Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Investigation of the effects of propolis and ozone addition on the physical and mechanical properties of MTA: an in vitro study
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, 14030 Bolu, Turkey
2Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, 14030 Bolu, Turkey
DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.095 Vol.50,Issue 4,July 2026 pp.113-121
Submitted: 17 December 2025 Accepted: 06 February 2026
Published: 03 July 2026
*Corresponding Author(s): Zeynep Öztürk E-mail: zeynep.ozturk@ibu.edu.tr
Background: Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), a calcium silicate–based cement introduced in 1993, is widely used in vital pulp therapy due to its excellent sealing ability, biocompatibility, and low cytotoxicity. This study added propolis (known for its antibacterial activity) and ozonated water to MTA to evaluate their effects on its physical and mechanical properties. Methods: Three experimental groups (n = 18 each) were created by mixing MTA with distilled water (control), propolis, or ozonated distilled water. Initial and final setting times were measured, Vickers microhardness was recorded at 1, 3, 7, and 28 days, and compressive strength was evaluated on day 28. Surface morphology and elemental composition were analyzed using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (FE-SEM/EDS). Data were analyzed with repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) or Friedman tests for intra-group comparisons and using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests for inter-group comparisons (p < 0.05). Results: Propolis significantly prolonged both the initial (6 min) and final setting times (238.611 ± 4.804 min) compared with the other groups (p < 0.001), whereas ozonated water yielded values similar to those of the control. The compressive strength of the MTA + propolis group (30.749 ± 3.374 MPa) was significantly lower than that of the other groups (p < 0.001). Microhardness increased over time in all groups (p < 0.001), but the values in the propolis group remained consistently lower at all measurement points (p < 0.001). FE-SEM analyses revealed that crystalline formation was preserved in all groups, but samples with added propolis exhibited a film-like layer partially covering the surface. Conclusions: The addition of propolis adversely affected the physical and mechanical properties of MTA, whereas ozonated distilled water preserved its structural integrity, suggesting that ozonated water may be a safe alternative liquid for the clinical modification of MTA.
Mineral trioxide aggregate; Antibacterial; Microhardness; Compressive strength
Zeynep Öztürk,Büşra Tosun. Investigation of the effects of propolis and ozone addition on the physical and mechanical properties of MTA: an in vitro study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(4);113-121.
[1] Karunakaran S, Praveen N, Selvandran KE, Leburu A, Madhuram K, Kumar ARA. Effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate and its modifications in inducing dentin bridge formation during pulp capping: a systematic review. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2025; 28: 222–230.
[2] Nabeel M, Abu-Seida AM, Elgendy AA, Tawfik HM. Biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine as root-end filling materials: an in vivo study. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14: 3568.
[3] Mehdipour A, Fateh R, Naseri Z, Aghaali M, Saleh A, Kabiri F, et al. In vitro comparison of anti-microbial and anti-adherence activities of three new mineral trioxide aggregate formulations against species associated with failed endodontic treatment. Journal of Dentistry. 2025; 26: 336–345.
[4] Öztürk Z, Bal C, Güngörmüş M, Aksoy M. Effects of a mineralization-promoting peptide on the physical and chemical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2023; 138: 105570.
[5] Maharti ID, Ramadiani N, Indrastuty Siringoringo R, Anri ZK, Meidyawati R, Margono A, et al. The effect of various water-soluble chitosan concentrations on physical properties and antibiofilm ability of mineral trioxide aggregate. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2024; 18: e18742106311545.
[6] Milani AS, Hadinia F, Rezaei Y, Soroush Barhaghi MH, Attari K, Nouroloyouni A. Addition of bioactive glass decreases setting time and improves antibacterial properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. International Journal of Biomaterials. 2024; 2024: 4190647.
[7] Nazemi Salman B, Kalantari M, Mohebbi Rad M, Saburi E. Comparison of cytotoxic and apoptosis-inducing effects of MTA, propolis, and propolis-MTA on immature dental pulp stem cells. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2023; 24 :797–802.
[8] Aldosari AY, Aljared AM, Alqurshy HS, Alfarran AM, Alnahdi MG, Alharbi SS, et al. The clinical effectiveness of propolis on the endodontic treatment of permanent teeth: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials and updates. Cureus. 2025; 17: e77430.
[9] Ballouk MAH, Altinawi M, Fudalej PS. An all-inclusive review on propolis uses in dentistry. Discover Applied Sciences. 2025; 7: 1388.
[10] Sycińska-Dziarnowska M, Szyszka-Sommerfeld L, Bugajska M, Ziąbka M, Szućko-Kociuba I, Spagnuolo G, et al. Propolis as a natural remedy in reducing dental plaque and gingival inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2025; 16: 336.
[11] Widjiastuti I, Kunarti S, Ningtyas EK, Atikah AR, Basalamah KF, Puspita AE, et al. Propolis-enhanced calcium hydroxide combination for direct pulp capping: impact on oxidative stress markers in wistar rat teeth. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2024; 19: 99–104.
[12] Kalaskar RR, Badhe HK, Ninawe NS, Khade AV, Balasubramanian S, Kamki H. Comparative evaluation of ozonoid olive oil and calcium hydroxide as an indirect pulp capping agent in primary mandibular second molar: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2022; 23: 208–214.
[13] Condori JY, Meza-Mauricio J, Mendoza-Azpur G, Castro-Rodríguez Y. Is the use of ozonated oil effective in the treatment of oral lesions? Systematic review of clinical studies. Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2024; 26: 35–53.
[14] Badhe H, Kalaskar R, Balasubramanian S, Kamki H, Kalaskar A. Antimicrobial effect of ozone therapy in deep dentinal carious lesion: a systematic review. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2022; 15: S252–S260.
[15] Santos M, Leandro F, Barroso H, Delgado AHS, Proença L, Polido M, et al. Antibacterial effect of ozone on cariogenic bacteria and its potential prejudicial effect on dentin bond strength—an in vitro study. Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16: 614.
[16] Yeşilöz Gökçen E, Aksoy M, Orhan AI, Özçelik B, Tulga Öz F. Assessment of the effectiveness of ozone theraphy and an antibacterial bonding agent on the cavity disinfection of deciduous teeth: an in vivo study. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2019; 22: 442–450.
[17] Ghabraei S, Afkhami F, Shamshiri AR, Mohammadi Z. Comparison of cytotoxicity between mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with chlorhexidine and common endodontic regeneration medicaments on periodontal ligament stem cells: an in vitro study. Frontiers in Dentistry. 2023; 20: 1.
[18] Mejía J, Giovagnoli-vicuña C, Jacob C, Montenegro G, Moreno-switt AI, Giordano A. Antioxidant, antibacterial, and bioaccessibility properties of ultrasound-extracted chilean propolis. Antioxidants. 2025; 14: 651.
[19] Özdemir Çelik DS, Aslan T. The effect of ozone application on the color stability and surface roughness of restorative materials aged with different solutions: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25: 1302.
[20] International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6876:2025. Dentistry—endodontic sealing materials. 2025. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/83587.html (Accessed: 12 February 2026).
[21] International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9917-1:2025. Dentistry—water-based cements—part 1: acid-base cements. 2025. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/76037.html (Accessed: 12 February 2026).
[22] Vandekar M, Pendse G, Toprani N, Hulyal SU, Panikkar P, Tewary E. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate with and without silver nanoparticles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2025; 28: 859–866.
[23] Suresh B, Ravindran V. Comparative analysis of antimicrobial properties and physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with distilled water, chlorhexidine, and sodium hypochlorite solutions: an in vitro study. Cureus. 2024; 16: e67563.
[24] Rao HM, Krishnan R, Shivalingam C, Ramadoss R. Structural and morphological characterization of silver nanoparticles intruded mineral trioxide aggregate admixture as a chair-side restorative medicament: an in vitro experimental study. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2025; 50: e30.
[25] Shi B, Zhao Y, Yuan X. Effects of MTA and Brazilian propolis on the biological properties of dental pulp cells. Brazilian Oral Research. 2019; 33: e117.
[26] Tiyapitsanupaisan N, Kantrong N, Puasiri S, Nathapakti P. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with Thai propolis extract on matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression in inflamed human dental pulp cells. Mahidol Dental Journal. 2023; 43: S57–S66.
[27] Veneri F, Filippini T, Consolo UGO, Vinceti M, Generali L. Ozone therapy in dentistry: an overview of the biological mechanisms involved. Biomedical Reports. 2024; 21: 115.
[28] Makowiecki P. The influence of ozone on the effectiveness of the vital pulp therapy with Biodentine. Pomeranian Journal of Life Sciences. 2023; 69: 1–5.
[29] El-Tayeb MM, Abu-Seida AM, El Ashry SH, El-Hady SA. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of propolis on regenerative potential of necrotic immature permanent teeth in dogs. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19: 174.
[30] Stowe TJ, Sedgley CM, Stowe B, Fenno JC. The effects of chlorhexidine gluconate (0.12%) on the antimicrobial properties of tooth-colored ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate. Journal of Endodontics. 2004; 30: 429–431.
[31] Kogan P, He J, Glickman GN, Watanabe I. The effects of various additives on setting properties of MTA. Journal of Endodontics. 2006; 32: 569–572.
[32] Kazemipoor M, Azizi N, Farahat F. Evaluation of microhardness of mineral trioxide aggregate after immediate placement of different coronal restorations: an in vitro study. Journal of Dentistry. 2018; 15: 116–122.
[33] Camilleri J, Formosa L, Damidot D. The setting characteristics of MTA plus in different environmental conditions. International Endodontic Journal. 2013; 46: 831–840.
[34] Nekoofar MH, Adusei G, Sheykhrezae MS, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, Dummer PMH. The effect of condensation pressure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. International Endodontic Journal. 2007; 40: 453–461.
[35] Watts JD, Holt DM, Beeson TJ, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE. Effects of pH and mixing agents on the temporal setting of tooth-colored and gray mineral trioxide aggregate. Journal of Endodontics. 2007; 33: 970–973.
[36] Formosa LM, Mallia B, Camilleri J. Mineral trioxide aggregate with anti-washout gel—properties and microstructure. Dental Materials. 2013; 29: 294–306.
[37] Holt D, Watts J, Beeson T, Kirkpatrick T, Rutledge R. The anti-microbial effect against enterococcus faecalis and the compressive strength of two types of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with sterile water or 2% chlorhexidine liquid. Journal of Endodontics. 2007; 33: 844–847.
[38] Lee Y, Lee B, Lin F, Yun A, Lan W, Lin C. Effects of physiological environments on the hydration behavior of mineral trioxide aggregate. Biomaterials. 2004; 25: 787–793.
[39] Guo YJ, Du TF, Li HB, Shen Y, Mobuchon C, Hieawy A, et al. Physical properties and hydration behavior of a fast-setting bioceramic endodontic material. BMC Oral Health. 2016; 16: 23.
[40] Chang SW. Chemical characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate and its hydration reaction. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2012; 37: 188–193.
[41] Tingey MC, Bush P, Levine MS. Analysis of mineral trioxide aggregate surface when set in the presence of fetal bovine serum. Journal of Endodontics. 2008; 34: 45–49.
[42] Nekoofar MH, Stone DF, Dummer PMH. The effect of blood contamination on the compressive strength and surface microstructure of mineral trioxide aggregate. International Endodontic Journal. 2010; 43: 782–791.
[43] Oloomi K, Mokhtari H, Mokhtari HR. Evaluation of the effect of blood contamination on the compressive strength of MTA modified with hydration accelerators. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2013; 38: 128–133.
[44] Kolaylı S, Kara Y, Can Z. Comparative study of some commercial propolis extract with new prepared ethanolic propolis extract. Bee Studies. 2020; 12: 27–30.
[45] Besharati M, Gholamalipour A, Taghizadeh A, Azhir D. The physicochemical characteristics and antioxidant attributes of propolis sourced from various regions in Iran. Applied Food Research. 2024; 4: 100603.
[46] Singh TK, Kumar M. Comparative evaluation of effect of different pH and mixing agents on compressive strength of mineral trioxide aggregate—an in vitro study. Saudi Journal of Oral and Dental Research. 2019; 4: 478–483.
[47] Saghiri MA, Garcia-Godoy F, Asatourian A, Lotfi M, Banava S, Khezri-Boukani K. Effect of pH on compressive strength of some modification of mineral trioxide aggregate. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal. 2013; 18: e714–e720.
[48] Lee Y, Wang W, Lin F, Lin C. Hydration behaviors of calcium silicate-based biomaterials. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2017; 116: 424–431.
[49] Shehab NF, Hasan NH, Dawood AE, Khalaf NA. Advanced structural and compositional profiling of mineral trioxide aggregate incorporated with nano-carbonated hydroxyapatite: a comprehensive X-ray diffraction and energy dispersive X-ray investigation. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry. 2025; 12: 216–225.
Top