Parents’Attitude toward their Children’s Appearance in the Case of Esthetic Defects of the Anterior Primary Teeth

Purpose: To evaluate parents' attitude toward esthetic defects of maxillary primary incisors and the association between various demographic parameters and the treatment parents chose for their children.

Methods: The study consisted of two parts: 1) a clinical examination of the child's primary incisors, and 2) a questionnaire for the accompanying parent. 362 parents who accompanied 294 children aged 1-6 years, participated in the study. They were divided in 2 groups: parents' accompanying children with esthetic defects (study group) and parents' of children without esthetic defects (control group).

Results: Significantly more parents in the study group (73%) recognized an esthetic problem in their child's incisors, compared to (17%) in the control group. Eighty seven percent (219 in the Study Group [85.20%] and 97 in the Control Group [92.4%]) advocated dental treatment to save a primary tooth even if the chances for success were only 50%. 35.9% rejected the idea of a prosthetic replacement for a lost primary incisor. The same percentage of parents (35.9%) answered that they "want it 'very much'" while the rest (28.2%) chose intermediate scores '2-3' on a scale of '0' (= not at all) to '5' (= yes! very much).

Conclusion: Parents are interested in a conservative treatment for preserving esthetically damaged incisors, but will be less enthusiastic to replace extracted or missing teeth with an esthetic device.

esthetic restorations ,primary, deciduous, teeth, parents

1. Garcia-Godoy F, Garcia-Godoy F, Garcia-Godoy FM. Reasons for seeking treatment after traumatic dental injuries. Endod Dent Traumatol, 5: 180–1, 1989.

2. Holan G, Fuks AB. The diagnostic value of coronal dark-gray discoloration in primary teeth following traumatic injuries. Pediatr Dent, 18: 224–7, 1996.

3. Holan G, Ram D. Sequelae and prognosis of intruded primary incisors: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent, 21: 242–7, 1999.

4. Cardoso M, de Carvelho Rocha MJ. Traumatized primary teeth in children assisted at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Dent Traumatol, 18: 129–33, 2002.

5. Gondim JO, Moreira Neto JJ. Evaluation of intruded primary incisors. Dent Traumatol, 21: 131–3, 2005.

6. Soxman JA, Nazif MM, Bouguot J. Pulpal pathology in relation to discoloration of primary anterior teeth. J Dent Child, 51: 282–4, 1984.

7. DenBesten P, Berkowitz R. Early childhood caries: an overview with reference to our experience in California. J Calif Dent Assoc, 31: 139–43, 2003.

8. Daugaard-Jensen J, Nodal M, Kjaer I. Pattern of agenesis in the primary dentition: a radiographic study in 193 cases. Int J Paediatr Dent, 7: 3–7, 1997.

9. Knezevic A, Travan S, Tarle Z, Sutalo J, Jankovic B, Ciglar I. Double tooth. Coll Antropol, 26: 667–72, 2002.

10. Tasa GL, Lukacs JR. The prevalence and expression of primary double teeth in western India. ASDC J Dent Child, 68: 196–200, 2001.

11. Prahl-Andersen B, Boersma H, Van der Lindan FP, Moore AW. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc, 98: 209–12, 1979.

12. Birkeland K, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. Orthodontic concern among 11 years old children and their parents compared with orthodontic treatment need assessed by Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 110: 197–205, 1996.

13. Levy SM, Warren JJ, Broffitt B, Nielsen B. Factors associated with parents’ esthetic perceptions of children’s mixed dentition fluorosis and demarcated opacities. Pediatr Dent, 27: 486–92, 2005.

14. Kupietzky A, Waggoner WF, Galea J. The clinical and radiographic success of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent, 25(6): 577–81, 2003.

15. Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod, 79: 399–415, 1981.

16. Woo D, Sheller B, Williams B, Mancl L, Grembowski D. Dentists’ and parents’ perceptions of health, esthetics, and treatment of maxillary primary incisors. Pediatr Dent, 27: 19–23, 2005.

17. Brantley DH, Barnes KP, Haywood VB. Bleaching primary teeth with 10% carbamide peroxide. Pediatr Dent, 23(6): 514–6, 2001.

18. Lee SS, Zhang W, Lee DH, Li Y. Tooth whitening in children and adolescents: a literature review. Pediatr Dent, 27(5): 362–8, 2005.

19. Bussadori SK, Roth F, Guedes CC, Fernandes KP, Domingues MM, Wanderley MT. Bleaching non vital primary teeth: case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 30(3): 179–82, 2006

20. Kupietzky A, Waggoner WE, Galea J Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years. Pediatr Dent, 27(3): 221–5, 2005.

21. Ram D, Fuks AB Clinical performance of resin-bonded composite strip crowns in primary incisors: a retrospective study. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2006 Jan; 16(1): 49–54.

22. Croll TP. Primary incisor restoration using resin-veneered stainless steel crowns. ASDC J Dent Child, 65(2): 89–95, 1998.

23. Waggoner WF, Kupietzky A. Anterior esthetic fixed appliances for the preschooler: considerations and a technique for placement. Pediatr Dent, 23(2): 147–50, 2001.

24. Kapur A, Chawla HS, Goyal A, Gaube K. An esthetic point of view in very young children. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 30(2): 99–103, 2005.

25. Woodward GL, Main PA, Leake JL. Clinical determinants of a parent’s satisfaction with the appearance of a child’s teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 24(6): 416–8, 1996.

26. Shulman JD, Maupome G, Clark DC. Perception of desirable tooth color among parents, dentists and children. J Am Dent Assoc, 135: 595–604, 2004.

27. Roberts C, Lee JY, Wright JT, Clinical evaluation of and parental satisfaction with resin-faced stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent, 23(1): 28–31, 2001.

28. Peretz B, Ram D: Restorative material for children’s teeth: preferences of parents and children ASDC J Dent Child, 69(3): 243–8, 233, 2002.

29. Koroluk LD, Riekman GA. Parental perceptions of the effects of max-illary incisors extractions in children with nursing caries. ASDC J Dent Child, 58: 233–6, 1991.

30. Tickle M, Milsom KM, Humphris GM, Blinkhorn AS. Parental attitudes to the care of the carious primary dentition. Br Dent J, 25; 195(8): 451–5, 2003.

31. Vallittu PK, Vallittu AS, Lassilla VP. Dental aesthetics: a survey of attitudes in different groups of patients. J Dent, 24: 335–8, 1996.