Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 2101
  • Dowloads 220

Original Research

Open Access

Modified Surgical Stent for Accurate TAD Placement

  • Masamitsu Takahashi1
  • Jae Hyun Park2,*,
  • Satoshi Uzuka3
  • Kiyoshi Tai4

1Private practice of orthodontics, Tokyo, Japan

2Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University, International Scholar, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea

3Division of Orthodontics, The Nippon Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

4Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, and private practice of orthodontics, Okayama, Japan

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-42.6.12 Vol.42,Issue 6,November 2018 pp.465-458

Published: 01 November 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Jae Hyun Park E-mail: JPark@atsu.edu

PDF (891.75 kB) View Full-text

Abstract

The development of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) has allowed for the creation of anchorage in situations where there once was none. Many studies have suggested that the most significant cause of miniscrew failure is insufficient distance between the surface of a root and the miniscrew. In order to reduce the miniscrew failure rate, a modified surgical stent has been shown to not only increase TAD insertion accuracy but also to increase TAD success rates.

Keywords

Surgical stents, TADs, miniscrew

Cite and Share

Masamitsu Takahashi,Jae Hyun Park,Satoshi Uzuka,Kiyoshi Tai. Modified Surgical Stent for Accurate TAD Placement. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2018. 42(6);465-458.

URL:

https://www.jjocpd.com/articles/10.17796/1053-4625-42.6.12

References

1. Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP, Papadopoulos MA. Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142: 577-95, 2012.

2. Jung YR, Kim SC, Kang KH, Cho JH, Lee EH, Chang NY, Chae JM. Placement angle effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants and other factors with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143: 173-81, 2013.

3. Watanabe H, Deguchi T, Hasegawa M, Ito M, Kim S, Takano-Yamamoto T. Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density. Orthod Craniofac Res 16: 44-55, 2013.

4. Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Hasimoto T, Kyung HM, Yamamoto TT. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131: S68-S73, 2007.

5. Wu JC, Huang JN, Zhao SF, Xu XJ, Xie ZJ. Radiographic and surgical template for placement of orthodontic microimplants in interradicular areas: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21: 629-34, 2006.

6. Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Tamamoto T. Quantitative evaluation of corticol bone thickness with computedtomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129: 721.e7-e12, 2006

Submission Turnaround Time

Top