Article Data

  • Views 205
  • Dowloads 126

Original Research

Open Access

Comparison of post-operative pain in relation to working length assessment by electronic apex locator and digital radiography in permanent teeth among pediatric patients

  • Osama Khattak1,*,
  • Duaa Ahmed Alyamani2
  • Aliya Ehsan3
  • Thani Alsharari4
  • Mohammed Fareed Felemban5
  • Farida Habib Khan6
  • Amirah Fahad Alshammeri7
  • Rakhi Issrani2
  • Shilpa Magar3

1Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, 72345 Sakaka, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

2Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, 72345 Sakaka, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

3Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, 72345 Sakaka, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

4Department of Restorative Dental Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, 21944 Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

5Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, 21944 Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

6Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ha’il, 81451 Ha’il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

7Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Ha’il, 81451 Ha’il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.064 Vol.50,Issue 3,May 2026 pp.94-101

Submitted: 19 September 2025 Accepted: 20 November 2025

Published: 03 May 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Osama Khattak E-mail: okhattak@ju.edu.sa

Abstract

Background: Effective measurement of working length is essential for successful endodontic treatment. Electronic Apex Locators (EAL) and Digital Radiography (DR) are commonly used methods, yet their comparative impact on post-operative pain remains unclear. This study aimed to compare post-operative pain intensity and pain dissipation duration following working length determination using EAL and DR in pediatric endodontic patients. Methods: A total of 130 patients aged 10–15 years were randomly assigned to the EAL group (n = 65) or the DR group (n = 65). Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at pre-operative, and at 6, 12, 24, 48 hours, and 7 days post-operatively. Pain scores were further analyzed by age and gender. Independent and paired t-tests and Analysis of Variance were applied for statistical analysis. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between the EAL and DR groups in VAS scores at any time point (p > 0.05). Female participants consistently reported higher mean pre- and post-operative pain scores compared with males, with significant differences observed in both groups (EAL: p = 0.031; DR: p < 0.001 for pre-op scores). Overall, while both groups showed comparable pain reduction trends over time, gender influenced pain perception and pain relief duration significantly in both treatment modalities. Conclusions: Both EAL and DR are effective for working length determination, showing no significant difference in post-operative pain. Pain perception and relief duration, however, vary with gender and age and should be considered during endodontic treatment planning. Clinical Trial Registration: The trial was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT07181252, Retrospective registration).


Keywords

Post-operative pain; Working length; Radiography


Cite and Share

Osama Khattak,Duaa Ahmed Alyamani,Aliya Ehsan,Thani Alsharari,Mohammed Fareed Felemban,Farida Habib Khan,Amirah Fahad Alshammeri,Rakhi Issrani,Shilpa Magar. Comparison of post-operative pain in relation to working length assessment by electronic apex locator and digital radiography in permanent teeth among pediatric patients. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(3);94-101.

References

[1] Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. Journal of Endodontics. 1990; 16: 498–504.

[2] Ricucci D, Langeland K. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. International Endodontic Journal. 1998; 31: 394–409.

[3] Kataia MM, Kataia EM, Khalil HF, Seoud MAE. Post-operative pain after root canal preparation with different apical finishing sizes a triple blinded split mouth clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 800.

[4] Paradiso D, Tullio A, Bensi C. Working length determination in primary teeth pulpectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2023; 49: 444–454.

[5] ElAyouti A, Hülber-J M, Judenhofer MS, Connert T, Mannheim JG, Löst C, et al. Apical constriction: location and dimensions in molars—a micro-computed tomography study. Journal of Endodontics. 2014; 40: 1095–1099.

[6] Forsberg J. Radiographic reproduction of endodontic “working length” comparing the paralleling and the bisecting-angle techniques. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology. 1987; 64: 353–360.

[7] Jeger FB, Janner SF, Bornstein MM, Lussi A. Endodontic working length measurement with preexisting cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a prospective, controlled clinical study. Journal of Endodontics. 2012; 38: 884–888.

[8] Oznurhan F, Ünal M, Kapdan A, Ozturk C, Aksoy S. Clinical evaluation of apex locator and radiography in primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2015; 25: 199–203.

[9] Custer LE. Exact method of locating the apical foramen. Dental Register. 1918; 72: 420–425.

[10] Osei-Bonsu F, Ampofo PC, Nyako EA, Hewlett SA, Buckman VA, Konadu AB, et al. Accuracy of the electronic apex locator, tactile, and radiographic methods in working length determination. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2023; 26: 311–315.

[11] Čabraja LK, Dukić W. In vitro accuracy of two different electronic apex locators under various conditions. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15: 6892.

[12] Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. Journal of Endodontics. 2011; 37: 429–438.

[13] Khabiri M, Kamgar S, Iranmanesh P, Khademi A, Torabinejad M. Postoperative pain of single-visit endodontic treatment with gutta-percha versus MTA filling: a randomized superiority trial. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23: 1026.

[14] Sadaf D, Ahmad MZ. Factors associated with postoperative pain in endodontic therapy. International Journal of Biomedical Science. 2014; 10: 243–247.

[15] Kaplan T, Kaplan SS, Sezgin GP. The effect of different irrigation and disinfection methods on post-operative pain in mandibular molars: a randomised clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22: 601.

[16] Pradittapong P, Chompu-Inwai P, Chaipattanawan N, Nirunsittirat A, Phinyo P, Manmontri C. Postoperative pain following vital pulp therapy in carious permanent teeth of children and adolescents: a prospective cohort study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2025; 35: 800–814.

[17] McGrath PJ, Walco GA, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Brown MT, Davidson K, et al.; PedIMMPACT. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. Journal of Pain. 2008; 9: 771–783.

[18] Guzel E, Uyan M, Ersahan S, Gundogar M, Ozcelik F. Comparison of electronic apex locator and simultaneous working length detection methods with radiological method in terms of postoperative pain. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 1408.

[19] Topçuoğlu G, Topçuoğlu HS, Delikan E, Aydınbelge M, Dogan S. Postoperative pain after root canal preparation with hand and rotary files in primary molar teeth. Pediatric Dentistry. 2017; 39: 192–196.

[20] Rawat G, Kumar P, Chugh VK, Duraisamy AK, Pathak K, Sharma R. Postoperative pain evaluation in patients undergoing endodontic treatment subsequent to working length determination with and without integrated apex locator endomotor: randomized control trial. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2024; 27: 1032–1036.

[21] Angolkar YS, Kulkarni S, Yavagal CM, Yavagal PC, Bhosle U, Patil VC, et al. Effect of laser photobiomodulation on postoperative pain after single-visit endodontic treatment in children: a randomized control trial. Children. 2024; 11: 1511.

[22] Solanki J, J Cheta B, Uikey AK, Kumar A, Raj A, Ghosh O, et al. Comparative evaluation of post-operative pain following single vs. multiple visit pulpectomy: a clinical assessment. Bioinformation. 2025; 21: 653–656.

[23] Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L, Subramanian EMG, Priyadarshini P. Comparative evaluation of quality of obturation and its effect on postoperative pain between pediatric hand and rotary files: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021; 14: 88–96.

[24] Kara Tuncer A, Gerek M. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or digital radiography on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Endodontics. 2014; 40: 38–41.

[25] Kaur G, Thomas AR, Samson RS, Varghese E, Ponraj RR, Nagraj SK, et al. Efficacy of electronic apex locators in comparison with intraoral radiographs in working length determination—a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 532.

[26] Suzuki K. Experimental study on ionophoresis. Journal of the Japanese Stomatological Society. 1942; 16: 411–429. (In Japanese)

[27] Pawar AM, Bhardwaj A, Zanza A, Wahjuningrum DA, Arora S, Luke AM, et al. Severity of post-operative pain after instrumentation of root canals by XP-Endo and SAF full sequences compared to manual instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11: 7251.

[28] Bartley EJ, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013; 111: 52–58.

[29] Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL III. Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. Journal of Pain. 2009; 10: 447–485.

[30] International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). Overview of sex and gender differences in human pain [Fact sheet]. 2024. Available at: https://www.iasp-pain.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/gender-differences-in-pain-fact-sheet_R1.pdf (Accessed: 14 April 2025).

[31] Mogil JS. Qualitative sex differences in pain processing: emerging evidence of a biased literature. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2020; 21: 353–365.

[32] Craft RM, Mogil JS, Aloisi AM. Sex differences in pain and analgesia: the role of gonadal hormones. European Journal of Pain. 2004; 8: 397–411.

[33] Loyd DR, Murphy AZ. The neuroanatomy of sexual dimorphism in opioid analgesia. Experimental Neurology. 2014; 259: 57–63.

[34] Mogil JS, Bailey AL. Sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia. Progress in Brain Research. 2010; 186: 141–157.

[35] Sorge RE, Mapplebeck JC, Rosen S, Beggs S, Taves S, Alexander JK, et al. Different immune cells mediate mechanical pain hypersensitivity in male and female mice. Nature Neuroscience. 2015; 18: 1081–1083.

[36] Hagy H, Hidalgo-Lopez E, Portengen C, Holman A, Schrepf A, Clauw DJ, et al. The emergence of sex differences in primary pain during adolescence: a conceptual developmentally-oriented biopsychosocial model and opportunities for further investigation. BMC Pediatrics. 2025; 25: 899.

[37] Shabbir J, Khurshid Z, Qazi F, Sarwar H, Afaq H, Salman S, et al. Effect of different host-related factors on postoperative endodontic pain in necrotic teeth dressed with interappointment intracanal medicaments: a multicomparison study. European Journal of Dentistry. 2021; 15: 152–157.

[38] Nagendrababu V, Gutmann JL. Factors associated with postobturation pain following single-visit nonsurgical root canal treatment: a systematic review. Quintessence International. 2017; 48: 193–208.

[39] García-Font M, Duran-Sindreu F, Calvo C, Basilio J, Abella F, Ali A, et al. Comparison of postoperative pain after root canal treatment using reciprocating instruments based on operator’s experience: a prospective clinical study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2017; 9: e869–e874.

[40] Xiqian L, Ying Z, Mian M. The effect of apical patency on postoperative pain following endodontic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2024; 132: e12986.

[41] Tanalp J. A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study apical extrusion of debris and irrigants. International Endodontic Journal. 2022; 55: 153–177.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top