Morphological evaluation of the chin and symphysis and its relationship with occlusal planes in skeletal Class II malocclusions

Background: To investigate the correlation between the inclination of occlusal planes (OPs) and the morphologies of the chin and mandibular symphysis in skeletal Class II malocclusion. Methods: This retrospective study utilized cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to explore the relationship of the occlusal plane (OP) inclinations with the chin and mandibular symphysis in different skeletal patterns. A total of 150 children aged 6–12 years were recruited for this study. The included cases were categorized into three groups: normodivergent skeletal Class I malocclusion (IN ), normodivergent skeletal class II malocclusion (IIN ) and hyperdivergent skeletal Class II malocclusion (IIH ). Each group consisted of 50 individuals. Results: In terms of the contours of the chin and mandibular symphysis, the IN group had the broadest and shortest shapes, whereas the IIH group had the thinnest and tallest morphologies. No significant differences in chin volume were found among the three groups. Compared with those in IN group, the anterior occlusal plane (AOP) and posterior occlusal plane (POP) were steeper in the groups with skeletal Class II malocclusion. In addition, there was a negative correlation between the OPs and the height and width of the chin and mandibular symphysis, as well as the position of the chin. Conclusions: In individuals with skeletal Class II malocclusion, the development of the height and width of the chin and mandibular symphysis may be related to the inclination of the OPs.

Occlusal plane; Anterior occlusal plane; Posterior occlusal plane; Chin; Mandibular symphysis; Skeletal Class II malocclusion; CBCT

[1] Schwartz JH, Tattersall I. The human chin revisited: what is it and who has it? Journal of Human Evolution. 2000; 38: 367–409.

[2] Adamek A, Sarul M, Lis J, Kobiela Z, Kiełczawa M, Semeniuk F. Influence of lip projection and chin position on facial profile preferences among various layers of polish population. Part 1. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2022; 14: 253–263.

[3] Skieller V, Bjork A, Linde-Hansen T. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation evaluated from a longitudinal implant sample. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1984; 86: 359–370.

[4] Khojastepour L, Naderi A, Akbarizadeh F, Movahhedian N, Ahrari F. Symphysis morphology and mandibular alveolar bone thickness in patients with β-thalassemia major and different growth patterns. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2022; 27: e22205.

[5] Decaup PH, Couture C, Garot E. Is the distribution of cortical bone in the mandibular corpus and symphysis linked to loading environment in modern humans? A systematic review. Archives of Oral Biology. 2023;152: 105718.

[6] Zhang J, Liang Y, Chen R, Chen S, Lin J, Han B, et al. Inclination of mandibular incisors and symphysis in severe skeletal class III malocclusion. Head & Face Medicine. 2023; 19: 16.

[7] Ghafari JG, Ziade EG, Kassab A, Saadeh M, Macari AT. Variation of chin morphology and mandibular incisor length in different facial divergence patterns: new insights from CBCT records. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2025; 28: 142–150.

[8] Ferreira AP, Lopes JD, Ponces MJ, De Castro SM, Nobre R. The relation between mandibular symphysis and the Angle class in orthodontic treatment. Medicine and Pharmacy Reports. 2022; 95: 446–454.

[9] Arruda KEM, Valladares Neto J, Almeida GdA. Assessment of the mandibular symphysis of Caucasian Brazilian adults with well-balanced faces and normal occlusion: the influence of gender and facial type. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2012; 17: 40–50.

[10] Badran SA, Abu Alhaija ES, Al Maaitah EF, Al-Khateeb SN. Mandibular symphysis morphology and dimensions in different anteroposterior jaw relationships. The Angle Orthodontist. 2014; 84: 304–309.

[11] Aki T, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Nanda SK. Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1994; 106: 60–69.

[12] McNamara JA III. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. The Angle Orthodontist. 1981; 51: 177–202.

[13] Cacciatore G, Ugolini A, Sforza C, Gbinigie O, Plüddemann A. Long-term effects of functional appliances in treated versus untreated patients with class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14: e0221624.

[14] Tanaka EM, Sato S. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2008; 134: 602. e1–11.

[15] Cai J, Min Z, Deng Y, Jing D, Zhao Z. Assessing the impact of occlusal plane rotation on facial aesthetics in orthodontic treatment: a machine learning approach. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 30.

[16] Eppard H. The occlusal plane inclination relative to craniofacial form: a cephalometric investigation [master’s thesis]. West Virginia University. 2012.

[17] Gómez-Bedoya JD, Escobar-Serna PA, Tanaka-Lozano EM, Agudelo-Suárez AA, Ramírez-Ossa DM. Occlusal plane, mandibular position and dentoalveolar changes during the orthodontic treatment with the use of mini-screws. Dentistry Journal. 2024; 12: 278.

[18] Peng H, Liu W, Yang L, Yan P, Zhong W, Gao X, et al. Craniocervical posture in patients with skeletal malocclusion and its correlation with craniofacial morphology during different growth periods. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14: 5280.

[19] Mehta S, Arqub SA, Sharma R, Patel N, Tadinada A, Upadhyay M, et al. Variability associated with mandibular ramus area thickness and depth in subjects with different growth patterns, gender, and growth status. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2022; 161: e223–e234.

[20] Sella Tunis T, May H, Sarig R, Vardimon AD, Hershkovitz I, Shpack N. Are chin and symphysis morphology facial type-dependent? A computed tomography-based study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2021; 160: 84–93.

[21] Seker ED, Sunal Akturk E, Yilmaz HN, Kucukkeles N. Occlusal plane rotation and orthodontic decompensation: influence on the outcome of surgical correction of class III malocclusion. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics. 2022; 84: 373–383.

[22] Hosseini HR, Ngan P, Tai SK, Andrews LJ, Xiang J. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes in patients with a Class II relationship treated with clear aligner mandibular advancement and Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2024; 165: 205–219.

[23] Bozkurt AP, Aras I, Othman E, Aras A. Comparison of 2 treatment protocols using fixed functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: treatment results and stability. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2020; 157: 474–480.

[24] Kawamura J, Park JH, Kojima Y, Kook YA, Kyung HM, Chae JM. Biomechanical analysis for total mesialization of the mandibular dentition: a finite element study. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2019; 22: 329–336.

[25] Bardideh E, Tamizi G, Shafaee H, Rangrazi A, Ghorbani M, Kerayechian N. The effects of intrusion of anterior teeth by skeletal anchorage in deep bite patients; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomimetics. 2023; 8: 101.

[26] Yun S, Park JH, Chang NY, Seo HY, Sung JH, Hong SJ, et al. Craniomaxillofacial changes using high-pull j-hook headgear and mini-implant anchorage in adolescents: a structural superimposition method. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021; 45: 433–440.

[27] Sambataro S, Lorusso P, Caprioglio A, Franchi L, Cicciu M, Fastuca R. Changes of occlusal plane in growing patients with increased vertical dimension during Class II correction by using cervical headgear. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2020; 31: 172–177.

[28] Daegling DJ. Functional morphology of the human chin. Evolutionary Anthropology. 2005; 1: 170–177.

[29] Gómez Y, García-Sanz V, Zamora N, Tarazona B, Bellot-Arcís C, Langsjoen E, et al. Associations between mandibular symphysis form and craniofacial structures. Oral Radiology. 2018; 34: 161–171.

[30] Holliday CM, Nesbitt SJ. Morphology and diversity of the mandibular symphysis of archosauriforms. Geological Society, London, Special Publications Home. 2013; 379: 555–571.

[31] Delpupo FVB, Liberti EA, da Silva Baptista J, de Oliveira F. Light and scanning electron microscope characterization of mandibular symphysis tissue as a functional adaptation in the mandible development of human fetuses. Journal of Anatomy. 2025; 246: 222–233.

[32] Pintavirooj P, Sumetcherngpratya R, Chaiwat A, Changsiripun C. Relationship between mentalis muscle hyperactivity and mandibular symphysis morphology in skeletal Class I and II patients. Orthodontic Waves. 2019; 73: 130–135.

[33] Yoshida S, Ota S, Kobayashi S. Influence of mandibular incisor agenesis and growth pattern on symphysis characteristics: a retrospective cephalometric study. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2023; 26: 393–401.

[34] Okumura Y, Koizumi S, Suginouchi Y, Hikita Y, Yamaguchi T, Nadim M, et al. Chin morphology in relation to the skeletal pattern, age, gender, and ethnicity. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12: 12717.

[35] Marghalani HYA, Guan G, Hyun P, Tabbaa S, Linjawi AI, Al-Jewair T. Relationship between mandibular symphysis dimensions and skeletal pattern in adults. Folia Morphologica. 2022; 81: 464–471.

[36] Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1969; 55: 109–123.

[37] Anwar N, Fida M. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009; 31: 516–522.

[38] Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1969; 55: 585–599.

[39] Li Y, Li X, Li J, Wang J, Zhao S, Zhao Z, et al. Occlusal plane canting reduction accompanies mandibular counterclockwise rotation in camouflaging treatment of hyperdivergent skeletal Class II malocclusion. The Angle Orthodontist. 2013; 83: 758–765.

[40] Casko JS, Shepherd WB. Dental and skeletal variation within the range of normal. The Angle Orthodontist. 1984; 54: 5–17.

[41] Liaw J, Huang G, Tsai FF, Wang SH, Liao W. Torque control of maxillary anterior teeth with the double J retractor and palatal miniscrews during en masse retraction. The Angle Orthodontist. 2022; 92: 562–572.

[42] Wu Y, Yu Q, Xia Y, Wang B, Chen S, Gu K, et al. Does mandibular advancement with clear aligners have the same skeletal and dentoalveolar effects as traditional functional appliances? BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23: 65.

[43] Sharma JN. Skeletal and soft tissue point A and B changes following orthodontic treatment of Nepalese Class I bimaxillary protrusive patients. The Angle Orthodontist. 2010; 80: 91–96.

[44] Hasprayoon S, Liao YF, Hsieh YJ. Skeletal stability after mandibular counterclockwise rotational advancement for correction of skeletal Class II deformity—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice. 2019; 19: 156–165.

[45] da Silveira MLM, de Oliveira Bueno ML, da Silva JSP, Germano AR. Biomechanical analysis in mandibular advancement and occlusal plane rotation with finite element analysis. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021; 59: 362–367.