Article Data

  • Views 200
  • Dowloads 134

Original Research

Open Access

Effect of theaflavins pretreatment on bond strength and microleakage to deciduous dentin: an in vitro study

  • Licheng Lai1,2,†
  • Beining Hao1,†
  • Jiangjingjun Xu1
  • Xiaoying Tang1
  • Feng Liu1
  • Xin Chen1
  • Liping Zhong1
  • Yan Huang1,*,

1The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, 330000 Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

2The Maternal and Children Health Care Hospital (Huzhong Hospital) of Huadu, 510000 Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.075 Vol.50,Issue 3,May 2026 pp.199-210

Submitted: 29 June 2025 Accepted: 05 November 2025

Published: 03 May 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Yan Huang E-mail: ndfskqyy152@ncu.edu.cn

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Background: Reliable bonding between resin composite restorations and deciduous dentin is clinically challenging. Theaflavins (TFs), black tea-derived natural polyphenols with collagen cross-linking, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-inhibiting and antibacterial activities, have not been studied as a deciduous dentin pretreatment agent. This study evaluated 2% (w/v) TFs for improving bond strength and marginal sealing, with 2% chlorhexi dine (CHX) and distilled water (DW) as controls. Methods: Forty-eight caries-free primary molars were randomly assigned to micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS, 30 teeth) or microleakage (18 teeth) testing. Each group was subdivided into TFs, CHX, and DW subgroups, and these were further split into immediate/aged testing. After pretreatment and adhesive/resin application, µTBS measurement, fracture mode observation, interface morphology analysis, and International Organization for Standardization (ISO)-standard microleakage assessment were conducted; data were analyzed via SPSS 26.0 (α = 0.05). Results: µTBS: In both immediate and aged groups, TFs group depicted the highest strength, followed by CHX and DW (p < 0.05). Fracture mode: After aging, the DW group showed predominantly type I interfacial failure, while the CHX and TFs groups displayed fracture mode III—a mode not observed in the DW group. Interface morphology: TFs group had the most and longest resin tags, while the thickest and most intact hybrid layer were observed in both immediate and aged groups. Microleakage: In both immediate and aged groups, the TFs group was lower than DW (p < 0.05) but showed no significant difference from CHX group (p > 0.05). TFs group had no significant change in microleakage after aging (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The 2% TFs pretreatment significantly improved bond strength and reduced microleakage in deciduous dentin, as compared with those with 2% CHX.


Keywords

Dentin bonding; Bond durability; Theaflavins (TFs); Microtensile bond strength (µTBS); Microleakage; Deciduous teeth; Chlorhexidine (CHX)


Cite and Share

Licheng Lai,Beining Hao,Jiangjingjun Xu,Xiaoying Tang,Feng Liu,Xin Chen,Liping Zhong,Yan Huang. Effect of theaflavins pretreatment on bond strength and microleakage to deciduous dentin: an in vitro study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(3);199-210.

References

[1] Andaş K, Knorst JK, Bonifácio CC, Kleverlaan CJ, Hesse D. Compomers for the restorative treatment of dental caries in primary teeth: an umbrella review. Journal of Dentistry. 2023; 13: 104696.

[2] do Amaral Junior OL, Braccini Fagundes ML, Hugo FN, Kassebaum NJ, do Amaral Giordani JM. Structural determinants of inequalities in untreated dental caries in the global burden of disease study. PLOS ONE. 2025; 20: e0325138.

[3] Huang S, Tian W, Tian J, Tang H, Qin M, Zhao B, et al. Deep saliva proteomics elucidating the pathogenesis of early childhood caries and identifying biomarkers for early prediction. Journal of Proteome Research. 2024; 24: 750–761.

[4] Askar H, Krois J, Göstemeyer G, Bottenberg P, Zero D, Banerjee A, et al. Secondary caries: what is it, and how it can be controlled, detected, and managed? Clinical Oral Investigations. 2020; 24: 1869–1876.

[5] Zhang Q, Wang J, Xia B, Zhao W, Chen X, Jiang B, et al. Expert consensus on clinical management for early childhood caries. West China Journal of Stomatology. 2022; 40: 495–503.

[6] Liu ED, Lü J, Liu YQ, Jin XA. Effects of different pretreatment agents on bonding durability of deciduous dentin. Journal of Oral Disease Prevention and Treatment. 2022; 30: 475–482. (In Chinese)

[7] Xu XQ, Wu HY, Liu J. Effects of two etching agents on bonding strength between primary tooth enamel and resin: an in vitro study. Journal of Stomatology. 2025; 45: 608–612. (In Chinese)

[8] Chang S, Han TT, Zhou WW. Study on self-etching bonding technology in the treatment of primary dentin caries. Clinical Research. 2025; 33: 38–41. (In Chinese)

[9] Guo X, Yu Y, Gao S, Zhang Z, Zhao H. Biodegradation of dental resin-based composite—a potential factor affecting the bonding effect: a narrative review. Biomedicines. 2022; 10: 2313.

[10] Maravic T, Breschi L, Paganelli F, Bonetti GA, Martina S, Di Giorgio G, et al. Endogenous enzymatic activity of primary and permanent dentine. Materials. 2021; 14: 4043.

[11] Betancourt DE, Baldion PA, Castellanos JE. Resin-dentin bonding interface: mechanisms of degradation and strategies for stabilization of the hybrid layer. International Journal of Biomaterials. 2019; 20: 5268342.

[12] Ding Y, Li Q, Tang W, Pan YH, Nie RR, Meng XF. Effect of a primer containing Artemisinin on dentin endogenous MMPs and resin bond durability. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2023; 123: 103340.

[13] Masarykova N, Tkadlec E, Chlup Z, Vrbsky J, Brysova A, Cernochova P, et al. Comparison of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with five different adhesive systems: in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23: 637.

[14] Nassaj AE, Ghadimi S, Seraj B, Chiniforush N. Effect of photodynamic therapy on microleakage of class V composite restorations in primary teeth. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2020; 32: 101964.

[15] Singhal DK, Acharya S, Thakur AS. Microbiological analysis after complete or partial removal of carious dentin using two different techniques in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Dental Research Journal. 2016; 13: 30–37.

[16] Elkassas DW, Fawzi EM, El Zohairy A. The effect of cavity disinfectants on the micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesives. European Journal of Dentistry. 2014; 8: 184–190.

[17] Honaje NV, Ninawe N, Anija CK, Jagtap SD. Comparative evaluation of the effect of different matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors on shear bond strength between composite and dentin: an in vitro study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025; 18: 1066–1070.

[18] García-Varela S, Ramos JC, Ginzo-Villamayor MJ, Castelo-Baz P, Méndez-Díaz R, Anache-D’Abate MA, et al. Effect of dentin irrigants on push-out bond strength in resin cementation protocols for fiber posts in endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro study. Materials. 2024; 17: 1432.

[19] Gursel Surmelioglu D, Gungor Borsoken A, Kervancıoglu G, Yeniceri Hilaloglu NE. Effect of the cavity disinfectant containing chitosan on dentin bonding strength after radiotherapy. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2022; 16: 1602–1606.

[20] Huang WQ. Effects of different matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors on bonding effect of dentin affected by caries. China Practical Medicine. 2022; 17: 206–208. (In Chinese)

[21] Coelho A, Amaro I, Apolónio A, Paula A, Saraiva J, Ferreira MM, et al. Effect of cavity disinfectants on adhesion to primary teeth—a systematic review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22: 4398.

[22] Ebrahimi M, Naseh A, Abdollahi M, Shirazi AS. Can chlorhexidine enhance the bond strength of self-etch and etch-and-rinse systems to primary teeth dentin? The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2018; 19: 404–408.

[23] Oznurhan F, Ozturk C, Ekci ES. Effects of different cavity-disinfectants and potassium titanyl phosphate laser on microtensile bond strength to primary dentin. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2015; 18: 400–404.

[24] Parsaie Z, Firouzmandi M, Mohammadi N. Evaluating the effect of pretreatment with matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors on the shear bond strength of composite resin to primary teeth dentin: a 6-month in vitro study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2021; 12: 408–413.

[25] Zhang M, Jin J, Liu Y, Ben C, Li H, Cheng D, et al. Analysis of povidone iodine, chlorhexidine acetate and polyhexamethylene biguanide as wound disinfectants: in vitro cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity. BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health. 2023; 6: 21.

[26] Cheong JZA, Liu A, Rust CJ, Tran CL, Hassan SE, Kalan LR, et al. Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: chlorhexidine gluconate demonstrates short-term efficacy and long-term cytotoxicity. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2022; 30: 573–584.

[27] Chye RML, Sharma A, Rincon J, Hui WL, Sharma LA, Alavi SE, et al. Effectiveness of chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes after dental surgery: a quadruple-blind randomized pilot trial. 3 Biotech. 2025; 15: 385.

[28] Windhorst ER, Joosstens M, van der Sluijs E, Slot DE. The effect of cetylpyridinium chloride compared to chlorhexidine mouthwash on scores of plaque and gingivitis: a systematic review and meta-analyses. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2025; 23: 665–681.

[29] O’Neill EJ, Termini D, Albano A, Tsiani E. Anti-cancer properties of theaflavins. Molecules. 2021; 26: 987.

[30] Zhang F, Wang Y, Aaqil M, Guo YW, Zheng JC, Zhang Z, et al. Research progress on tea pigments: isolation and purification, stability modulation, bioactivities, and comprehensive applications. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2025; 165: 105290.

[31] Lian Y, Huang Z, Liu X, Deng Z, Gao D, Wang X. Discovery of ten anti-HIV hit compounds and preliminary pharmacological mechanisms studies. Current HIV Research. 2024; 22: 82–90.

[32] Wnuk E. The antioxidant potential of black tea polyphenols in heavy metal toxicity: an in vitro perspective. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26: 7926.

[33] Kong J, Xia K, Su X, Zheng X, Diao C, Yang X, et al. Mechanistic insights into the inhibitory effect of theaflavins on virulence factors production in Streptococcus mutans. AMB Express. 2021; 11: 102.

[34] Alavi M, Pedro SN, Freire MG, Ashengroph M, Khan H. Theaflavins applications to ameliorate implant failure and eradicate microbial infections and foodborne pathogens: a comprehensive review. Phytotherapy Research. 2025; 39: 494–504.

[35] Vidal CM, Zhu W, Manohar S, Aydin B, Keiderling TA, Messersmith PB, et al. Collagen-collagen interactions mediated by plant-derived proanthocyanidins: a spectroscopic and atomic force microscopy study. Acta Biomaterialia. 2016; 1: 110–118.

[36] Liu H, Guo J, Wang R, Wang Y. Theaflavins as a novel cross-linker quickly stabilize demineralized dentin collagen against degradation. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 196–199.

[37] K Suma N, K Shashibhushan K, Subba Reddy VV. Effect of dentin disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 0.3% iodine on dentin bond strength: an in vitro study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2017; 10: 223–228.

[38] Chen Z, Wei Y, Liang L, Wang X, Peng F, Liang Y, et al. Theaflavin-3, 3′-digallate/ethanol: a novel cross-linker for stabilizing dentin collagen. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2024; 12: 1401032.

[39] Nisar S, Hass V, Wang R, Walker MP, Wang Y. Effect of different crosslinkers on denatured dentin collagen’s biostability, MMP inhibition and mechanical properties. Polymers. 2023; 15: 3683.

[40] Ozan G, Sar Sancakli H, Batu S, Gurbuz Yurtsever A, Erdal MS, Sengelen A, et al. Efficacy of theaflavin-based dental varnishes against erosive demineralizatıon and matrix metalloproteinase expression. Odontology. 2026; 114: 924–938.

[41] Deng T, Liu M, Liu W, Wang W, Xie CL. Effects of EDTA and EDC pretreatment on bond strength of two-step self-etching adhesives. Journal of Oral Medicine Research. 2020; 36: 221–225. (In Chinese)

[42] Zhai MJ, Miao Y. Comparison of bonding effects of different bonding systems on sclerotic dentin. Chinese Medical Equipment Journal. 2025; 46: 72–78. (In Chinese)

[43] Yang LL. Experimental study on the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of dental glass ceramics [doctoral thesis]. Jinan: Shandong University. 2019.

[44] Huo WY, Liu YN, Cao Q, Wang HF. Study on bond strength, durability and microleakage of bulk-fill resin and dentin. China Medical Herald. 2023; 20: 121–124. (In Chinese)

[45] Cui Y, Zhang ZT, Ge LH, Ding N, Yang DM. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of five dentin adhesives on deciduous dentin. Beijing Journal of Stomatology. 2016; 24: 66–70. (In Chinese)

[46] Ilie N, Schöner C, Bücher K, Hickel R. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth. Journal of Dentistry. 2014; 42: 850–855.

[47] Guo J. Study on the mechanism of natural protein cross-linking agents in enhancing dentin bonding effect [doctoral thesis]. Nanchang: Nanchang University. 2020.

[48] Coelho ASEC, Paula ABP, Carrilho TMP, da Silva MJRF, Botelho MFRR, Carrilho EVVF. Chlorhexidine mouthwash as an anticaries agent: a systematic review. Quintessence International. 2017; 48: 585–591.

[49] Guo J, Yang M, Hu M. The roles of theaflavins in reducing dentin erosion. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13: 9413.

[50] Haydari M, Bardakci AG, Koldsland OC, Aass AM, Sandvik L, Preus HR. Comparing the effect of 0.06% -, 0.12% and 0.2% Chlorhexidine on plaque, bleeding and side effects in an experimental gingivitis model: a parallel group, double masked randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17: 118.

[51] Tjäderhane L, Mehtälä P, Scaffa P, Vidal C, Pääkkönen V, Breschi L, et al. The effect of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) on dentin bonding and nanoleakage of etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dental Materials. 2013; 29: 1055–1062.

[52] Salim Al-Ani AA, Mutluay M, Stape THS, Tjäderhane L, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Effect of various dimethyl sulfoxide concentrations on the durability of dentin bonding and hybrid layer quality. Dental Materials Journal. 2018; 37: 501–505.

[53] Armstrong S, Breschi L, Özcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B. Academy of Dental Materials Guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) approach. Dental Materials. 2017; 33: 133–143.

[54] Deng DL. Comparative study on aging methods of dentin bonding interface [doctoral thesis]. Wuhan: Wuhan University. 2013.

[55] Deng D, Yang H, Guo J, Chen X, Zhang W, Huang C. Effects of different artificial ageing methods on the degradation of adhesive-dentine interfaces. Journal Of Dentistry. 2014; 42: 1577–1585.

[56] Snehi, Pathivada L, Garg N, Karthik KM, Bhyri P, Koyande A. Comparative evaluation of marginal microleakage of different forms of glass ionomer cements in primary molars: an in vitro study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025; 18: 544.

[57] Yıldırım-Işık H, Büyükgöze-Dindar M. Influence of different adhesives and surface treatments on shear and tensile bond strength and microleakage with micro-CT of repaired bulk-fill composites. Polymers. 2025; 17: 1680.

[58] Sridhar LP, Moses J, Rangeeth BN, Sivakumar S. Comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of two commercially available pit and fissure sealants. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2016; 10: ZC01–ZC04.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top