Article Data

  • Views 208
  • Dowloads 115

Original Research

Open Access

Effect of a U-shaped toothbrush in removing plaque among pre-school children: a randomized controlled trial

  • Kamar Abdulrahman1
  • Yasser Alsayed Tolibah1,*,
  • Mohammaed N. Al-Shiekh1
  • Nada Bshara1

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Damascus University, 3062 Damsacus, Syria

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.072 Vol.50,Issue 3,May 2026 pp.168-179

Submitted: 19 February 2025 Accepted: 26 May 2025

Published: 03 May 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Yasser Alsayed Tolibah E-mail: yasser94.tolibah@damascusuniversity.edu.sy

Abstract

Background: With the emergence of U-shaped manual toothbrushes, it has become necessary to evaluate their effectiveness in preschool children when used independently. Accordingly, this cross-over randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a manual U-shaped toothbrush for dental plaque removal among preschool children, compared with a manual traditional toothbrush, and to assess the ease of use of both toothbrushes and children’s preferences. Methods: Thirty children aged 4–5 years were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 15), in which children used a manual traditional toothbrush for 21 days followed by a manual U-shaped toothbrush for another 21 days, and Group 2 (n = 15), in which children used a manual U-shaped toothbrush for 21 days followed by a manual traditional toothbrush for 21 days. Plaque accumulation was evaluated by two blinded examiners using Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein plaque index (TMQHPI) at seven-time points; pre-brushing (T0), immediately after using the first toothbrush (T1), 7 days after using the first toothbrush (T2), 21 days after using the first toothbrush (T3), immediately after using the second toothbrush (T4), 7 days after using the second toothbrush (T5), and 21 days after using the second toothbrush (T6) to determine which toothbrush achieved better plaque removal. At T3 and T6, children were asked about the ease of use of both toothbrushes, while at T6, they were asked about their preferred toothbrush. Results: At T2, T3, T5, and T6, plaque accumulation was significantly lower with the use of the U-shaped toothbrush. Both toothbrushes were reported to be easy or moderately easy to use by the children. Most children preferred the U-shaped toothbrush. Conclusions: U-shaped toothbrushes significantly improved preschool children’s plaque control ability. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06288581.


Keywords

Dental plaque; Oral hygiene; Preschool children; Primary teeth; Toothbrushing


Cite and Share

Kamar Abdulrahman,Yasser Alsayed Tolibah,Mohammaed N. Al-Shiekh,Nada Bshara. Effect of a U-shaped toothbrush in removing plaque among pre-school children: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(3);168-179.

References

[1] Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century—the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2003; 31: 3–23.

[2] D’Agostino S, Ferrara E, Valentini G, Stoica SA, Dolci M. Exploring oral microbiome in healthy infants and children: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19: 11403.

[3] Ballouk MA, Dashash M. Caries prevalence and dental health of 8–12 year-old children in Damascus city in Syria during the Syrian Crisis; a cross-sectional epidemiological oral health survey. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19: 16.

[4] Moyer VA. Prevention of dental caries in children from birth through age 5 years: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Pediatrics. 2014; 133: 1102–1111.

[5] Mandal A, Singh DK, Siddiqui H, Das D, Dey AK. New dimensions in mechanical plaque control: an overview. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2017; 9: 133–139.

[6] Droubi L, Laflouf M, Alkurdi S, Sauro S, Mancino D, Haikel Y, et al. Does customized handle toothbrush influence dental plaque removal in children with down syndrome? A randomized controlled trial. Healthcare. 2021; 9: 1130.

[7] Duangthip D, Chu CH. Challenges in oral hygiene and oral health policy. Frontiers in Oral Health. 2020; 1: 575428.

[8] Sandström A, Cressey J, Stecksén-Blicks C. Tooth-brushing behaviour in 6–12 year olds. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2011; 21: 43–49.

[9] Pujar P, Subbareddy VV. Evaluation of the tooth brushing skills in children aged 6–12 years. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2013; 14: 213–219.

[10] Mentes A, Atukeren J. A study of manual toothbrushing skills in children aged 3 to 11 years. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2002; 27: 91–94.

[11] Sarvia ME, Bush JP, Mourino AP. Psychomotor skills and incentive as predictors in a children’s toothbrushing program. Journal of Pedodontics. 1989; 14: 31–35.

[12] Stroski ML, de Souza Dal Maso AM, Wambier LM, Chibinski AC, Pochapski MT, Santos FA, et al. Clinical evaluation of three toothbrush models tested by schoolchildren. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2011; 9: 149–154.

[13] Gupta H, Bhaskar D, Kaur N. General recent advancements of plaque control. Guident. 2018; 8: 8–10.

[14] Kiran S, Padmanabh D, Gangurde V. Evaluation of the cleaning efficacy of a normal toothbrush and a manual U shaped toothbrush in children aged 8–10 years: a randomized crossover trial. SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences. 2024; 14: 134–138.

[15] Tusi SK, Momeni Z, Hamdollahpoor H, Parviz N, Ghorbani M. Evaluating the effectiveness of various teaching methods on dental plaque removal in children: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Pediatrics. 2025; 25: 109.

[16] Janakiram C, Varghese N, Venkitachalam R, Joseph J, Vineetha K. Comparison of modified Bass, Fones and normal tooth brushing technique for the efficacy of plaque control in young adults—a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2020; 12: e123–e129.

[17] Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. Journal of Periodontology. 1970; 41: 41–43.

[18] James P, Worthington HV, Parnell C, Harding M, Lamont T, Cheung A, et al. Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017; 3: CD008676.

[19] Leal SC, Bezerra AC, de Toledo OA. Effectiveness of teaching methods for toothbrushing in preschool children. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2002; 13: 133–136.

[20] American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry; American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): classifications, consequences, and preventive strategies. Pediatric Dentistry. 2008; 30: 40–43.

[21] Huebner CE, Riedy CA. Behavioral determinants of brushing young children’s teeth: implications for anticipatory guidance. Pediatric Dentistry. 2010; 32: 48–55.

[22] Marshman Z, Ahern SM, McEachan RRC, Rogers HJ, Gray-Burrows KA, Day PF. Parents’ experiences of toothbrushing with children: a qualitative study. JDR Clinical & Translational Research. 2016; 1: 122–130.

[23] Youcharoen K, Thomngam N, Aranya N, Wongphanthuset Y, Rungruangpattana M, Kaewsutha N. Plaque removal efficacy of triple-headed toothbrush in 4–6-year-old children: a randomized crossover study. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2021; 11: 546–552.

[24] Schnabl D, Wiesmüller V, Hönlinger V, Wimmer S, Bruckmoser E, Kapferer-Seebacher I. Cleansing efficacy of an auto-cleaning electronic toothbrushing device: a randomized-controlled crossover pilot study. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021; 25: 247–253.

[25] Nieri M, Giuntini V, Pagliaro U, Giani M, Franchi L, Franceschi D. Efficacy of a U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush in dental plaque removal: a cross-over randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 4649.

[26] Khan IM, Mani SA, Doss JG, Danaee M, Kong LYL. Pre-schoolers’ tooth brushing behaviour and association with their oral health: a cross sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 283.

[27] Lim CY, In J. Considerations for crossover design in clinical study. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2021; 74: 293–299.

[28] Ullah R, Iqbal SK, Zafar MS. The urgency of cautious prescription for fluoride toothpaste: recommendations for the stakeholders. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2024; 19: 133–135.

[29] Zhang Q, Guan L, Guo J, Chuan A, Tong J, Ban J, et al. Application of fluoride disturbs plaque microecology and promotes remineralization of enamel initial caries. Journal of Oral Microbiology. 2022; 14: 2105022.

[30] Ilyas M, Ashraf S, Jamil H. Tooth brushing techniques: relative efficacy and comparison in the reduction of plaque score in 8–11 years old children. The Professional Medical Journal. 2018; 25: 135–139.

[31] Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm. Caries Research. 2004; 38: 204–211.

[32] Ballouk MA, Dashash M. The gingival health status of 8–12 year-old children in Damascus city in Syria during the Syrian Crisis: a cross-sectional epidemiological oral health survey. BMC Research Notes. 2018; 11: 887.

[33] Koroluk LD, Hoover JN, Komiyama K. Factors related to plaque distribution in a group of Canadian preschool children. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 1994; 4: 167–172.

[34] Kayalvizhi G, Radha S, Prathima GS, Mohandoss S, Ramesh V, Arumugam SB. Comparative evaluation of plaque removal effectiveness of manual and chewable toothbrushes in children: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2019; 12: 107–110.

[35] Davidovich E, Ccahuana-Vasquez RA, Timm H, Grender J, Zini A. Randomised clinical study of plaque removal efficacy of an electric toothbrush in primary and mixed dentition. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2021; 31: 657–663.

[36] Davidovich E, Shafir S, Shay B, Zini A. Plaque removal by a powered toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Dentistry. 2020; 42: 280–287.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top