Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Evaluation of pulpal inflammation level in young permanent teeth using biomarker levels
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, 25010 Erzurum, Turkey
2Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, 25010 Erzurum, Turkey
DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.078 Vol.50,Issue 3,May 2026 pp.233-242
Submitted: 23 October 2025 Accepted: 12 December 2025
Published: 03 May 2026
*Corresponding Author(s): Aybike Bas Ozturk E-mail: aybike.bas@atauni.edu.tr
Background: In today’s clinic, there are no definitive diagnostic criteria for determining the level of pulp inflammation. Increased biomarker levels in pulp inflammation enable the quantitative measurement of pulp inflammation and provide objective data. Based on this, in our study, the level of pulp inflammation was measured using biomarkers, and the increased biomarker level was compared with the clinical parameters used to determine the level of pulp inflammation. In addition, biomarker levels were compared in teeth classified as reversible pulpitis (RP) and irreversible pulpitis (IRP) according to clinical diagnostic parameters. Furthermore, the effect of Presepsin, a novel biomarker used in the assessment of pulp inflammation, was demonstrated. Methods: The study was conducted on teeth that underwent pulpotomy and were classified as RP (n = 30) and IRP (n = 30) based on clinical parameters. During the treatment period, pain, bleeding time, severity and color findings were recorded. Bleeding samples were taken to measure the level of inflammation in pulp, and the biomarkers TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor α), IL-6 (Interleukin 6), IL-1β (Interleukin 1β), IL-8 (Interleukin 8), and Presepsin were evaluated. Results: When clinical parameters were examined, a significant difference was found between the presence of spontaneous pain, pulp bleeding more than 3 minutes, severe bleeding, and an increase in biomarker levels. When comparing the pulp of RP and IRP teeth, biomarker levels in the coronal pulp were similar, while in the radicular pulp, biomarker levels in IRP teeth were significantly higher. Presepsin demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing IRP teeth from RP teeth. Conclusions: Clinically assessed pain, pulp bleeding time and severity data can be considered in the evaluation of pulp inflammation. Among the biomarkers, Presepsin, which has the highest sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between RP and IRP teeth, can be considered an important biomarker in the evaluation of pulp inflammation.
Dental pulp diseases; Pulpotomy; Biomarkers; Presepsin
Aybike Bas Ozturk,Muhammet Alagoz,Sera Derelioglu,Fatih Sengul,Esra Laloglu,Peris Celikel. Evaluation of pulpal inflammation level in young permanent teeth using biomarker levels. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(3);233-242.
[1] Moreira LV, Machado GF, Ramos-Jorge ML, Mourão PS, Ramos-Jorge J, Fernandes IB. Longitudinal assessment of factors associated with dental caries on the first permanent molars: a prospective clinical study in Brazilian children. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2025; 26: 779–790.
[2] Priya B L, Singh N, Mangalam KK, Sachdev R, P A, Jain HN, et al. Success and complication rates of revascularization procedures for immature necrotic teeth: a systematic review. Cureus. 2023; 15: e51364.
[3] Pohl S, Akamp T, Smeda M, Uderhardt S, Besold D, Krastl G, et al. Understanding dental pulp inflammation: from signaling to structure. Frontiers in Immunology. 2024; 15: 1474466.
[4] Zhu L, Liu W, Deng X, Chen Z, Chen J, Qian W. Full pulpotomy versus root canal therapy in mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 1231.
[5] Duncan HF, Galler KM, Tomson PL, Simon S, El-Karim I, Kundzina R, et al. European society of endodontology position statement: management of deep caries and the exposed pulp. International Endodontic Journal. 2019; 52: 923–934.
[6] Camp JH. Diagnosis dilemmas in vital pulp therapy: treatment for the toothache is changing, especially in young, immature teeth. Pediatric Dentistry. 2008; 30: 197–205.
[7] Donnermeyer D, Dammaschke T, Lipski M, Schäfer E. Effectiveness of diagnosing pulpitis: a systematic review. International Endodontic Journal. 2023; 56: 296–325.
[8] Duncan HF. Present status and future directions—vital pulp treatment and pulp preservation strategies. International Endodontic Journal. 2022; 55: 497–511.
[9] Hirsch V, Wolgin M, Mitronin AV, Kielbassa AM. Inflammatory cytokines in normal and irreversibly inflamed pulps: a systematic review. Archives of Oral Biology. 2017; 82: 38–46.
[10] Elsalhy M, Azizieh F, Raghupathy R. Cytokines as diagnostic markers of pulpal inflammation. International Dental Journal. 2013; 46: 573–580.
[11] Memar MY, Baghi HB. Presepsin: a promising biomarker for the detection of bacterial infections. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2019; 111: 649–656.
[12] Aliu-Bejta A, Atelj A, Kurshumliu M, Dreshaj S, Baršić B. Presepsin values as markers of severity of sepsis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020; 95: 1–7.
[13] Bas A, Derelioglu SS, Laloglu E. Efficacy of proinflamatory cytokines in the clinical and radiograpic outcomes of different primary molar pulpotomy agents: a comperative randomised study featuring a novel biomarker for pulpal diagnosis. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 1227.
[14] Careddu R, Duncan HF. A prospective clinical study investigating the effectiveness of partial pulpotomy after relating preoperative symptoms to a new and established classification of pulpitis. International Endodontic Journal. 2021; 54: 2156–2172.
[15] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. 2025. Available at: https://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/BP_PulpTherapy.pdf (Accessed: 25 November 2025).
[16] Wolters WJ, Duncan HF, Tomson PL, Karim IE, McKenna G, Dorri M, et al. Minimally invasive endodontics: a new diagnostic system for assessing pulpitis and subsequent treatment needs. International Endodontic Journal. 2017; 50: 825–829.
[17] Ricucci D, Loghin S, Siqueira JF III. Correlation between clinical and histologic pulp diagnoses. Journal of Endodontics. 2014; 40: 1932–1939.
[18] Sabeti MA, Nikghalb KD, Pakzad R, Fouad AF. Expression of selected inflammatory mediators with different clinical characteristics of pulpal inflammation. Journal of Endodontics. 2024; 50: 336–343.
[19] Mejàre IA, Axelsson S, Davidson T, Frisk F, Hakeberg M, Kvist T, et al. Diagnosis of the condition of the dental pulp: a systematic review. International Endodontic Journal. 2012; 45: 597–613.
[20] Michaelson PL, Holland GR. Is pulpitis painful? International Endodontic Journal. 2002; 35: 829–832.
[21] Seltzer S, Bender IB, Ziontz M. The dynamics of pulp inflammation: correlations between diagnostic data and actual histologic findings in the pulp. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 1963; 16: 969–977.
[22] Ardavan A, Roghanizadeh L, Asgary S. Tampon vital pulp therapy in the management of excessive haemorrhage in inflamed pulps: a hypothesis. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2023; 18: 274–276.
[23] Mutluay M, Arıkan V, Sarı S, Kısa Ü. Does achievement of hemostasis after pulp exposure provide an accurate assessment of pulp inflammation? Pediatric Dentistry. 2018; 40: 37–42.
[24] Asgary S, Shamszadeh S. Hemostasis in vital pulp therapy for children and adolescents: does duration matter? A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025; 49: 10–18.
[25] Aminabadi NA, Parto M, Emamverdizadeh P, Jamali Z, Shirazi S. Erratum to: pulp bleeding color is an indicator of clinical and histohematologic status of primary teeth. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2017; 21: 1843.
[26] Cooper PR, Holder MJ, Smith AJ. Inflammation and regeneration in the dentin-pulp complex: a double-edged sword. Journal of Endodontics. 2014; 40: S46–S51.
[27] Rechenberg DK, Galicia JC, Peters OA. Biological markers for pulpal inflammation: a systematic review. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11: e0167289.
[28] Zou Q, Wen W, Zhang XC. Presepsin as a novel sepsis biomarker. World Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014; 5: 16–19.
[29] Farges JC, Keller JF, Carrouel F, Durand SH, Romeas A, Bleicher F, et al. Odontoblasts in the dental pulp immune response. The Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution. 2009; 312B: 425–436.
[30] Zanini M, Meyer E, Simon S. Pulp inflammation diagnosis from clinical to inflammatory mediators: a systematic review. Journal of Endodontics. 2017; 43: 1033–1051.
[31] Lin LM, Ricucci D, Saoud TM, Sigurdsson A, Kahler B. Vital pulp therapy of mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis from the perspective of pulp biology. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2020; 46: 154–166.
[32] Silva AC, Faria MR, Fontes A, Campos MS, Cavalcanti BN. Interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-8 in healthy and inflamed dental pulps. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2009; 17: 527–532.
[33] Huang GT, Potente AP, Kim JW, Chugal N, Zhang X. Increased interleukin-8 expression in inflamed human dental pulps. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics. 1999; 88: 214–220.
[34] Kokkas AB, Goulas A, Varsamidis K, Mirtsou V, Tziafas D. Irreversible but not reversible pulpitis is associated with up-regulation of tumour necrosis factor-alpha gene expression in human pulp. International Endodontic Journal. 2007; 40: 198–203.
[35] Sorsa T, Gursoy UK, Nwhator S, Hernandez M, Tervahartiala T, Leppilahti J, et al. Analysis of matrix metalloproteinases, especially MMP-8, in gingival creviclular fluid, mouthrinse and saliva for monitoring periodontal diseases. Periodontology 2000. 2016; 70: 142–163.
Top