Microbiological Assessment of Root Canals Following Use of Rotary and Manual Instruments in Primary Molars

To assess the microflora of root canals in primary molars following use of rotary NiTi files and conventional hand NiTi and stainless steel files. Study design: This randomized clinical trial consisted of a total of 60 first and second primary molars requiring root canal treatment, who were selected from children aged 5-9 years. Based on type of root canal instrumentation, the teeth were randomly assigned to three groups of twenty teeth each; Group A: Rotary NiTi files, Group B: Hand NiTi files and Group C: Hand stainless steel files. Following administration of local anesthesia, isolation with rubber dam was carried out. For the purpose of instrumentation and sampling, the palatal canal of maxillary molars and the distal canal of mandibular molars were selected. Prior to sampling, the orifices of other canals in these teeth were sealed, so as to prevent any contamination. Instrumentation was carried out in each group using respective instruments along with intermittent saline irrigation. Root canal samples were obtained both before and after instrumentation, using sterile absorbent paper points and transferred to a sterile vial with transport fluid. Serial dilutions were prepared and cultured on suitable agar media. Both aerobic and anaerobic microbial counts were made. Data obtained was subjected to statistical analysis using Wilcoxon signed rank test and one-way Analysis of variance. Results: In all three groups, there was a significant reduction in both aerobic and anaerobic mean microbial count following root canal instrumentation. (p<0.001). Conclusion: Rotary NiTi files were as efficient as conventional hand instruments in significantly reducing the root canal microflora.

instumention, microflora, Rotary, NiTi

1. Figdor D, Sundqvist G. A big role for the very small – understanding the endodontic microbial flora. Aust Dent J 52(1 Suppl):S38-51, 2007.

2. Bertrand MF, Collet X, Augros C, Medioni E. Modifications of the Quantec system: effects on root canal configuration. J Dent Res 78:39,1999.

3. Veltri M, Mollo A, Montovani L, Pini P, Balleri P, Grandini S.. A comapri-tive study of Endoflare –Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals. Int Endod J 38(9):610-6, 2005.

4. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 21(7):453-4, 1999.

5. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 22(1):77-8,2000.

6. Conoglu H, Tekcicek MU, Cehreli ZC. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy. Pediatr Dent 28(6):518-23, 2006.

7. Nagaratna PJ, Shashikiran ND, Subbareddy VV. In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 24(4): 186-91,2006.

8. Walia HM, Brantely WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod14(7):346-51, 1988.

9. Dalton BC, Orstavik D, Phillips C, Pettiette M, Trope M. Bacterial reduction with nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. J Endod 24(1): 763-7,1998.

10. Möller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Ohman AE, Heyden G. Influence on periapical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 89(6): 475-84,1981

11. Consensus report of the European Society of endodontology on quality guidelines for endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 27(3) :115-24,1994

12. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effect of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 20:340-9,1965

13. Sundqvist G, Johansson E, Sjogren U. Prevalence of black-pigmented bacteroides species in root canal infections. J Endod.15(1):13-9,1989.

14. Haapasaalo M. Bacteroides buccae and related taxa in necrotic root canal infections. J Clin Microbiol 24(6): 940-4,1986

15. Siqueira JF Jr. Taxonomic changes of bacteria associated with endodontic infections. J Endod 29(10):619-23, 2003.

16. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J 18(1):35-40, 1985.

17. Shuping GB, Orstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medica-tions. J Endod 26(12):751-5,2000.

18. Bystrom A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1(5):170–5, 1985.

19. Card SJ, Sigurdsson A, Ørstavik D, Trope M. The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria. J Endod 28(11):779-83, 2002.

20. Silva LA, Leonardo MR, Nelson Filho P, Tanomaru JM. Comparison of rotary and manual Instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. J Dent Child 71(1):45-7,2004.

21. Dhanyakumar NM , Vasundhara S , Saurabh G . SEM evaluation of smear layer formation after using three different nickel titanium rotary instru-ments- Endowave, K3 and Protaper - an invitro study. J Endodon 22(1):

28- 38, 2010.

22. Zand V, Bidar M, Ghaziani P, Rahimi S, Shahi S. A comapritive SEM investigation of the smear layer following preparation of root canals using nickel titanium rotary and hand instruments. J Oral Sc 49(1):47-52,2007

23. Baumgartner JC, Falkler WA: Bacteria in the apical 5mm of infected root canals. J Endod 17(8):380-3,1991.

24. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 32(5):389-98,2006.

25. Hariharan VS, Nandlal B, Srilatha KT. Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: A scanning electron microscopy study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 28(4):271-7, 2010.

26. Salama FS, Abdelmegid FY. Six percent citric acid better than hydrogen peroxide in removing smear layer: an in vitro pilot study. Pediatr Dent16(6):424-6,1994.

27. Viswanath D, Hegde AM, Munshi AK. The removal of the smear layer using EGTA: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 28(1):69-74,2003.

28. McComb D, Smith DC. A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod 1(7):238-42, 1975

29. Grossman LI, Oliet S, Rio CE. Microbiology: In Grossman LI Editor. Endodontic practice; 11th ed; Varghese publishing house, India, 1991.

30. Suchitra U, Kundabala M, Shenoy MM. In search of endodontic pathogens. Kathmandu Uni Medi 4(4):525-9,2006.

31. Sundqvist G, Figdor D. Life as an endodontic pathogen. Endod Topics 6:3-28,2003.

32. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer HH. How useful is root canal culturing in predicting treatment outcome? J Endod 33(3):220-5,2007.

33. da Silva LA, Nelson Filho P, Faria G, de Souza-Gugelmin MC, Ito IY. Bacterial profile in primary teeth with necrotic pulp and periapical lesions. Braz Dent J 17(2):144-8, 2006.

34. Ledezma-Rasillo G, Flores-Reyes H, Gonzalez-Amaro AM, Garro-cho-Rangel A, Ruiz-Rodriguez Mdel S, Pozos-Guillen AJ.Identification of Cultivable Microorganisms from primary teeth with necrotic pulps. J Clin Pediatr Dent 34(4):329-33,2010.

35. Nair PN. Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 15(6):348-81, 2004.

36. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 89(4):321-8, 1981.