Article Data

  • Views 821
  • Dowloads 210

Original Research

Open Access

Indirect Pulp Capping in the Primary Dentition: a 4 Year Follow-up Study

  • Juliana J. Marchi1
  • Fernando B. de Araujo1,*,
  • Andréa M. Fröner1
  • Lloyd H. Straffon1
  • Jacques E. Nör2

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

2Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.31.2.y4um5076341226m5 Vol.31,Issue 2,March 2007 pp.68-71

Published: 01 March 2007

*Corresponding Author(s): Fernando B. de Araujo E-mail: fernando.araujo@ufrgs.br

Abstract

Purpose :Evaluate clinical and radiographic changes in primary teeth submitted to indirect pulp capping (IPC) over a 48-month-period.

Methods: Twenty seven primary molars with deep caries, but without preoperative signs of irreversible pulpits, were treated with IPC. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups, according to the material used for protection of the dentin-pulp complex: (1) a calcium hydroxide liner(Dycal®) and (2) glass ionomer cement (Vitremer®).

Results: After 48 months, Group-1 showed a success rate of 88.8% and Group-2 of 93%. No statistical significant difference between the groups was observed(P = 0.62).

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study suggested that indirect pulp capping in primary teeth arrests the progression of the underlying caries, regardless of the material used as a liner.

Keywords

Pulp capping, indirect, primary dentition

Cite and Share

Juliana J. Marchi,Fernando B. de Araujo,Andréa M. Fröner,Lloyd H. Straffon,Jacques E. Nör. Indirect Pulp Capping in the Primary Dentition: a 4 Year Follow-up Study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2007. 31(2);68-71.

References

1. Shovelton, D.S. A Study of Deep Carious Dentine. Int. Dent. J., 18:392-405, 1968.

2. Besic, F.C. The Fate of Bacteria Sealed in Dental Cavities. J. Dent. Res., 22: 349-354, 1943.

3. King, J.B.; Crawford, J.J.; Lindahl,R.L. Indirect Pulp Capping: a Bacteriologic Study of Deep Carious Dentin in Human Teeth. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 20:663-671, 1965.

4. Bjørndal, L., Larsen, T, Thylstrup, A. A Clinical and Microbiological Study of Deep Carious Lesions during Stepwise Excavation using Long Treatment Intervals. Caries Res., 31: 411-417, 1997.

5. Bjørndal, L., Larsen, T. Changes in the Cultivable Flora in Deep Carious Lesions Following a Stepwise Excavation Procedure. Caries Res., 34: 502-508, 2000.

6. Pinto,A. Avaliação Clínica, Microbiológica e Radiográfica de Lesões de Cárie de Molares Decíduos, após Remoção Parcial da Dentina Cariada. 2001. 152f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Clínicas Odontológicas-Odontopediatria) - Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre.

7. Massara, M.L.A.; Alves, J.B.; Brandão, P.R.G. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment: Clinical, Ultrastructural and Chemical Analysis. Caries Res., 36:430-436, 2002.

8. Bressani, A.E.L. Avaliação da Coloração, Consistência e Contaminação da Dentina de Dentes Decíduos Submetidos ao Capeamento Pulpar Indireto com Remoção Parcial de Tecido Cariado. 2003. 66f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Clínicas Odontológicas-Odontopediatria) -Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre.

9. Fitzgerald, M.; Heys, R.J. A Clinical and Histological Evaluation of Conservative Pulpal Therapy in Human Teeth. Operative Dent 16:101-112, 1991.

10. Straffon, L.H. et al. Twenty-four- Month Clinical Trial of Visible Light Activated Cavity Liner in Young Permanent Teeth. J. Dent. Child., 58:124-128, 1991.

11. Farooq, N.S. et al. Success Rates of Formocresol Pulpotomy and Indirect Pulp Therapy in the Treatment of Deep Dentinal Caries in Primary Teeth. Pediatric Dent., 22:278-286, 2000.

12. Ranly, D.M.; Garcia-Godoy, F. Current and Potential Pulp Therapies for Primary and Young Permanent Teeth. J. of Dent., 28: 153-161, 2000.

13. Bjørndal, L.; Thylstrup, A. A Practice-Based Study on Stepwise Excavation of Deep Carious Lesions in Permanent Teeth: a 1-year Follow-up Study. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol., 26:122-128, 1998.

14. Falster, K. et al. Indirect Pulp Treatment: in vivo Outcomes of an Adhesive Resin System vs Calcium Hydroxide for Protection of the Dentin-Pulp Complex. Pediatric Dent., 24:241-248, 2002.

15. Al-Zayer, M.A. et al. Indirect Pulp Treatment of Primary Posterior Teeth: a Retrospective Study. Operative Dent., 25: 29-36, 2003.

16. Maltz, M. et al. A Clinical, Microbiologic and Radiographs Study of Deep Caries Lesions after Incomplete Caries Removal. Quintessence Int., 33:193-197, 2002.

17. Erickson, R.L. & Glasspole, E.A. Bonding to Tooth Structure: A Comparison of Glass-Ionomer and Composite-Resin Systems. J. Esthetic Dent., 06:227-244, 1994.

18. Nör, J.E. et al. Dentin bonding: SEM Comparison of the Resin Dentin in Primary and Permanent Teeth. J. Dent. Res 75:1396-1403, 1996.

19. Fairbourn, D.R. Charbeneau, G.T. Loesche, W.J. Effect of Improved Dycal and IRM on Bacteria in Deep Carious Lesions.

JADA, 100: 547-552, 1980.

20. Eidelman, E. Finn, S. Koulourides, T. Remineralization of Carious Dentin Treated with Calcium Hydroxide. J. Dent. Res., 32: 218-225, 1965.

21. Francci, C. et al. Fluoride Release from Restorations Materials and its Effects on Dentin Deminaralization. J. Dent. Res., 78:1647-1654, 1999.

22. Fuks, A.B. et al. Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Class II Esthetic Restorations in Primary Molars. Pediatric Dent 22: 479-485, 2000.

23. Croll, T.P. et al. Clinical Performance of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Restorations in Primary Teeth. JADA, 132:1110-1116, Aug. 2001.

24. Donly, K.J. et al. Clinical Performance and Caries Inhibition of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Amalgam Restorations. JADA, 130:1459-1466, Oct. 1999.

25. Kidd, E.A.M. How ‘Clean’Must a Cavity Be before Restoration?Caries Res., 38:305-313, May-June 2004.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

PubMed (MEDLINE) PubMed comprises more than 35 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top