Ferric sulfate as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: twenty month clinical follow-up

Seventy primary molar teeth, carious exposed, symptom free, without any sign of root resorption in children aged from 3 to 6 years (main age 4.3 yr) were treated with conventional pulpotomy procedures. Ferric sulfate 15.5% solution (applied for 15 second for 35 teeth) and formocresol solution (five minute procedure of Buckley's formula for next 35 teeth) have been used as pulpotomy agents. In both groups, pulp stumps were covered with zinc-oxide eugenol paste. Permanent restorations were stainless steel crowns. Clinical check up was every three-months and radiographic follow-up time was six and twenty months after treatment. Our results within this period revealed 100% clinical success rate in both groups. Radiographic success rate was in both groups 97.2%, while in 2.8% cases has shown internal root resorption. On the basis of these results, we can recommend ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth in substitution for formocresol at the moment.

1. Nainar SM. Profile of primary teeth with pulpal involvement secondary to caries. J Dent Child 65: 57-9, 1998.

2. Bimstein E. Pulpotomy treatment in primary teeth. The Compendium 6: 8, 586-591, 1985.

3. Ranly DM. Pulpotomy therapy in primary teeth: new modalities for old rationales. Pediatr Dent 16: 403-409, 1994.

4. Gruythuysen RJM, Weerheijm KI. Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy with a light-cured cavity-sealing material after two years. J Dent Child 64: 251-253, 1997.

5. Alacam A. Long term effects of primary teeth pulpotomies with formocresol, glutaraldehyde-calcium hydroxide and glutaraldehyde-zinc oxide eugenol on succudaneous teeth. Pediatr Dent 13: 307- 312, 1989.

6. Lewis B. Formaldehyde in dentistry: a review for the millennium. Pediatr Dent 22: 167-177, 1998.

7. Avram DC, Pulver F. Pulpotomy medicaments for vital primary teeth. J Dent Child 56: 426-434, 1989.

8. Ranly DM, Garcia-Gody F. Reviewing pulp treatment for primary teeth. JADA 122: 83-86, 1991.

9. Amazon KR, Ywlin AM. Furrugination caused by Monsel’s solution. Clinical observations. Am J Dermatopath 2: 197-228 1980.

10. Fuks AB, Eidelman E, Cleaton-Jones, Michaeli Y. Pulp response to ferric sulfate, diluted formocresol and IRM in pulpotomized primary baboon teeth. J Dent Child 64: 254-259, 1997.

11. Coates O, Boj JR, Canalda C, Carreras M. Pulpal tissue reaction to formocresol vs. ferric sulfate in pulpotomized rat teeth. Pedi-atr Dent 21: 247-253, 1997.

12. Prabhu NT, Munshi AK. Clinical, radiographic and histological observations of the radicular pulp following “feracrylum” pulpotomy. J Clin Pediatr Dent 21: 151-156, 1997.

13. Fuks AB, Holan G, Davis JM, Eidelman E. Ferric sulfate versus dilute formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: long-term follow-up. Pediatr Dent 19: 327-30, 1997.

14. Fei AL, Udin RD, Johnson R. A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth. Peditr Dent 13: 327-32, 1991.

15. Fuks AB, Bimstein E, Guelman-Mklein H. Assessment of a 2 percent buffered glutaraldehyde solution in pulpotomized primary teeth of schoolchildren. J Dent Child 57: 371-375, 1990.

16. Levin LG. Pulpal regeneration. Practical Periodontics & Aesthetics 10: 621-4, 1998.

17. Ibricevic H, Mirkov M, Al-Jame Q, Al-Gaoud O. Pediatric dental treatment under general anesthesia at Al-Amiri hospital. The 8th Kuwait Dental Association Conference. Abstract book 35- 36.

18. Ketley CE, Goodman RJ. Formocresol toxicity: is there a suitable alternative for pulpotomy of primary molars? J Ped Dent 2: 67-72, 1991.

19. Wozney MJ. The bone morphogenic protein family: multifunctional cellular regulators in the embryo and adult. Eur J Oral Sci 106 (suppl 1): 160-66, 1998.

20. Smith JA, Matthews BJ, Hall CR. Transforming growth factor Beta 1 (TGF-beta1) in dentine matrix. Ligand activation and receptor expression. Eur J Oral Sci 106 (suppl 1) 179-84, 1998.