Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Article Menu
Export Article
More by Authors Links
Article Data
- Views 653
- Dowloads 148
Original Research
Open AccessIn vitro occlusal wear of restorative materials on primary teeth
In vitro occlusal wear of restorative materials on primary teeth
1Bioscience Research Center, Nova Southeastern University, College of Dental Medicine, Ft Lauderdale FL USA
2Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University of São Paulo, SP Brazil
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.29.3.32681824784r10p4 Vol.29,Issue 3,July 2005 pp.221-224
Published: 01 July 2005
*Corresponding Author(s): P.Villalta E-mail: pvillalt@nova.edu
Abstract
Since primary tooth enamel wears more rapidly than permanent tooth enamel, it is important to study the mechanical wear patterns of restorative materials used in the primary dentition. It is important that an in vitro evaluation of wear resistance of different restorative materials is done in order to establish a valid in vitro test protocol for use in pediatric dentistry.
Cite and Share
P.Villalta,C.R.M.D. Rodrigues. In vitro occlusal wear of restorative materials on primary teeth . Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2005. 29(3);221-224.
References
1. Leinfelder KF, Mirshahidi M, Cury C, O’Neil W. An in vitro wear device for determining wear of posterior composites J Dent Res 70 abstract: 636: 345, 1991.
2. Lugassy AA, Moffa JP. Laboratory model for the quantification of clinical occlusal wear. J Dent Res 64: 63, 1985.
3. Draughn RA, Harrison A Relationship between abrasive wear and microstructure of composite resins. J Prosthetic Dent 40: 220- 224, 1978.
4. Taylor DF, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD. Correlation of M- L, Leinfelder, and USPHS clinical evaluation techniques of wear. Dent Mat 6: 151-153, 1990.
5. Leinfelder KF, Suzuki S. In vitro wear device for determining posterior composite wear. JADA 130: 1347-1353, 1999.
6. Peutzfeldt A, García-Godoy F, Asmussen E. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers. Am J Dent 10: 15-17, 1997.
7. Faria FPC, Bortolotto FR, Braga RR. Evaluation of wear and roughness of dental materials. In: Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Society for Oral, Brazil Abstract 83 ,1999.
8. Smales RJ, Koutsikas P. Occlusal wear of resin-ionomer restora-tive materials. Aust Dent J 40: 171-172, 1995.
9. Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. JADA 128: 1088-1097, 1997.
10. Leung SK, Wei SHJ, Hse KMY. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 2 years results. 13th Annual Scientific Meeting, Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong Abstract 24, 1998.
11. Nelson GV, Osborne JW, Gale EN, Norman RD, Phillips RW. A three-year clinical evaluation of composite resin and high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth. J Dent Child 47: 414 - 418, 1980.
12. Tonn EM, Ryge G, Chambers DW. A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars. J Dent Child 47: 405 - 413 , 1980.
13. Tonn EM, Ryge G. Two-year clinical evaluation of light-cured composite resin restorations in primary molars. JADA 111: 144 -48, 1985.
14. Tonn EM, Ryge G. Clinical evaluations of composite resin restorations in primary molars: 4-year follow-up study. JADA 117: 603-606, 1988.
15. Derkson GD, Richadson AS, Waldman R Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results. J Can Dent Assoc 50: 478 - 480, 1984.
16. Walls AW, Murray JJ, Mccabe JF. The use of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements in the deciduous dentition. Brit Dent J 165:13-17, 1988.
17. Hung TW, Richardson AS Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cement restorations in primary molars: one year results. J Canadian Dent Assoc 56: 239-240, 1990.
18. Östlund J, Möller K, Koch G. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in class II restorations in primary molars -a three year clinical evaluation. Swedish Dent J 16: 81-86, 1992.
19. Marks, LA, Weerheijm KL, Van Amerongen WE, Groen HJ. Dyract versus Tytin class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation. Caries Res 33: 387 - 392, 1999.
20. Roberts MW, Moffa JP, Broring CL. Two-year clinical evaluation of a proprietary composite resin for the restoration of primary posterior teeth. Pediatr Dent 7: 14-18, 1985.
21. Vann WF Jr, Barkmeier WW, Mahler DB. Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: four-year findings. J Dent Res 67: 876- 879, 1988.
22. Wendell JJ, Vann WF Jr. Wear of composite resin restorations in primary, versus permanent molar teeth. J Dent Res 67: 71-74, 1987.
23. Cardoso PEC. The Influence of load cycling and light sources on wear, roughness and microstructure of resin composites São Paulo Brazil, 1993.
24. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N. Viscous glass-ionomer cements: a new alternative to amalgam in the primary dentition?Quintessence Internat 28: 667-676, 1997.
25. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vitro wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 68: 1752-1754, 1989.
26. Hickel R, Voss A. A comparison of glass cerment cement and amalgam restoration in primary molars. J Dent Child 57: 184 -188, 1990.
27. Nose K. Study on the hardness of human and animal teeth. Jap J Exp Med 69: 1925-1945, 1961.
28. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Occlusal forces in normal and long face adults. J Dent Res 62: 566 - 570, 1983.
29. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Occlusal forces in normal and long face children. J Dent Res 62: 571 - 574, 1983.
30. Willems G, Lambrects P, Lesaffre E, Braem M, Vanherle G. Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: SEM study of differential wear. J Dent 21: 79- 86, 1993.
31. Council in dental materials, instruments, and equipment expan-sion of the acceptance program for dental materials for occlusal class II restorations. JADA 102: 349-350, 1981.
Abstracted / indexed in
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Submission Turnaround Time
Conferences
Top