Article Data

  • Views 203
  • Dowloads 132

Systematic Reviews

Open Access

Evaluation of clinical and radiographic success and parental satisfaction of zirconia crowns compared to stainless steel crowns in primary mandibular molars requiring full-crown restoration: a systematic review

  • Guru Vishnu1
  • Ganesh Jeevanandan1,*,
  • Rocco Franco2
  • Maria Maddalena Marrapodi3,4
  • Marco Di Blasio5,*,
  • Marco Cicciù6
  • Giuseppe Minervini7

1Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, 600077 Chennai, India

2Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata”, 00100 Rome, Italy

3Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, 600077 Chennai, India

4Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy

5Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy

6Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy

7Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological Specialties, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.113 Vol.50,Issue 5,September 2026 pp.35-41

Submitted: 12 June 2024 Accepted: 14 September 2024

Published: 03 September 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Ganesh Jeevanandan E-mail: ganesh.sdc@saveetha.com
*Corresponding Author(s): Marco Di Blasio E-mail: marco.diblasio@unimi.it

Abstract

Background: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success, along with parental satisfaction, associated with zirconia and stainless steel crowns (SSCs) in primary mandibular molars. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, the System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (SIGLE), the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and Web of Science, to identify randomized clinical trials comparing zirconia and SSCs in primary mandibular molars. Studies meeting the predefined inclusion criteria were selected. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB 2) tool. Results: A total of 245 studies were screened following the deletion of duplicate entries, with 239 having been excluded based on screening of titles and abstracts. Six studies were identified for full text analysis and all six had their eligibility analyzed. Five studies were identified as being eligible after one study did not meet the inclusion criteria. Zirconia crowns demonstrated clinical and radiographic outcomes comparable to those of SSCs, with potential advantages in gingival health and parental satisfaction. Conclusions: According to the current literature, zirconia crowns represent an acceptable choice to stainless steel crowns for the treatment of primary mandibular molars. The two types of crowns proved themselves to have similar performance; however, there were some benefits associated with zirconia crowns in terms of periodontal status and parents’ satisfaction. Nonetheless, it should be remembered that the results need to be considered carefully because of the small number of available researches. The PROSPERO Registration: CRD42023458332.


Keywords

Zirconia; Systematic review; Parental satisfaction; Mandibular molars; Crowns; Stainless steel


Cite and Share

Guru Vishnu,Ganesh Jeevanandan,Rocco Franco,Maria Maddalena Marrapodi,Marco Di Blasio,Marco Cicciù,Giuseppe Minervini. Evaluation of clinical and radiographic success and parental satisfaction of zirconia crowns compared to stainless steel crowns in primary mandibular molars requiring full-crown restoration: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026. 50(5);35-41.

References

[1] Oliveros-Villarico M, Pungchanchaikul P, Watthanasaen S, Chaichit R, Pitiphat W. Prevalence and risk indicators of early childhood caries among toddlers in Caloocan City, Philippines: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24: 642.

[2] Zohoori FV, Duckworth RM. The impact of nutrition and diet on oral health. 1st edn. Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers: Basel. 2019.

[3] Retnakumari N, Cyriac G. Childhood caries as influenced by maternal and child characteristics in pre-school children of Kerala—an epidemiological study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2012; 3: 2–8.

[4] Drury TF, Horowitz AM, Ismail AI, Maertens MP, Rozier RG, Selwitz RH. Diagnosing and reporting early childhood caries for research purposes. A report of a workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the Health Care Financing Administration. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 1999; 59: 192–197.

[5] American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): unique challenges and treatment options. Pediatric Dentistry. 2005; 27: 34–35.

[6] Słotwińska-Pawlaczyk A, Orzechowska-Wylęgała B, Latusek K, Roszkowska AM. Analysis of the clinical status and treatment of facial cellulitis of odontogenic origin in pediatric patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20: 4874.

[7] Sheller B, Williams BJ, Lombardi SM. Diagnosis and treatment of dental caries-related emergencies in a children’s hospital. Pediatric Dentistry. 1997; 19: 470–475.

[8] Leal SC, Takeshita EM. Pediatric restorative dentistry. 1st edn. Springer: Cham. 2018.

[9] AlMotawah FN, Chandra Pani S, AlKharashi T, AlKhalaf S, AlKhathlan M, AlSultan F, et al. Comparison of survival rates of stainless-steel crowns placed with and without pulpotomy: a two-year retrospective study. International Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 2020: 8883189.

[10] Ashley P, Anand P, Andersson K. Best clinical practice guidance for conscious sedation of children undergoing dental treatment: an EAPD policy document. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2021; 22: 989–1002.

[11] Coté CJ, Wilson S; American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics. 2019; 143: e20191000.

[12] Foster KD, Jordan L. Ethical considerations for pediatric esthetic crowns in anterior teeth. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2023; 154: 858–859.

[13] Alqadi S, Aljehani O, Kurdi YE, Alqadi M, Naaman R, Algarni AA. Clinical and radiographical outcomes of restorative treatment with stainless steel crowns performed by undergraduate dental students in Medina, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2023; 15: e49906.

[14] Peethambar P, Ganesh C, Konde S, Agarwal M, Prasad SN. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of the face and components of smile in children with deciduous dentition. International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry. 2022; 8: 227–235.

[15] Abuelniel G, Eltawil S. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of stainless steel versus zirconia crowns on primary molars: randomized controlled trial. Egyptian Dental Journal. 2018; 64: 977–989.

[16] Mathew MG, Roopa KB, Soni AJ, Khan MM, Kauser A. Evaluation of clinical success, parental and child satisfaction of stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns in primary molars. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2020; 9: 1418–1423.

[17] Donly KJ, Sasa I, Contreras CI, Mendez MJC. Prospective randomized clinical trial of primary molar crowns: 24-month results. Pediatric Dentistry. 2018; 40: 253–258.

[18] Taran PK, Kaya MS. A comparison of periodontal health in primary molars restored with prefabricated stainless steel and zirconia crowns. Pediatric Dentistry. 2018; 40: 334–339.

[19] Donly KJ, Méndez MJC, Contreras CI, Liu JA. Prospective randomized clinical trial of primary molar crowns: 36-month results. American Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 33: 165–168.

[20] Rojas-Briceño NB, Oc Carrasco OJ, Silva Díaz YA, Ordinola Ramírez CM, Pizarro Salazar O, Tuesta-Mendoza SJ, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of parents about oral health in the primary dentition stage in a Peruvian High Andean City. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21: 154.

[21] Mathew MG, Jeevanandan G. Evaluation of factors affecting clinical outcomes of full mouth rehabilitation under general anaesthesia for children with early childhood caries: a prospective cohort study. Cureus. 2023; 15: e46778.

[22] Mathew MG, Jeevanandan G. Perceived outcomes, parental satisfaction, and oral health-related quality of life after full mouth rehabilitation under general anesthesia for early childhood caries. Cureus. 2023; 15: e47126.

[23] Rahate I, Fulzele P, Thosar N. Comparative evaluation of clinical performance, child and parental satisfaction of Bioflx, zirconia and stainless steel crowns in pediatric patients. F1000Research. 2023; 12: 756.

[24] Attari N, Roberts JF. Restoration of primary teeth with crowns: a systematic review of the literature. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2006; 7: 58–62.

[25] Kindelan SA, Day P, Nichol R, Willmott N, Fayle SA; British Society of Paediatric Dentistry. UK national clinical guidelines in paediatric dentistry: stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2008; 18: 20–28.

[26] Talekar AL, Waggoner WF, Silotry TMH, Musale PK, Chaudhari GS. Prospective, randomized, clinical evaluation of preformed zirconia crowns and stainless steel crowns on permanent first molars: 12-month results. Pediatric Dentistry. 2023; 45: 232–239.

[27] Moslemi F, Yasaie AM, Shojaiepour R. Is the metallic color of stainless steel crown satisfying for cooperative children and their parents? A preliminary study. Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 23: 480–488.

[28] Prabhu D, Anantharaj A, Praveen P, Rani SP, Sudhir R. A clinical and radiographic comparative evaluation of custom-made zirconia crowns using CAD-CAM and stainless steel crowns in primary molars. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2022; 40: 34–42.

[29] Lee JH. Guided tooth preparation for a pediatric zirconia crown. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2018; 149: 202–208.e2.

[30] Sharaf AA, Farsi NM. A clinical and radiographic evaluation of stainless steel crowns for primary molars. Journal of Dentistry. 2004; 32: 27–33.

[31] Checchio LM, Gaskill WF, Carrel R. The relationship between periodontal disease and stainless steel crowns. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1983; 50: 205–209.

[32] Myers DR, Schuster GS, Bell RA, Barenie JT, Mitchell R. The effect of polishing technics on surface smoothness and plaque accumulation on stainless steel crowns. Pediatric Dentistry. 1980; 2: 275–278.

[33] Webber DL. Gingival health following placement of stainless steel crowns. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1974; 41: 186–189.

[34] Guelmann M, Matsson L, Bimstein E. Periodontal health at first permanent molars adjacent to primary molar stainless steel crowns. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1988; 15: 531–533.

[35] Bimstein E. Frequency of alveolar bone loss adjacent to proximal caries in the primary molars and healing due to restoration of the teeth. Pediatric Dentistry. 1992; 14: 30–33.


JOCPD Volume 50 Issue 5 cover
Current Issue

Vol.50, Issue 5, 03 September 2026

Table of contents
All Issues

Submission Turnaround Time

Top