Article Data

  • Views 725
  • Dowloads 148

Original Research

Open Access

Bacterial Penetration along Different Root Canal Fillings in the Presence or Absence of Smear Layer in Primary Teeth

  • Sisodia R1,*,
  • Ravi KS2
  • Shashikiran ND3
  • Singla S1
  • Kulkarni V4

1Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Rishiraj College of Dental Sciences and RC, Bhopal, India

2Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of dentistry, King Khalid University, Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia

3Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, People’s College of Dental Sciences and RC, Bhopal, India

4Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Modern Dental College, Indore, India.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.q8w63111t2354786 Vol.38,Issue 3,April 2014 pp.229-234

Published: 01 April 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): Sisodia R E-mail: rinky_sisodia@yahoo.com

Abstract

To study the effect of the smear layer on the penetration of bacteria along different root canal fillings and to compare the sealing ability of new endodontic material Apexit plus as compared to Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) in primary teeth. Study design: A total of 60 human root segments were instrumented for endodontic treatment. Half of the sample size was irrigated with normal saline and in other half, 3% NaOCl, 3% H2O2 and 17% EDTA was used alternatively as irrigant during instrumentation. The roots were rinsed thoroughly with distilled water and sterilized by autoclaving for 20 min at 121 ± 2 0 C. Roots with and without smear layer were obturated with Apexit plus, Zinc oxide eugenol. Following storage in humid conditions at 370 C for 2 days, the specimens were mounted into a bacterial leakage test model for 180 days. Results: At 180 days, there is statistically significant difference with a P value of < 0.05 among all groups except ZOE –smear and –nonsmear. In the presence of smear layer, Apexit plus demonstrated more leakage. No leakage was observed in ZOE groups. ZOE demonstrated better sealing ability than Apexit plus. Conclusions: Removal of smear layer helps in better resistance to bacterial penetration along Apexit plus root canal fillings but no effect is seen along ZOE root canal fillings.

Keywords

Apexit plus, bacterial penetration, smear layer, Zinc oxide eugenol.

Cite and Share

Sisodia R,Ravi KS,Shashikiran ND,Singla S,Kulkarni V. Bacterial Penetration along Different Root Canal Fillings in the Presence or Absence of Smear Layer in Primary Teeth. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2014. 38(3);229-234.

References

1. Saha S, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Ghoshal U . Antimicrobial activity of different endodontic sealers: an in vitro evaluation. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 28: 251-7, 2010.

2. Johnson WT, Gutmann JL. Pathways of the Pulp. 9th ed. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 358–99, 2005.

3. Sundqvist G, Figdor D. Essential Endodontology. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd, 253, 1998.

4. McComb D, Smith DC. A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod, 1: 238–42, 1975.

5. Lalh MS, Titley K, Torneck CD, Friedman S. The shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement sealers to bovine dentine conditioned with common endodontic irrigants. Int Endod J, 32: 430–5, 1999.

6. Saleh IM, Ruyter IE, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. The effects of dentine pre-treatment on the adhesion of root canal sealers. Int Endod J, 35: 859–66, 2002.

7. Reddy S, Ramakrishna Y. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Various Root Canal Filling Materials Used in Primary Teeth: A microbiological Study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 31: 193-8, 2007.

8. Spedding RH. In complete resorption of resorbable root canal filling in primary teeth: Report of two cases. ASDC J Dent child 52: 214-6, 1985.

9. Apexit Plus, Dental Radiopaque Non-Shrinking Root Canal Sealer Paste. htm [Internet]. [cited 2010 Sep 24].Available from : http://www.directdentalsupplies.com /home- dental office supply

10. Saleh IM, Ruyter IE, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. Bacterial penetration along different root canal filling materials in the presence or absence of smear layer. Int Endod J, 41: 32–40, 2008.

11. Pashley DH. Smear layer: physiological considerations. Oper Dent Suppl, 3: 13-29, 1984.

12. Saleh IM, Ruyter IE, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. Survival of Enterococcus Faecalis in dentinal tubules after root canal filling with different root canal sealers in vitro. Int Endod J, 37: 193-8, 2004.

13. Pascon FM, Kantowitz KR, Borges AF, Puppin-Rontani RM. Influence of cleansers and irrigation methods on primary root dentin permeability. J Dent Child (Chic), 74: 30-5, 2007.

14. Teixeira CS, Felippe MC, Felippe WT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Int Endod J, 38: 285–90, 2005.

15. Grossman LI. Sterilization of infected root canals. J Am Dent Assoc, 85: 900-5, 1972.

16. De Quieroz GA, Day DF. Antimicrobial activity and effectiveness of a combination of sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide in killing and removing Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms from surfaces. J Appl Microbiol, 103: 794-802, 2007.

17. Erdemir A, Ari H, Güngüneş H, Belli S . Effect of medications for root canal treatment on bonding to root canal dentin. J Endod, 30: 113–6,2004.

18. Yiu CK, Garcia-Godoy F, Tay FR et al. A nanoleakage perspective on bonding to oxidized dentin. J Dent Res, 81: 628–32, 2002.

19. Lai SC, Mak YF, Cheung GS et al. Reversal of compromised bonding to oxidized etched dentin. J Dent Res, 80: 1919–24, 2001.

20. Eldeniz AU, Erdemir A, Belli S. Shear bond strength of three resin based sealers to dentin with and without the smear layer. J Endod, 31: 293–6, 2005.

21. Rabinowitz Bz. Pulp management in primary teeth. Oral surg Oral med Oral path, 6: 542-50, 1953.

22. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlén G, Kvist T. Microbiological status of rootfilled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J, 31: 1–7, 1998.

23. Kokkas AB, Boutsioukis ACh, Vassiliadis LP, Stavrianos CK. The influence of the smear layer on dentinal tubule penetration depth by 3 different root canal sealers: An in vitro study. J Endod, 30: 100-2, 2004.

24. Tannure PN, Azevedo CP, Bercelos R, Gleiser R, Primo LG. Long-term outcomes of primary tooth pulpectomy with and without smear layer removal: A randomized split-mouth clinical trial. Pediatr Dent, 33: 3l6-20, 2011.

25. White RR, Goldman M, Lin PS. The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by plastic filling materials. J Endod, 10: 558–62, 1984.

26. Kouvas V, Liolios E, Vassiliadis L, Parissis-Messimeris S, Boutsioukis A . Influence of smear layer on depth of penetration of three endodontic sealers: an SEM study. Endod Dent Traumatol, 14: 191–5, 1998.

27. Mutal L, Gani O. Presence of pores and vacuoles in set endodontic sealers. Int Endod J, 38: 690-6, 2005.

28. Holan G, Fuks AB. A comparison of pulpectomies using Zinc oxide eugenol and KRI paste in primary molars: A retrospective study. Peditr Dent, 15: 403-7, 1993.

29. Sadrian R, Coll JA. Long terms follow up on the retention rate of zinc oxide eugenol filler after primary tooth pulpectomy. Pediatr Dent, 15: 249-53, 1993.

30. Stevens RH, Grossman LI. Evaluation of anti microbial potential of calcium hydroxide as an intra canal medicament. J Endod, 9: 372-4, 1983.

31. Chawla HS, Mani SA, Tewari A, Goyal A. Calcium Hydroxide as a root canal filling material in primary teeth: A pilot study. J Indian Soc Pedod Preven Dent, 16: 90-2, 1998.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top