Article Data

  • Views 206
  • Dowloads 147

Original Research

Open Access

Comparative evaluation of visual-tactile examination and near-infrared transillumination in the diagnosis of dental caries in children aged 5–9 years

  • Paulina Strzelecka1
  • Elżbieta Kubala1
  • Piotr Skomro2,*,
  • Helena Gronwald2
  • Ryta Łagocka1
  • Danuta Lietz-Kijak2

1Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland

2Department of Propaedeutics, Physical Diagnostics and Dental Physiotherapy, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.036 Vol.50,Issue 2,March 2026 pp.79-88

Submitted: 02 September 2025 Accepted: 11 November 2025

Published: 03 March 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Piotr Skomro E-mail: piotr.skomro@pum.edu.pl

Abstract

Background: Near-infrared light transillumination (NILT) has been proposed as a radiation-free alternative to traditional visual-tactile (VT) examination, yet comparative evidence in pediatric populations remains limited. To compare the detection rates of dental carious lesions using NILT (DIAGNOcam) and VT methods in children aged 5–9 years, and to explore potential associations between dietary habits and caries indices. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 185 children (89 girls, 96 boys; mean age 7.2 ± 1.4 years) attending routine dental check-ups. Each participant underwent both VT and NILT examinations performed by two calibrated examiners (κ = 0.86 intra-; κ = 0.82 inter-examiner reliability). Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, McNemar’s test, Cohen’s κ, and Spearman’s correlation. Radiographs were excluded in alignment with the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle. Results: NILT identified significantly more carious lesions than VT in both dentitions Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (permanent dentition)(DMFT): 1.38 ± 1.31 vs. 0.79 ± 1.11, p < 0.001; decayed, missing, and filled teeth (primary dentition) (dmft): 4.68 ± 2.53 vs. 4.51 ± 2.52, p < 0.001. Agreement between methods was moderate (κ = 0.71). Weak but significant associations were observed between juice consumption and dmft indices (ρ = 0.195, p = 0.008). Conclusions: NILT demonstrated a higher detection rate for early enamel lesions compared with VT, particularly on interproximal surfaces. While not a replacement for radiographs in diagnosing deeper lesions, NILT represents a valuable non-invasive adjunct. Dietary findings were exploratory and require longitudinal confirmation.


Keywords

Dental caries in children; Caries diagnosis; Visual-tactile examination; Near-infrared light transillumination; DIAGNOcam; Minimally invasive dentistry


Cite and Share

Paulina Strzelecka,Elżbieta Kubala,Piotr Skomro,Helena Gronwald,Ryta Łagocka,Danuta Lietz-Kijak. Comparative evaluation of visual-tactile examination and near-infrared transillumination in the diagnosis of dental caries in children aged 5–9 years. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(2);79-88.

References

[1] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Policy on Minimally Invasive Dentistry (MID). 2023. Available at: https://www.aapd.org/globalassets/media/policies_guidelines/p_minimallyinvasivedentistry.pdf (Accessed: 03 December 2025).

[2] Slayton RL, Urquhart O, Araujo MWB, Fontana M, Guzmán-Armstrong S, Nascimento MM, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions: a report from the American Dental Association. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2018; 149: 837–849.

[3] World Health Organization. Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland. 2022.

[4] Keyes PH. The infectious and transmissible nature of experimental dental caries. Findings and implications. Archives of Oral Biology. 1960; 1: 304–320.

[5] Touger-Decker R, van Loveren C. Sugars and dental caries. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003; 78: 881S–892S.

[6] Butera A, Maiorani C, Morandini A, Simonini M, Morittu S, Trombini J, et al. Evaluation of children caries risk factors: a narrative review of nutritional aspects, oral hygiene habits, and bacterial alterations. Children. 2022; 9: 262.

[7] Russotto F, Tirone F, Salzano S, Borga FC, Paolino DS, Ferraro A, et al. Clinical evaluation of near-infrared light transillumination (NIRT) as an interproximal caries detection tool in a large sample of patients in private practice. Journal of Radiology and Imaging. 2016; 1: 1–5.

[8] Hoxie A, Perumbedu A, Patel P, Xie J, Mitchell K, Broome A, et al. Near-infrared imaging in orthodontic intraoral scanners for evaluation of interproximal caries: validity against micro-CT. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2024; 166: 138–147.

[9] Cuenin K, Chen J, Tai SK, Lee D, Gerges G, Oh H. Caries detection and characterization in pediatric patients using iTero 5D near-infrared technology. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2024; 165: 54–63.

[10] Negi S, Mathur A, Tripathy S, Mehta V, Snigdha NT, Adil AH, et al. Artificial intelligence in dental caries diagnosis: umbrella review. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research. 2024; 10: e70004.

[11] Angelakopoulos N, Anton Y Otero CI, Franco A, Vazquez L, Leprince J, Abdelaziz M. Atlas of dental near-infrared transillumination images. Diagnostics. 2024; 14: 1154.

[12] Elsawaf AE, Deri AYA, Armanious PS, Khasawneh AM, AlKhaja AM, Yasin AR, et al. Efficiency of near-infrared technology in the clinical detection of caries: systematic review. Diagnostics. 2024; 18: 14–25.

[13] Spagopoulos D, Michou S, Gizani S, Pappa E, Rahiotis C. Fluorescence and near-infrared light for detection of secondary caries: systematic review. Dentistry Journal. 2023; 11: 271.

[14] Angelone F, Ponsiglione AM, Ricciardi C, Cesarelli G, Sansone M, Amato F. Diagnostic applications of intraoral scanners: a systematic review. Journal of Imaging. 2023; 9: 134.

[15] Marinova-Takorova M, Panov V, Anastasova R. Effectiveness of near-infrared transillumination in early caries diagnosis. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2016; 30: 1207–1211.

[16] De Zutter M, Vandenbulcke JD, Van Acker JWG, Martens LC. In vivo correlation of near-infrared transillumination and visual inspection with bitewing radiography for the detection of interproximal caries in permanent and primary teeth. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2020; 21: 509–518.

[17] Patel J, Vannemreddy A, Goh YJ, Francis Y, Anthonappa R. Evaluation of near-infrared digital imaging transillumination compared with bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection in children. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2025; 35: 108–117.

[18] Kanar Ö, Tağtekin D, Korkut B. Accuracy of an intraoral scanner with near-infrared imaging for interproximal caries. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2024; 36: 845–857.

[19] Marcondes APM, Campos PH, Ribeiro CS, Novaes TF, Lussi A, Diniz MB. Performance of NILT (DIAGNOcam) for occlusal lesions in deciduous molars. Journal of Dentistry. 2023; 44: 103744.

[20] Foros P, Oikonomou E, Koletsi D, Rahiotis C. Detection methods for early caries diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Caries Research. 2021; 55: 247–259.

[21] Al-Khalifa KS, Ahmed WM, Azhari AA, Qaw M, Alsheikh R, Alqudaihi F, et al. The use of artificial intelligence in caries detection: a review. Bioengineering. 2024; 11: 936.

[22] Large JF, Madigan C, Pradeilles R, Markey O, Boxer B, Rousham EK. Impact of unhealthy food and beverage consumption on caries risk in children ≤10 years: systematic review. Nutrition Reviews. 2024; 82: 1539–1555.

[23] Beckett EL, Fayet-Moore F, Cassettari T, Starck C, Wright J, Blumfield M. Health effects of drinking 100% juice: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Advances in Nutrition. 2025; 83: e722–e735.

[24] Llena C, Leyda A, Forner L, Garcet S. Association between the number of early carious lesions and diet in children with a high prevalence of caries. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2015; 16: 7–12.

[25] Ozkan G, Guzel KGU. Clinical evaluation of near-infrared light transillumination in approximal dentin caries detection. Lasers in Medical Science. 2017; 32: 1417–1422.

[26] Alamoudi NM, Khan JA, El-Ashiry EA, Felemban OM, Bagher SM, Al-Tuwirqi AA. Accuracy of the DIAGNOcam and bitewing radiographs in the diagnosis of cavitated proximal carious lesions in primary molars. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2019; 22: 1576–1582.

[27] Ortiz MIG, de Melo Alencar C, De Paula BLF, Magno MB, Maia LC, Silva CM. Accuracy of near-infrared light transillumination (NILT) compared to bitewing radiograph for detection of interproximal caries in the permanent dentition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 98: 103351.

[28] Metzger Z, Colson DG, Bown P, Weihard T, Baresel I, Nolting T. Reflected near-infrared light versus bite-wing radiography for the detection of proximal caries: a multicenter prospective clinical study conducted in private practices. Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 116: 103861.

[29] Serban C, Lungeanu D, Bota SD, Cotca CC, Negrutiu ML, Duma VF, et al. Emerging technologies for dentin caries detection—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11: 674.

[30] Błażejewska A, Dacyna N, Niesiobędzki P, Trzaska M, Gozdowski D, turska-szybka A, et al. Comparison of the detection of proximal caries in children and youth using DIAGNOcam and bitewing radiovisiography. Dental and Medical Problems. 2016; 53: 468–475.

[31] Ismail AI. The role of early dietary habits in dental caries development. Special Care in Dentistry. 1998; 18: 40–45.

[32] Moynihan P. Sugars and dental caries: evidence for setting a recommended threshold for intake. Advances in Nutrition. 2016; 7: 149–156.

[33] Homer T, Maguire A, Douglas GVA, Innes NP, Clarkson JE, Wilson N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of child caries management: a randomised controlled trial (FiCTION trial). BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 45.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top