Article Data

  • Views 1244
  • Dowloads 190

Original Research

Open Access

The Effect of Label and Medication Package Insert Reading Habits of Parents on their Children’s Oral Dental Health

  • Pınar Serdar Eymirli1,*,
  • Şeyma Öztürk1
  • Sevilay Karahan2
  • Melek Dilek Turgut1
  • Meryem Uzamış Tekçiçek1

1Hacettepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey

2Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Ankara, Turkey

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.5.2 Vol.45,Issue 5,November 2021 pp.298-305

Published: 05 November 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Pınar Serdar Eymirli E-mail: pinarserdar@hotmail.com

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between packaged product label and medication package insert reading habits of parents and their children’s oral/dental health.

Study design: A questionnaire including demographic characteristics and label/insert reading habits was filled by parents of 301 children who referred to the Pediatric Dentistry Department. The children were examined intraorally and dmft/DMFT and ICDAS II scores were recorded. The data were evaluated statistically.

Results: Label and medication package insert reading were found in 71.4% and 88.4% of the parents, respectively. Label reading increased as the age of the child and the number of children in the family increased. Medical package insert reading increased as the mother’s education and SLS/paraben knowledge increased. Decrease of 1 point in ICDAS II resulted in the 1.410 times increase in the rate of medical package insert reading of the parents.

Conclusion: It is concluded that improving the label and medical insert reading rate of the parents would be effective for providing better oral and dental health for their children.

Keywords

Oral health; Caries; Packaged product; Label; Medical package insert

Cite and Share

Pınar Serdar Eymirli,Şeyma Öztürk,Sevilay Karahan,Melek Dilek Turgut,Meryem Uzamış Tekçiçek. The Effect of Label and Medication Package Insert Reading Habits of Parents on their Children’s Oral Dental Health. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021. 45(5);298-305.

References

1. Fejerskov O, Nyvad B., Kidd, E.A.M. Dental caries: what is it? In: Fejerskov O, Nyvad B., Kidd, E.A.M., editor. Dental Caries: The disease and its clinical management. 3. ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; p. 480, 2015.

2. Mathur VP, Dhillon JK. Dental Caries: A Disease Which Needs Attention. Indian J Pediatr 2018; 85(3):202-6.

3. Fluoride Therapy. Pediatr Dent 2018; 40(6):250-3, 2018.

4. Toumba KJ, Twetman S, Splieth C, Parnell C, van Loveren C, Lygidakis N. Guidelines on the use of fluoride for caries prevention in chil-dren: an updated EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2019; 20(6):507-16.

5. Policy on Dietary Recommendations for Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Pediatr Dent 2017; 39(6):64-6.

6. Donaldson M, Goodchild JH, Epstein JB. Sugar content, cariogenicity, and dental concerns with commonly used medications. J Am Dent Assoc 2015; 146(2):129-33.

7. Cowburn G, Stockley L. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2005; 8(1):21-8, 2005.

8. Zarkin GA, Dean N, Mauskopf JA, Williams R. Potential health benefits of nutrition label changes. Am J Public Health 1993; 83(5):717-24.

9. Watson KT, Barash PG. The new Food and Drug Administration drug package insert: implications for patient safety and clinical care. Anesth Analg 2009; 108(1):211-8.

10. Baciu A, Stratton, K.R., Burke, S.P. The future of drug safety: promoting and protecting the health of the public. Washington: National Academies Press; 2007.

11. Kang HT, Shim JY, Lee YJ, Linton JA, Park BJ, Lee HR. Reading nutrition labels is associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome in Korean adults: the 2007-2008 Korean NHANES. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2013;23(9):876-82.

12. Graham DJ, Laska MN. Nutrition label use partially mediates the relationship between attitude toward healthy eating and overall dietary quality among college students. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012; 112(3):414-8.

13. Satia JA, Galanko JA, Neuhouser ML. Food nutrition label use is associated with demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial factors and dietary intake among African Americans in North Carolina. J Am Diet Assoc 2005; 105(3):392-402; discussion -3.

14. Pizzol T, Moraes CG, Arrais PSD, Bertoldi AD, Ramos LR, Farias MR, et al. Medicine package inserts from the users’ perspective: are they read and understood? Rev Bras Epidemiol 2019; 22:e190009, 2019.

15. Zarea Gavgani V, Mirzadeh-Qasabeh S, Hanaee J, Hamishehkar H. Calculating reading ease score of patient package inserts in Iran. Drug Healthc Patient Saf 10:9-19, 2018.

16. Muhlbauer V, Prinz R, Muhlhauser I, Wegwarth O. Alternative package leaflets improve people’s understanding of drug side effects-A randomized controlled exploratory survey. PLoS One 2018; 13(9):e0203800.

17. Organization WH. Oral health surveys: basic methods–5th edition. 5th ed ed. France; 2013.

18. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, et al. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007; 35(3):170-8.

19. Chopera P, Chagwena DT, Mushonga NG. Food label reading and understanding in parts of rural and urban Zimbabwe. Afr Health Sci ,2014; 14(3):576-84.

20. Wiles NL, Paterson, M., Meaker, J.L. What Factors Determine the Use of the Nutrition Information on the Food Label when Female Consumers from Pietermaritzburg Select and Purchase Fat Spreads? South African J Clin Nutrition 2009; 22(2):69-73.

21. Kasapila W, Shawa, P. Use and Understanding of Nutrition Labels Among Consumers in Lilongwe (Malawi). African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 2011; 11:5171-86.

22. Klaus G. Grunert JMW. A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health 2007; 15:385-99.

23. Neuhouser ML, Kristal AR, Patterson RE. Use of food nutrition labels is associated with lower fat intake. J Am Diet Assoc 1999; 99(1):45-53.

24. Akgür M. TÜRK GIDA KODEKSİ YÖNETMELİĞİ İstanbul2002 [Available from: https://www.loder-lss.org/pdf/Türk%20gıda%20kodeksi%20 yönetmeliği%20(İTO).pdf.

25. Prathiraja PK, Ariyawardana, A. Impact of Nutritional Labeling on Consumer Buying Behavior. Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics 2003; 5(1):35-46.

26. Grunert GK. F-CL, Wills JM., Bonsmann SSG., Nureeva L. Use and Understanding of Nutrition Information on Food Labels in Six European Countries. J Public Health 2010; 18:261-77.

27. Carrillo E, Varela P, Fiszman S. Influence of nutritional knowledge on the use and interpretation of Spanish nutritional food labels. J Food Sci 2012; 77(1):H1-8,.

28. Miller LMS, Cassady DL. The effects of nutrition knowledge on food label use. A review of the literature. Appetite 2015; 92:207-16.

29. Anastasiou K, Miller M, Dickinson K. The relationship between food label use and dietary intake in adults: A systematic review. Appetite 138:280-91, 2019.

30. Stran KA, Knol LL. Determinants of food label use differ by sex. J Acad Nutr Diet 2013; 113(5):673-9.

31. Ranilovic J, Baric IC. Differences between younger and older populations in nutrition label reading habits. Brit Food J 2011; 113(1):109-21.

32. Verissimo AC, Barbosa MCD, Almeida NAV, Queiroz ACC, Kelmann RG, da Silva CLA. Association between the habit of reading food labels and health-related factors in elderly individuals of the community. Rev Nutr 32, 2019.

33. Campos S, Doxey J, Hammond D. Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2011; 14(8):1496-506.

34. Guthrie JF, Fox JJ, Cleveland LE, Welsh S. Who Uses Nutrition Labeling, and What Effects Does Label Use Have on Diet Quality. J Nutr Educ 1995; 27(4):163-72.

35. Kim MG, Oh SW, Han NR, Song DJ, Um JY, Bae SH, et al. Association between Nutrition Label Reading and Nutrient Intake in Korean Adults: Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, 2007-2009 (KNHANES IV). Korean J Fam Med 201 35(4):190-8.

36. Kresic G, Mrduljas N. The Relationship between Knowledge and the Use of Nutrition Information on Food Package. Acta Aliment Hung 45(1):36-44.

37. Dickens C, Piano MR. Health literacy and nursing: an update. Am J Nurs 2013; 113(6):52-7,.

38. Ozdemir H, Alper Z, Uncu Y, Bilgel N. Health literacy among adults: a study from Turkey. Health Educ Res 2010; 25(3):464-77.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top