Etch-and-rinse versus self-etching sealants for preventing occlusal carious lesions in erupting permanent molars: a randomized controlled trial

Background: This triple-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluated and compared the effectiveness of resin-based sealants (RS) and giomer-based sealants (GS) in preventing dental caries in erupting permanent molars in children. Methods: Erupting permanent molars in children (aged 5–14 years) with non-cavitated carious lesions (International Caries Detection and Assessment System scores 1–2) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either GS or RS. Clinical assessments were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome was sealant retention. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of caries and sealant quality (anatomical form, marginal adaptation, superficial texture, and marginal discoloration). Results: Among a total of 88 erupting permanent molars in 88 children (aged 6.93–12.11 years) included in the analysis, the RS group demonstrated significantly higher total retention compared with the GS group at both 6 (90.7% (39/43) vs. 59.1% (26/44); p = 0.002) and 12 (61.9% (26/42) vs. 17.1% (7/41); p < 0.001) months. Regarding caries, no new lesions were detected in the RS group throughout the study period. In the GS group, new caries were identified in 2.3% (1/44) of teeth at 6 months and 4.9% (2/41) at 12 months. As only two caries events were observed overall, this study was underpowered to detect between-group differences in caries incidence. However, a weak, significant positive correlation was observed between sealant loss and caries development at 12 months (r = 0.221, p = 0.045). Conclusions: While both the RS and GS were associated with a low incidence of caries over 12 months, the RS demonstrated significantly superior retention and overall clinical quality. These findings highlight the clinical trade-off between the enhanced durability of RS and the potential for a simplified application with GS. Further long-term studies are warranted to fully evaluate these differences. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05969756.

Early carious lesions; Fit and fissure sealants; Erupting permanent molars; Pediatric dentistry

[1] Li Z, Yu C, Chen H. Global, regional, and national caries of permanent teeth incidence, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years, 1990–2021: analysis for the global burden of disease study. BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25: 715.

[2] Lynch RJ. The primary and mixed dentition, post-eruptive enamel maturation and dental caries: a review. International Dental Journal. 2013; 63: 3–13.

[3] Pitts NB, Twetman S, Fisher J, Marsh PD. Understanding dental caries as a non-communicable disease. British Dental Journal. 2021; 231: 749–753.

[4] Kashbour W, Gupta P, Worthington HV, Boyers D. Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020; 11: CD003067.

[5] Kapoor V, Kumar A, Manjunath BC, Yadav V, Sabbarwal B. Comparative evaluation of retention and cariostatic effect of glass ionomer, hydrophobic & hydrophilic resin-based sealants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evidence-Based Dentistry. 2023; 24: 41–42.

[6] Elmokanen MA, Gad HMA. Retention rate of giomer S-PRG filler containing pit and fissure sealant applied with or without etching: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 1356.

[7] Imazato S, Nakatsuka T, Kitagawa H, Sasaki JI, Yamaguchi S, Ito S, et al. Multiple-ion releasing bioactive surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler: innovative technology for dental treatment and care. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2023; 14: 236.

[8] Penha KJS, Roma F, Filho EMM, Ribeiro CCC, Firoozmand LM. Bioactive self-etching sealant on newly erupted molars: a split-mouth clinical trial. Journal of Dentistry. 2021; 115: 103857.

[9] Hopewell S, Chan AW, Collins GS, Hrobjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomized trials. Nature Medicine. 2025; 31: 1776–1783.

[10] Byju M, Mala K, Natarajan S, Thomas MS, Parolia A. Comparing the effectiveness of an e-learning module at different levels of magnification for detecting occlusal caries in permanent teeth, utilizing the international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS): an ex vivo study. BDJ Open. 2025; 11: 43.

[11] Yamal JM, Mofleh D, Chuang RJ, Wang M, Johnson K, Garcia-Quintana A, et al. Training protocol and calibration of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System in a school-based clinical trial of elementary school-age children. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2025; 85: 13–20.

[12] Carvalho JC, Ekstrand KR, Thylstrup A. Dental plaque and caries on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars in relation to stage of eruption. Journal of Dental Research. 1989; 68: 773–779.

[13] Zhao M, Wang Z, Liu M, Song Z, Wang R, Yang L. Eruption and caries status of first permanent molars in children aged 6–7 years in Shijingshan District, Beijing, China. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 1143.

[14] Karim R, Baider M, Splieth CH, Schmoeckel J. Efficiency of glass ionomer sealant application in reducing hypersensitivity in MIH-molars in schoolchildren immediately and after 12 weeks. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2025; 26: 361–373.

[15] Ntaoutidou S, Arhakis A, Tolidis K, Kotsanos N. Clinical evaluation of a surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filler-containing dental sealant placed with a self-etching primer/adhesive. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2018; 19: 431–437.

[16] Kamath V, Hebbal M, Ankola A, Sankeshwari R, Jalihal S, Choudhury A, et al. Comparison of retention between conventional and nanofilled resin sealants in a paediatric population: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11: 3276.

[17] Muller-Bolla M, Courson F, Lupi-Pegurier L, Tardieu C, Mohit S, Staccini P, et al. Effectiveness of resin-based sealants with and without fluoride placed in a high caries risk population: multicentric 2-year randomized clinical trial. Caries Research. 2018; 52: 312–322.

[18] Griffin SO, Gray SK, Malvitz DM, Gooch BF. Caries risk in formerly sealed teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2009; 140: 415–423.

[19] Hu X, Zhang W, Fan M, Mulder J, Frencken JE. Frequency of remnants of sealants left behind in pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces after 2 and 3 years. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2017; 21: 143–149.

[20] Paemanukornruk Y, Luksamijarulkul N, Gaewkhiew P. Resin-based sealant effectiveness in high-caries risk children: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25: 768.

[21] Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Operative Dentistry. 2003; 28: 647–660.

[22] Althomali YM, Musa S, Manan NM, Nor NAM. Retention evaluation of fissure sealants applied using self-etch and conventional acid-etch techniques: a randomized control trial among schoolchildren. Pediatric Dentistry. 2022; 44: 249–254.

[23] Papageorgiou SN. On correlation coefficients and their interpretation. Journal of Orthodontics. 2022; 49: 359–361.

[24] Rechmann P, Chaffee BW, Rechmann BMT, Featherstone JDB. Changes in caries risk in a practice-based randomized controlled trial. Advances in Dental Research. 2018; 29: 15–23.

[25] Uchil SR, Suprabha BS, Shenoy R, Rao A. Clinical effectiveness of resin-modified glass ionomer-based fluoride varnish for preventing occlusal caries lesions in partially erupted permanent molars: a randomised active-controlled trial. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2022; 32: 314–323.

[26] Rodrigues JA, Santos NM, Azevedo CB, Haas AN, Lenzi TL. Non-invasive and micro-invasive treatments to arrest active occlusal carious lesions in erupting permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial. Brazilian Oral Research. 2021; 35: e058.

[27] Diniz JA, Dourado A, Barbirato DDS, de Oliveira MSV, de Lira V, de Melo Filho SMC, et al. Evaluation of the effects of pregabalin and dexamethasone coadministration on preemptive multimodal analgesia and anxiety in third molar surgeries: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2024; 28: 304.

[28] Shan H, Yan LY, Prasanna N, Hung CK, Yi LJK, Ngai HF, et al. Effectiveness of preprocedural mouthwashes: a triple-blind randomised controlled clinical trial. International Dental Journal. 2025; 75: 868–876.

[29] La Rosa GRM, Pedulla E, Chapple I, Pacino SA, Polosa R. The use of quantitative light-induced fluorescence in carious lesions research: a bibliometric review. Journal of Dentistry. 2024; 148: 105220.

[30] Albashaireh ZSM, Al-Khateeb SN, Altallaq MK. Comparative evaluation of ICON resin infiltration and bioactive glass adhesive for managing initial caries lesions using quantitative light-induced fluorescence: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Dentistry. 2025; 159: 105853.

[31] Bittar A, Cetin T, Basyigit GM, Gozetici-Cil B. Validity assessment of a third-generation light-induced fluorescence device in detecting proximal and occlusal caries lesions: a cross-sectional study. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2024; 50: 104368.

[32] Bagher SM, Sabbagh HJ. A literature review of clinical efficiency, patient satisfaction, and future preference of Isolite and DryShield dental isolation systems among pediatric patients. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 47: 1–8.

[33] Pozos-Guillen A, Chavarria-Bolanos D, Garrocho-Rangel A. Split-mouth design in paediatric dentistry clinical trials. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2017; 18: 61–65.

[34] Uhlen-Strand MM, Stangvaltaite-Mouhat L, Mdala I, Volden Klepaker I, Wang NJ, Skudutyte-Rysstad R. Fissure sealants or fluoride varnish? A randomized pragmatic split-mouth trial. Journal of Dental Research. 2024; 103: 705–711.