Article Data

  • Views 688
  • Dowloads 140

Original Research

Open Access

Clinical Usefulness of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway for Anesthesia during Dental Procedures in Children

  • Young-Jae Kim1
  • Hong-Keun Hyun1
  • Jung-Wook Kim1
  • Ki-Taeg Jang1
  • Sang-Hoon Lee1
  • Chong-Chul Kim1
  • Teo Jeon Shin1,*,
  • Yong-Seo Koo2

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

2Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.39.2.a0x2t7427m08w245 Vol.39,Issue 2,March 2015 pp.179-182

Published: 01 March 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): Teo Jeon Shin E-mail: XXX

Abstract

Although the Proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) has been widely used in anesthesia, little is known about its clinical effectiveness during dental procedures. We describe the clinical feasibility of the PLMA for managing airways in the field of pediatric dentistry. .Study design: We reviewed the medical records of children who underwent airway management with the use of the PLMA from January 2011 to December 2012 at an outpatient facility at Seoul National Dental University Hospital. Results: During the study period, the airways of 19 children were managed with the PLMA for dental procedures. During its placement, blood pressure and heart rate were stably maintained. There were no interruptions of the dental procedures. None of the children experienced oxygen desaturation or ventilation difficulty. In one patient, the PLMA was dislodged for a short time, but the problem was easily solved with repositioning. After transferring to the post-anesthetic care unit, there were no incidences of oxygen desaturation or vomiting. All of the children were discharged from the hospital without complications. Conclusion: The PLMA can be successfully used in airway management during dental treatment in children.

Keywords

Airway Management; Laryngeal Mask Airway; Pediatric Dentistry

Cite and Share

Young-Jae Kim,Hong-Keun Hyun,Jung-Wook Kim,Ki-Taeg Jang,Sang-Hoon Lee,Chong-Chul Kim,Teo Jeon Shin,Yong-Seo Koo. Clinical Usefulness of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway for Anesthesia during Dental Procedures in Children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2015. 39(2);179-182.

References

1. Johnston DF, Wrigley SR, Robb PJ, Jones HE. The laryngeal mask airway in paediatric anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 45: 924-927, 1990.

2. Smith I, White PF. Use of the laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to a face mask during outpatient arthroscopy. Anesthesiology, 77: 850-855, 1992.

3. Yazbeck-Karam VG, Aouad MT, Baraka AS. Laryngeal mask airway for ventilation during diagnostic and interventional fibreoptic bronchoscopy in children. Paediatr Anaesth, 13: 691-694, 2003.

4. Riazi J, Morrison DE. The laryngeal mask airway in pediatric anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin North America, 16: 813-825, 1998.

5. Goodwin APL, Ogg TW, Lamb WT, Adlam DM. The reinforced laryngeal mask in dental day surgery. Ambulatory Surgery, 1: 31-35, 1993.

6. George JM, Sanders GM. The reinforced laryngeal mask in paediatric outpatient dental surgery. Anaesthesia, 54: 546-551, 1999.

7. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA ‘ProSeal’—a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth, 84: 650-654, 2000

8. BRAIN AIJ. The laryngeal mask – A new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth, 55: 801-806, 1983.

9. Hung WT, Hsu SC, Kao CT. General anesthesia for developmentally disabled dental care patients: a comparison of reinforced laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation anesthesia. Spec Care Dentist, 23: 135-138, 2003.

10. Leach AB, Alexander CA. The Laryngeal Mask-an overview. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl, 4: 19-31, 1991.

11. Brimacombe J, Berry A. The laryngeal mask airway for dental surgery--a review. Aust Dent J, 40: 10-14, 1995.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top