Article Data

  • Views 166
  • Dowloads 114

Original Research

Open Access

Cytotoxicity and antibacterial effects of sodium phytate- and bromelain-containing experimental toothpastes for pediatric black stain management: an in vitro study

  • Aybike Sayar1,*,
  • Didem Atabek2
  • Eylül Su Saral-Acarca3
  • Sibel Ilbasmis-Tamer4

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Aksaray University, 68100 Aksaray, Türkiye

2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 06490 Ankara, Türkiye

3Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Başkent University, 06790 Ankara, Türkiye

4Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, 06330 Ankara, Türkiye

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.156 Vol.50,Issue 6,November 2026 pp.165-173

Submitted: 30 June 2026 Accepted: 25 August 2026

Published: 03 November 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Aybike Sayar E-mail: aybike.memis@aksaray.edu.tr

PDF (951.03 kB) View Full-text

Abstract

Background: Black stain is a common form of extrinsic tooth discoloration in pediatric patients. Recently, interest in home-care strategies, such as toothbrushing with specialized toothpaste formulations, has increased. Natural ingredients, including sodium phytate and bromelain, have been proposed as alternatives to conventional whitening agents for managing black stain; however, their cytotoxic and antibacterial performance remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of two experimental toothpaste formulations for black stain management. Methods: Three toothpaste groups were tested: Group A (0.85% w/w sodium phytate, fluoride-free), Group B (5% w/w bromelain, fluoride-free), and Group C (commercial children’s toothpaste, 500 ppm fluoride), all containing sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) as a common surfactant. Cytotoxicity was assessed using the XTT (sodium 3′-(1-phenylaminocarbonyl)-3,4-tetrazolium-bis(4-methoxy-6-nitro)benzenesulphonic acid) assay on L929 cells at six serial dilutions (1:1–1:32) with exposure times of 1, 2, and 5 minutes. Cell viability below 70% was considered cytotoxic according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 10993-5. Antibacterial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans (S. Mutans) was assessed using agar-well diffusion. Penicillin-streptomycin and distilled water served as positive and negative controls, respectively. Results: All toothpaste formulations reduced cell viability below 70% at dilutions from 1:1 to 1:8. At the 2-minute exposure and 1:8 dilution, Group A was the most cytotoxic, followed by Group B, whereas Group C exhibited the highest cell viability (p < 0.001). All formulations demonstrated significant antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans. Group A’s inhibition zone (19.54 ± 0.99 mm) was comparable to the positive control (p > 0.05) and significantly greater than Groups B and C (p < 0.05), which were comparable to each other (p > 0.05). Conclusions: While the experimental toothpastes demonstrated antibacterial activity, their cytotoxic potential warrants caution, and studies optimizing formulation composition, including SLS-free or fluoride-containing alternatives, are needed to confirm clinical safety and applicability.

Keywords

Bromelain; Sodium phytate; Dentifrices; Sodium lauryl sulfate; Antibacterial efficacy; Iron stain

Cite and Share

Aybike Sayar, Didem Atabek, Eylül Su Saral-acarca, Sibel Ilbasmis-tamer. Cytotoxicity and antibacterial effects of sodium phytate- and bromelain-containing experimental toothpastes for pediatric black stain management: an in vitro study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2026; 50(6): 165-173. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2026.156

References

[1] Heinrich-Weltzien R, Bartsch B, Eick S. Dental caries and microbiota in children with black stain and non-discoloured dental plaque. Caries Research. 2014; 48: 118–125.
[2] Żyła T, Kawala B, Antoszewska-Smith J, Kawala M. Black stain and dental caries: a review of the literature. BioMed Research International. 2015; 2015: 469392.
[3] Garcia Martin JM, Gonzalez Garcia M, Seoane Leston J, Llorente Pendas S, Diaz Martin JJ, Garcia-Pola MJ. Prevalence of black stain and associated risk factors in preschool Spanish children. Pediatrics International. 2013; 55: 355–359.
[4] Chen X, Zhan JY, Lu HX, Ye W, Zhang W, Yang WJ, et al. Factors associated with black tooth stain in Chinese preschool children. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2014; 18: 2059–2066.
[5] de Rezende VS, Fonseca-Silva T, Drumond CL, Ramos-Jorge ML, Paiva SM, Vieira-Andrade RG. Do patients with extrinsic black tooth stains have a lower dental caries experience? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Caries Research. 2019; 53: 617–627.
[6] Reid JS, Beeley JA, MacDonald DG. Investigations into black extrinsic tooth stain. Journal of Dental Research. 1977; 56: 895–899.
[7] Heidari A, Shahrabi M, Shahrabi MS. Efficacy of three toothpastes in iron stain removal from primary teeth. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2019; 12: 10–14.
[8] Moran J, Claydon NC, Addy M, Newcombe R. Clinical studies to determine the effectiveness of a whitening toothpaste at reducing stain (using a forced stain model). International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2005; 3: 25–30.
[9] Joiner A. Whitening toothpastes: a review of the literature. Journal of Dentistry. 2010; 38: e17–e24.
[10] Lee SS, Zhang W, Lee DH, Li Y. Tooth whitening in children and adolescents: a literature review. Pediatric Dentistry. 2005; 27: 362–368.
[11] Maciel CRO, Amorim AA, Oliveira RFL, Vivanco RG, Pires-de-Souza FCP. Whitening efficacy of popular natural products on dental enamel. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2022; 33: 55–66.
[12] Kalyana P, Shashidhar A, Meghashyam B, Sreevidya KR, Sweta S. Stain removal efficacy of a novel dentifrice containing papain and bromelain extracts—an in vitro study. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2011; 9: 229–233.
[13] Chakravarthy P, Acharya S. Efficacy of extrinsic stain removal by novel dentifrice containing papain and bromelain extracts. Journal of Young Pharmacists. 2012; 4: 245–249.
[14] Milleman KR, Creeth JE, Burnett GR, Milleman JL. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the stain removal efficacy of a sodium phytate dentifrice formulation. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2018; 30: E45–E51.
[15] Ghapanchi J, Kamali F, Moattari A, Poorshahidi S, Shahin E, Rezazadeh F, et al. In vitro comparison of cytotoxic and antibacterial effects of 16 commercial toothpastes. Journal of International Oral Health. 2015; 7: 39–43.
[16] Prasanth M. Antimicrobial efficacy of different toothpastes and mouthrinses: an in vitro study. Dental Research Journal. 2011; 8: 85–94.
[17] Kasi SR, Roffel S, Özcan M, Gibbs S, Feilzer AJ. In vitro cytotoxicity (irritant potency) of toothpaste ingredients. PLOS ONE. 2025; 20: e0318565.
[18] Cvikl B, Lussi A, Moritz A, Gruber R. Dentifrices for children differentially affect cell viability in vitro. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2017; 21: 453–461.
[19] Petrović B, Kojić S, Milić L, Luzio A, Perić T, Marković E, et al. Toothpaste ingestion-evaluating the problem and ensuring safety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023; 11: 1279915.
[20] Gurdere S. In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of experimental toothpastes in removal of discolorations due to iron formulation in primary tooth [doctoral thesis]. Gazi University. 2024.
[21] International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry—dentifrices—requirements, test methods and marking. 2026. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/11609 (Accessed: 02 September 2026).
[22] Liu H, Tu J. Reduction of extrinsic tooth stain by a toothpaste containing 10% high cleaning silica, 0.5% sodium phytate and 0.5% sodium pyrophosphate: an 8-week randomised clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 113.
[23] Rahmi H, Widayanti A, Hanif A. Utilization of bromelain enzyme from pineapple peel waste on mouthwash formula against Streptococcus mutans. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019; 217: 012036.
[24] International Organization for Standardization. Biological evaluation of medical devices—part 12: sample preparation and reference materials. 2021. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/75769.html (Accessed: 25 April 2025).
[25] Souza-Rodrigues RD, Ferreira Sda S, D’Almeida-Couto RS, Lachowski KM, Sobral MÂ, Marques MM. Choice of toothpaste for the elderly: an in vitro study. Brazilian Oral Research. 2015; 29: 1–7.
[26] Rode SM, Sato TDP, Matos FS, Correia AMO, Camargo SEA. Toxicity and effect of whitening toothpastes on enamel surface. Brazilian Oral Research. 2021; 35: e025.
[27] Aydın N, Süloğlu AK, İdil N, Öztürk S, Karaoğlanoğlu S. Examination of cytotoxic and antimicrobial effect of whitening toothpastes: an in vitro study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2024; 83: 327–333.
[28] Randall JP, Seow WK, Walsh LJ. Antibacterial activity of fluoride compounds and herbal toothpastes on Streptococcus mutans: an in vitro study. Australian Dental Journal. 2015; 60: 368–374.
[29] International Organization for Standardization. Biological evaluation of medical devices—part 5: tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. 2009. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/36406.html (Accessed: 25 April 2025).
[30] Nassar M, Nassar R, Maki H, Al-Yagoob A, Hachim M, Senok A, et al. Phytic acid: properties and potential applications in dentistry. Frontiers in Materials. 2021; 8: 638909.
[31] Pavan R, Jain S, Shraddha, Kumar A. Properties and therapeutic application of bromelain: a review. Biotechnology Research International. 2012; 2012: 976203.
[32] Reddy BA, Ganapathy D, Kumar PK. Prevalence of toothpaste swallowing habit in children between the age group of 3 and 5 years. Drug Invention Today. 2019; 12: 1452–1455.
[33] Eldeniz AU, Mustafa K, Ørstavik D, Dahl JE. Cytotoxicity of new resin-, calcium hydroxide- and silicone-based root canal sealers on fibroblasts derived from human gingiva and L929 cell lines. International Endodontic Journal. 2007; 40: 329–337.
[34] Stevens MG, Olsen SC. Comparative analysis of using MTT and XTT in colorimetric assays for quantitating bovine neutrophil bactericidal activity. Journal of Immunological Methods. 1993; 157: 225–231.
[35] Pecci-Lloret MP, López-García S, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Álvarez-Novoa P, García-Bernal D. In vitro biocompatibility of several children’s toothpastes on human gingival fibroblasts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19: 2954.
[36] Herlofson BB, Barkvoll P. Oral mucosal desquamation caused by two toothpaste detergents in an experimental model. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1996; 104: 21–26.
[37] Cvikl B, Lussi A, Gruber R. The in vitro impact of toothpaste extracts on cell viability. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2015; 123: 179–185.
[38] Moore C, Addy M, Moran J. Toothpaste detergents: a potential source of oral soft tissue damage? International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2008; 6: 193–198.
[39] Birant S, Duran Y, Akkoc T, Seymen F. Cytotoxic effects of different detergent containing children’s toothpastes on human gingival epithelial cells. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22: 66.
[40] Karaman GE, Ünal İ, Beler M, Üstündağ FD, Cansız D, Üstündağ ÜV, et al. Toothpastes for children and their detergent contents affect molecular mechanisms of odontogenesis in zebrafish embryos. Drug and Chemical Toxicology. 2024; 47: 15–25.
[41] Nassar M, Hiraishi N, Islam MS, Aizawa M, Tamura Y, Otsuki M, et al. Effect of phytic acid used as etchant on bond strength, smear layer, and pulpal cells. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2013; 121: 482–487.
[42] Ribeiro JS, Barboza ADS, Cuevas-Suárez CE, da Silva AF, Piva E, Lund RG. Novel in-office peroxide-free tooth-whitening gels: bleaching effectiveness, enamel surface alterations, and cell viability. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10: 10016.
[43] Müller-Heupt LK, Wiesmann-Imilowski N, Kaya S, Schumann S, Steiger M, Bjelopavlovic M, et al. Effectiveness and safety of over-the-counter tooth-whitening agents compared to hydrogen peroxide in vitro. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 1956.
[44] Thongthai P, Sivavong P, Osathanon T, Tantilertanant Y, Sakoolnamarka R, Singthong T, et al. Fluoride concentration, antibacterial effect, and cytotoxicity in children’s toothpaste: in vitro study. European Journal of General Dentistry. 2023; 12: 199–208.
[45] Bubonja-Šonje M, Knežević S, Abram M. Challenges to antimicrobial susceptibility testing of plant-derived polyphenolic compounds. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 2020; 71: 300–311.
[46] Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: a review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2016; 6: 71–79.
[47] Evans A, Leishman SJ, Walsh LJ, Seow WK. Inhibitory effects of children’s toothpastes on Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis and Lactobacillus acidophilus. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2015; 16: 219–226.
[48] Patil S, Venkataraghavan K, Anantharaj A, Patil S. Comparison of two commercially available toothpastes on the salivary streptococcus mutans count in urban preschool children—an in vivo study. International Dentistry SA. 2010; 12: 72–82.
[49] Nassar R, Nassar M, Vianna ME, Naidoo N, Alqutami F, Kaklamanos EG, et al. Antimicrobial activity of phytic acid: an emerging agent in endodontics. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2021; 11: 753649.
[50] Goudarzi M, Mehdipour M, Hajikhani B, Sadeghinejad S, Sadeghi-Nejad B. Antibacterial properties of Citrus limon and pineapple extracts on oral pathogenic bacteria (Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguis). International Journal of Enteric Pathogens. 2019; 7: 99–103.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top