Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 913
  • Dowloads 166

Original Research

Open Access

Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Class II Adolescent with Anterior Open Bite using Mini-Screws and Modified Palatal Anchorage Plate

  • Kook YA1,*,
  • Park JH1
  • Kim Y1
  • Ahn CS1
  • Bayome M1

1Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.39.2.b5317m147r228760 Vol.39,Issue 2,March 2015 pp.187-192

Published: 01 March 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): Kook YA E-mail: kook190036@yahoo.com

PDF (2.76 MB) View Full-text

Abstract

This article presents a non-extraction orthodontic treatment case using mini-screws and a modified palatal anchorage plate (MPAP) to intrude the maxillary posterior teeth, and distalize the whole arch dentition and control the extrusion of the maxillary posterior dentition during distalization. Keywords: Malocclusion, Skeletal Class II; Anterior Open Bite; Modified Palatal Anchorage Plate (MPAP); mini-screws

Cite and Share

Kook YA,Park JH,Kim Y,Ahn CS,Bayome M. Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Class II Adolescent with Anterior Open Bite using Mini-Screws and Modified Palatal Anchorage Plate. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2015. 39(2);187-192.

URL:

https://www.jocpd.com/articles/10.17796/jcpd.39.2.b5317m147r228760

References

1. Greenlee GM, Huang GJ, Chen SS, et al. Stability of treatment for anterior open-bite malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139:154-169, 2011.

2. Reyneke JP, Ferretti C. Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 19:321- 338, 2007.

3. Closs L, Pangrazio Kulbersh V. Combination of bionator and high-pull headgear therapy in a skeletal open bite case. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 109:341-347, 1996.

4. Kuhn RJ. Control of anterior vertical dimension and proper selection of extraoral anchorage. Angle Orthod, 38:340-349, 1968.

5. Meyer-Marcotty P, Kochel J, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. The impact of spur therapy in dentoalveolar open bite. Aust Orthod J, 29:145-152, 2013.

6. Sarver DM, Weissman SM. Nonsurgical treatment of open bite in nongrowing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108:651-659, 1995.

7. Kim YH. Anterior openbite and its treatment with multiloop edgewise archwire. Angle Orthod, 57:290-321, 1987.

8. Lopez-Gavito G, Wallen TR, Little RM, Joondeph DR. Anterior open-bite malocclusion: a longitudinal 10-year postretention evaluation of orthodontically treated patients. Am J Orthod, 87:175-186, 1985.

9. Lee HA, Park YC. Treatment and posttreatment changes following intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth with miniscrew implants for open bite correction. Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 38:31-40, 2008.

10. Moon CH, Lee JS, Lee HS, Choi JH. Non-surgical treatment and retention of open bite in adult patients with orthodontic mini-implants. Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 39:402-419, 2009.

11. Han S, Bayome M, Lee J, et al. Evaluation of palatal bone density in adults and adolescents for application of skeletal anchorage devices. Angle Orthod, 82:625-631, 2012.

12. Lee SM, Park JH, Bayome M, et al. Palatal soft tissue thickness at different ages using an ultrasonic device. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 36:405-409, 2012.

13. Ryu JH, Park JH, Vu Thi Thu T, et al. Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142:207-212, 2012.

14. Vu T, Bayome M, Kook YA, Han SH. Evaluation of the palatal soft tissue thickness by cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod, 42:291- 296, 2012.

15. Kinzinger GS, Gulden N, Yildizhan F, Diedrich PR. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136:578-586, 2009.

16. Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO, Kircelli C. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance. Angle Orthod, 76:650-659, 2006.

17. Kook YA, Kim SH, Chung KR. A modified palatal anchorage plate for simple and efficient distalization. J Clin Orthod, 44:719-730; quiz 743, 2010.

18. Sa’aed N, Park C, Bayome M, et al. Skeletal and dental effects of molar distalization using a modified palatal anchorage plate in adolescents. Angle Orthod, In press.

19. Reitan K, Rygh P. Biomechanical principles and reactions. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall Jr RL, editors. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 2 ed. Elsevier Health Sciences. St. Louis, 1994.

20. Kook YA, Lee DH, Kim SH, Chung KR. Design improvements in the modified C-palatal plate for molar distalization. J Clin Orthod, 47:241-248; quiz 267-248, 2013.

21. Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, et al. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clin Oral Implants Res, 18:768-775, 2007.

22. Yu IJ, Kook YA, Sung SJ, et al. Comparison of tooth displacement between buccal mini-implants and palatal plate anchorage for molar distalization: a finite element study. Eur J Orthod, 36:394-402, 2014.

23. Cevidanes LH, Heymann G, Cornelis MA, DeClerck HJ, Tulloch JF. Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136:94-99, 2009.

24. Tai K, Park JH, Mishima K, Shin JW. 3-Dimensional cone-beam computed tomography analysis of transverse changes with Schwarz appliances on both jaws. Angle Orthod, 81:670-677, 2011.

25. Tai K, Hotokezaka H, Park JH, et al. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138:262.e261-262.e211; discussion 262-263, 2010.

26. Kook YA, Bayome M, Trang VT, et al. Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146:47-54, 2014.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top