Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
The effect of restorative material and application timing on the bond strength to primary dentin treated with silver diamine fluoride
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Türkiye
2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42090 Konya, Türkiye
DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.097 Vol.50,Issue 4,July 2026 pp.130-140
Submitted: 15 December 2025 Accepted: 26 March 2026
Published: 03 July 2026
*Corresponding Author(s): Ömer Faruk Güdük E-mail: omerfarukguduk@ktu.edu.tr
Background: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of restorative material, specifically resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC; Fuji II LC, GC Corporation, Japan) compared to bulk-fill flowable composite resin (SDR Plus, Dentsply Sirona, Germany), and the timing of their application timing on the bond strength to artificially demineralized primary dentin treated with 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF; Riva Star, SDI, Australia). Methods: Sixty-eight extracted primary molars with artificially demineralized, flat dentin surfaces were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 17/group) according to restorative material and timing of application: GIC0 (RMGIC—day 0), BF0 (bulk-fill composite—day 0), GIC14 (RMGIC—day 14), and BF14 (bulk-fill composite—day 14). For bulk-fill restorations, a universal adhesive system was applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following the SDF application and restoration procedures, all specimens were stored in artificial saliva for 30 days before testing. Macro-shear bond strength (SBS) was measured, fracture types were classified under a stereomicroscope, and selected specimens were further analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: Application timing significantly influenced bond strength, whereas restorative material type showed no significant effect. Restorations placed 14 days after SDF application demonstrated significantly higher bond strength than those placed on day 0 for both RMGIC (p = 0.009) and bulk-fill composite (p = 0.011). The highest mean bond strength was observed in BF14 (5.56 ± 3.54 MPa; bulk-fill composite—day 14), while the lowest was in GIC0 (1.78 ± 1.46 MPa; RMGIC—day 0). Although bulk-fill composite demonstrated higher mean values than RMGIC within the same application time, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Bond strength improved when restoration was delayed by two weeks after SDF application. Although the restorative material type did not significantly affect bond strength, application timing should be considered to optimize clinical outcomes.
Silver diamine fluoride; Bond strength; Shear bond strength; Resin-modified glass ionomer; Bulk-fill composite
Merve Yaz,Ömer Faruk Güdük,Merve Abaklı İnci. The effect of restorative material and application timing on the bond strength to primary dentin treated with silver diamine fluoride. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(4);130-140.
[1] Arrow P, Forrest H, Piggott S. Minimally invasive dentistry: parent/carer perspectives on atraumatic restorative treatments and dental general anaesthesia to the management of early childhood caries. Frontiers in Oral Health. 2021; 2: 656530.
[2] Zou J, Du Q, Ge L, Wang J, Wang X, Li Y, et al. Expert consensus on early childhood caries management. International Journal of Oral Science. 2022; 14: 35.
[3] Muntean A, Mzoughi SM, Pacurar M, Candrea S, Inchingolo AD, Inchingolo AM, et al. Silver diamine fluoride in pediatric dentistry: effectiveness in preventing and arresting dental caries—a systematic review. Children. 2024; 11: 499.
[4] Jabin Z, Vishnupriya V, Agarwal N, Nasim I, Jain M, Sharma A. Effect of 38% silver diamine fluoride on control of dental caries in primary dentition: a systematic review. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2020; 9: 1302–1307.
[5] Singhal R, Singhal P, Namdev R, Negi S. Can silver diamine fluoride be an alternative to aerosol-based dentistry during the COVID scenario? A retrospective analysis. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2021; 39: 316–320.
[6] Gupta J, Thomas MS, Radhakrishna M, Srikant N, Ginjupalli K. Effect of silver diamine fluoride–potassium iodide and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate cavity cleansers on the bond strength and microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2019; 22: 201–206.
[7] Wakhloo T, Reddy SG, Sharma SK, Chug A, Dixit A, Thakur K. Silver diamine fluoride versus atraumatic restorative treatment in pediatric dental caries management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2021; 11: 367–375.
[8] Gaintantzopoulou MD, Gopinath VK, Zinelis S. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2017; 21: 1063–1070.
[9] Peric T, Markovic E, Markovic D, Petrovic B. Meta-analysis of in vitro bonding of glass-ionomer restorative materials to primary teeth. Materials. 2021; 14: 3915.
[10] Rathke A, Pfefferkorn F, McGuire MK, Heard RH, Seemann R. One-year clinical results of restorations using a novel self-adhesive resin-based bulk-fill restorative. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12: 3934.
[11] Marovic D, Par M, Macan M, Klarić N, Plazonić I, Tarle Z. Aging-dependent changes in mechanical properties of the new generation of bulk-fill composites. Materials. 2022; 15: 902.
[12] Ko AK, Matsui N, Nakamoto A, Ikeda M, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, et al. Effect of silver diammine fluoride application on dentin bonding performance. Dental Materials Journal. 2020; 39: 407–414.
[13] Kiesow A, Menzel M, Lippert F, Tanzer JM, Milgrom P. Dentin tubule occlusion by a 38% silver diamine fluoride gel: an in vitro investigation. BDJ Open. 2022; 8: 1.
[14] Menzel M, Kiesow A, De Souza E Silva JM. Nano-CT characterization of dentinal tubule occlusion in SDF-treated dentin. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13: 15895.
[15] Selvaraj K, Sampath V, Sujatha V, Mahalaxmi S. Evaluation of microshear bond strength and nanoleakage of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives to dentin pretreated with silver diamine fluoride/potassium iodide: an in vitro study. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2016; 27: 421–425.
[16] Zhao IS, Chu S, Yu OY, Mei ML, Chu CH, Lo ECM. Effect of silver diamine fluoride and potassium iodide on shear bond strength of glass ionomer cements to caries-affected dentine. International Dental Journal. 2019; 69: 341–347.
[17] Banerjee I, Chatterjee A, Kundu GK, Zahir S, Purkait SK, Kumar S. Effect of silver diamine fluoride application on the microtensile bond strength of three commonly used restorative materials in primary teeth: an ultrastructural study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2024; 42: 240–248.
[18] François P, Greenwall-Cohen J, Le Goff S, Ruscassier N, Attal JP, Dursun E. Shear bond strength and interfacial analysis of high-viscosity glass ionomer cement bonded to dentin with protocols including silver diamine fluoride. Journal of Oral Science. 2020; 62: 444–448.
[19] Aldosari MM, Al-Sehaibany FS. Evaluation of the effect of the loading time on the microtensile bond strength of various restorative materials bonded to silver diamine fluoride-treated demineralized dentin. Materials. 2022; 15: 4424.
[20] Aldowsari MK, Alfawzan F, Alhaidari A, Alhogail N, Alshargi R, Bin Saleh S, et al. Comparison of shear bond strength of three types of adhesive materials used in the restoration of permanent molars after treatment with silver diamine fluoride: an in vitro study. Materials. 2023; 16: 6831.
[21] Pulido MT, Wefel JS, Hernandez MM, Denehy GE, Guzman-Armstrong S, Chalmers JM, et al. The inhibitory effect of MI paste, fluoride and a combination of both on the progression of artificial caries-like lesions in enamel. Operative Dentistry. 2008; 33: 550–555.
[22] Yilmaz N, Baltaci E, Baygin O, Ozkaya S, Canakci A. Effect of the usage of Er,Cr:YSGG laser with and without different remineralization agents on the enamel erosion of primary teeth. Lasers in Medical Science. 2020; 35: 1607–1620.
[23] Ismail AM, Bourauel C, ElBanna A, Salah Eldin T. Micro versus macro shear bond strength testing of dentin-composite interface using chisel and wireloop loading techniques. Dentistry Journal. 2021; 9: 140.
[24] El Mourad AM. Assessment of bonding effectiveness of adhesive materials to tooth structure using bond strength test methods: a review of literature. Open Dentistry Journal. 2018; 12: 664–678.
[25] Somani R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ, Sibal GK. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various glass ionomer cements to dentin of primary teeth: an in vitro study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2016; 9: 192–196.
[26] Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dental Materials. 2010; 26: e100–e121.
[27] Uchil SR, Suprabha BS, Suman E, Shenoy R, Natarajan S, Rao A. Effect of three silver diamine fluoride application protocols on the microtensile bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to carious dentin in primary teeth. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2020; 38: 138–144.
[28] Amaechi BT. Protocols to study dental caries in vitro: pH cycling models. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2019; 1922: 379–392.
[29] Amaechi BT, AbdulAzees PA, Okoye LO, Meyer F, Enax J. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and fluoride oral care gels for remineralization of initial caries: a pH-cycling study. BDJ Open. 2020; 6: 9.
[30] Gornig DC, Maletz R, Ottl P, Warkentin M. Influence of artificial aging: mechanical and physicochemical properties of dental composites under static and dynamic compression. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2022; 26: 1491–1504.
[31] Sauro S, Makeeva I, Faus-Matoses V, Foschi F, Giovarruscio M, Maciel Pires P, et al. Effects of ions-releasing restorative materials on the dentine bonding longevity of modern universal adhesives after load-cycle and prolonged artificial saliva aging. Materials. 2019; 12: 722.
[32] Lutgen P, Chan D, Sadr A. Effects of silver diammine fluoride on bond strength of adhesives to sound dentin. Dental Materials Journal. 2018; 37: 1003–1009.
[33] Markham MD, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Jurado CA, Fischer NG, Watanabe H, et al. Influence of 38% silver diamine fluoride application on bond stability to enamel and dentin using universal adhesives in self-etch mode. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2020; 128: 354–360.
[34] Fröhlich TT, Rocha RO, Botton G. Does previous application of silver diammine fluoride influence the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and adhesive systems to dentin? Systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2020; 30: 85–95.
[35] Jiang M, Mei ML, Wong MCM, Chu CH, Lo ECM. Effect of silver diamine fluoride solution application on the bond strength of dentine to adhesives and to glass ionomer cements: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 40.
[36] Greenwall-Cohen J, Greenwall L, Barry S. Silver diamine fluoride—an overview of the literature and current clinical techniques. British Dental Journal. 2020; 228: 831–838.
[37] Auychai P, Khumtrakoon N, Jitongart C, Daomanee P, Laiteerapong A. Bond strength and microleakage of a novel glass ionomer cement containing silver diamine fluoride. European Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 16: 606–611.
[38] Elmallah S, Abdou A, Rizk A, Kusumasari C, Ashraf R. Effect of silver diamine fluoride activation on bond strength to root dentin. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23: 733.
[39] Rizzante FAP, Mondelli RFL, Furuse AY, Borges AFS, Mendonça G, Ishikiriama SK. Shrinkage stress and elastic modulus assessment of bulk-fill composites. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2019; 27: e20180132.
[40] Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Miyazaki M, Latta MA. Depth of cure, flexural properties and volumetric shrinkage of low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill giomers and resin composites. Dental Materials Journal. 2017; 36: 205–213.
[41] Burrer P, Attin T, Tauböck TT, Marovic D, Tarle Z, Par M, et al. Effect of polymerization mode on shrinkage kinetics and degree of conversion of dual-curing bulk-fill resin composites. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2023; 27: 3169–3180.
[42] Souza JCM, Silva JB, Aladim A, Carvalho O, Nascimento RM, Silva FS, et al. Effect of zirconia and alumina fillers on the microstructure and mechanical strength of dental glass ionomer cements. Open Dentistry Journal. 2016; 10: 58–68.
[43] Sulyanto RM, Kang M, Srirangapatanam S, Berger M, Candamo F, Wang Y, et al. Biomineralization of dental tissues treated with silver diamine fluoride. Journal of Dental Research. 2021; 100: 1099–1108.
[44] Burgess JO, Vaghela PM. Silver diamine fluoride: a successful anticarious solution with limits. Advances in Dental Research. 2018; 29: 131–134.
[45] Üçtaşlı M, Stape THS, Mutluay MM, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Silver diamine fluoride and resin-dentin bonding: optimization of application protocols. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2023; 126: 103468.
Top