included from dental settings in high- and low-middle-income countries. Teledentistry demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for caries detection, with store-and-forward and mobile health (mHealth) modalities showing sensitivity (44%–98.3%) and specificity (58%–100%). Non-dental personnel achieved reliable results post-training. Preventive applications, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven apps and school-based programs, improved oral health knowledge and access, particularly in underserved areas. Teledentistry is a promising tool for pediatric caries management, offering scalable solutions for early detection and prevention. However, equitable implementation requires addressing digital disparities, standardizing training, and fostering policy support. The pre-designed protocol for this review was established and registered in the Open Science Network (Reg. No. osf.io/fs56z).

Keywords:Teledentistry;Pediatric dentistry;Dental caries;Screening;Preventive care;Global health
PDF(1.33 MB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Mannaa K. Aldowsari. Teledentistry for dental caries screening and preventive care in children and adolescents: a global scoping review.Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry,2026,50(2):1-13 DOI:10.22514/jocpd.2026.030

1. Introduction

Dental caries remains the most widespread chronic disease among children globally [1, 2]. The Global Burden of Disease Study estimated that over 530 million children are affected by untreated dental caries in primary teeth, making it the most common untreated condition worldwide [3]. If left untreated, caries can lead to significant complications, such as pain, infections, malnutrition, absenteeism, and reduced psychosocial well-being [4].

Despite being largely preventable through timely risk assessment, behavior modification, and fluoride application, access to preventive dental care remains unevenly distributed. Children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and underserved populations in high-income countries (HICs) face significant barriers, including geographic isolation, limited healthcare infrastructure, shortage of pediatric dental professionals, low oral health literacy, and financial constraints [5]. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated these disparities by restricting in-person dental services, highlighting the fragility of conventional dental care systems [1]. Teledentistry has emerged as a promising, technology-driven approach to extend the reach of dental services, particularly for early caries detection and preventive counseling in pediatric populations [6].

Teledentistry, a subset of telehealth, is defined as the use of telecommunication technology to provide dental care, consultation, education, and public health interventions remotely [7]. It comprises various modalities, including synchronous (real-time interaction), asynchronous (store-and-forward), remote monitoring, and mobile health (mHealth). These modalities can facilitate screening, diagnosis, education, and referral in both community and clinical settings [4]. In pediatric oral health, teledentistry has been used in school-based screening programs, maternal-child health services, and mobile dental units to detect early signs of caries, deliver anticipatory guidance to caregivers, and promote oral hygiene behaviors [8, 9].

Several pilot programs in high-income settings have demonstrated the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of teledentistry. The “Virtual Dental Home” model in California, for example, successfully deployed mid-level dental providers in community sites to collect diagnostic data, which was remotely reviewed by dentists, leading to early intervention and reduced need for advanced treatment [10]. Similarly, school-based teledentistry initiatives in Australia have shown that mobile and asynchronous platforms can significantly improve access to preventive care among rural and indigenous children [11, 12]. In LMICs, although the adoption of teledentistry is still emerging, mHealth interventions using smartphones and instant messaging platforms have been piloted with encouraging outcomes, especially in India, Brazil, and Iran [13, 14, 15].

However, significant implementation challenges remain. Diagnostic accuracy is heavily influenced by image quality, device calibration, and user training [10, 16]. Additionally, ethical considerations, such as data privacy, consent, and legal accountability in remote care models, are yet to be comprehensively addressed in many jurisdictions [5]. Moreover, disparities in digital infrastructure, particularly in rural and low-income settings, may inadvertently exacerbate oral health inequities if not addressed through targeted policy and resource allocation [3].

The existing literature on pediatric teledentistry is expanding but remains fragmented, with limited synthesis of global evidence regarding its use specifically for caries screening and prevention. Previous reviews have either focused on teledentistry in general populations, evaluated treatment-based applications, or were geographically restricted [7, 8, 17, 18, 19]. As the global health community pushes toward digital health integration within Universal Health Coverage frameworks, there is a need for comprehensive evidence to inform scalable, equitable, and context-sensitive teledentistry interventions in pediatric oral health [1, 6].

This scoping review aims to address this gap by systematically mapping the global application of teledentistry for caries screening and preventive care among children. By identifying best practices, contextual challenges, and evidence gaps, this review seeks to inform researchers, policymakers, and clinicians about how teledentistry can be optimized to reduce the global burden of dental caries in children.

2. Material and method

The pre-designed protocol for this review was established and registered in the Open Science Network (Reg. No. osf.io/fs56z). The current scoping review was conducted in accordance with the methodological framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for scoping reviews and reported following the Preferred reporting system for systematic review and meta-analysis for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) checklist (Supplementary material 1) [20]. The review systematically mapped the existing global literature on the application of teledentistry for dental caries screening and preventive care in pediatric populations.

2.1 Research question

Following Population, context, and concept guidelines for scoping review, the research question developed was “What is known about the use of teledentistry for caries screening and preventive care among children and adolescents worldwide?”.

Where, Population (P): Children and adolescents aged 0–18 years from any geographic, socioeconomic, or cultural background. Concept (C): Application of teledentistry technologies for dental caries screening (detection, diagnosis, risk assessment) and delivery of preventive care (oral hygiene instruction, fluoride therapy, dietary counseling, anticipatory guidance). Context (C): Global implementation in various settings, including school-based programs, community health clinics, rural and remote areas, low-resource environments, and both public and private healthcare systems.

2.2 Inclusion criteria

• Peer-reviewed original studies (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods).

• Studies published in the English language.

• Studies published from January 2015 to present to capture contemporary developments in teledentistry.

2.3 Exclusion criteria

• Studies not involving children or adolescents as primary subjects.

• Studies focusing exclusively on treatment or restorative dental care via teledentistry (not screening or prevention).

• Opinion, editorials, commentaries, reviews, and conference abstracts without sufficient data.

2.4 Search strategy

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across four electronic databases to identify relevant studies. The primary databases searched include MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and the Web of Science. These databases were selected to ensure a broad and inclusive search of peer-reviewed literature across disciplines related to pediatrics, dental public health, and digital health.

To supplement the electronic database search and capture gray literature, additional sources, such as Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and official websites of international health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Federal dental information (FDI) World Dental Federation, were also explored.

A preliminary search was conducted on MEDLINE (via PubMed) to identify relevant keywords, subject headings (MeSH terms), and appropriate search terms related to the topic. These terms were then refined and adapted for use in each database by incorporating Boolean operators and database-specific syntax to ensure sensitivity and specificity of the search. The terminologies used in each database are presented in Supplementary Table 1.

2.5 Data screening

All identified records from the database and gray literature searches were imported into EndNote 20 for the purpose of de-duplication. The screening process was conducted in two distinct stages. In Stage 1, two reviewers (MA and SA) independently screened the titles and abstracts of all retrieved articles to identify potentially relevant studies based on the predefined inclusion criteria. In Stage 2, the full texts of selected articles were retrieved and reviewed in detail to determine their eligibility for inclusion in the scoping review. Any discrepancies or disagreements between reviewers at either stage were resolved through discussion, and if consensus could not be reached, a third reviewer (AS) was consulted to make the final decision.

2.6 Data extraction

A standardized data charting form was developed specifically for this review to ensure consistent and comprehensive extraction of relevant information. The form was pilot tested on a small sample of studies to assess clarity, completeness, and usability, and was refined as necessary. Two reviewers independently extracted data using Microsoft Excel (Version 2025, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA), ensuring methodological rigor and reducing bias in the data collection process. The data extraction was divided into three forms, (1) different caries detection methods; (2) preventive programs for dental caries reduction and education; and (3) specificity and sensitivity of the teledentistry programs. The data extracted had the following outcomes; for Table 1 (Ref. [10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]), Name of the authors/country/year, study design, sample population, teledentistry modalities (synchronous, asynchronous, mobile health (mHealth), or artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled platforms), technologies used, caries screening method, and conclusions; for Table 2 (Ref. [31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38]), Name of authors/country/year; study design, population demographics, preventive teledentistry program, and conclusions.

Table 1.Characteristics of included studies for diagnosis of dental caries in children using teledentistry.
Sr No.Authors/Year/CountryStudy designSample populationTeledentistry modalitiesTechnologies usedCaries screening methodConclusions
1.Ashtiani et al. [21] 2024, IranCross sectional studyn = 131; age group = 6–12 yearsCaries screening by mobile phone applicationmHealth softwareIntra-oral photographsTeledentistry have been proven to be cost effective measure in diagnosis of dental caries in children from low-income countries.
2.Aly et al. [23] 2024, EgyptRandomized factorial trialn = 27; Children under 6 yearsIntraoral camera and smartphoneC50 Full HD intraoral camera, Samsung Galaxy A24 smartphoneCAST (Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment) indexAims to assess effectiveness of tele-detection methods and referral pathways for early childhood caries control.
3.Mohamed Estai et al. [11] 2021, AustraliaCross sectionaln = 138; M = 67, F = 71 age group = 4–12 yearsDMFT index by mobile phone camera applicationmHealth softwareIntra-oral photographsTeledentistry is acceptable in primary caries detection among the children.
4.Nasim Seyfi [15] 2024, IranDiagnostic accuracy studyn = 115 SHCN school childrenMobile teledentistrySmartphone camera, EmailVisual examination (DMFT/dmft index), Photographic assessmentTeledentistry showed high sensitivity (91.2%–91.6%) and specificity (97.2%–99.6%) with almost perfect agreement (kappa: 0.89–0.93). Suitable for caries screening in SHCN children.
5.Somayyeh Azimi et al. [24] 2023, AustraliaDiagnostic cross-sectional studyn = 42 preschool children (<4 years) and their parentsParent-captured dental photos via mobile appSmartphone app (“Tele-dental”), Remote-i platformICDAS-II (gold standard: pediatric dentist; test: OHTs reviewing photos)Teledentistry showed high specificity (≥95.5%) but variable sensitivity (44%–88.4%). Feasible for ECC screening post-training, with 90% photo quality rated good/fair. Parent acceptance was high.
6.AlShaya et al. [26] 2022, Saudi ArabiaDiagnostic accuracy study (Smartphone app with real-time feedback guidelines)n = 95 schoolchildren aged 5–10 years (54 boys, 41 girls) from a private school in JeddahNon-dentist (teachers) and dentist teledentistryiPhone X smartphone cameraClinical examination (WHO criteria) vs. blinded analysis of intraoral photosTeledentistry showed high accuracy for caries detection in primary (sensitivity: 98.3%, specificity: 91.4%) and permanent teeth (sensitivity: 88.5%, specificity: 96.1%). Non-dentist personnel (teachers) achieved comparable results to dentists.
7.Golsanamloo et al. [22] 2022, IranDouble-blind clinical trialn = 20 children (6–12 years) with dental cariesMobile phone teledentistry (photos + radiographs)iPhone 13 smartphone cameraClinical exam vs. virtual exam (photos) vs. gold standard (expert pedodontist)Teledentistry showed comparable accuracy to clinical exams (sensitivity: 76.44%, specificity: 92.9%). No significant difference in treatment plans between virtual and clinical exams (p > 0.05). Intra examiner reliability (ICC = 0.92) was high.
8.Alkilzy et al. [30] 2019, GermanyRandomized controlled trialn = 49 children (5–6 years old; test group: n = 26, control: n = 23)Smartphone app with real-time feedbackManual toothbrush with gravitation sensor + Bluetooth-connected app (iOS/Android)Plaque index (QHI) and gingival index (PBI) and DMFTThe app significantly improved oral hygiene indices (QHI: 0.44 vs. 1.49; PBI: 0.05 vs. 0.21 at 12 weeks) compared to controls, demonstrating efficacy for medium-term plaque reduction.
9.Bissessur & Naidoo [27] 2019, South AfricaConcordance study (comparative analysis)n = 233 children (6–8 years old)Store-and-forward teledentistryIntraoral camera (Kodak 1500-Carestream), laptop, web-based eFilesDMFT index (Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth) via traditional vs. teledentistry screeningTeledentistry showed high diagnostic agreement (kappa: 0.9630–0.9480) with traditional screening, proving reliable for caries detection in underserved areas.
10.AlShaya et al. [16] (2018), Saudi ArabiaReliability study (diagnostic accuracy)n = 57 children aged 6–12 years; 342 comparisons by 6 examinersStore-and-forwardiPhone 7, Google Drive, WhatsApp MessengerWHO oral health assessment form (2013); images analyzed without radiographsMobile phone teledentistry offers acceptable reliability for initial caries diagnosis in children, though less accurate than clinical exams. Higher reliability in primary teeth than permanent teeth. Sensitivity > specificity, indicating more false positives.
11.Park et al. [25] 2018, AustraliaRetrospective descriptive studyn = 77 patients (2–14 years) undergoing dental treatment under general anesthesiaStore-and-forward teledentistryDSLR camera (Canon EOS 7D, EF 100 mm lens, Macro Ring Lite MR-14EX) Cloud-based server for image storageGold Standard: Comprehensive Dental Examination (CDE) with visual-tactile + radiographs.Moderate diagnostic performance (kappa = 0.62). Higher specificity (95%) than sensitivity (61.5%). Anterior teeth: Better agreement (kappa = 0.67) vs. posterior (kappa = 0.59). Underestimated caries (CDE dft/DFT = 7.01 vs. photo = 5.22). Potential for cost-effective screening in remote areas.
12.Kohara et al. [29] (2018), BrazilDiagnostic accuracy study (in vitro and in vivo)n = 20 exfoliated primary teeth (in vitro); 119 primary molars from 15 children aged 3–6 years (in vivo)Store-and-forwardiPhone 5, Nexus 4, Panasonic DMC-G2 macro cameraInternational Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS); images analyzed without radiographsSmartphone images are feasible for distinguishing sound surfaces from extensive caries lesions but are inaccurate for detecting initial and moderate lesions. The performance was similar between smartphones and macro cameras.
13.Subbalekshmi et al. [28] (2017), IndiaDiagnostic accuracy studyn = 312 children aged 3–6 yearsStore-and-forward2.5 MP intraoral camera (Dr. Schwartz Home Care, Japan)Visual examination (dmft index) and digital photographs analyzed by two examiners (E1 and E2)Teledentistry using intraoral images is feasible and reliable for caries screening in school settings, with high inter- and intra-examiner agreement (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.983). Limitations include potential false positives due to visual-only diagnosis.
14.Purohit et al. [14] (2016), IndiaCross-sectionaln = 139 school children aged 12 yearsStore-and-forwardSony Xperia smartphone (8 MP, 720p video)Visual-tactile examination (DMFT index) vs. video-graphic assessment (recorded videos)teledentistry is comparable to clinical exams for caries screening (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 58%). Video-graphic assessment is viable for remote consultations, though specificity is moderate.
15.Daniel & Kumar [10] (2016), USAComparative diagnostic accuracy studyn = 78 children aged 4–7 yearsStore-and-forwardiPhone 4S (photographs uploaded to Blackboard®)Clinical visual examination (DFS index) vs. teledentistry (photographic assessment) by dentists and hygienistsDental hygienists identified caries as accurately as dentists via teledentistry (Spearman’s correlation: 0.99 for clinical vs. teledentistry hygienist). No significant difference between clinical dentist and teledentistry hygienist (p > 0.10).

DMFT: Decayed, Missing, Filled permanent Teeth; dmft: decayed, missing, filled primary teeth; n: sample size; mHealth: mobile health; SHCN: Special health care needs; M: male; F: female; DFS: Decayed and Filled Surfaces; WHO: World Health Organization; ICC: Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; DSLR: Digital Single-Lens Reflex; OHT: oral health technology; ECC: Early childhood caries; dft/DFT: primary/permanent Decayed and filled tooth.

Table 2.Studies on teledentistry using preventive measures for the reduction of dental caries in children.
Sr No.Authors/Year/CountryStudy designSample populationPreventive measures utilizedTechnologies usedConclusions
School based programParental educationDental training
1.Fageeh et al. [35] 2024, Saudi ArabiaRandomized Controlled Trialn = 100 participants (50 blind, 50 deaf), aged 12–18 years, from special schools in Jazan ProvinceMobile health (mHealth) Telesmile app with tailored content (audio for blind, video/sign language for deaf)N/AN/ATelesmile mobile app (Android/iOS), sign language videos, audio files, interactive modulesTelesmile app significantly improved oral health knowledge among blind and deaf students; audio and visual content tailored to disability was effective for education of the reduction in dental caries
2.Alana Aluditasari et al. [34] 2023, IndonesiaDiagnostic accuracy studyn = 37 highly educated parents of children aged 0–5 yearsN/AMobile application (“SKOR GIGI”); CAMBRA (gold standard), Parental input via appN/AAndroid-based app, Firebase“SKOR GIGI” showed high sensitivity (96.3%), specificity (100%), and agreement with CAMBRA (p = 1.000). Valid for caries risk assessment by highly educated parents.
3.Somayyeh Azimi et al. [38] 2023, AustraliaCross-sectional surveyn = 42 primary caregivers of preschool childrenN/AMobile app for remote dental screening. Parent-captured dental photos, remote caries diagnosisN/ASmartphone app (Remote-i), RedCap questionnaireHigh acceptance (PE: 4.54/5, PU: 4.65/5). PU and ATB significantly influenced BI (p < 0.05). Apps feasible for remote screening in caregivers.
4.Al-Jallad et al. [32] 2022, USAMixed methods (usability testing)n = 42 parent-child dyads (10 in Step 1, 32 in Step 2) from low-income familiesN/ASmartphone camera, AI algorithm. AI analysis of parent-taken photos of children’s teethN/AAI-powered smartphone app (AICaries)The AICaries app demonstrated excellent usability (SUS score: 78.4) and feasibility, with 78.5% of parent-taken photos being diagnostic. It offers a promising tool for at-home caries screening and education.
5.Ward et al. [37] (2022), United StatesProspective observational cohort studyn = 164 preschool students (ages 3–5) at 7 rural Head Start sites.Children’s Dental Services (CDS): n = 1467 students (ages 1–18) at 57 rural school sites. Demographics: Predominantly low-income, Hispanic/Latinx (MCHS) and mixed racial/ethnic backgrounds (CDS).MCHS: Synchronous (live video) with on-site dental hygienists connected to remote dentists. CDS: Asynchronous (store-and-forward) with hygienists/dental assistants capturing images for remote dentists/advanced dental therapistsN/AN/ALaptops with USB intraoral cameras.
- Digital x-ray sensors (CDS).
- Electronic health records (Open Dental).
- Mobile hotspots for low-bandwidth areas.
School-based teledentistry using mid-level providers (hygienists/therapists) and telehealth technology effectively identified caries, enabled preventive care, and improved access for rural children. Programs were cost-efficient and adaptable to age-specific needs.
6.Lotto et al. [36] (2020), BrazilSingle-blind randomized controlled trialn = 104 parent-child dyads (children aged 36–60 months) from low-income preschools in Bauru, Brazil.N/ABiweekly WhatsApp text messages. Based on Health Belief Model; included audio narrations. Parental eHealth literacy (eHEALS)N/AmHealth applicationWhatsApp messages improved parental eHealth literacy and dietary habits, potentially mitigating ECC severity in low-income preschoolers. Longer-term studies needed.
7.Alqarni et al. [33] 2018, Saudi ArabiaCross sectional studyn = 230 parentsN/AQuestionnaire-based knowledge assessmentN/AiOS and Android mobile application (“Your child’s smile”)Mobile applications significantly improved parents’ knowledge of child dental health, with 75% favoring apps as an effective educational tool.
8.Kale et al. [31] 2019, IndiaDiagnostic accuracy studyn = 100 mothers and their children (3–5 years old)N/AStore-and-forward teledentistry via WhatsApp. Visual examination (WHO 1997 criteria) vs. mother’s diagnosis via smartphone imagesN/AMotorola 3G smartphone (intraoral photographs)Mothers demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity: 88.3%, specificity: 98.3%, kappa: 0.87) after dental health education, supporting smartphone-based parental screening.

CAMBRA: Caries Management by Risk Assessment; n: sample size; N/A: not applicable; AI: Artificial intelligence; AICaries: Artificial intelligence caries detection; USB: Universal Serial Bus; MCHS: Marshfield Clinic Health System; SUS: System Usability Scale; PE: perceived ease of use; PU: perceived usefulness; eHEALS: eHealth Literacy Scale.

2.7 Data synthesis

A descriptive synthesis was undertaken to analyze and interpret the data extracted from the included studies. The findings were collated and summarized using a combination of narrative synthesis, tabular and visual representations. The narrative synthesis provided a detailed account of the characteristics of teledentistry interventions, their reported outcomes, and the specific contexts in which they were implemented. To enhance clarity and facilitate comparison, tabular and visual summaries, including graphs, and concept maps, were developed to illustrate accuracy of programs delivered and gaps in literature.

3. Results

3.1 Study selection

A total of 497 records were identified through database searches, including PubMed (n = 422), EMBASE (n = 13), Web of Science (n = 24), and SCOPUS (n = 38). An additional five records were located through citation searching (Fig. 1). After removing 288 duplicates using EndNote21 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA), 209 records remained for screening. Following title and abstract screening, 159 records were excluded. Of the 50 full-text articles sought for retrieval, two could not be retrieved. Ultimately, 48 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 25 were excluded as they did not match the inclusion criteria (Supplementary Table 2). Consequently, 23 studies were included in the final synthesis of this scoping review.

PRISMA flowchart 2020 for study screening and selection.

Fig. 1.PRISMA flowchart 2020 for study screening and selection.

3.2 Diagnostic application of teledentistry in pediatric caries detection

A total of 15 studies were identified focusing on the application of teledentistry for diagnosing dental caries in children across various global settings, including Iran (n = 3) [15, 21, 22], Egypt (n = 1) [23], Australia (n = 3) [11, 24, 25], Saudi Arabia (n = 2) [16, 26], South Africa (n = 1) [27], India (n = 2) [14, 28], Brazil (n = 1) [29], Germany (n = 1) [30], and the United States (n = 1) [10]. The majority of these studies adopted diagnostic accuracy or cross-sectional designs and utilized store-and-forward or mobile health (mHealth) modalities, employing intraoral photographs, smartphone-based applications, and video-based assessments (Table 1).

Seyfi demonstrated sensitivity (91.2%–91.6%) and specificity (97.2%–99.6%) of teledentistry programs in children with special healthcare needs using mobile teledentistry, with a kappa value ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 [15]. AlShaya et al. [26] showed that teachers using smartphones could achieve caries detection sensitivity of 98.3% for primary teeth and 88.5% for permanent teeth, with corresponding specificities of 91.4% and 96.1%. Estai et al. [11] supported mHealth as an acceptable tool for caries detection, while Azimi et al. [24] highlighted feasibility of parent-captured photos, albeit with variable sensitivity (44%–88.4%).

Two studies demonstrated that even non-dental personnel could reliably contribute to caries detection following training [28, 31]. Tools like the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS), Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST), and Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT), were the most commonly used diagnostic benchmarks across these studies.

3.3 Preventive applications of teledentistry in pediatric populations

Eight studies explored the use of teledentistry platforms for preventive oral health interventions targeting parents, caregivers, and children [24, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]. These interventions included parental education [33], AI-based apps for risk prediction [32], school-based models [37], and mHealth programs, such as WhatsApp-based behavioral interventions [36].

Fageeh et al. [35] (2024) used the Telesmile mobile app with tailored audiovisual content to improve oral health knowledge in blind and deaf adolescents, yielding significant knowledge gains. Aluditasari et al. [34] (2023) validated the “SKOR GIGI” app among highly educated parents, showing perfect agreement with the Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) gold standard for caries risk assessment (sensitivity: 96.3%, specificity: 100%) (Table 2).

School-based models were particularly effective in underserved or rural settings. Ward et al. [37] implemented both synchronous and asynchronous teledentistry programs using dental hygienists and mid-level providers across 64 school sites, improving access and caries detection efficiency. Similarly, Kale et al. [31], found that mothers using smartphones after dental education could achieve high diagnostic accuracy (kappa = 0.87), affirming the feasibility of parent-led teledentistry interventions.

3.4 Diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry programs

The comparison of sensitivity and specificity across various teledentistry modalities and diagnostic quality levels is illustrated in Fig. 2. The modalities assessed included mHealth, mobile teledentistry, store-and-forward systems, and teledentistry screening, with diagnostic performance. Fourteen studies reported sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of teledentistry in caries detection and prevention. The highest performance metrics were noted in studies using targeted mobile applications and trained personnel.

Specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of different 
caries detection programs utilized in pediatric dentistry.

Fig. 2.Specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of different caries detection programs utilized in pediatric dentistry.

Ashtiani et al. [21] and Seyfi et al. [15] both reported high overall accuracy, with Seyfi’s study showing near-perfect agreement with clinical examinations [15, 21]. On the contrary, Kohara et al. [29] and Park et al. [25] reported lower sensitivity, particularly for initial caries lesions (specificity 0.73, sensitivity 0.69), indicating underdiagnosis in earlier stages (Supplementary Table 3).

The integration of AI-driven applications and the use of intraoral photographs captured by caregivers or school staff helped expand access while maintaining reliability [32]. Programs combining diagnostic and educational components, such as those by Aluditasari et al. [34] (2023) and Kale et al. [31] (2019), demonstrated comprehensive success in both prevention and detection.

Overall, mobile teledentistry and store-and-forward modalities under high or acceptable quality conditions showed the most favorable diagnostic accuracy in terms of both sensitivity and specificity (Fig. 2). In contrast, mHealth and low-quality teledentistry screening demonstrated suboptimal performance, emphasizing the importance of diagnostic quality and modality selection in teledentistry-based caries detection and prevention programs in children.

4. Discussion

This scoping review aimed to map and synthesize the global evidence on the application of teledentistry for dental caries screening and preventive care in pediatric populations. The findings underscore the growing utility, effectiveness, and potential scalability of teledentistry as a supportive tool in pediatric oral healthcare, particularly in the domains of caries detection and prevention.

The review noted the diagnostic robustness of teledentistry in detecting carious lesions among children, with performance metrics often approaching clinical gold standards. Store-and-forward systems and mobile teledentistry emerged as the most reliable modalities, with studies demonstrating high sensitivity, specificity, and inter-rater reliability. Seyfi et al. [15] reported near-perfect agreement between photographic assessments and clinical exams (kappa 0.89–0.93), while Bissessur & Naidoo demonstrated kappa values above 0.94 in caries detection by photographs provided by the parents to the dentists through web-based e-files [27]. These results indicate that high-fidelity intraoral imaging, even when captured remotely, can effectively support diagnostic workflows.

Mobile health (mHealth) applications also showed promise but exhibited greater variability in diagnostic accuracy. While studies like those by Estai et al. [11] and AlShaya et al. [26] showed high sensitivity and specificity when mobile apps were used by trained individuals, Kohara et al. [29] noted a marked decline in accuracy when detecting early lesions. This suggests that while mHealth broadens access, its effectiveness is contingent on both image quality and user training. Notably, applications involving caregiver-captured images [38] and AI-powered interpretation [32] demonstrated that non-dental personnel could perform effective caries screening when adequately supported by technology and training.

In the current review, application of teledentistry was evaluated for different age groups and the results showed a promising outcome for different ages. For infants and preschool children (0–5 years), teledentistry is most effective for parental counseling, anticipatory guidance, caries risk assessment, and reinforcement of preventive practices, such as feeding habits and oral hygiene routines [24, 34]. In school-aged children (6–12 years), teledentistry can be leveraged for screening of caries, malocclusion, and early periodontal conditions, often through school-based programs where teachers or allied health workers assist in data collection [14, 37]. For adolescents (13–18 years), programs are particularly valuable for promoting self-care behaviors, monitoring orthodontic treatments, addressing trauma or sports-related dental issues, and supporting adherence to preventive visits [2, 22]. This stratified approach highlights that while teledentistry is applicable across the pediatric age spectrum, tailoring interventions to the developmental stage and oral health needs of each subgroup enhances its effectiveness and clinical impact.

One of the key strength of this review is the inclusion of studies from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), offering insights into how contextual factors shape the implementation and impact of teledentistry. In HICs like Australia, the USA, and Germany, teledentistry interventions were often embedded within structured school-based or health-system-supported models, featuring high-bandwidth communication infrastructure, trained mid-level providers, and integration with electronic health records [4, 10, 36]. Programs such as the “Virtual Dental Home” in the USA or school dental tele-screening in Queensland, Australia demonstrate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of such integrated approaches [5, 8, 23]. Conversely, in LMICs such as India, Iran, Brazil, and South Africa, teledentistry was primarily implemented through pilot studies or community-based outreach programs, often relying on mobile phones, WhatsApp, and store-and-forward imaging [14, 27, 31, 36]. While these models successfully demonstrated feasibility and community acceptance, they were often constrained by infrastructural limitations, lower digital literacy, and lack of regulatory frameworks. Nevertheless, such programs have proven critical in improving access to care in rural and underserved regions, especially where pediatric dentists are scarce.

Programs in LMICs showcased impressive creativity and adaptability. Subbalekshmi et al. [28] demonstrated the feasibility of school-based screening with intraoral cameras in India, while Aluditasari et al. [34] validated a parental risk assessment app (“SKOR GIGI”) that achieved perfect agreement with CAMBRA in Indonesia. These interventions highlight the untapped potential of low-cost, community-driven models in promoting pediatric oral health.

Another key point addressed in the current review is implementation of preventive programs for caries detection with the help of teledentistry. The Telesmile app by Fageeh et al. [35] demonstrated significant knowledge gains among blind and deaf adolescents by offering disability-tailored content. Similarly, the use of WhatsApp-based behavioral messaging improved parental eHealth literacy for early onset of childhood caries among low-income families [36]. Moreover, the findings of this review indicate that teledentistry can support reliable early detection of caries and periodontal conditions, improve triaging, and reduce unnecessary in-person visits, thereby optimizing clinical time. It also facilitates follow-up care, patient education, and referral pathways, especially in underserved and pediatric populations, highlighting its potential as a complementary tool within routine dental practice.

School-based teledentistry programs, by Ward et al. [37], successfully combined synchronous and asynchronous modalities to screen, refer, and counsel children across 64 rural school sites. These programs not only facilitated early intervention, but also served as models of interprofessional collaboration, engaging dental hygienists, assistants, and remote dentists. Moreover, in the studies by Azimi et al. [38] and Kale et al. [31], the inclusion of caregivers in the diagnostic and preventive loop promotes family-centered care and enhances long-term behavioral change. In the study by Al-Jallad et al. [32], AICaries app enabled caregivers to perform accurate caries screening at home, with high usability scores and diagnostic success. Teledentistry offers scalable, personalized guidance and can be tailored to support anticipatory guidance, fluoride varnish application reminders, or dietary assessments. However, teledentistry programs have several challenges, including cultural and linguistic adaptation, limited standardized content, and variability in caregiver engagement. Future research should prioritize the co-design of digital interventions with community stakeholders to ensure relevance, acceptance, and sustainability, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

Although the present review did not specifically focus on pandemic-related adaptations, it is important to acknowledge that the COVID-19 pandemic acted as a major catalyst in accelerating the uptake of teledentistry worldwide. Lockdowns and restrictions on in-person dental visits highlighted its value for preventive counseling, registration of urgent cases, and continuity of care, particularly for pediatric populations. While this review did not analyze these developments in detail, future research should examine how pandemic-driven changes have influenced the long-term sustainability, accessibility, and equity of teledentistry programs.

4.1 Clinical implications

• Capacity building: Train dental professionals, allied health workers, and school staff in standardized screening and referral protocols.

• Family-centered approach: Use culturally and linguistically appropriate educational materials and involve parents to increase engagement.

• System integration: Embed teledentistry within school health programs and primary care services to improve accessibility and scalability.

• Technology and security: Employ secure, user-friendly digital platforms with strong data protection measures.

• Quality assurance: Establish tele-mentoring, feedback loops, and periodic audits to maintain diagnostic reliability and sustainability.

4.2 Limitations

This review synthesizes global evidence on teledentistry in pediatric populations, highlights gaps in current practice and research, and provides practical guidance for the development and implementation of age- and context-specific preventive and diagnostic programs.

This scoping review, while comprehensive, is subject to several limitations. First, only studies published in English were included, potentially excluding relevant data from non-English-speaking regions, particularly in Latin America, Asia, and Africa, where teledentistry initiatives may be underreported in indexed literature. Second, the review only included studies published from January 2015 onwards to capture contemporary developments; this time restriction may have omitted earlier but relevant foundational work. Variability in diagnostic benchmarks and diverse teledentistry modalities further complicate thematic synthesis. Finally, the most included studies were pilot projects or cross-sectional in nature, lacking long-term follow-up data or cost-effectiveness evaluations, which are essential for assessing sustainable implementation.

5. Conclusions

This scoping review presents a comprehensive overview of how teledentistry is being utilized globally for pediatric dental caries screening and prevention. It reveals strong diagnostic performance particularly for store-and-forward and mobile models alongside growing innovation in preventive education and caregiver engagement. However, challenges related to infrastructure, training, digital equity, and long-term evaluation remain. With targeted investment, policy support, and community involvement, teledentistry holds transformative potential to improve pediatric oral health worldwide.

Availability of data and materials

Data will be available on request from the corresponding author.

Author contributions

MKA—developed the initial protocol; performed the initial search and registered the protocol; has done initial search on PubMed and extracted the final articles; did the final data extraction and charting of the data; has written and drafted the manuscript for publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Acknowledgment

Author would like to thank the College of Dentistry Research Center and Dean ship of Scientific Research at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, for funding this research project. The author wants also to thank his colleagues Saad Bin Saleh and Ayman M Sulimany working in Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, for contributing to data collection, data extraction and initial drafting of this scoping review.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://oss.jocpd.com/ files/article/2028733654400679936/attachment/ Supplementary%20material.docx.

References

Dykgraaf SH, Sunjaya AP, James D, Kidd M. Access to dental services for children: a scoping review on the impact of COVID-19 and implications for future models of care. BMJ Open. 2025; 15: e097256.

[Google Scholar]

Horowitz AM, Maybury C, Clough SR, Wang MQ, Kleinman DV. Dental hygiene students’ knowledge, understanding and intended use of caries preventive regimens and community water fluoridation. Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2024; 98: 68–77.

[Google Scholar]

Pisano M, Bramanti A, Menditti D, Sangiovanni G, Santoro R, Amato A. Modern approaches to providing telematics oral health services in pediatric dentistry: a narrative review. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13: 8331.

[Google Scholar]

Inês Meurer M, Caffery LJ, Bradford NK, Smith AC. Accuracy of dental images for the diagnosis of dental caries and enamel defects in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2015; 21: 449–458.

[Google Scholar]

Benzian H, Garg R, Monse B, Stauf N, Varenne B. Promoting oral health through programs in middle childhood and adolescence. 3rd edn. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank: Washington (DC). 2017.

[Google Scholar]

World Health Organization. Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. World Health Organization: Geneva. 2021.

[Google Scholar]

Wallace CK, Schofield CE, Burbridge LA, O’Donnell KL. Role of teledentistry in paediatric dentistry. British Dental Journal. 2021. PMID: 34172921; PMCID: PMC8231751.

[Google Scholar]

Baheti MJ, Bagrecha SD, Toshniwal NG, Misal A. Teledentistry: a need of the era. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2014; 1: 80–91.

[Google Scholar]

Crouch E, Nelson J, Merrell MA, Martin A. The oral health status of America’s rural children: an opportunity for policy change. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2021; 81: 251–260.

[Google Scholar]

Daniel S, Kumar S. Comparison of dental hygienists and dentists: clinical and teledentistry identification of dental caries in children. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2017; 15: e143–e148.

[Google Scholar]

Estai M, Kanagasingam Y, Mehdizadeh M, Vignarajan J, Norman R, Huang B, et al. Mobile photographic screening for dental caries in children: diagnostic performance compared to unaided visual dental examination. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2022; 82: 166–175.

[Google Scholar]

Lalloo R, Tadakamadla SK, Kroon J, Jamieson LM, Ware RS, Johnson NW. Carious lesions in permanent dentitions are reduced in remote Indigenous Australian children taking part in a non-randomised preventive trial. PLOS ONE. 2021; 16: e0244927.

[Google Scholar]

Khami MR, Folayan MO, Soto-Rojas AE, Murtomaa H, Phantumvanit P, Farrokhi F. Beyond the borders of dentistry: interprofessional and interdisciplinary approach to oral health promotion. In Rezaei N (ed.) Multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity in health (pp. 269–294). 1st edn. Springer: Cham. 2022.

[Google Scholar]

Purohit BM, Singh A, Dwivedi A. Utilization of teledentistry as a tool to screen for dental caries among 12-year-old school children in a rural region of India. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2017; 77: 174–180.

[Google Scholar]

Seyfi N. Diagnostic value of a teledentistry-method comparing visual-caries-assessment in SHCN. International Dental Journal. 2024; 74: S413.

[Google Scholar]

AlShaya MS, Assery MK, Pani SC. Reliability of mobile phone teledentistry in dental diagnosis and treatment planning in mixed dentition. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2020; 26: 45–52.

[Google Scholar]

Anugrah PM, Olivia M, Badruddin IA, Adiatman M, Rahardjo A, Bahar A, et al. Effectiveness of smartphone application in teledentistry for enhancing parental knowledge, attitude, and practice (kap) associated with children’s oral health: a systematic review. Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry. 2024; 36: 400–414.

[Google Scholar]

Surdu S, Langelier M. Teledentistry: increasing utilisation of oral-health services for children in rural areas. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2023; 29: 41–49.

[Google Scholar]

Zotti F, Pietrobelli A, Malchiodi L, Nocini PF, Albanese M. Apps for oral hygiene in children 4 to 7 years: fun and effectiveness. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2019; 11: e795.

[Google Scholar]

McGowan J, Straus S, Moher D, Langlois EV, O’Brien KK, Horsley T, et al. Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2020; 123: 177–179.

[Google Scholar]

Ashtiani GH, Sabbagh S, Moradi S, Azimi S, Ravaghi V. Diagnostic accuracy of tele-dentistry in screening children for dental caries by community health workers in a lower-middle-income country. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2024; 34: 567–575.

[Google Scholar]

Golsanamloo O, Iranizadeh S, Jamei Khosroshahi AR, Erfanparast L, Vafaei A, Ahmadinia Y, et al. Accuracy of teledentistry for diagnosis and treatment planning of pediatric patients during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications. 2022; 2022: 4147720.

[Google Scholar]

Aly NM, El Kashlan MK, Giraudeau N, El Tantawi M. A Tele-detection and referral pAthways model for early childhood cariEs control—a protocol for a randomized factorial study: the TRACE study. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 934.

[Google Scholar]

Azimi S, Fernando C, Estai M, Patel J, Silva D, Tennant M. Experience of primary caregivers in utilising an mHealth application for remote dental screening in preschool children. Australian Health Review. 2023; 47: 545–552.

[Google Scholar]

Park JS, Kruger E, Nicholls W, Estai M, Winters J, Tennant M. Comparing the outcomes of gold-standard dental examinations with photographic screening by mid-level dental providers. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2019; 23: 2383–2387.

[Google Scholar]

AlShaya M, Farsi D, Farsi N, Farsi N. The accuracy of teledentistry in caries detection in children—a diagnostic study. Digital Health. 2022; 8: 20552076221109075.

[Google Scholar]

Bissessur S, Naidoo S. A comparative analysis of traditional dental screening versus teledentistry screening. South African Dental Journal. 2019; 74: 19–23.

[Google Scholar]

Subbalekshmi T, Anandan V, Apathsakayan R. Use of a teledentistry-based program for screening of early childhood caries in a school setting. Cureus. 2017; 9: e1416.

[Google Scholar]

Kohara EK, Abdala CG, Novaes TF, Braga MM, Haddad AE, Mendes FM. Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions? PLOS ONE. 2018; 13: e0202116.

[Google Scholar]

Alkilzy M, Midani R, Höfer M, Splieth C. Improving toothbrushing with a smartphone app: results of a randomized controlled trial. Caries Research. 2019; 53: 628–635.

[Google Scholar]

Kale S, Kakodkar P, Shetiya SH. Assessment of mother’s ability in caries diagnosis, utilizing the smartphone photographic method. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2019; 37: 360–364.

[Google Scholar]

Al-Jallad N, Ly-Mapes O, Hao P, Ruan J, Ramesh A, Luo J, et al. Artificial intelligence-powered smartphone application, AICaries, improves at-home dental caries screening in children: moderated and unmoderated usability test. PLOS Digital Health. 2022; 1: e0000046.

[Google Scholar]

Alqarni AA, Alfaifi HM, Aseeri NA, Gadah T, Togoo RA. Efficacy of a self-designed mobile application to improve child dental health knowledge among parents. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2018; 8: 424–430.

[Google Scholar]

Aluditasari A, Fauziah E, Budiardjo SB. Indonesian version of caries management by risk assessment mobile application “SKOR GIGI” in highly educated parents. Dental Journal. 2023; 56: 251–254.

[Google Scholar]

Fageeh HN, Mansoor MA, Fageeh HI, Abdul HN, Khan H, Akkam A, et al. “Teledentistry” using a mobile app (Telesmile) to improve oral health among the visually impaired and hearing-impaired populations in Saudi Arabia: a randomized controlled study. Frontiers in Oral Health. 2024; 5: 1496222.

[Google Scholar]

Lotto M, Strieder AP, Aguirre PEA, Oliveira TM, Andrade Moreira Machado MA, Rios D, et al. Parental-oriented educational mobile messages to aid in the control of early childhood caries in low socioeconomic children: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 101: 103456.

[Google Scholar]

Ward MM, Bhagianadh D, Ullrich F, Merchant KAS, Meyer CL, Wovcha S, et al. Two teledentistry models for the provision of essential oral health care services in rural school settings. Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2022; 96: 43–49.

[Google Scholar]

Azimi S, Estai M, Patel J, Silva D. The feasibility of a digital health approach to facilitate remote dental screening among preschool children during COVID-19 and social restrictions. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2023; 33: 234–245.

[Google Scholar]