Article Data

  • Views 1880
  • Dowloads 287

Original Research

Open Access

Retrospective analysis of dental treatment under general anesthesia among children with early childhood caries in Malaysia

  • Noor Azlinaliana Ibrahim1,2
  • Nor Azlida Mohd Nor2,*,
  • Nurul Zeety Azizi3
  • Tengku Nurfarhana Nadirah Tengku Hamzah3
  • Nabihah Dziaruddin3
  • Sabri Musa3

1School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, 16150 Kelantan, Malaysia

2Department of Community Oral Health and Clinical Prevention, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

3Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.034 Vol.47,Issue 4,July 2023 pp.46-53

Submitted: 06 December 2022 Accepted: 16 February 2023

Published: 03 July 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Nor Azlida Mohd Nor E-mail: azlida@um.edu.my

Abstract

Many children are affected by early childhood caries (ECC) with some requiring dental treatment under general anesthesia (GA). In pediatric dentistry, GA is one of the established methods of behavior management. GA data is useful for understanding the caries burden among young children. This study aimed to determine the trends, patient characteristics, and types of treatments conducted under GA among young children in a Malaysian dental hospital over a 7-year period. A retrospective study using pediatric patient records from 2013 to 2019 was conducted on children aged 2–6 years (24–71 months) having ECC. Relevant data were collected and analyzed. In total, 381 children with a mean age of 49.8 months were identified. Some of the ECC cases were associated with abscesses (32.5%) and multiple retained roots (36.7%). Over a 7-year period, there was an upward trend of preschool children receiving GA. Of the 4713 carious teeth treated, 55.1% were extracted, 29.9% were restored, 14.3% had preventive procedures, and 0.4% were pulp treated. Mean extractions were significantly higher among preschoolers compared to toddlers (p = 0.001), while preventive treatment was markedly higher among toddlers. In terms of the type of restorative materials, almost similar distribution was observed between the two age groups with 86.5% treated using composite restorations. Dental treatment under GA was more frequently used among preschoolers than in toddlers, with extractions and restoration with composite resin being the common treatment options. The findings can help decision-makers or relevant parties address the burden of ECC and enhance oral health promotion activities.


Keywords

Behavior management; Early childhood caries; Children; General anesthesia; Pediatric dentistry


Cite and Share

Noor Azlinaliana Ibrahim,Nor Azlida Mohd Nor,Nurul Zeety Azizi,Tengku Nurfarhana Nadirah Tengku Hamzah,Nabihah Dziaruddin,Sabri Musa. Retrospective analysis of dental treatment under general anesthesia among children with early childhood caries in Malaysia. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023. 47(4);46-53.

References

[1] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): classifications, consequences, and preventive strategies. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry (pp 79–81). Edition. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Chicago, Ill. 2020. Available at: https://www.aapd.org/media/policies_guidelines/p_eccclassifications.pdf (Accessed: 02 February 2023)

[2] Li MY, Zhi QH, Zhou Y, Qiu RM, Lin HC. Impact of early childhood caries on oral health-related quality of life of preschool children. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2015; 16: 65–72.

[3] Colak H, Dülgergil CT, Dalli M, Hamidi MM. Early childhood caries update: A review of causes, diagnoses, and treatments. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine. 2013; 4: 29–38.

[4] Che Salleh N, Yaw SL, Abd Muttalib Khairiyah, Ab Rahman J. National oral health survey of preschool children 2015 (NOHPS 2015), Vol. I: oral health status and caries treatment needs of 5-year-old children. 2017. Available at: https://ohd.moh.gov.my/images/pdf/compendium/NOHPS-2015-CARIES.pdf (Accessed: 10 March 2023).

[5] Strøm K, Rønneberg A, Skaare AB, Espelid I, Willumsen T. Dentists’ use of behavioural management techniques and their attitudes towards treating paediatric patients with dental anxiety. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2015; 16: 349–355.

[6] Knapp R, Gilchrist F, Rodd HD, Marshman Z. Change in children’s oral health-related quality of life following dental treatment under general anaesthesia for the management of dental caries: a systematic review. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2017; 27: 302–312.

[7] Takriti M, Alhakim D, Splieth C. Dental characteristics and according to treatments of children under GA in Germany. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2019; 20: 617–622.

[8] Nadeem S, Mohd Noor SNF, Shahabuddin S, Ghaffar ZA, Soon Eu C. Characteristics and dental treatments of children under general anaesthesia. Archives of Orofacial Science. 2020; 15: 35–44.

[9] Chen Y, Hsieh C, Hsu W, Wu F, Shih W. A 10-year trend of dental treatments under general anesthesia of children in Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2017; 80: 262–268.

[10] Jankauskienė B, Virtanen JI, Kubilius R, Narbutaitė J. Treatment under dental general anesthesia among children younger than 6 years in Lithuania. Medicina. 2013; 49: 403–408.

[11] Schroth RJ, Quiñonez C, Shwart L, Wagar B. Treating early childhood caries under general anesthesia: a national review of Canadian data. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. 2016; 82: g20.

[12] Ministry of Health Malaysia. Guidelines early childhood oral healthcare. 2008. Available at: https://ohd.moh.gov.my/images/pdf/xtvtnsop/Guidelines-Early-Childhood-Oral-Healthcare-2008.pdf (Accessed: 05 December 2022).

[13] Anil S, Anand PS. Early childhood caries: prevalence, risk factors, and prevention. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2017; 5: 157.

[14] Broomhead T, Rodd HD, Baker SR, Jones K, Davies G, White S, et al. A rapid review of variation in the use of dental general anaesthetics in children. British Dental Journal. 2020; 229: 31–39.

[15] Tickotsky N, Petel R, Araki R, Moskovitz M. Caries progression rate in primary teeth: a retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2017; 41: 358–361.

[16] Arrow P. Incidence and progression of approximal carious lesions among school children in Western Australia. Australian Dental Journal. 2007; 52: 216–226.

[17] Xiao J, Alkhers N, Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, Billings RJ, Wu TT, Castillo DA, et al. Prenatal oral health care and early childhood caries prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Caries Research. 2019; 53: 411–421.

[18] Jamani NA. Prevention of oral health disease: knowledge and practices among pregnant women in Kuantan, Malaysia. International Journal of Allied Health Sciences. 2019; 3: 923–932.

[19] Adeniyi A, Donnelly L, Janssen P, Jevitt C, Kardeh B, von Bergmann H, et al. Pregnant women’s perspectives on integrating preventive oral health in prenatal care. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021; 21: 271.

[20] Tahmassebi JF, Achol LT, Fayle SA. Analysis of dental care of children receiving comprehensive care under general anaesthesia at a teaching hospital in England. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2014; 15: 353–360.

[21] Azadani EN, Peng J, Kumar A, Casamassimo PS, Griffen A, Amini H, et al. A survival analysis of primary second molars in children treated under general anesthesia. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2020; 151: 568–575.

[22] Bayram M, Akgöl BB, Üstün N. Longevity of posterior composite restorations in children suffering from early childhood caries—results from a retrospective study. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021; 25: 2867–2876.

[23] Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, de Oliveira LJC, Conde MCM, Demarco FF, et al. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2018; 28: 123–139.

[24] Mejàre I, Axelsson S, Dahlén G, Espelid I, Norlund A, Tranæus S, et al. Caries risk assessment: a systematic review. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2014; 72: 81–91.

[25] Adil AH, Eusufzai SZ, Kamruddin A, Wan Ahmad WMA, Jamayet NB, Karobari MI, et al. Assessment of parents’ oral health literacy and its association with caries experience of their preschool children. Children. 2020; 7: 101.

[26] Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Positive parenting tips. 2023. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/childdevelopment (Accessed: 02 February 2023).


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top