Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026; 50(5): 98-104. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.119
Original Research

Assessing the efficacy of short reel content on social media for enhancing oral hygiene practices among 12-year-old school-going children

Saeed Awod Bin Hassan1, Ahmed Babiker Mohamed Ali1, Shafait Ullah Khateeb1, Shan Sainudeen1, Sahana Shivakumar2,*,, Marco Di Blasio3,*,, Marco Cicciù4, Giuseppe Minervini5,6

1Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, 62529 Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

2Public Health Dentistry, Peoples College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Peoples University, 462037 Bhopal, India

3Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy

4Department of Biomedical and Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Catania University, 95123 Catania, Italy

5Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, 600077 Chennai, India

6Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological Specialties, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy

*Corresponding Author(s):sahana20579@gmail.com (Sahana Shivakumar); marco.diblasio@unimi.it (Marco Di Blasio)

History Submitted: 02 February 2024 | Accepted: 02 July 2024 | Published: 03 September 2026
Copyright:  ©2026 The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

Background: In recent years, social media platforms have become increasingly popular as powerful communication tools for exchanging information and ideas. Oral health plays a crucial role in overall well-being. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of short-reel content on social media in enhancing oral hygiene practices among 12-year-old school-going children. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted among 380 12-year-old schoolchildren selected from five schools using stratified convenience sampling. Five schools were assigned to the intervention group, which received educational short reels on social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, or WhatsApp, while the other two served as the control group, receiving only a chairside educational talk. Information concerning knowledge, attitude, and oral hygiene practices was obtained using a questionnaire, while oral examinations were performed using the Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S). Results: A significant difference in knowledge, attitude, and practices in the intervention group (compared to the control group) was evident after the intervention. The mean value of the oral hygiene index simplified was 2.57 ± 1.61 at baseline. After the intervention, it was 1.17 ± 0.55 in the experimental group and 2.35 ± 3.71 in the control group, with a statistically significant p-value (0.001). Before the intervention, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The intervention led to significant improvement in the intervention group, indicating that social media has helped enhance both oral health and oral hygiene practices. Conclusions: The observations from the study indicate that social media short-film content contributed to knowledge, attitudes, and oral hygiene practices in 12-year-old schoolchildren. Novel, fast-paced formats, such as those found on the short reels, could have a great effect on memory and behaviour change. Clinical Trial Registration: Registered with the Clinical Trials Registry (CTRI) under the number CTRI/2025/10/095625 (Delayed registration).

Keywords:Oral hygiene;Knowledge;Attitude;Practices;Social media;Short reels
PDF(316.64 kB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Saeed Awod Bin Hassan, Ahmed Babiker Mohamed Ali, Shafait Ullah Khateeb, Shan Sainudeen, Sahana Shivakumar, Marco Di Blasio, Marco Cicciù, Giuseppe Minervini. Assessing the efficacy of short reel content on social media for enhancing oral hygiene practices among 12-year-old school-going children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026; 50(5): 98-104. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.119

1. Introduction

Oral health plays a pivotal role in overall well-being, as oral diseases not only impact eating efficiency but also have profound implications on an individual’s personality, social satisfaction, and confidence [1]. The global impact of oral diseases is extremely high, affecting approximately 3.5 billion people worldwide and imposing enormous health and economic burdens [2]. Permanent tooth caries is one of the most common health conditions globally and profoundly affects quality of life, according to the Global Burden of Disease 2017 data [3]. In India, the overall prevalence of dental caries is 54.16%, according to a study, and has been reported at 52% among specific age groups, especially 3 to 18 years old [4]. Despite being preventable, dental diseases still lead to significant public health challenges, which are largely attributed to factors such as diet and lifestyle modifications. Thus, there is a critical need for holistic guidance, especially at early developmental stages, to facilitate the implementation of effective lifestyles and practices to prevent oral diseases [5].

During adolescence, typically between the ages of 12 and 14 years, cognitive functions are fully developed. This makes it a critical period for behavior modification to instill lifelong self-care habits [6]. At 12 years, children are typically finishing their primary education, making it a very good time to collect the data. Moreover, as all permanent teeth except for the third molars have erupted by this age, it is an optimal period for universal comparison of dental disease types [7]. Indian schoolchildren often experience comorbidity with dental diseases, resulting in high treatment costs. Thus, prevention is considered the most promising method used to combat oral health problems [8]. However, India struggles to achieve this due to disparities in the healthcare system, which is even more limited in rural areas, where a majority of the population resides, with over 40% being children under 15 years old [9, 10].

Social media, a culmination of internet-based applications stemming from Web 2.0, empowers individuals to generate and distribute their own content [11, 12]. Recent years have seen an explosion in the popularity of virtual media as an effective communication tool for exchanging information and ideas [13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Digital media usage in India has surged with an estimated 600 million active internet users. Starting from simple email messaging, internet usage today covers an array of online platforms such as WhatsApp, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Messenger, and Twitter, which have smoothly integrated into the daily lives of many Indians [18]. This pattern extends to dentistry, where young dentists increasingly use social networking applications to promote oral health [19]. Acknowledging the opportunities of digital media in terms of their ability to reach large audiences, especially in remote regions where oral health services are less accessible, is imperative, given the close association between poor oral health and systemic health issues. Consequently, advocating and adopting healthy practices, especially from a young age, is paramount. Hence, the present study aims to assess the efficacy of short reel content on social media in enhancing oral hygiene practices among 12-year-old school-going children.

2. Materials and methods

A quasi-experimental study design was adopted to assess the efficacy of short reel content on social media for enhancing oral hygiene practices among 12-year-old school-going children. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee of the People’s College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre (EC202179). The study was conducted over four months, between May 2023 and August 2023. The study protocol was developed, and all subjects/parents/caregivers provided written informed consent before participation. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (exposed to short-reel content on oral hygiene) or the control group (not exposed to short-reel content). The intervention group received access to short-film content on social media platforms focused on oral hygiene practices. The content included educational videos, animations, and interactive quizzes aimed at promoting oral health habits. Table 1 presents a detailed description of the educational intervention. The control group did not receive any intervention and continued their usual oral hygiene routines.

Table 1.Oral health education intervention chart.
ContentDescriptionTime durationMedia employed
Educational videosShowing oral hygiene practices like brushing, flossing, and rinsing2 minWhatsApp, Instagram
AnimationsAnimations showing the effect of poor oral hygiene and the advantages of maintaining good oral hygiene1 minWhatsApp, Instagram
Interactive quizQuiz questions to reinforce the learning from videos and animations2 minWhatsApp
Tutorial on dental productsExplaining the availability of oral care products and their correct usage2 minWhatsApp videocall
Technique demonstrationReal-time demonstration of brushing and flossing techniques by a professional5–7 minWhatsApp videocall, Facebook live
Feedback sessionsSessions for students to share their feedback on their oral hygiene practices5–7 minWhatsApp, Facebook

Intervention group inclusion criteria were: (i) students aged 12 years; (ii) students willing to participate; and (iii) students who were able to effectively communicate. Exclusion eligibility criteria included students with systemic diseases, students on medication, and students unwilling to participate. It also excluded children with significant cognitive or physical impairments that could prevent effective engagement.

With 80% power and 5% level of significance, we determined the desired sample size (n = 136) for each group, for a total of 272 participants. To account for an expected 20% sample loss on follow-ups, the sample size was increased to 324 participants. A final sample size of 380 was calculated to ensure that the full stratum of 12-year-olds in the selected schools, including 190 individuals from each group, resulted in a more complete representation of participants from the target age group. Therefore, the final sample size (380 participants, evenly split between the intervention and control groups) was considered essential to properly evaluate the effect of the intervention on improving oral hygiene practices of school-going children aged 12 years. A stratified random sampling technique was employed to recruit the study sample. The study selected one school from each administrative zone (North, East, West, South, and Central) of Bhopal city.

2.1 Group allocation and data collection

Students were randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. Before group allocation, baseline data on knowledge, attitude, and oral hygiene practices among students were collected through a validated, closed-ended questionnaire [20]. This study validated the questionnaire and assessed its content validity using the Content Validity Index (CVI) score. The study quotes the questionnaire in the Annexures as Supplementary material. This process guarantees that the questionnaire accurately assesses the intended constructs and is considered valid for the study’s goals. An oral health examination was performed using the Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S) [21]. The intervention group received ten educational and motivational short reels related to knowledge, attitude towards oral health, and oral hygiene practices on social media platforms, either on Instagram, Facebook, or WhatsApp, within one month, while the non-intervention group received only a session of chairside educational talk at school. After 1 month, information regarding knowledge, attitude, and oral hygiene practices was collected using the same questionnaire, followed by oral examination using the Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S).

2.2 Statistical analysis

The data were transferred to Excel spreadsheets and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS) version 25.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). descriptive statistics included numbers, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Differences in knowledge, attitude, and practices were assessed using the Chi-square test. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to compare the OHI-S data collected from children at multiple time points. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 for all analyses.

3. Results

Among the 380 students included in the study, there were 189 males and 191 females. The assessment of students’ knowledge and attitudes toward oral health revealed that 58.1% recognized how to detect tooth decay or cavities; 83.1% were aware that yellow or brown discoloration near the tooth and gum indicated unhealthy teeth; 59.2% understood that fluoride helps prevent tooth decay; and 74.2% knew that mouthwashes can prevent or reduce gum problems (Table 2).

Table 2.Knowledge and attitude regarding oral health among students before intervention.
QuestionsChoicesCorrect answer
n (%)
Knowledge
1. What are the signs or symptoms that indicate the presence of tooth decay or cavity?Correct221 (58.1%)
2. What does swollen and discoloration on gums indicate?Correct316 (83.1%)
3. Does fluorides prevent tooth decay/cavity?Correct225 (59.2%)
4. Do mouthwashes contain medications that can prevent or reduce gum problems?Correct282 (74.2%)
Attitude
1. Do you think oral health is important for the overall health of our body?Yes329 (86.5%)
2. Do you take care of teeth and gums?Yes278 (73.1%)
3. Do you feel dental treatment is expensive?Expensive16 (4.2%)
4. Do you have anxiety or fear of visiting a dentist for routine check-ups or any treatment?Yes259 (68.1%)
5. Do you think you should visit the dentist regularly?Yes18 (4.7%)
Frequency distribution table of knowledge and attitude.

In terms of attitudes, 86.5% and 73.1% of students acknowledged the importance of oral health and caring for teeth and gums, respectively. However, only 4.2% believed that dental treatment was affordable, while 68.1% experienced anxiety about visiting a dentist, and only 4.7% recognized the necessity of biannual dental visits (Table 2).

Assessment of students’ oral hygiene practices (Table 3) revealed that only 20.5% brushed their teeth twice daily, 15.7% utilized additional cleaning measures such as dental floss and tongue cleaners, 25.7% used medium-hard brushes, and 12.6% replaced their brushes every three months. Additionally, 19.7% and 18.1% of students reported occasional consumption of sweets and carbonated drinks, respectively, while only 13.6% rinsed their mouths with water after eating, and 21.3% visited a dentist regularly.

Table 3.Oral hygiene practices of students before intervention.
QuestionsChoicesCorrect answer
n (%)
Practices
1. How many times do you brush your teeth daily?≥2 times78 (20.5%)
2. How much time do you brush?Adequate time101 (26.5%)
3. In addition to the toothbrush and toothpaste, do you use any other measures to keep your teeth clean?Yes60 (15.7%)
4. What kind of toothbrush do you use?Appropriate type98 (25.7%)
5. How often do you change your toothbrush?Every 3 months48 (12.6%)
6. Do you use mouthwash?Regularly84 (22.1%)
7. How frequently do you eat sweets?Occasionally75 (19.7%)
8. How frequently do you take carbonated drinks?Occasionally69 (18.1%)
9. Do you rinse your mouth with water after eating?Always52 (13.6%)
10. Have you ever visited a dentist?Yes81 (21.3%)
Frequency distribution table of oral hygiene practices.

As shown in Table 4, following the intervention, the intervention group significantly improved their knowledge, attitudes, and oral hygiene practices compared to the non-intervention group.

Table 4.Knowledge, attitude & practices regarding oral health among groups after intervention.
QuestionsCorrect choicesExperimental group
(N = 190)
n (%)
Non-experimental group
(N = 190)
n (%)
p value
Knowledge
What are the signs or symptoms that indicate the presence of tooth decay or cavity?Correct167 (87.8%)145 (76.3%)0.008
What does swollen and discoloration on gums indicate?Correct174 (91.5%)150 (78.9%)0.001
Does fluoride prevent tooth decay/cavity?Correct170 (89.4%)146 (76.8%)0.004
Do mouthwashes contain medications that can prevent or reduce gum problems?Correct176 (92.6%)151 (79.4%)0.001
Attitude
Do you think oral health is important for the overall health of our body?Yes181 (95.2%)174 (91.5%)0.214
Do you take care of teeth and gums?Yes178 (93.6%)161 (84.7%)0.024
Do you feel dental treatment is expensive?Expensive176 (92.6%)172 (90.5%)0.580
Do you have anxiety or fear of visiting a dentist for routine check-ups or any treatment?Yes172 (90.5%)157 (82.6%)0.024
Do you think you should visit the dentist regularly?Yes172 (90.5%)126 (66.3%)0.001
Practices
How many times do you brush your teeth daily?≥2 times171 (90.0%)151 (79.4%)0.008
How much time do you brush?Adequate time168 (88.4%)136 (71.5%)0.001
In addition to the toothbrush and toothpaste, do you use any other measures to keep your tooth clean?Yes151 (79.4%)145 (76.3%)0.120
What kind of toothbrush do you use?Appropriate type173 (91.0%)163 (85.7%)0.078
How often do you change your toothbrush?Every 3 months164 (86.3%)141 (74.2%)0.012
Do you use mouthwash?Regularly166 (87.3%)123 (64.7%)0.001
How frequently do you eat sweets?Occasionally164 (86.3%)146 (76.8%)0.001
How frequently do you take carbonated drinks?Occasionally169 (88.9%)154 (81.0%)0.097
Do you rinse your mouth with water after eating?Always170 (89.4%)157 (82.7%)0.021
Have you ever visited a dentist?Yes175 (92.1%)157 (82.6%)0.075
Chi-square test was applied. Bold p-values indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).

The oral hygiene index simplified mean value decreased to 1.171 ± 0.552 in the intervention group and 2.35 ± 3.71 in the control group post-intervention, with a statistically significant difference noted (Table 5). The mean value of the simplified oral hygiene index before and after intervention in the experimental group was 2.570 ± 1.618 and 1.171 ± 0.552, while in the control group it was 2.590 ± 0.824 and 2.356 ± 3.717, respectively (Table 5). The intervention significantly improved the oral hygiene index in the experimental group, but not in the control group. The experimental group showed a strong intervention effect with a higher effect size, indicating the effectiveness of the educational intervention in improving oral hygiene practices.

Table 5.Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified in the intervention and control groups.
GroupsBefore interventionAfter interventionF valueEffect sizep value
Experimental group2.57 ± 1.611.17 ± 0.55F(1, 58) = 136.79η2 = 0.70<0.001
Control group2.59 ± 0.822.35 ± 3.71F(1, 58) = 0.85η2 = 0.010.360
p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

The study findings suggest that there is a notable gap in oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices among school-going children. Prior to the intervention, a significant proportion of students demonstrated a limited understanding of oral health concepts and exhibited suboptimal oral hygiene practices. However, following the intervention, there was a marked improvement in knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to oral health among the intervention group compared to the control group. Specifically, there was increased awareness regarding tooth decay, the importance of oral health, and the need for regular dental visits. Moreover, the intervention group showed a significant enhancement in oral hygiene practices, as evidenced by a lower mean value of the simplified oral hygiene index compared to the control group.

4. Discussion

With the widespread availability of computers and mobile phones in households, children now have easier access to the internet, which has increased influence of social media platforms, especially among younger populations. This trend has grown significantly over recent decades, allowing individuals to access a wealth of health-related information published by both public and private sources [22]. Recognizing this as a valuable opportunity, the present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of short-reel content on social media in enhancing oral hygiene practices among 12-year-old school-going children. The study found that students’ knowledge, attitudes, and oral health practices were suboptimal, indicating significant room for improvement in their approach to oral health. However, after the intervention using short-reel content, there was a marked improvement in awareness, attitudes, and oral hygiene practices compared to the control group, which received only chair-side educational talks.

This study suggests that social media has a significant visual impact on memory and behaviour change among students, particularly when compared to traditional educational methods. Previous studies have also shown that oral health interventions on virtual platforms improve participants’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Such interventions generally show satisfactory acceptability and retention rates and have significant potential, and social media may therefore be an effective medium for promoting oral health education in schoolchildren [23].

In this study, approximately 77.8% of students initially reported using the internet to seek information on oral healthcare. Althunayan et al. [24] reported that 64% of participants used social media to access oral health updates, highlighting the potential of social media to shape oral health behaviours. The widespread use of virtual platforms for health information seeking is partly due to their easy accessibility and high public acceptability. Social media can enhance children’s learning outcomes in oral health interventions and promote adherence to recommended oral hygiene practices, as demonstrated by the current study. This finding aligns with several other studies showing that technologies, such as oral health videos on different social networking sites, text-messaging reminders, and WhatsApp messages, can improve knowledge, attitudes, and oral health practices [25, 26, 27, 28].

In the present study, the mean OHI-S score before the intervention was 2.57 ± 1.61 in the experimental group and 2.59 ± 0.82 in the control group, indicating a fair oral hygiene status among students. Similar findings were reported by Sukhabogi JR et al. [29], who observed a mean OHI-S index of 2.8 ± 1.1 among students, also reflecting a fair oral hygiene status.

Following the intervention in our study, the OHI-S score significantly improved in the experimental group compared to the control group. This trend is consistent with the results of Dientyah Nur Anggina et al. [19], who reported a significant reduction in OHI-S score among adolescents receiving social media-mediated oral health intervention. Lopes Dos Santos R et al. [30] showed that mobile applications can lead to oral hygiene improvement in adolescents. Collectively, these insights underscore the impact of interactive digital interventions disseminated through diverse social media platforms on knowledge, attitude, behavior, and overall oral health. In countries such as India, where oral health diseases are highly prevalent among children and access to oral health services is variable, preventive measures are vital to reducing the burden of oral health problems.

The restricted geographical area of the sample may limit the generalizability of the findings to broader populations of school-going children. Additional studies using larger samples with a more varied sample could provide broader insight into the effectiveness of short-film content on social media in promoting oral hygiene behavior. The duration of follow-up was rather brief in the current study. Longer-term follow-up could be employed to assess the persistence of improvements in oral hygiene practices. This study was based solely on self-reported data from participants, which may be susceptible to recall bias or social desirability bias. In the future, objective or observational methods might be used to confirm self-reported oral hygiene practice. The control group in this study received chair-side educational talks, which may have influenced their oral hygiene practices independently of the intervention. Comparing the short-reel content intervention with a true no-intervention control group could provide more robust evidence of its efficacy.

5. Conclusions

The current study found that short reel content significantly enhanced students’ knowledge, attitude, oral hygiene practices following the intervention. Before the intervention, students were already heavily utilizing the internet through various social media platforms, primarily due to its quick access and lack of time constraints. Short reels focus on delivering concise information through innovative content, which significantly enhances children’s memory retention. If used wisely, social media can influence behavior modification and promote healthy lifestyles among 12-year-old schoolchildren. This study recommends utilizing these findings to establish successful oral health programs and achieve desired health benefits for children, as good oral health is an essential component of overall health and well-being.

Availability of data and materials

The data will be available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Author contributions

SABH, SaS—conceptualization; formal analysis. ABMA, SUK, ShS—methodology; data curation. MDB, MC—software. SaS—investigation. MDB, GM—writing–original draft preparation. MC, GM—writing, review, and editing. GM—supervision; funding acquisition. MC—administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the People’s College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, India (Approval Number: EC202179). Informed consent was obtained from all participants and their caregivers prior to study enrollment.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Luis Eduardo Almeida, a native English speaker at the Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, for reviewing and editing the manuscript to ensure proper scientific English. Moreover, the authors would like to acknowledge Mario Fordellone, a professional statistician, who reviewed the statistical analysis of this paper.

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used DeepL Translate for language checking/grammar correction. After its use, the authors thoroughly reviewed, verified, and revised all content to ensure accuracy and originality. The authors take full responsibility for the integrity and final content of the published article.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Giuseppe Minervini was a member of the Editorial Board of this journal at the time of submission We declare that Giuseppe Minervini had no involvement in the peer review of this article and had no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to JEN.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version, at https://oss.jocpd.com/files/article/2095394016465960960/attachment/Supplementary%20material.docx.

References

Maharani DA, Adiatman M, Rahardjo A, Burnside G, Pine C. An assessment of the impacts of child oral health in Indonesia and associations with self-esteem, school performance and perceived employability. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17: 65.

[Google Scholar]

Peres MA, Macpherson LMD, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur MR, et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. The Lancet. 2019; 394: 249–260.

[Google Scholar]

GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2018; 392: 1789–1858.

[Google Scholar]

Pandey P, Nandkeoliar T, Tikku AP, Singh D, Singh MK. Prevalence of dental caries in the Indian population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 2021; 11: 256–265.

[Google Scholar]

Bener A, Al Darwish MS, Tewfik I, Hoffmann GF. The impact of dietary and lifestyle factors on the risk of dental caries among young children in Qatar. The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association. 2013; 88: 67–73.

[Google Scholar]

Silk H, Kwok A. Addressing adolescent oral health: a review. Pediatrics in Review. 2017; 38: 61–68.

[Google Scholar]

Ambarkova V, Ivanova V. Dental caries experience among primary school children in the Eastern Region of the Republic of Macedonia. Oral Health and Dental Management. 2014; 13: 1–7.

[Google Scholar]

Damle SC, Patel AR. Caries prevalence and treatment need amongst children of Dharavi, Bombay, India. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1994; 22: 62–63.

[Google Scholar]

Delhi Dental Council of India. National oral health survey and fluoride mapping, 2002–2003. 2004. Available at: https://dciindia.gov.in/Rule_Regulation/delhi137pages.pdf (Accessed: 05 January 2024).

[Google Scholar]

Amudha S, Moses J, Vijayakumar M, Shankar P. Prevalence of dental caries among different socioeconomic status and their treatment needs among 5–15-year-old school-going children in Maduravoyal Area, Chennai. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021; 14: 403–411.

[Google Scholar]

Afful-Dadzie E, Afful-Dadzie A, Egala SB. Social media in health communication: a literature review of information quality. Health Information Management. 2023; 52: 3–17.

[Google Scholar]

Guo J, Yan X, Li S, Van der Walt J, Guan G, Mei L. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube. The Angle Orthodontist. 2020; 90: 411–418.

[Google Scholar]

Schillinger D, Chittamuru D, Ramírez AS. From “Infodemics” to health promotion: a novel framework for the role of social media in public health. American Journal of Public Health. 2020; 110: 1393–1396.

[Google Scholar]

Das H, Janakiram C, S VK, Karuveettil V. Effectiveness of school-based oral health education interventions on oral health status and oral hygiene behaviors among schoolchildren: an umbrella review. Evidence-Based Dentistry. 2025; 26: 110–111.

[Google Scholar]

Guerra F, Pardo A, Di Nasta V, Grassi R, Nardi GM. Smoking knowledge and behaviors in a population of Italian students in dental hygiene or other health disciplines. Healthcare. 2025; 13: 1195.

[Google Scholar]

Aurlene N, Shaik SS, Dickson-Swift V, Tadakamadla SK. Assessment of usefulness and reliability of YouTube™ videos on denture care. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2024; 22: 106–115.

[Google Scholar]

Wafaie K, Rizk MZ, Basyouni ME, Daniel B, Mohammed H. Tele-orthodontics and sensor-based technologies: a systematic review of interventions that monitor and improve compliance of orthodontic patients. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2023; 45: 450–461.

[Google Scholar]

Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI). India Internet Report 2022. (ICUBE 2022). New Delhi: IAMAI; 12 December 2022. 2023.

[Google Scholar]

Anggina DN, Erlyn P. Social media line as a health promotion media of adolescent oral hygiene. International Conference on Health Sciences. 2022; 8: 1–6.

[Google Scholar]

Kumar MPS. Knowledge, attitude and practices towards oral health among law students in Chennai. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2016; 8: 650–653.

[Google Scholar]

Greene JC, Vermillion JR. The simplified oral hygiene index. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1964; 68: 7–13.

[Google Scholar]

Maharani DA, El Tantawi M, Yoseph MG, Rahardjo A. The use of internet platforms for oral health information and associated factors among adolescents from Jakarta: a cross sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 22.

[Google Scholar]

Kitsaras G, Gomez J, Hogan R, Ryan M. Evaluation of a digital oral health intervention (Know Your OQ™) to enhance knowledge, attitudes and practices related to oral health. BDJ Open. 2023; 9: 40.

[Google Scholar]

Althunayan A, Alsalhi R, Elmoazen R. Role of social media in dental health promotion and behavior change in Qassim province, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Medical and Health Research. 2018; 4: 98–103.

[Google Scholar]

Yazdani R, Vehkalahti MM, Nouri M, Murtomaa H. School-based education to improve oral cleanliness and gingival health in adolescents in Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2009; 19: 274–281.

[Google Scholar]

Vangipuram S, Jha A, Raju R, Bashyam M. Effectiveness of peer group and conventional method (dentist) of oral health education programme among 12–15 year old school children—a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2016; 10: ZC125–ZC129.

[Google Scholar]

Marchetti G, Fraiz FC, Nascimento WMD, Soares GMS, Assunção LRDS. Improving adolescents’ periodontal health: evaluation of a mobile oral health App associated with conventional educational methods: a cluster randomized trial. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2018; 28: 410–419.

[Google Scholar]

Fjeldsoe BS, Marshall AL, Miller YD. Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009; 36: 165–173.

[Google Scholar]

Sukhabogi JR, Shekar C, Hameed IA, Ramana I, Sandhu G. Oral health status among 12- and 15-year-old children from government and private schools in Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research. 2014; 4: S272–S277.

[Google Scholar]

Lopes Dos Santos R, Spinola MDS, Carvalho E, Lopes Dos Santos DC, Dame-Teixeira N, Heller D. Effectiveness of a new App in improving oral hygiene in orthodontic patients: a pilot study. International Dental Journal. 2023; 73: 395–402.

[Google Scholar]